« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

John Kerry’s debate prep

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 20:32 by John Sinteur in category: Indecision 2008

John Kerry’s debate prep session (as imagined by Harry Shearer)

And probably also very realistic:

[Quote:]

For four days, John Kerry has huddled with his top advisers in a Frank Lloyd Wright-inspired resort in the low hills of south-central Wisconsin, being drilled on foreign-policy details and practicing what for him is a most elusive objective: brevity.

For Kerry aides, preparing the Massachusetts Democrat to debate President Bush on foreign policy tonight has had less to do with providing him material – he inhales facts the way a Hoover vacuums a carpet – and more with restraining him from exhaling it all back when asked a question.

Kerry held four full-length mock debates with aides, said Stephanie Cutter, his communications director. Each was videotaped, and Kerry and his aides watched the tapes afterward to look for any ways he could improve his performance. Aides used a buzzer to help him keep his answers short.


Write a comment

Supreme Court backs ‘do-not-call’ list

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 19:53 by John Sinteur in category: If you're in marketing, kill yourself

[Quote:]

The U.S. Supreme Court Monday let stand a lower-court ruling that telemarketers’ rights to free speech are not violated by the government’s nationwide do-not-call list.

Without comment, the justices rejected an appeal by commercial telemarketers against the lower-court ruling, which upheld as constitutional the popular program in which consumers can put their names on a list if they do not want to be called by telemarketers.

“We hold that the do-not-call registry is a valid commercial speech regulation because it directly advances the government’s important interests in safeguarding personal privacy and reducing the danger of telemarketing abuse without burdening an excessive amount of speech,” the appeals court said.


Write a comment

SpaceShipOne captures X Prize

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 19:49 by John Sinteur in category: News


[Quote:]

SpaceShipOne achieved its most spectacular flight yet, climbing to an altitude of 364,000 feet (70 miles), eight miles beyond what was needed to win the $10 million Ansari X Prize.


Write a comment

‘iPod users are music thieves’

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 19:48 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property, Microsoft

[Quote:]

The most common format of music on an iPod is ‘stolen’.

–Steve Ballmer (CEO Microsoft)

You know, my iPod has only music I own the CD for (95%), or I got legally in another way (such as the new hitch-hiker episodes or some dutch radio comedy (5%). Mister Ballmer can go kiss my ass, calling me a thief like that. And if he thinks he’s going to be able to shove his DRM crap down my throat he’s got another thing coming.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I think its funny that someone from Microsoft is worried about stealing. If it weren’t for stealing ideas and software from everyone else, MS would never be in business.

  2. amen!

  3. Yeah, you’re much better off getting Apple’s DRM rammed down your throat.

  4. You know me better than that. None of the music on my iPod currently has DRM on it. I intend to keep it at that low percentage.

  5. Sure, and there are thousands of people playing WMA files on their PocketPCs with no DRM.

  6. Alternate response to the post: the fact that you don’t have any stolen music doesn’t mean that Ballmer is lying.

  7. who cares, it’s just a digital replica, the record companys aren’t loosing any money

  8. Where did I say he was lying? He’s calling me a thief, which I’m not, and that pisses me off. It’s as simple as that.

  9. You’re taking his comment as “the most common format on ANY iPod”. That’s a maximally literal interpretation, whereas he clearly must have meant “of all the music on all iPods, most of it is stolen.” The latter may be true and does not refer to you.

  10. You’re nitpicking, but so was I. So let me rephrase that in more general terms, and also illustrate something else. Normally I don’t care much about a random Steve Ballmer statement, but this one is different. It dovetails nicely with everything the music industry is doing (insult your public, call them thieves, treat them like scum, fleece them). It sucks up to them (“our DRM doesn’t suck like the rest does – buy from us!”) as well as shit on a big competitor (both Apple and Microsoft stuff plays both mp3 and their own drm format (aac or wma), but apple has a whopping 30-40% of the entire mp3-hardware market where microsoft has zilch. In addition, the iTunes music store has an undisclosed but huge percentage of the digital music market where microsoft’s offering are not even marginal at best). Anyway, add all this up: shit on your customers, suck up to whoever can give you market dominance, and stab your competitors, and you’ve got a standard Microsoft trifecta from Hell. One sentence, and there’s so many layers of evil in there it’s almost scary. Is it really that difficult for a CEO from microsoft to say something nice for a change? I mean, Bill Gates could do that (about software I wrote, so I know this is true from personal experience), why not Steve? Paul Allen could do it – did you see his interview at the second X-price flight? But Steve is the kind of person the world could do without. And your explanation of his statement is a perfect example – yes, you are absolutely correct, his statement didn’t refer to my iPod specifically if you read his statements carefully, but do you really think the rest of the world reads it that way? It was carefully grafted to not insult any specific iPod owner and yet make sweeping generalisations. Evil.

  11. Oh. So saying “most music stored on iPods is illegally acquired” is a statement by Ballmer about APPLE and about AAC?

    This seems more deluded than I think you are, so I went & checked the article you quoted. The context is this:

    “We’ve had DRM in Windows for years. The most common format of music on an iPod is ‘stolen’.”

    That’s quite a bit more sketchy than the isolated quote you posted. I agree, implying that content played by WMP is on average more legal than that played on iPods is highly sketchy. Though WMP does by default have the “add DRM when ripping” checkbox turned on. Maybe that’s what Ballmer is thinking of.

    Apple and Microsoft are both catering to the record labels in this space. They’re both trying to get their DRM format established as the dominant format. Let’s not pretend that MS is any more evil here than Apple, even if Jobs is less outspoken about his intentions.

    Having met Ballmer in person and having seen him reign in his empoyees to keep them from overstating their product’s strengths, I was actually very pleasantly surprised. The real Ballmer has more integrity than the public persona seems to have.

  12. Steve Ballmer and the Ipod

‘DON’T VOTE’

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 14:09 by John Sinteur in category: If you're in marketing, kill yourself

[Quote:]

A series of billboards around the Twin Cities that brazenly declare “DON’T VOTE” have angered civil rights activists.

Fifteen of the billboards have sprung up in Minneapolis, St. Paul and its suburbs in the last few days. Several are in areas with large minority populations, including the Phillips neighborhood in Minneapolis, leading the NAACP and other groups to criticize even the suggestion that citizens shouldn’t exercise the right to vote.

“This is a highly sensitive election season, and to put it in areas like the Phillips neighborhood, that’s a minority community that’s been disenfranchised enough,” Brett Buckner, NAACP branch president in Minneapolis, said Friday. “I don’t care what kind of campaign this is, that community’s been through enough.”

The billboards are owned by Clear Channel Communications Inc. Lee Ann Muller, the company’s general manager for outdoor advertising in Minnesota, wouldn’t say who is paying for the billboards, but said it’s a “teaser” campaign and its full meaning would become clear soon.

“I made the judgment call that the end of the campaign has value and a positive message, positive benefits for the community,” Muller said.

Muller said the sponsor, which is paying about $60,000 to have the billboards up for a month, is not advertising a product. She said the “reveal,” when new billboards replace the “DON’T VOTE” message, would be Oct. 11.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. i guess we should be thankful that the signs didn’t say
    ‘jump off a bridge’ or ‘stick a pin in your eye’, otherwise we’d have
    dead or blind minorities all over the place :razz:

  2. Isn’t it a coincidence that these “don’t vote” signs are paid for
    by Clear Channel, the company who has been permitted by Bush’s
    appointee as FCC chairman, Michael Powell (son of Colin Powell)
    to merge to an unprecedented size (due to Powell’s deregulation)
    into the world’s largest radio broadcaster, concert promoter, &
    billboard advertising firm’now owning more than 1,300 stations
    (previously a single broadcaster couldn’t own more than 40 sta-
    tions). And isn’t ironic that the CEO of Clear Channel is none
    other than Lowry Mays, a former business partner of George Bush..
    and now we are forced to look at a truly anti-American statement:
    “DON’T VOTE” & try to explain it to our children what this means
    in the “land of the free, home of the brave”.
    We don’t have to wait for George’s second term…we are already
    a “Banana Republic”!!

  3. I believe this is mostly misinformation. The billboards are owned by Clear Channel, not paid for by them, and presumably rented out to someone else. Clear Channel was enormous and dominated several markets before Bush took office. I don’t like them, but I see no evidence that this is an evil plot by Clear Channel.

  4. Nice, Jericho. Thing is, we don’t have a problem in minority neighborhoods
    with people jumping off bridges or sticking pens in their eyes. If we did
    have a problem with people jumping off bridges and sticking pens in their eyes
    do you think it would be funny for someone to go around encouraging them to
    continue? I certainly hope not. The problem with these signs is that we DO
    have a problem with voter turnout in these areas and to encourage less turn
    out is a very bad thing (unless you are republican, of course). I don’t care
    what these billboards end up saying, they are giving a bad impression and
    are completely unnecessary in delivering any positive message.

  5. Listen to this new song by 50 Billion:
    Don’t Vote
    http://billionairesforbush.com/music/dontvote.mp3
    Coincidence? Tell us what you think

  6. Well,
    It turns out Clear Channel did pay for these advertisements
    since they are ads for that cheesy Dave Ryan.
    They are made by Clear Channel for Clear Channel.
    I don’t believe their is a great political conspiracy
    only a really bad judgement made to promote a shallow self-serving
    radio show.
    We should all be sending them a letter asking for an
    apology to their listeners, our communities and all of
    the folks who have worked so hard to register voters
    this year. Their address is below, you know what is right for you.
    KDWB-FM
    1600 Utica Avenue South, Suite 400
    St. Louis Park, MN 55416
    e-mail advertising at BarbGehlen@clearchannel.com

Kyoto a-go-go

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 14:05 by John Sinteur in category: News


[Quote:]

Soviet Russia was famous for its smokestack industries, belching noxious fumes in pursuit of quixotic five-year plans. It took on, as a national mission, the “subjection of nature’s forces to man?, as Karl Marx had so memorably put it. The downfall of red Russia was thus a triumph for greens everywhere. As the “evil empire? collapsed, a sizeable chunk of its dirty industry soon followed. This week, the post-Soviet Russia of President Vladimir Putin provided another victory for the environmentalists. On Thursday September 30th, Mr Putin’s government approved the Kyoto protocol, the 1997 treaty that aims to curb greenhouse gases. With Russia in, the treaty can finally come into effect, seven years after it was agreed.


Write a comment

Bush/Cheney campaign fails the honesty test

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 13:53 by John Sinteur in category: Indecision 2008

[Quote:]

In an attempt to use John Kerry’s words against him, the Bush/Cheney campaign has taken two words uttered by him at Thursday’s presidential debate and begun using them in a misleading way that contradicts the Democratic presidential candidate’s position.

The deceptive attack is best captured in a new ad released by the Bush/Cheney campaign, which features the following script:

He said he’d attack terrorists who threaten America. But at the debate, John Kerry said America must pass a “global test” before we protect ourselves.
The Kerry doctrine: A global test.
So we must seek permission from foreign governments before protecting America?
A global test?
So America will be forced to wait while threats gather?
President Bush believes decisions about protecting America should be made in the Oval Office, not foreign capitals.

Kerry did say that he believes a preemptive war waged by the US should pass a “global test.” But in context, his meaning was quite different than what the Bush campaign is claiming: “But if and when you do it, Jim,” Kerry said to Jim Lehrer of PBS, the debate moderator, “you have to do it in a way that passes the test, that passes the global test where your countrymen, your people understand fully why you’re doing what you’re doing and you can prove to the world that you did it for legitimate reasons.”

Clearly, Kerry meant that a President must be able to demonstrate to the world that the preemptive war is being waged for legitimate reasons, not that foreign governments must provide “permission.”

In fact, Kerry said the exact opposite at another point in the debate. In his very first answer of the night, the Democratic candidate said, “I’ll never give a veto to any country over our security.”

The misleading quote isn’t only being used in a Bush ad. The President has also made it part of his stump speech. Speaking October 1, the day after the debate, in Lehigh, Pennsylvania, he said, “One other point I want to make about the debate last night. Senator Kerry last night said that America has to pass some sort of global test before we can use American troops to defend ourselves. He wants our national security decisions subject to the approval of a foreign government.”

The President has even gone so far as to call this out of context quote the “Kerry doctrine.”


Write a comment

Poland was too honest…

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 11:56 by John Sinteur in category: Mess O'Potamia

[Quote:]

Poland, which has sent troops to support the US-led forces in Iraq, has acknowledged its “ultimate objective” is to acquire supplies of Iraqi oil.

The Polish Foreign Minister, Wlodzimierz Cimoszewicz, said his country had never disguised the fact that it sought direct access to the oilfields.

He was speaking as a group of Polish firms signed a deal with a subsidiary of US Vice President Dick Cheney’s former company, Halliburton.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Well, I can’t say I’m proud that my country, Poland, is part of this ‘coalition’, but hey – at least we’re not bullshiting anyone, right? :twisted:

Accuracy of the Bible is unrivaled as a text

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 11:46 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote:]

The recent controversy surrounding CBS News documents related to President Bush’s National Guard service demonstrated how the reliability and validity of documents must be examined before they are accepted as truth. In the same way, when considering Christianity, one must examine the reliability of the Bible, the foundation of the Christian faith. Upon careful review, one will find that the Bible is not only the most distributed, most translated and most unique religious text in the world, but it is one of the most verifiable and reliable documents in history, religious or otherwise.

C. Sanders, in the Introduction to Research in English Literary History, explains tests that determine a book’s historical reliability. The three tests are the bibliographical test (examining the manuscripts that exist), the internal evidence test (is the whole book consistent with itself?), and the external evidence test (can outside sources verify the contents of the book?). In using these academic tests, one will find that, indeed, the Bible is unrivaled in its historical accuracy.

I kept expecting a punch line, but apparently this guy is absolutely serious.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I guess they couldn’t find the right font in MS Word to match their bible.

  2. I think this guy is trying to say, however clumsily, that the text of the bible has been correctly handed down over the centuries. Bluntly put: excellent copying, not a letter changed. That position is well defendable on scientific grounds. Only one other text has been preserved better: the Koran.

    All of this preciseness, naturally, merely reflects the diligence of the copyists; the value of the contents is to be appreciated on a per-person basis.

    Did you know the text of Shakespeare, very young by comparision, have been heavily mutiliated over the ages? Copying error estimates for Koran / Bible / Shakespeare run at about zero / 1 letter in 50,000 / 1 letter in 1,000 respectively if I remember correctly. Note the dramatic differences!

  3. I guess you’re more than just partly right (in the sense he’s saying it clumsily because his religion is in the way). It’s Religion that stops the mistakes in the Koran and Bible from propagating. Simply put, if you make it a sin – I’m sorry, a Sin – to make errors in copying, folks tend to make less errors. In he case of the Koran, where perfect memorizing of the Book is a highly valued skill, the results are indeed impressive. In the case of this guy, he’s reading way more into it than simply ‘no copying errors’. Which reminds me of “zeta. Zeta. Zeta!” in this book, but that’s probably a reference that’s a bit too obscure…

Dirty Debate Tricks

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 11:39 by John Sinteur in category: Funny!, Indecision 2008

goat.jpg

It’s the one thing that will confuse W. and paralyze him in a moment of crisis.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. HAH!! Thats great!

Tie!

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 11:35 by John Sinteur in category: Indecision 2008

[Quote:]

The patriots at Free Republic have uncovered a Kerry dirty trick so vile, it threatens the very foundation of our democracy.

Posted on 10/01/2004 11:59:30 AM PDT by Lazamataz

I noticed something last night.

G.W. Bush’s necktie was askew. It looked unprofessional. I wondered HOW in the heck that could have happened.

Then during the replay, I saw how it happened. When Kerry greeted Bush, Kerry held on to Bush’s hand as Bush was walking away. Bush was forced to awkwardly stretch his torso, dislodging the correct placement of the tie.

I initially thought it was all happenstance. But on further review, I saw that Kerry made a point of adjusting his tie after the handshake, just in case the manuever dislodged his too.

Maybe it was an accident, maybe not. I think not. If anyone has contacts to Bush, please advise them of this possible purposeful action, or at the very least, MAKE SURE BUSH’S TIE IS STRAIGHT. I was focused on the tie, it looked so sloppy.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I thought the problem was that Bush put all his rhetorical power on display while wearing a BLUE tie. What a mistake! All those people persuaded that they want to be a blue state! Imagine the horrors if any ballots are printed in color!

Freewayblogger.com

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 11:33 by John Sinteur in category: Funny!


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Freewayblogger.com: All I got was
    From Freewayblogger.com (via The Daily Irrelevant)

7 van de 10 providers verwijderen tekst Multatuli

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 10:45 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property

[Quote:]

Uit een onderzoek van Bits of Freedom naar de praktijk van notice en takedown bij internetproviders blijkt dat het merendeel van de providers veel te snel ingrijpt bij klachten en websites radicaal verwijdert. Juist omdat providers met één druk op de knop teksten kunnen blokkeren, vormt de lakse omgang met klachten een ernstige bedreiging voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting online.

Voor de test heeft Bits of Freedom een tekst uit 1871 uitgekozen van Multatuli (pseudoniem van Eduard Douwes Dekker) en bij 10 verschillende providers online gezet. Vervolgens heeft de fictieve ‘juridisch adviseur van het E.D. Dekkers genootschap’, Mr. Johan Droogleever, via een gratis Hotmail adres een klacht gestuurd aan alle providers. In 70% van de gevallen bleken de providers de tekst te verwijderen, zonder verder te kijken naar de pagina of de twijfelachtige herkomst van de klager.

Het auteursrecht op werken verstrijkt 70 jaar na de dood van de auteur. Douwes Dekker overleed in 1887. Sinds 1957 behoren al zijn werken dus tot het publieke domein. Deze basiskennis van het auteursrecht blijkt helaas niet aanwezig bij de meeste internetproviders. Vooral bij zakelijke websites zou je verwachten dat de provider de belangen van zijn klant zwaar laat wegen, maar alle drie de geteste zakelijke hostingproviders (Active 24, iFast en Yourhosting) verwijderden de website, één zelfs binnen drie uur. Ook twee gratis toegangsproviders, Tiscali en Wanadoo, verwijderen de tekst zonder verdere vragen aan de klager. Een Hotmail adres volstaat dus om een website te verwijderen. De drie geteste betaalde toegangsproviders (Demon, Planet Internet en XS4ALL) hanteerden een procedure met een schriftelijke vragenlijst. Maar alleen XS4ALL bekeek de website daadwerkelijk en constateerde dat het werk tot het publiek domein behoorde. UPC liet weten geen klachten te accepteren van een niet-verifieerbaar Hotmail adres en liet de tekst ook staan. Freeler reageerde in het geheel niet op de klacht en deed niets.

Onder de Europese richtlijn voor elektronische handel uit 2000 riskeert een provider zware claims als het gaat om materiaal waarvan ze ‘redelijkerwijs behoort te weten’ dat het een onrechtmatig karakter heeft. Hoe een provider iets zou ‘behoren’ te weten is onduidelijk gebleven. Providers hoeven niet actief alle informatie te controleren, maar moeten na een klacht zelf beoordelen of een homepage of website misschien onrechtmatig is. Aan die beoordeling en aan de verdere procedure zijn geen verdere regels verbonden. Die zelf-regulering blijkt in de praktijk te leiden tot cowboy-rechtspraak.

Bits of Freedom pleit daarom voor een precieze afbakening van de aansprakelijkheid van providers, en een concrete invulling van de notice en takedown procedure, met ruimte voor hoor en wederhoor. Providers zouden materialen alleen moeten verwijderen als er onmiddellijk gevaar dreigt, als de onrechtmatigheid daadwerkelijk onmiskenbaar is of er als er aantoonbaar grote financiële schade dreigt. In alle andere gevallen zouden websites online moeten blijven totdat de rechter een oordeel heeft uitgesproken. Ten slotte pleit Bits of Freedom voor jaarlijkse publicatie van de aantallen klachten en gevolgde procedures. Geen enkele provider in Nederland biedt een dergelijk overzicht aan, wellicht uit angst dat dergelijke transparantie tot ongewenst publiek debat leidt.


Write a comment

30 days

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 10:28 by John Sinteur in category: Mess O'Potamia

This just proves Bush’s and Allawi’s point.
The attacks are just in a small percentage of the country. The insurgents are only able to attack where there are roads, buildings, or people nearby.
Once we get rid of all the roads, buildings and people, the attacks will stop.


Write a comment

Poodle

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 10:26 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture


A poodle named Peter poses with glasses during competition at the World Dog Exhibition in Beijing Saturday Oct. 2, 2004. More than 400 dogs are expected to participate in the 5-day festival, which will feature grooming displays, competitions and advice on dog training. (AP Photo/str)


Write a comment

No. 3 CIA Pick Was Caught Shoplifting

Posted on October 4th, 2004 at 10:24 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

The man chosen for the third-ranking job in the CIA resigned under pressure from the U.S. spy agency more than 20 years ago after being caught shoplifting, The Washington Post reported Sunday.

Michael Kostiw, picked by new CIA Director Porter Goss to be the agency’s executive director, has not received final clearance to take the job, although he had been scheduled to be sworn in Monday, the newspaper reported, citing a friend of Kostiw whom it did not identify.

Citing past and current agency officials, the Post said Kostiw was caught shoplifting in late 1981 at CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. He had been an officer for 10 years at that point.


Write a comment