« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Abstinence Programs Face Rejection

Posted on December 16th, 2007 at 22:28 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

The number of states refusing federal money for “abstinence-only” sex education programs jumped sharply in the past year as evidence mounted that the approach is ineffective.

At least 14 states have either notified the federal government that they will no longer be requesting the funds or are not expected to apply, forgoing more than $15 million of the $50 million available, officials said. Virginia was the most recent state to opt out.

[..]

“We’re concerned about this,” said Stan Koutstaal of the Department of Health and Human Services, which runs the program. “My greatest concern about states dropping out is that these are valuable services and programs. It’s the youths in these states who are missing out.”

The program doesn’t work, so what would they be missing out on?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. The programs actually DO work. Well, they don’t do what they’re intended to to, but they are just as effective as comprehensive programs. The Mathematica study that all these States are looking at while deciding whether to reapply states that students in either program are almost exactly as likely to have sex, and almost exactly as likely to use protection.

  2. I assume by “comprehensive” you do not mean a program where students are thought how their equipment works, how it can “malfunction” and stuff like that? I assume you’re just talking about US programs, because every single other Western nation is doing better.

  3. I imagine that what their missing out on is a load of religious BS and an unwanted early entry into parenthood. No doubt with a forced marriage too that will likely fail, leaving the already unwanted children dealing with a split family as well. Don’t see how they could be much worse off really.

‘Sleeping with the boss’ common at KBR in Iraq

Posted on December 16th, 2007 at 22:26 by John Sinteur in category: Mess O'Potamia

[Quote:]

always an adventure for Linda Lindsey.

“If you wanted to get a promotion you didn’t necessarily have to have the qualifications,” remembered Lindsey, a former KBR contractor. “You just needed to be sleeping with the person who was doing the hiring.”

Lindsey spent two and a half years at the Al Asad Air Base in Iraq working for KBR. She coordinated military housing among other responsibilities.

Though she did not know Jamie Leigh Jones, the young KBR contractor who says she was drugged and gang raped by colleagues, Lindsey said Jones’ allegations are not surprising.

“Where I was at and when I was there it was very, very upsetting,” Lindsey recalled.

In a sworn affidavit for the Jones case, Lindsey said: “I saw rampant sexual harassment and discrimination.”

[Quote:]

The alleged rape Jamie Leigh Jones surely wouldn’t have been the first incident of sexual assault on a female contractor, and it also probably won’t be the last. Government contractors effectively operate outside the rule of any law and they know it. They are exempt from Iraqi laws and they are exempt from any American laws. The most the American government can do is withdraw their contracts — and perhaps not even that — but it’s unlikely to happen with the larger contractors which have good political connections.

Do you really think that the people working for these contractors are unaware of the fact that no laws bind them and that no legal authorities can call them to accountability for their actions? Maybe a few are that dumb, but most surely aren’t. The worst they can expect to suffer as a consequence of immoral or otherwise illegal behavior is to be fired and sent home, but even that won’t likely happen with the best employees, with those who act as an organized group, or with those who are acting with some form of tacit approval from above.

[..]

This means that not only will Jamie Leigh Jones not see justice, but others are even more likely to become the victims of crimes — and management will be just as responsible as those who actually commit the crimes. The US government also arguably shares responsibility here for allowing a lawless environment to be created in the first place. Of course, given how President Bush himself doesn’t appear to feel that he should be subjected to any laws, perhaps we should have expected him to willfully take us down such a road. It’s just that authoritarian leaders prefer to be the only ones above the law.


Write a comment

Report Says That the Rich Are Getting Richer Faster, Much Faster

Posted on December 16th, 2007 at 18:01 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

The increase in incomes of the top 1 percent of Americans from 2003 to 2005 exceeded the total income of the poorest 20 percent of Americans, data in a new report by the Congressional Budget Office shows.

The poorest fifth of households had total income of $383.4 billion in 2005, while just the increase in income for the top 1 percent came to $524.8 billion, a figure 37 percent higher.

In other words, if the top 1 percent had accepted a stagnant income, no growth and no decrease, it would have been possible to more than double the income of one out of every five americans.

How’s that for unequal income distribution?


Write a comment

There’s a Ted Stevens joke in here somewhere

Posted on December 16th, 2007 at 11:18 by John Sinteur in category: Funny!

You can now measure your bandwidth in liters.


Write a comment