<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Orders YouTube to Give All User Histories to Viacom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.sinteur.com/2008/07/judge-orders-youtube-to-give-all-user-histories-to-viacom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.sinteur.com/2008/07/judge-orders-youtube-to-give-all-user-histories-to-viacom/</link>
	<description>the Daily Irrelevant</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://weblog.sinteur.com/2008/07/judge-orders-youtube-to-give-all-user-histories-to-viacom/#comment-26150</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.sinteur.com/?p=24283#comment-26150</guid>
		<description>Sounds like Viacom is fishing for evidence. Hope they have some big discs, or are ready to process a live stream that will go for months. 

As for videos that have been taken down, I hope the folks at YouTube had the smarts to actually delete them - best not to keep content that has been taken down in case some dumb judge comes along and demands you hand it over. I suspect a court order will mean that there is no copyright violation though, as long as Viacom deletes it all once they've finished their fishing expedition. A smarter move would have been to use an independent intermediary to do the research though.

Still sad that the courts don't understand what user generated content sites are, and how they work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Viacom is fishing for evidence. Hope they have some big discs, or are ready to process a live stream that will go for months. </p>
<p>As for videos that have been taken down, I hope the folks at YouTube had the smarts to actually delete them - best not to keep content that has been taken down in case some dumb judge comes along and demands you hand it over. I suspect a court order will mean that there is no copyright violation though, as long as Viacom deletes it all once they&#8217;ve finished their fishing expedition. A smarter move would have been to use an independent intermediary to do the research though.</p>
<p>Still sad that the courts don&#8217;t understand what user generated content sites are, and how they work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
