« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

More xml/xslt numbers

Posted on April 11th, 2006 at 10:40 by John Sinteur in category: Sun Coolthreads T2000 -- Write a comment

A collegue was kind enough to run the test set on one of his linux boxes.

The specs:

Debian GNU/Linux 2.6.15
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_06-b05)
Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz (with 2MB level2 cache)
2 GB DDR-2 RAM

The results:

fastest transformation
saxon xalan
chess 26 156
game 0 1
nitf 1 2
recipes 2 4
table 0 1
topic 2 4
wai 0 8

(“zero” microseconds doesn’t mean “zero time”, it means less than half a microsecond)

number of transformations done
saxon xalan
chess 27066 11433
game 193012 34978
nitf 118298 12136
recipes 71345 7181
table 136911 9918
topic 79239 7401
wai 90454 14324
average time for a transformation
saxon xalan
chess 423 n/a
game 53 n/a
nitf 93 n/a
recipes 143 n/a
table 84 n/a
topic 128 n/a
wai 126 n/a

I can’t give any xalan numbers, the individual threads for each case reported numbers that were so wildly different from each other that a sensible “average” wasn’t really possible. Apparently xalan does something weird on this setup.

A nice, fast, modern laptop, and no surprises other than the xalan test: an individual transformation is a lot faster than on a T2000, but on total capacity the T2000 still wins. And again it’s clear that if you’re running a website with a lot of traffic, the T2000 is an excellent choice. Your visitors won’t get the fastest possible response time, but you’ll handle far more visitors for the same amount of dollar investment than if you’re buying the other machines I’ve tested so far. If you’ve only got a few visitors, or each visitor needs the fastest possible response time, don’t pick the T2000. The T2000 isn’t a formula 1 car, it’s an 18-wheeler truck.

previous post: Cartoons

next post: Several Asinine and/or Risky Ideas Regarding Apple’s Strategy That Boot Camp Does Not Portend