« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Competnce

Posted on March 31st, 2009 at 16:03 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

45846736

[Quote:]

Lori Tschudy, left, and Laura Masotti, right, both of Bridgefield join protesters during a Stamford Tea Party to voice opposition to Obama’s tax plan.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. This makes me so proud to be a Stamford resident. It just underscores that neither intelligence nor ability are needed to be wealthy. What makes this sign even more ironic is that the building in the background is the main branch of the Ferguson Public Library.

  2. Not to mention poor Laura…couldn’t leave home without her $300 Burberry check cashmere scarf – classic, don’t you know, dahling?

  3. Amazing they didn’t bother to protest when Bush and the Republicans were looting the country and running the most criminally incompetent administration in history. Obama is repeating much of the criminality and stupidity of the psychopathic Republicans but at least he is thinking about it first. All governments handcuff themselves to the rotting stinking corpse of bad policy. It’s breathtaking to see the other branch of the warfare/welfare party so cheerful and happy at doing so.

    This is like St Madonna flying to Malawi in her Gulfstream V to visit her poor peoples project wearing $2800.00 designer clothes. Plus Her Madge-isty gets a poor nekkid African baby as a door prize to show how saintly she is compared to Oprah and St Angelina.

Bush’s Torture Rationale Debunked

Posted on March 31st, 2009 at 15:52 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

Abu Zubaida was the alpha and omega of the Bush administration’s argument for torture.

That’s why Sunday’s front-page Washington Post story by Peter Finn and Joby Warrick is such a blow to the last remaining torture apologists.

Finn and Warrick reported that “not a single significant plot was foiled” as a result of Zubaida’s brutal treatment — and that, quite to the contrary, his false confessions “triggered a series of alerts and sent hundreds of CIA and FBI investigators scurrying in pursuit of phantoms.”

Zubaida was the first detainee to be tortured at the direct instruction of the White House. Then he was President George W. Bush’s Exhibit A in defense of the “enhanced interrogation” procedures that constituted torture. And he continues to be held up as a justification for torture by its most ardent defenders.

But as author Ron Suskind reported almost three years ago — and as The Post now confirms — almost all the key assertions the Bush administration made about Zubaida were wrong.

Zubaida wasn’t a major al Qaeda figure. He wasn’t holding back critical information. His torture didn’t produce valuable intelligence — and it certainly didn’t save lives.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. but still bush is free and we have more problems at hand.

Judge Must Release Woman Sentenced to Jail for Being Poor, ACLU Says in Court Papers | ACLU of Michigan | Because Freedom Can’t Protect Itself

Posted on March 31st, 2009 at 15:39 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

The American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan asked for an emergency hearing today on behalf of an Escanaba woman sentenced to 30 days in jail because she is too poor to reimburse the court for her son’s stay in a juvenile detention facility.

“Like many people in these desperate economic times, Ms. Nowlin was laid off from work, lost her home and is destitute,” said Michael J. Steinberg, ACLU of Michigan Legal Director. “Jailing her because of her poverty is not only unconstitutional, it’s unconscionable and a shameful waste of resources. It is not a crime to be poor in this country and the government must stop resurrecting debtor’s prisons from the dustbin of history.”

In December 2008, Ms. Nowlin’s 16-year-old son was sentenced to the Bay Pines Center and Ms. Nowlin was ordered to pay $104 per month for his lodging. At the time of this order, Ms. Nowlin was homeless and working part-time with a friend after being laid off from her job. She told the court that she was unable to pay the ordered amount, however the judge found her in contempt for failing to pay. In addition, Ms. Nowlin’s requests for a court appointed attorney were denied.

Since March 3, 2009, Ms. Nowlin has been serving her sentence at the Delta County Jail. On March 6, 2009, she was released for one day to work. Once released she picked up her $178.53 check from work thinking that she now could pay the $104.00 to get out of jail. However, upon her return to jail that evening, the sheriff forced her to sign over her check to the jail to cover $120.00 for “room and board.” She was also charged $22 for a drug test and the booking fee.

According to the ACLU’s motion: “This country did away with debtors’ prisons more than a century ago. The imprisonment of Ms. Nowlin because she is too destitute to make payments to the court is a miscarriage of justice.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I smell a rat here, much like the one where judges were getting kickbacks from the operators of juvenile detention facilities for sentencing kids there (Pennsylvania, wasn’t it?). This should get a lot more scrutiny from the DOJ, in my opinion.

  2. Do you want to really piss off your right wing nutty neighbor? Join the ACLU, alter your name to his or hers on the acceptance letter, photocopy and and scatter the sheets around the “hood”.

    That may get you in trouble. Better still, join because the ACLU is working for you…

    When I read stuff like this, I am glad I did!!!

Bus slogan generator

Posted on March 31st, 2009 at 12:04 by John Sinteur in category: Funny!, Pastafarian News

[Quote:]

Atheists have started advertising on buses in the UK. Do you want to see your own message on the side of a bus? Well now’s your chance.

picture-2


Write a comment

Comments:

Death Opens Doors on Group

Posted on March 31st, 2009 at 11:55 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote:]

Answering to a leader called Queen Antoinette, they denied a 16-month-old boy food and water because he did not say “Amen” at mealtimes. After he died, they prayed over his body for days, expecting a resurrection, then packed it into a suitcase with mothballs. They left it in a shed in Philadelphia, where it remained for a year before detectives found it last spring.

Tomorrow, five of the group’s alleged members — including the boy’s mother, Ria Ramkissoon — are scheduled to be tried in Baltimore on murder charges. Sources and Ramkissoon’s mother said Ramkissoon, 22, has agreed to plead guilty to a lesser charge on one condition: The charges against her must be dropped if her son, Javon Thompson, is resurrected.

Psychiatrists who evaluated Ramkissoon at the request of a judge concluded that she was not criminally insane. Her attorney, Steven Silverman, said the doctors found that her beliefs were indistinguishable from religious beliefs, in part because they were shared by those around her.

“She wasn’t delusional, because she was following a religion,” Silverman said, describing the findings of the doctors’ psychiatric evaluation.


Write a comment

Pixar vs Dreamworks

Posted on March 31st, 2009 at 9:56 by John Sinteur in category: News

3398960470_05527c04b1_b


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Priceless! So true!

  2. Dreamworks’ all about the ‘tude… and now I have an headache. >_<

Woman who plays classical music to soothe horses told to get licence

Posted on March 31st, 2009 at 9:48 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property

PD*27799260

[Quote:]

Rosemary Greenway has been playing passages of opera and orchestral symphonies on the radio to the animals at her stables for more than 20 years, convinced that it helps soothe them.

While not all of her staff are quite as fond of the output of Classic FM as she is, Mrs Greenway, 62, kept the radio tuned to the station religiously while mucking out because of the apparent benefits.

But she has dropped the practice after being told that she must pay a £99 annual licence fee as it constitutes a “performance”.

As you can see from their long faces, the horses are quite upset by this.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. It’s simple: just use classical music played more than 20 years ago (the deadline for execution rights) and where the composer died more than 70 years ago (so it’s basically almost all classical music).

    You can find plenty of FREE classical music here: http://www.liberliber.it/audioteca/index.htm

    This music has no standing copyrights, but there is a creative commons “noncommercial” license for the digitalization and equalization work. If you need to use the files commercially, Marco asks only to find an agreement on a small fee to compensate the website running costs.

Nobody expects the Spanish jurisidiction!

Posted on March 31st, 2009 at 9:30 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

A high-level Spanish court has taken the first steps toward opening a criminal investigation against six former Bush administration officials, including former Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, on whether they violated international law by providing a legalistic framework to justify the use of torture of American prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, said an official close to the case.
The case was sent to the prosecutor’s office for review by Baltasar Garzon, the crusading investigative judge who indicted the former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet. The official said that it was “highly probable” that the case would go forward and could lead to arrest warrants.


Write a comment

120% APR

Posted on March 31st, 2009 at 9:12 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote:]

This time, the nice lady at the counter asked me if I needed immediate access to the deposit?
Huh? Said I. Looking at the payeee – “I think the check will clear…”

Oh, it is not that, said she, it is just that some people need immediate access to their deposits, like same day, or tomorrow, and if you did we can expedite it.

Oh, that’s nice, thought I, and said “no thanks, got enough balance to cover any outstanding transactions thanks, but been there…”

so, I wandered off, and suddenly though – well was prompted by my better half to think – “expedited? at what price?”

[..]

“The Finance Charge is a one-time transaction charge and is not dependent upon the length of time the advance is outstanding. The Finance Charge is $2.00 for every $20 that is advanced, which equates to an Annual Percentage Rate (APR) of 120%.”

Wow.
That’s criminal.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. It *should* be criminal (i.e., illegal) but it is probably not. Interest rates are only governed by the state or country in which the bank is incorporated. Most are in Delaware which has no maximum rate on loans.

    Here’s an example of a 2462% annual rate! http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/living/2009/03/27/howard.payday.loan.cnn?iref=videosearch

  2. Oh wait. That’s not a loan in the original story. It is a fee. I’m not sure how the 120% could have even been calculated. What’s the duration? …and there’s no compounding. Even so the 120% APR seems to be completely made up.

    If for some odd reason the check took a full year to clear then I suppose you could say that the annual rate was 10% (=$2/$20).

    If the check took a week to clear then I guess you could say the annualized rate would be (1+10%)^52 – 1 = 1.1^52 – 1 = 142 – 1 = 141 = 14100%.

    If instead the check takes 3 days to clear then the annualized rate is 1.1^(365/3) – 1 =108,669 = 10866900% (over 10 million percent!)

    To get the 120% from the original story you need to assume the check clears in 44.12 days. 1.1^(365/44.12) – 1 = 1.2 = 120%

Newspaper Corrections – Los Angeles Times

Posted on March 31st, 2009 at 9:08 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

Solar power: A Friday editorial said that according to the U.S. Energy Department, enough sunlight hits a “100-square-mile” portion of the Nevada desert to power the entire country. It should have said “100-miles-square.”

Oh well, what’s a few orders of magnitude among friends…


Write a comment

Senator Webb Introduces Bill to Overhaul America’s Criminal Justice System

Posted on March 31st, 2009 at 8:07 by John Sinteur in category: If you're in marketing, kill yourself, News

I could say a few things about drugs, but I won’t – I’ll try something else.

Senator Webb, you’re part of the problem. Your country has too many elected officials. Why is that a problem? Simple. It is much easier to scare the public than it is to educate them. So if two people are running for DA, it becomes a competition to be tougher on crime than the other guy. Court judges running for re-election can also not be seen to be “soft on crime”. Legislators will not be able to fix unfair laws because their opponents will scare the public with a “he’s soft on crime”.

Look at the amount of people who wrote Obama on his web site to make pot legal. Just about a majority of people want it legal. Yet no elected official will burn his fingers on this issue.

Fix this flaw in your political system, and the rest will follow.

You’d think there’s a pretty obvious source of the problem: the country is great at creating consumer appetites for cars, clothes, gadgets, and entertainment, but very bad at creating jobs that pay enough to afford the things for which people have appetites. If you create a ravenous appetites for luxury but give people no way to get those luxuries, you create a problem. So, start with killing all the marketing people… You’d expect lots of robberies and burglaries to satisfy those needs.

So, here’s some statistics:

Total crimes per capita

#1 Dominica: 113.822 per 1,000 people
#2 New Zealand: 105.881 per 1,000 people
#3 Finland: 101.526 per 1,000 people
#4 Denmark: 92.8277 per 1,000 people
#5 Chile: 88.226 per 1,000 people
#6 United Kingdom: 85.5517 per 1,000 people
#7 Montserrat: 80.3982 per 1,000 people
#8 United States: 80.0645 per 1,000 people
#9 Netherlands: 79.5779 per 1,000 people
#10 South Africa: 77.1862 per 1,000 people
#11 Germany: 75.9996 per 1,000 people
#12 Canada: 75.4921 per 1,000 people
#13 Norway: 71.8639 per 1,000 people
#14 France: 62.1843 per 1,000 people
#15 Seychelles: 52.9265 per 1,000 people
#16 Hungary: 44.9763 per 1,000 people
#17 Estonia: 43.3601 per 1,000 people
#18 Czech Republic: 38.2257 per 1,000 people
#19 Italy: 37.9633 per 1,000 people
#20 Switzerland: 36.1864 per 1,000 people

Burglaries per capita

#1 Australia: 21.7454 per 1,000 people
#2 Dominica: 18.7892 per 1,000 people
#3 Denmark: 18.3299 per 1,000 people
#4 Estonia: 17.4576 per 1,000 people
#5 Finland: 16.7697 per 1,000 people
#6 New Zealand: 16.2763 per 1,000 people
#7 United Kingdom: 13.8321 per 1,000 people
#8 Poland: 9.46071 per 1,000 people
#9 Canada: 8.94425 per 1,000 people
#10 South Africa: 8.89764 per 1,000 people
#11 Montserrat: 8.24323 per 1,000 people
#12 Iceland: 8.11156 per 1,000 people
#13 Switzerland: 8.06303 per 1,000 people
#14 Slovenia: 7.93734 per 1,000 people
#15 Czech Republic: 7.24841 per 1,000 people
#16 Hungary: 7.15849 per 1,000 people
#17 United States: 7.09996 per 1,000 people
#18 France: 6.11634 per 1,000 people
#19 Ireland: 5.73755 per 1,000 people
#20 Netherlands: 5.55531 per 1,000 people

Robberies per capita

#1 Spain: 12.3265 per 1,000 people
#2 Chile: 6.92522 per 1,000 people
#3 Costa Rica: 4.79109 per 1,000 people
#4 South Africa: 4.4434 per 1,000 people
#5 Estonia: 3.56639 per 1,000 people
#6 Mexico: 2.02555 per 1,000 people
#7 Portugal: 1.6237 per 1,000 people
#8 United Kingdom: 1.57433 per 1,000 people
#9 Uruguay: 1.57114 per 1,000 people
#10 Poland: 1.38838 per 1,000 people
#11 United States: 1.38527 per 1,000 people
#12 Latvia: 1.37991 per 1,000 people
#13 Venezuela: 1.37833 per 1,000 people
#14 Lithuania: 1.21601 per 1,000 people
#15 Australia: 1.16048 per 1,000 people
#16 Netherlands: 1.13549 per 1,000 people
#17 Zimbabwe: 0.974838 per 1,000 people
#18 Mauritius: 0.947197 per 1,000 people
#19 Russia: 0.923114 per 1,000 people
#20 Jamaica: 0.851974 per 1,000 people

And incarceration rates.

#1 United States: 715 per 100,000 people
#2 Russia: 584 per 100,000 people
#3 Belarus: 554 per 100,000 people
#4 Palau: 523 per 100,000 people
#5 Belize: 459 per 100,000 people
#6 Suriname: 437 per 100,000 people
#7 Dominica: 420 per 100,000 people
#8 Ukraine: 416 per 100,000 people
#9 Bahamas, The: 410 per 100,000 people
#10 South Africa: 402 per 100,000 people
#11 Kyrgyzstan: 390 per 100,000 people
#12 Singapore: 388 per 100,000 people
#13 Kazakhstan: 386 per 100,000 people
#14 Barbados: 367 per 100,000 people
#15 Panama: 354 per 100,000 people
#16 Trinidad and Tobago: 351 per 100,000 people
#17 Thailand: 340 per 100,000 people
#18 Estonia: 339 per 100,000 people
#19 Latvia: 339 per 100,000 people
#20 Saint Kitts and Nevis: 338 per 100,000

You’ll note that incarceration rates do not correlate with crime rates. The problem does not lie with the people doing the crimes. The problem lies with the people who have to be “tough on crime”

In other words, Senator: you are the problem.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. What about Webb’s presentation is so offensive? Your statistics make exactly the same point Webb was making. He’s trying to start a conversation that re-evaluates our crime policies, which is what you are calling for. His presentation was thoughtful, given in good faith, and willing to question the status quo, and if it wasn’t, the voters in his state would be the problem, not him. A politician is the sum of his electorate. If Congress won’t bring up pot or reform crime, it’s because their (probably very good) analysis guesses that a majority of voters in their districts don’t want it. (A self-selecting survey of Obama supporters, of all people, doesn’t prove otherwise.)

    Your post treats the US as a whole, with flaws that manifest as a result of mistakes made by the whole. (We create demand for consumer goods, we don’t create jobs…) Even if you didn’t intend to blame the whole, you certainly implied what the whole ought not to be like. It’s hard to apply that kind of criticism. Nobody in the US government has the power to “kill all the marketing people”, figuratively or otherwise. The US is 300 million people all doing their own thing, and policy recommendations should reflect that.

    Your one tangible recommendation is fewer elected officials. Replaced with what, appointees? Doesn’t that just make our government more oligarchical than it is? Sure, an election can be won dishonorably, but are you really advocating less democracy? What’s your alternative to electing, say, District Attorneys?

  2. but are you really advocating less democracy?

    Of course not – please check out other democracies, look how they are doing this, and steal as many ideas from them as you need to fix this.