Archive for the 'If you're in marketing, kill yourself' Category

Here today. Gone tomorrow.

Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

[Quote:]

Fortis gaat zijn reclameslogan ‘Here today. Where tomorrow?’ afvoeren. Op het internet werd er al snel ‘Here today. Gone tomorrow.’ van gemaakt.

Toch zegt Fortis dat het niet de grappen zijn, die hen overstag deed gaan. “De huidige marktsituatie van Fortis is de reden om nog eens goed te kijken naar wat je wilt zeggen in reclameboodschappen.”

Going to the dogs

Sunday, September 28th, 2008

[Quote:]

Has the American presidential campaign gone to the dogs?

One could be forgiven for thinking so after seeing the latest issue of Nature magazine.

The world’s leading scientific journal has featured a powerful image of John McCain and Barack Obama on its front cover. The pair radiate statesmanlike-authority, the image is suitably sombre for the weighty interview inside.

Then, however, you see the back cover.

[..]

“It just goes to show that editorial and advertising aren’t working in cahoots.”

Microsoft’s “I’m a PC” Ads - Made on a Mac

Saturday, September 20th, 2008

[Quote:]

Flickr user LuisDS discovered metadata on the creative copy of the “stereotyped PC user” and other photos appearing on Microsoft’s “I’m a PC” website that reveal they were produced using Macs running Adobe Creative Suite 3.

Microsoft code monkeys scrubbed the identifying information from the website stills overnight.

Apart from the ha-ha-this-is-funny, here’s a question for you marketing people: how can you, as an advertising agency, be able to create compelling advertising for a product you yourself have rejected?

There’s Nothing There

Friday, September 19th, 2008

[Quote:]

Microsoft’s panicked reaction to these Seinfeld ads, yanking them from the air and severing ties with Seinfeld, isn’t because the ads were poorly received. And dropping these ads is a panicked reaction. Let’s not pretend it makes any sense that the Seinfeld spots were planned as a two-episode teaser all along. No one signs Jerry Seinfeld for $10 million in a much-heralded deal to make just two spots that only run for a grand total of two weeks. The most telling fact is that the firm that reached out to the media yesterday to explain that this sudden shift was supposedly the plan all along was not Crispin Porter, the advertising agency producing the campaign, but Waggener Edstrom, Microsoft’s PR firm. Advertising campaigns which are going according to plan do not need PR firms to assert such.

The reaction to the ads wasn’t bad, it was mixed (and/or baffled). But the spots were undeniably successful in one important regard: they were noticed and discussed. I suspect what sparked the panic is that the Seinfeld ads were too good, too accurate at capturing just what it is that Microsoft, as a company and brand, stands for: nothing.

Microsoft announcement tomorrow: No more Seinfeld ads!

Thursday, September 18th, 2008

[Quote:]

Remember those awful Microsoft ads with Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Gates? Well, now you can forget them. Microsoft flacks are desperately dialing reporters to spin them about “phase two” of the ad campaign — a phase, due to be announced tomorrow, which will drop the aging comic altogether. Microsoft’s version of the story: Redmond had always planned to drop Seinfeld. The awkward reality: The ads only reminded us how out of touch with consumers Microsoft is — and that Bill Gates’s company has millions of dollars to waste on hiring a has-been funnyman to keep him company.

And if you think they’re in a mess, get this:

[Quote:]

One new Microsoft commercial even begins with a company engineer who resembles John Hodgman, the comedian portraying the loser PC character in the Apple campaign. “Hello, I’m a PC,” the engineer says, echoing Mr. Hodgman’s recurring line, “and I’ve been made into a stereotype.”

What I’ve learned on marketing is that this is basically an explicit admission that Microsoft is the second-place brand. You never compare yourself to your competitors this way if you want to present yourself as number one.

Best Buy + Windows Guru = Apple Store experience?

Friday, September 12th, 2008

[Quote:]

As part of Windows Vista’s $300 million marketing rehab, Microsoft Corp. will hire an initial wave of 155 “Windows Gurus” to walk around Best Buy and Circuit City stores, answer customer questions and defend Vista’s reputation against skeptics.

[..]

One way Windows Gurus will differ from Apple Geniuses is that they are not intended to be sources of free technical support for existing Vista users.

“The guru role is to help sell Windows-based PCs. It is not to be an alternative tech support channel for Microsoft, as this has no financial return beyond improved customer satisfaction,” Baker said.

So the solution to people disliking Vista is…. get more people pitching the product at them.

Right. That’ll work.

Microsoft’s 2nd attempt: Gates+Seinfeld ‘New Family’ - long version

Friday, September 12th, 2008

I don’t get it. At all. This is how they’re going to improve the Microsoft image and sell lots of Vista?

Microsoft’s First Seinfeld Ad Airs: Shoe Circus

Friday, September 5th, 2008

That totally makes me want to go buy a copy of Vista..

Seinfeld was reportedly paid $10 million for his work in this series of ads…

Euro guidelines will allow Bluetooth spam

Wednesday, August 27th, 2008

[Quote:]

The Mobile Marketing Association has published its guidelines for advertising pushed over Bluetooth connections, and considers anyone who hasn’t opted out to be fair game for spammers.

The guidelines are now available for public review until 26 September, and take a distinct step beyond the UK’s Direct Marketing Association (DMA) rules in that they consider any handset left in “discoverable” mode to be implicitly giving permission for pushed adverts - something the DMA explicitly rejects.

The document (pdf) has been produced by the “Proximity Committee”, a part of the Mobile Marketing Association (MMA), and is mostly concerned with an explanation of what Bluetooth is and how it can effectively be used. It says that IMS Research reckons that in the US more than 60 per cent of handsets sport Bluetooth and 70 per cent in Europe, making it an attractive channel for pushed advertising.

Oh look, something useful that people use and enjoy, let’s fuck it and make it annoying….

The article mentions a website where “they’d love to hear your comments”, but I wouldn’t bother - there’s no point in trying to talk to spammers.

Actors paid to queue for Poland’s iPhone launch

Saturday, August 23rd, 2008

[Quote:]

Mobile phone carrier Orange Poland admitted today that it hired actors to stand in line for the country’s iPhone debut.

“It was a part of our marketing strategy, the concept was thought up at Orange Poland,” the company told the Associated Press. “The aim was to ‘warm up’ the atmosphere around the launch of the iPhone.”

How did the BBC lose a million US readers? Advertising!

Monday, August 18th, 2008

[Quote:]

The latest data from Nielsen Online on monthly US visitors to the top news and information sites makes for depressing reading for the BBC.

The number of unique visitors to BBCNews.com has fallen by more than a million in a year.  The site had 5,253,000 readers in July 2008, compared to 6,408,000 July last year.

The drop comes at a time when the BBC has been ramping up its commercial operations outside the UK.  In November 2007, advertising was introduced on the international version of the BBC News website. In the first six months, the advertising brought in a measly £1.5 million ($2.96 million.

Fox TV news anchors enjoy plastic coffee

Thursday, July 24th, 2008

[Quote:]

Why are these news anchors smiling? Because they’ve been given cups filled with a solid plastic material that resembles coffee.

Two cups of McDonald’s iced coffee (BUY!) sit on the Fox 5 TV news desk, a punch-you-in-the-face product placement (BUY!) to chase down your morning news.

They’ve been on the Las Vegas station set for about two weeks, following the lead of a few TV stations across the country, and they’re still looking every bit as frosty and tantalizing (BUY!) as they were the first day you laid your eyes on them.

But wait, here’s the best part: They’re not real. Fake coffee on the real news, two plastic cups permanently filled with some kind of bogus drink. The anchors aren’t even supposed to acknowledge them, McDonald’s reps explain.

iPhone: Most Apple, AT&T stores sold out

Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008

Seen on “Sprint Connection”:

[Quote:]

The iPhone shortage may be good news for Sprint, which launched the iPhone-challenging Samsung Instinct in June.

In other words, the more customers AT&T gets, the better it is for Sprint…

The Loopt SMS Mess

Tuesday, July 15th, 2008

[Quote:]

Green advertising

Wednesday, July 9th, 2008

Soms verdient een comment z’n eigen post.

Sunday, July 6th, 2008

[Quote:]

De nuon reclame gezien met die leuke lampjes in de Sahara? Website gekeken?
http://www.nuon.nl/acties/verspilling/top-5-verspillers.jsp

Bij mij begon er iets te jeuken toen ik op de Nuon site las dat ze met
300 miljoen spaarlampjes ‘de hele sahara’ willen verlichten. Met mijn
vmbo-niveau (theoretische leerweg) kan ik dat nog wel uitrekenen…

300.000.000 spaarlampen op 9.065.000 km2 Sahara?
= 33 lampen per vierkante kilometer…

= 1 lamp moet 30.000 vierkante meter verlichten…
sterk lampje hoor…

Maar de hele reclamefilm en onderliggende berekening kloppen ook niet

Met z’n allen - inclusief industrie en transport - gebruiken we aan
energie 2698 PetaJoule per jaar (CBS 2007)
http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?VW=T&DM=SLNL&PA=37281&HD=080706-1219

Huishoudens doen daarvan 920 PetaJoules ( 1 PJ = 278 kWh) aan gas en

electriciteit…

30% van 920 = 276 maal 278 miljoen kWh = 76.728.000.000 kWh

Dat lijkt veel maar “de hele sahara” is wel 9.065.000 vierkante
kilometer groot…
Dus die 30% die wij met z’n allen verspillen is dan 8464 kWh per jaar
per vierkante kilometer Sahara

Nuon zegt nog: Dag en Nacht…
Dat betekent (8464/(365×24)) 966 W per vierkante kilometer… 100
spaarlampen ( van 10 watt) op een vierkante kilometer? Dat is 1 lamp

op 10.000m2

Kijk nog eens naar dat plaatje: dat klopt dus echt niet met de
afbeeldingen in de
reclame.———————————————————-
Ach waarom zou je in de Sahara een boek willen lezen, terwijl we hier
al niet kunnen rekenen… Nuon wordt aanbevolen door WCeend!

I set up a new web site today….

Thursday, July 3rd, 2008

Have you ever been forced to fill out an email address in a web-form, even when you never, ever, wanted to hear form the site again?

If so, you probably lied, and made up an email address on the spot that you were sure didn’t exist.

The word “niet” is a Dutch word generally meaning “not”.

A lot of dutch internet users, when confronted with a form where they are forced to enter an email address, use an address endig in “niet.com”.

For example: “liever@niet.com” translates as “rather@not.com”. In a way, they’re telling the site the’d rather not receive anything by email.

Of course, there are more rude variants. This website lists all email received in the last month or so, destined for the niet.com domain.

THERE ARE NO VALID NIET.COM ADDRESSES.

In other words, EVERY single mail you see is a spam message from a company that forces you to enter an email address in their web forms, either directly from that company, or sold to spammers.

The mail server refuses connections from ip addresses known to be spamming, and known to be in a dial-up range, so all the mail you see is really from asshole marketeers who think they can collect your address on a web form and then harrass you.

Enjoy

What Privacy Policy?

Thursday, July 3rd, 2008

[Quote:]

Want to know how well a company protects its customers’ data? Don’t talk to its security and compliance officers. Instead, try its marketing department.

A study released Monday by the privacy-focused Ponemon Institute and funded by e-mail marketing firm Strongmail reveals a disturbing disconnect in companies between the executives tasked with protecting customer data and marketing departments, which use the data for advertising purposes or share it with third parties.

As anybody who has worked with marketing in large companies already knows…

Sony Bravia

Tuesday, June 24th, 2008

Mobile phones to save airlines, by exposing passengers

Monday, June 23rd, 2008

[Quote:]

Airline travel is set to get even more unpleasant, as hapless airline passengers face being hounded through airports by online advertisers as well as security, customs and perfume touting duty free sales staff.

The airline industry could save $600m a year by tracking passengers through airports and punting ads to their mobiles, along with their tickets and boarding passes, according to a report from airline industry tech supplier SITA.

The prediction comes in a report from SITA, distributed at its Air Transport IT Summit in Brussels last. It gains a little credibility by including research from Cambridge University, though SITA are the one’s who would like to provide the technology.

[..]

At present customers receive an SMS asking them if they’re OK with the idea, and if they don’t say no then the third party (in this case the airport) gains access to instant information about the location of the phone, and hence that of the user.

And you’re probably expected to say “no” by sending an sms to a five pound premium number, which will send you another five pound confirmation sms?

Fuck ‘m!


indoor-dictatorial