« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Super Delegates

Posted on February 9th, 2008 at 11:54 by John Sinteur in category: Indecision 2008

[Quote:]

We’ve done a bad job of explaing this, but it is now basically mathematically impossible for either Clinton or Obama to win the nomination through the regular voting process (meaning the super-delegates decide this one, baby!).

Here’s the math. There are 3,253 pledged delegates, those doled out based on actual voting in primaries and caucuses. And you need 2,025 to win the nomination.

To date, about 55% of those 3,253 delegates have been pledged in the voting process — with Clinton and Obamb roughly splitting them at about 900 delegates a piece.

That means there are now only about 1,400 delegates left up for grabs in the remaining states and territories voting.

So, do the math. If they both have about 900 pledged delegates so far, they need to win more than 1,100 of the remaining 1,400 delegates to win the nomination through actual voting.

Ain’t gonna happen, barring a stunning scandal or some new crazy revelation. So, they’ll keep fighting this thing out, each accumulating their chunk of delegates, one of them holding a slight edge and bothing finishing the voting process with 1,600 or so delegates.

And then the super delegates decide this thing.

That’s the math.


Write a comment

I am a Muslim

Posted on February 9th, 2008 at 11:51 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture

[Quote:]
255484340_3a671469f9_o.jpg


Write a comment

if:book: book machine

Posted on February 9th, 2008 at 9:09 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote:]

Philip M. Parker, a professor at Insead, the international business school based in Fontainebleau, France, has written 85,000 books and counting. He’s like a machine. In fact, he has a machine that writes them for him. The Guardian has more.

Most, if not all, of these books can be found on Amazon. Sifting through them felt like a bad riff on “The Library of Babel.” I felt like I’d stumbled upon a weird new form of bibliographic spam — thousands of machine-generated titles gumming up the works, jamming the signal, eroding the utility of the library.

The follow up.

via


Write a comment

Designing What’s Right for Consumers

Posted on February 9th, 2008 at 0:11 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

But you don’t have to have an M.B.A. to understand that refusing to compromise on design, for any reason, can lead to fantastic commercial success. Look at Apple, Google, Sonos, R.I.M. (makers of the BlackBerry), or (in its glory days) Palm.

So what goes through the minds of executives who don’t sweat the small stuff? Don’t they realize that critics and bloggers will find and publicize the limitations? Don’t they realize that customers nowadays can compare notes, can warn each other away? And in a crowded field like digital frames, why on earth can’t they see that the only way to differentiate is to be better than the other guys?

That’s because most of them are fucking clueless. They look at an Apple product, and they truly, honestly, see nothing else but something that’s expensive and surely will only sell to the fanboys. They just don’t get Design, in a deep, deep way. They wouldn’t know passion for a product if it hit them in the gonads. At most, they’ll care about how to get a promotion and a move “up” in the next fiscal quarter (preferably before the shit hits the fan wherever they’re “managing” now). And most large companies are packed with these dilbert-MBA’s.

you can tell I’m bitter, right?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Let me tell you a nice fabel. I work as a business analyst, software designer. And what they told me?
    “Your first priority is not what the customer wants or needs. Your first priority is profit.”

    Go figure. I honestly got physically sick for a moment.

  2. Go find another employer, because your current one will at one point either fail, or be taken over by a bigger company (profits for the current owner!) and that will be really bad for you and the other employees, because the bigger company will buy yours for its customers, and not for your experience and qualities.

  3. I would have to look really hard, ’cause that is the style at every company I met around here.
    With some more, with some less. But that’s the basic behaviour.

  4. Just like me, you’ll have to start your own company..

  5. Or of course your current employer will end up with $44 billion in cash to spend on taking over competitors. :) ;)

  6. Only if you work for publicly traded companies will that be a problem :-)

  7. Ah, yes. Planning that in about 5 years. No chance to do it sooner.