John on Minnesota Senate Recount: Challenged ballots: You be the judge Well, three ways to look at this one I think:
1. It is pretty clear where the intention was since the machine's optical registration box was circled next to just one candidate.
2. This is a failure of the user interface. I read a similar discussion about web forms that are too strict about how user entered data is formatted. This form's interface, requiring the voter to fill in a small oval to cast their vote us clearly too strict.
3. This is being used as a mechanism to disqualify voters who are either too stupid to follow instructions, or too lazy to read them.
I'd say count the vote, and fix the user interface to be simpler and more tolerant of human impreciseness!
Roland Hesz on Yugo, 1953-2008 Yes, that's what I read too, so far Neelie Kroes holds out on it. I hope she can thwart the "oh, fuck capitalism, we are LOOSING!" movement.
Roland Hesz on Converting Dead Mormons into Homosexuals It is hilarious. What the Mormons declare is "Hey, God is Powerless!" and the Jews and Catholics who reacted with such a panic they did send the clear message "God is Powerless!".
How hilarious.
John Sinteur on Yugo, 1953-2008 you may want to time-stamp that comment, that zero may change to EUR 50b any second now.
News: 1, 2, 3.
Roland Hesz on Yugo, 1953-2008 So far the EU is sending 0EUR to help car manufacturers. It is still debated whether it's needed or not, however Germany stated that they will help Opel. But Germany is not the EU.
That's the current status of the car bailout in Europe.
John Sinteur on Yugo, 1953-2008 Have you seen how much money Europe is sending to struggling car manufacturers, including subsidiaries of GM?
Maarten on Yugo, 1953-2008 "We"? I didn't know you were going to help out! That's sweet of you.
Bill L. on Big Three CEOs Flew Private Jets to Plead for Public Funds I've never, n-e-v-e-r had to be at an airport 2 hours early. I've often wandered in with less than 40 minutes to my flight. Are we guessing that they have lots of luggage to check in and haven't bothered to check-in electronically?
Southwest, business select, one way, out one day and back the next, is $176 X 12 = 2,112. Not exactly 12 grand. 12k only pans out if you assume they "have" to travel first class.
The shortest flight listed is about 1 hour and 24 minutes. Ohh noes! How will they avoid spilling the corporate beans for nearly an eternity!
Are we to think that all the execs traveled on the same plane? Jet-pooling?
John Sinteur on Big Three CEOs Flew Private Jets to Plead for Public Funds You're forgetting one major cost factor: public image. This story is all over the news. At the cost of two or three extra hours, their image could have been one of real "cost-sensitve" CEO's.
Isn't that really worth it?
And any CEO not aware of public image is too stupid to be in that job.
Jason on Big Three CEOs Flew Private Jets to Plead for Public Funds How much time is lost by the GM representatives when they have to check in for a flight two hours early, or when the GM representatives are not to talk about business during the flight due to insider trading concerns?
The question is what is lost? When 12 people fly on a private jet it costs about $20,000. When 12 fly commercially to DC it costs about $12,000. Is a $8,000 savings worth the time lost?
Isn’t it really worth it in the long run?
http://nomedals.blogspot.com
Roland Hesz on Cartoons The iCar is cool :))
Never crashes :) But runs only on GM approved fuel, runs with GM approved tires, and only on roads in GM approved countries and states.
And everywhere differently. :)
This entry was posted
on Friday, October 3rd, 2008 at 13:33 and is filed under Indecision 2008.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
She’s of average intelligence, and the highest office can lead to disaster for our country if anything but an exceedingly intelligent and capable person is chosen for both President and VP, in case the President passes away. Obviosly you don’t know Jack Schitt. Sorry, couldn’t resist
Sarah Palin has turned out to be the nation’s inkblot test. Do you look at her and see:
Someone just like you, a mom with 5 kids?
A sexy, hot librarian in three inch heels?
A ruthless, power-mad back-stabber?
A small town girl who makes good?
A big dumbass who doesn’t have any idea of what the V.P. actually does?
A calculating cutie who could charm the socks off of Putin?
An idiot choking on her own vomit of nonsense?
A born-again Christian woman with a big heart and purity of soul?
An anti-abortionist?
A small-time hustler who won the lottery?
It was all I could do to not bother to respond to the trash on this website, but by my last reading of the requirements for President or Vice President was to exceed the age of 35. That’s it. Where is it written that the people who represent us must be Ivy League Graduates, or Community Organizers (ie: Lobbyists)? Doesn’t seem like that has been the maker or breaker of a good representative of the people so far. Why can we not be represented by an average ‘Joe’? The grocer on mainstreet or the cable guy with some basic common sense? Or do you even know who deeply affected our nation with a book called “Common Sense”? Why must MRS. Palin have to be knowledgeable on every subject known to man on the turn of a dime? Do you not make yourself aware of an issue when it comes up rather than researching everything in the world, just in case? Sarah Palin has focused on the State of Alaska and worked for the people of Alaska. She has been asked to expand her horizon and now focus on the greater nation and world. How uncharitable of you to not grant her the same opportunity when you and your forebears have granted carte blanche to Jimmy Carter for one, and to all our representatives in government over the centuries. What is that all about with you? I thought that was what made our country great. By your gutter standards (I speak to the slimiest of you with your disgusting remarks about “getting some of that” and “an idiot choking on her own nonsense’) none of the prescient men who started this nation would qualify for the office! Oh BTW, learn to spell (magnat? What is THAT?) if you are going to rant on about Palin being stupid. Your ignorance, prejudice and dirty dealing are on proud display for your party right here in this little forum. Good luck with that.
My party? I’m not even a US citizen. And if you start quoting options from the inblot-test list, you apparently failed the test yourself. Common sense is by Thomas Paine, and I wonder how many people who are US citizens know that.
And since a bit of fun flowchart is apparently reason for both sides of the isle to descend into name calling, I’m going to close this thread.
October 4th, 2008 at 0:51
Palin is hot, she should win.
October 4th, 2008 at 0:52
Palin is smokin hot, let’s make her VP just for that reason alone. I’d like to get me some of that.
October 4th, 2008 at 2:27
She’s of average intelligence, and the highest office can lead to disaster for our country if anything but an exceedingly intelligent and capable person is chosen for both President and VP, in case the President passes away. Obviosly you don’t know Jack Schitt. Sorry, couldn’t resist
October 5th, 2008 at 9:53
Sarah Palin has turned out to be the nation’s inkblot test. Do you look at her and see:
Someone just like you, a mom with 5 kids?
A sexy, hot librarian in three inch heels?
A ruthless, power-mad back-stabber?
A small town girl who makes good?
A big dumbass who doesn’t have any idea of what the V.P. actually does?
A calculating cutie who could charm the socks off of Putin?
An idiot choking on her own vomit of nonsense?
A born-again Christian woman with a big heart and purity of soul?
An anti-abortionist?
A small-time hustler who won the lottery?
October 7th, 2008 at 4:03
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfL2l1dk8nA
October 7th, 2008 at 15:42
It was all I could do to not bother to respond to the trash on this website, but by my last reading of the requirements for President or Vice President was to exceed the age of 35. That’s it. Where is it written that the people who represent us must be Ivy League Graduates, or Community Organizers (ie: Lobbyists)? Doesn’t seem like that has been the maker or breaker of a good representative of the people so far. Why can we not be represented by an average ‘Joe’? The grocer on mainstreet or the cable guy with some basic common sense? Or do you even know who deeply affected our nation with a book called “Common Sense”? Why must MRS. Palin have to be knowledgeable on every subject known to man on the turn of a dime? Do you not make yourself aware of an issue when it comes up rather than researching everything in the world, just in case? Sarah Palin has focused on the State of Alaska and worked for the people of Alaska. She has been asked to expand her horizon and now focus on the greater nation and world. How uncharitable of you to not grant her the same opportunity when you and your forebears have granted carte blanche to Jimmy Carter for one, and to all our representatives in government over the centuries. What is that all about with you? I thought that was what made our country great. By your gutter standards (I speak to the slimiest of you with your disgusting remarks about “getting some of that” and “an idiot choking on her own nonsense’) none of the prescient men who started this nation would qualify for the office! Oh BTW, learn to spell (magnat? What is THAT?) if you are going to rant on about Palin being stupid. Your ignorance, prejudice and dirty dealing are on proud display for your party right here in this little forum. Good luck with that.
October 7th, 2008 at 15:49
My party? I’m not even a US citizen. And if you start quoting options from the inblot-test list, you apparently failed the test yourself. Common sense is by Thomas Paine, and I wonder how many people who are US citizens know that.
And since a bit of fun flowchart is apparently reason for both sides of the isle to descend into name calling, I’m going to close this thread.