Archive for September 13th, 2007

Microsoft updates Windows without users’ consent

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

[Quote:]

Microsoft has begun patching files on Windows XP and Vista without users’ knowledge, even when the users have turned off auto-updates.

They can not be trusted. If somebody has the ability to forcefully modify code running on your property without your consent, you can call that a serious threat.

You must protect yourself from this kind of threats if you depend in any way on your computer. Either that, or accept that it really isn’t your computer any more.

Cartoons

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

cohen.jpg

sack1.jpg

Lies and the liars that tell them

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

[Quote:]

In a new embarrassment for the Bush administration top spymaster, Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell is withdrawing an assertion he made to Congress this week that a recently passed electronic-surveillance law helped U.S. authorities foil a major terror plot in Germany.
Story continues below ↓advertisement

The temporary measure, signed into law by President Bush on Aug. 5, gave the U.S. intelligence community broad new powers to eavesdrop on telephone and e-mail communications overseas without seeking warrants from the surveillance court. The law expires in six months and is expected to be the subject of intense debate in the months ahead. On Monday, McConnell—questioned by Sen. Joe Lieberman—claimed the law, intended to remedy what the White House said was an intelligence gap, had helped to “facilitate” the arrest of three suspects believed to be planning massive car bombings against American targets in Germany.

[..]

Late Wednesday afternoon, McConnell issued a statement acknowleding that “information contributing to the recent arrests [in Germany] was not collected under authorities provided by the ‘Protect America Act’.”

[..]

McConnell’s testimony that the new law helped in the German case was especially striking—since it seemed to contradict public statements by American and German officials about how the plot was exposed. About 10 months ago—long before the new law was put into effect—guards at a U.S. military base near Frankfurt noted a suspicious individual conducting surveillance outside the facility. U.S. military officials tipped off German authorities, who quickly identified the individual and several accomplices as militants affiliated with the Islamic Jihad Union, a violent Al Qaeda-linked group. The Germans kept the group under surveillance for months and discovered evidence that the militants—some of whom had been to an Islamic Jihad Union training camp in Pakistan—were assembling chemicals for bombing attacks on American military installations in Germany. (The U.S. Embassy in Berlin issued a public warning last April that it had received intelligence reporting about threats against U.S. personnel in that country.) One U.S. intelligence official described the law-enforcement operation as a case of “good old-fashioned police work.”
Story continues below ↓advertisement

Yet when McConnell testified before the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, he cited the German case as an example of how the new Protect America Act was working. The law, he started to say, “allowed us to see and understand all the connections with …” At that point, Lieberman, the committee chair, interrupted McConnell. Lieberman expressed surprise that the law might have contributed to the German counterterror operation. “The newly adopted law facilitated that during August?” he asked.

“Yes, sir, it did,” McConnell responded. “The connections to Al Qaeda, the connections specifically to what’s referred to as IJU, the Islamic Jihad Union, an affiliate of Al Qaeda. Because we could understand it, we could help our partners through a long process of monitoring and observation … And so at the right time, when Americans and German facilities were being targeted, the German authorities decided to move.”

APEC Security

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

People tolerate way, way too much….

Chasers & Osama get into APEC

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

MPAA: Pirate Party Politicians Are Illegitimate Thieves

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

[Quote:]

Last year Pirate Parties were formed all over the world. Their main goal is to protect privacy, culture, and knowledge. The MPAA is not happy with politicians they can’t buy fund, and labels them as illegitimate thieves.

[..]

Calling a political party illegitimate and their members thieves is a pretty bold statement for an organization who’s feeding politicians thousands of dollars to support their cause. I doubt that Garfield even read their election manifesto, if he did, he would know that the party has nothing to do with stealing copyright.

“This can only be seen as MPAA calling democracy illegitimate. We are a registered political party finishing in the top ten in a parliamentary democracy,” says Rick Falkvinge, leader of the Swedish Pirate Party in a response to TorrentFreak. “That these people claim it would somehow be illegitimate to change laws through a parliamentary process shows just how corrupt to the core they are.”

Falkvinge continues: “On the other hand, I think the statement may be partly out of fear. There’s one thing that beats all their lawyers, war chests and monopolies. Just one. That one thing is votes in a democratic election, and that’s what we have and they don’t. These claims are so far out they don’t even reflect sunlight. Unfortunately, that seems to be true for most statements from the Music And Film Industry Associations of America, but we’re also seeing the oldskool politicians slowly starting to understand our counterpoints. It’s going to be an interesting couple of next years.”

Those disappearing benchmarks, again

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

[Quote:]

White House press secretary Tony Snow, May 10, 2007: “Keep in mind, benchmarks … are not new. The president talked about them in [the] State of the Union. We talked about them in Amman in November. Secretary Rice put a list of 17 together in a letter to Sen. Levin. So you do need to have metrics.”

White House press secretary Tony Snow, Sept. 12, 2007: “No, benchmarks were something that Congress wanted to use as a metric. And we’re going to produce a report. But the fact is that the situation is bigger and more complex, and you need to look at the whole picture.”

1977: Steve Biko dies in custody

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

30 years ago today

He was arrested under Terrorism Act No 83 of 1967 which makes an interesting comparison to todays anti-terror laws.

The Pentecostal Church and The Holy Ghost Want You To Wear Pig Panties

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

GABBA GABBA GOOO

Cartoon

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

image.jpeg

Scan your pussy

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

[Quote:]

scan-your-pet-cat-23.jpg

Lessons on the surge from economics 101

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

[Quote:]

Economics professors have a standard game they use to demonstrate how apparently rational decisions can create a disastrous result. They call it a “dollar auction.” The rules are simple. The professor offers a dollar for sale to the highest bidder, with only one wrinkle: the second-highest bidder has to pay up on their losing bid as well. Several students almost always get sucked in. The first bids a penny, looking to make 99 cents. The second bids 2 cents, the third 3 cents, and so on, each feeling they have a chance at something good on the cheap. The early stages are fun, and the bidders wonder what possessed the professor to be willing to lose some money.

The problem surfaces when the bidders get up close to a dollar. After 99 cents the last vestige of profitability disappears, but the bidding continues between the two highest players. They now realize that they stand to lose no matter what, but that they can still buffer their losses by winning the dollar. They just have to outlast the other player. Following this strategy, the two hapless students usually run the bid up several dollars, turning the apparent shot at easy money into a ghastly battle of spiraling disaster.

Theoretically, there is no stable outcome once the dynamic gets going. The only clear limit is the exhaustion of one of the player’s total funds. In the classroom, the auction generally ends with the grudging decision of one player to “irrationally” accept the larger loss and get out of the terrible spiral. Economists call the dollar auction pattern an irrational escalation of commitment. We might also call it the war in Iraq.

America is long past the possibility of some kind of profitable outcome in Iraq. Neo-con dreams of a quick, cheap victory, delivering democracy and peace and self-financed from Iraq’s own oil revenue, got us started on this misadventure. Like the students, the early bidding seemed like a fun adventure to the boys in the Bush administration. “Bring ‘em on,” the chief boy said about the other bidders. And like the economics class, suddenly we were in the thing up to our necks, with only bad choices available at an ever-escalating cost.

Sun to become Windows Server OEM

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

[Quote:]

Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq “MSFT”) and Sun Microsystems Inc. (Nasdaq “JAVA”) today announced that Sun has signed on as a Windows Server® OEM. Additionally, Sun and Microsoft will collaborate to further enable deployment of Windows Server on Sun x64 systems.

Holy crap! The last big box company to do something like that was SGI, and two years after that they had sunk into irrelevance. Right now, I’d short Sun if I had any…


indoor-dictatorial