« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Best Buy + Windows Guru = Apple Store experience?

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 20:35 by John Sinteur in category: If you're in marketing, kill yourself, Microsoft

[Quote:]

As part of Windows Vista’s $300 million marketing rehab, Microsoft Corp. will hire an initial wave of 155 “Windows Gurus” to walk around Best Buy and Circuit City stores, answer customer questions and defend Vista’s reputation against skeptics.

[..]

One way Windows Gurus will differ from Apple Geniuses is that they are not intended to be sources of free technical support for existing Vista users.

“The guru role is to help sell Windows-based PCs. It is not to be an alternative tech support channel for Microsoft, as this has no financial return beyond improved customer satisfaction,” Baker said.

So the solution to people disliking Vista is…. get more people pitching the product at them.

Right. That’ll work.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. This is a rather stupid thing “has no financial return beyond improved customer satisfaction”.
    I mean a satisfied customer, who probably will buy more of your stuff and urge friends to buy more of your stuff is not financial return? Then what is, pray?

  2. Brilliant ploy! Your potential customers don’t want to buy your product? Simple. Just get some “gurus” to shout at them to buy it. That’ll do the trick!

Cartoons

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 17:50 by John Sinteur in category: Cartoon


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. When Republican Party, Mc Rove: http://view.break.com/260513

McCain-Palin

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 17:38 by John Sinteur in category: Indecision 2008


Write a comment

Sex Ed

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 17:27 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

An even better comparison is the Netherlands, which has a teenage birthrate 1/7th of ours and a teen abortion rate 1/7th of ours as well. And the Netherlands has what is considered to be the world’s most comprehensive sex education programs, complete with free and anonymous birth control and free and anonymous sexual health screening and treatment. And by the way, the average Dutch teen starts having sex nearly 2 years after the average American teen despite all of that. Good sex education does not lead to promiscuity.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Good sex education does not lead to promiscuity.”

    Maybe they expect they can’t do it good, so it will be bad sex education.

The terrifying cost of feeling safer

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 14:54 by John Sinteur in category: Security

[Quote:]

In a study of terrorism prepared for the Copenhagen Consensus project by Professor Todd Sandler, of the University of Texas, and two other economists, they conclude that “guarding against terrorism can use large resources for little reduction in risk”.

What’s more, defensive measures against terrorism “may simply change the focus of attacks (for example from hijacking to kidnaps) and even increase attacks by creating new grievances”.

Sandler and his colleagues conducted an analysis of the costs and benefits of five different approaches to combating terrorism. I must warn you that, because of the dearth of information, this study is even more reliant on assumptions than usual. Even so, in three cases the cost of the action so far exceeds the benefits that doubts about the reliability of the estimates recede.

Because the loss of life is so low, they measure the benefits of successful counter-terrorism measures in terms of loss of gross domestic product avoided. Trouble is, terrorism does little to disrupt economic growth, as even September 11 demonstrated.

Using the case of the US, Sandler estimates that simply continuing the present measures involves costs exceeding benefits by a factor of at least 10. Adopting additional defensive measures (such as stepping up security at valuable targets) would, at best, entail costs 3.5 times the benefits. Taking more pro-active measures (such as invading Afghanistan) would have costs at least eight times the benefits.

According to Sandler, only greater international co-operation, or adopting more sensitive foreign policies to project a more positive image abroad, could produce benefits greater than their (minimal) costs.

What’s that? You don’t care what it costs because no one can put a value on saving a human life? Heard of opportunity cost? Taxpayers’ money we waste on excessive counter-terrorism measures is money we can’t spend reducing the gap between white and indigenous health – or, if that doesn’t appeal, on buying Olympic medals.


Write a comment

McCain Thinks Americans See Their Doctor Frequently

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 13:40 by John Sinteur in category: Indecision 2008

Maybe like most Americans with 7 homes…


Write a comment

Study Says Intellectual Property System Should Die

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 13:32 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property

[Quote:]

A recently released study has claims that the current ‘Intellectual Property’ situation in the world is not working well. Driven by a fear of losing out, and bolstered by an attitude that profit is the aim of IP, progress is hampered. Not only by the entertainment industry, also in biotechnology where medicines are sometimes restricted or withheld, causing deaths.


Write a comment

Teachers should tackle creationism, says science education expert

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 13:04 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote:]

Creationism and intelligent design should be taught in school science lessons, according to a leading expert in science education.

The Rev Prof Michael Reiss, director of education at the Royal Society, said that excluding alternatives to scientific explanations for the origin of life and the universe from science lessons was counterproductive and would alienate some children from science altogether.

[..]

Reiss agreed that creationism and intelligent design are not scientific theories, but he said that did not automatically exclude them from science lessons. “Just because something lacks scientific support doesn’t seem to me a sufficient reason to omit it from the science lesson.”

Other subjects coming up soon:

Astrology
Phrenology
Alchemy
ESP
Flat earth geography
Transfiguration
Arithmancy
Divination


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Very much enjoy your work here.

    In a way I agree with Rev. Professor Reiss from one standpoint… doesn’t good science require including all possibilities when deciding lines of inquiry?

  2. doesn’t good science require including all possibilities when deciding lines of inquiry?

    No. First, let’s define “science”:

    [Quote:]

    The word science comes from the Latin “scientia,” meaning knowledge.

    How do we define science? According to Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary, the definition of science is “knowledge attained through study or practice,” or “knowledge covering general truths of the operation of general laws, esp. as obtained and tested through scientific method [and] concerned with the physical world.”

    “Good” science, as you call it, really requires the word “tested” in that last sentence.

    Creationism cannot be tested, it makes no testable predictions. Creationism is therefore not falsifiable, and therefore cannot be part of science.

    It’s perfectly fine to discuss creationism in schools, of course, but not in science class. Create a course on comparative religion, for example, and stick it in there.

  3. Sometimes science can be brought to life by discussing its role or place in society. Seems like using the debate over Creationism is a great place to enhance understanding of science by introducing Creationism and Evolution as mere theories and then discussing with the class `whether each one is falsifiable and what reproducible experiments might be performed to decide which is a better scientific theory.

  4. You’d be right for a minor detail: the Reverend doesn’t ask for “teach what science is and use the debate over creationism to do that” – he asks for: “Creationism and intelligent design should be taught in school science lessons”. In other words, creationism should be treated as science.

Olama 08

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 12:15 by John Sinteur in category: Indecision 2008


Write a comment

No consensus on who was behind Sept 11

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 11:24 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

Seven years after the Sept. 11 attacks, there is no consensus outside the United States that Islamist militants from al Qaeda were responsible, according to an international poll published on Wednesday.

The survey of 16,063 people in 17 nations found majorities in only nine countries believe al Qaeda was behind the attacks on New York and Washington that killed about 3,000 people in 2001.

[..]

On average, 46 percent of those surveyed said al Qaeda was responsible, 15 percent said the U.S. government, 7 percent said Israel and 7 percent said some other perpetrator. One in four people said they did not know who was behind the attacks.

Did you notice who wasn’t mentioned at all?

Hints: It starts with an ‘I’
Ends with a ‘Q’
Has ‘RA’ in the middle


Write a comment

For First Time, Figure in Rosenberg Case Admits Spying for Soviets

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 10:43 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

In 1951, Morton Sobell was tried and convicted with Julius and Ethel Rosenberg on espionage charges. He served more than 18 years in Alcatraz and other federal prisons, traveled to Cuba and Vietnam after his release in 1969 and became an advocate for progressive causes.

Through it all, he maintained his innocence.

But on Thursday, Mr. Sobell, 91, dramatically reversed himself, shedding new light on a case that still fans smoldering political passions. In an interview, he admitted for the first time that he had been a Soviet spy.


Write a comment

Palin Wrong on Former VP Credentials

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 9:37 by John Sinteur in category: Indecision 2008

[Quote:]

“Have you ever met a foreign head of state?” Gibson asked Palin Thursday.

“I have not,” Palin said, “and I think if you go back in history and if you ask that question of many vice presidents, they may have the same answer that I just gave you.”

However Palin, who obtained her first passport two years ago, would in fact be the first vice president in 32 years who hadn’t met a foreign head of state, if she were elected.


Write a comment

Evolutionary Acceleration Research Institute Ready to Start “Squirrel Smasher”

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 9:37 by John Sinteur in category: Funny!

[Quote:]

Scientists from the Evolutionary Acceleration Research Institute (EARI) announced that the first test of the Giant Animal Smasher (GAS) will begin on December 19, 2008, the 41st anniversary of the premiere of Dr. Dolittle.
Dr. Thomas Malwin, head of the research project, said, “The first test runs will only accelerate microscopic life-forms like bacteria and viruses to high speeds, but theoretically the GAS can handle animals as large as squirrels, hence the squirrel smasher moniker.”

Biologists from around the globe hope the GAS will unlock the secrets of the so-called “Darwin particle” that could unlock the secrets to life.


Write a comment

An inside look at Apple’s sneaky iTunes 8 upgrade

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 9:26 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote:]

I’m reading lots of complaints about the new iTunes 8 update causing horrific problems on Windows machines, including widespread reports of STOP errors, aka the Blue Screen of Death.

[..]

An even bigger problem is Apple’s attitude toward its Windows customers. These additional software packages and drivers are being installed with no disclosure and no consent. A pile of software, including the troubled MobileMe service, is also being installed and enabled at startup on Windows machines, even where the user has no MobileMe account and, for that matter, no mobile device.

Apple’s Get a Mac ads love to tweak Microsoft for its frequent crashes. Someone from Apple needs to look in the mirror and realize that they’re the problem in this case.


Write a comment

Abstinence Only lifeguard

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 9:20 by John Sinteur in category: Cartoon


Write a comment

Palin doesn’t know what the Bush Doctrine is

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 9:18 by John Sinteur in category: Indecision 2008

[Quote:]

Forget the war with Russia quote. Yes, that was a terrifying – but clarifying – moment in that it revealed the utter folly of pushing NATO membership for Georgia or Ukraine. Smart politicians are never supposed to admit to a possible war with Russia, even if it’s technically possible. And her “perhaps so” comment is getting WIDE play already (front page on the Washington Post, for example).

But far more troubling for me was her moose-in-the-headlights look when asked about the Bush Doctrine. See the video here.

[..]

How could Palin have flubbed this basic question about current national security policy? It was THE justification for the war in Iraq. There are dozens of books out there on it. Everybody in the McCain foreign policy camp knows the Bush Doctrine backwards and forwards – many of them helped write it. And yet she doesn’t know what it is?

What’s worse is that when she was finally told what the Bush Doctrine was – anticipatory self-defense and pre-emptive striking – she still flubbed it. She answered that the US could respond militarily in the case of an “imminent threat.” Well, that’s actually traditional war theory and NOT the Bush Doctrine. Remember all those defenders of the Iraq war insisting that Bush NEVER claimed Iraq was an “imminent” threat? How many times did we debate the meaning of “imminence?” The reason for that exchange was clear: if Iraq posed no imminent threat, then war was unjustified…UNLESS, you accept the Bush Doctrine that advocates war even when the threat is NOT imminent.

[..]

The question now is whether or not John McCain will let her speak unscripted again before the debates. Apparently her “regular mom” schtick is better protected by shielding her from even softball policy questions.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. If Obama had been this clueless, EVERYONE would be jumping on his ass about how inexperienced he is. You don’t run for VICE PRESIDENT and NOT know these things. How the hell are you supposed to pick up where your predecessor left off if you don’t even know what your predecessor DID?

    She didn’t have a different interpretation of the Bush Doctrine. She flat out didn’t know WHAT IT WAS. Anyone who’s followed politics for more than 48 hours and isn’t a complete dunderhead knows what it is.

  2. She thinks and talks like an over indoctrinated evangelical christian…by definition, that implies a very narrow mindset and view on reality. It also implies a fanatic. And even if you put lipstick on a fanatic, it is still a fanatic.

Microsoft’s 2nd attempt: Gates+Seinfeld ‘New Family’ – long version

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 8:10 by John Sinteur in category: If you're in marketing, kill yourself, Microsoft

I don’t get it. At all. This is how they’re going to improve the Microsoft image and sell lots of Vista?


Write a comment

The Slo’Reilly Factor

Posted on September 12th, 2008 at 6:55 by John Sinteur in category: Funny!

[Quote:]

Geraldo Rivera and Bill O’Reilly at half-speed. I am easily amused, and find this riotously funny when they start screaming at each other about a minute or so in. The Slo’Reilly Factor.


Write a comment