« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

iPhone 3.0 Headers

Posted on July 9th, 2009 at 18:33 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

Something tells me Apple doesn’t want you to use undocumented API’s


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Hahahahah! I’ve made methods like that before.

  2. This should almost be in the funny category.

  3. Update: Craig Hockenberry files a bug against the method.

MediaPost Publications EyeWonder Takes Takeovers To Another Level

Posted on July 9th, 2009 at 18:30 by John Sinteur in category: If you're in marketing, kill yourself

[Quote:]

And consumers thought a blinking banner ad was hard to avoid.

Taking attention-seeking to a whole new level, rich media company EyeWonder on Wednesday debuted a new home page-takeover ad that appears to manipulate a surrounding Web page by shrinking, stretching, crumpling or otherwise animating a real-time screenshot of the page.

Thoroughly immersing audiences in an ad experience, the PageMorph takeover format is just what marketers and publishers are looking for, according to Erin Quist, vice president of enterprise solutions at EyeWonder.

Next up: sticking a hot poker in your eye.

EyeWonder’s open-standard Universal In-Stream Framework works with any ad-serving provider and supports players built in Adobe Flash, Microsoft Silverlight and Akamai’s Media Framework.

Well, I’ve got a couple of blocking plugins that take care of that. Asshats.


Write a comment

Panetta Acknowledged CIA Misled On Interrogation Policy

Posted on July 9th, 2009 at 15:12 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

CIA Director Leon Panetta told lawmakers in a recent briefing that the intelligence agency he heads misled Congress on “significant actions” for a “number of years,” a group of Democrats revealed on Wednesday.

In a letter written to Panetta on June 26 by seven Democratic members of the House Intelligence Committee, the CIA chief is urged to “publicly correct” an earlier statement he made in which he insisted that it was not agency policy to mislead Congress.


Write a comment

Morgan Stanley Plans to Turn Downgraded Loan CDO Into AAA Bonds

Posted on July 9th, 2009 at 15:08 by John Sinteur in category: They never learn

[Quote:]

Morgan Stanley plans to repackage a downgraded collateralized debt obligation backed by leveraged loans into new securities with AAA ratings in the first transaction of its kind, said two people familiar with the sale.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Sooo, they do the same brilliant financial sleight of hands that sank the economy in the first place?
    Pure genius, I tell you, pure genius.

  2. Back in March, the new C.E.O. of A.I.G., Edward Liddy, went to Washington to testify. I guess we can now safely say that the names he didn’t have can now be had by contacting Morgan Stanley.

    [Quote:]

    grayson: Mr. Liddy, you said before that there’s 20 or 25 people who were involved in the credit default business. What are their names, please?

    liddy: I don’t have their names at my disposal, sir.
    grayson: Well, I’m sure you remember a few of the names. I mean, they did cause your company to crash.

    liddy: You know, I’ve been at the company, as you know, for six months. I don’t know all the people that were in AIG F.P., and many of them are gone.

    grayson: Well, there or gone, it doesn’t really matter. I want to know who they are. Names, please.…

    liddy: If it’s possible to provide you the names, we will. We will cooperate with you.

    grayson: That’s good, but I want to know the names that you know right now.

    liddy: I don’t know them, sir.

    grayson: Not a single one. You’re talking about a group, a small group of people who caused your company to lose $100 billion, as you sit here today, you can’t give me one single name.

    liddy: The single name I would give you is Joseph Cassano, who ran …

    grayson: That’s a good start. You already gave that name. Give me another name.

    liddy: I just don’t know them. I do not know those names. I don’t have them all at my command.

    grayson: Well, how can you propose to solve the problems of the company that you’re now running if you don’t know the names of the people who caused that problem? … I would expect you’d at least know more than one name. How about two names? Give us one more name.

    liddy: I’m just not going to do that, sir, because that will provide—that’ll be the—that could be a list of people that we could do—individuals who want to do damage to them could do that. It’s just not …

    grayson: Well, listen, these same people could now be working right now today at Citibank. Is it more important to protect them, the ones who caused the $100 billion loss, or protect us? Which is more important to you right now?

  3. (oh, by the way, that link I picked the quote from is a great article by itself as well)

Safe Food

Posted on July 9th, 2009 at 14:37 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

3700354954_fe4a3884e8


Write a comment

Fox News’ Kilmeade: We “marry other species,” Finns “pure”

Posted on July 9th, 2009 at 14:29 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote:]

Watching Fox News’ morning show, “Fox and Friends,” is a little bit like watching the aftermath of a particularly nasty car crash. Yeah, it’s awful, but you just have to keep looking, because, well, who knows what mangled body parts they’ll pull from the wreckage next?


Write a comment

House HELP Committee hearing on single payer

Posted on July 9th, 2009 at 11:36 by John Sinteur in category: Funny!

[Quote:]

During the questioning by committee members:

Rep. Dennis Kucinich: Dr. Gratzer, you’ve tried to make the case for rationing in Canada – worse than it is in the U.S. Do you know what Statistics Canada – the analogue to the U.S. Census – says the median wait time is across Canada for elective surgery?

Dr. David Gratzer: Why don’t you inform us,sir?

Kucinich: It’s four weeks. And what does Statistics Canada say the median wait time for diagnostic imaging like MRIs is?

Gratzer: I could tell you the Ontario government recently looked at that for…

Kucinich: It’s three weeks.

Gratzer: … for cancers, was six months.

Kucinich: It’s three weeks. How many uninsured are there in Canada?

Gratzer: Probably relatively few.

Kucinich: That’s right, none or very few. How many medical bankruptcies are there in Canada?

Gratzer: Depends on how you define medical bank..

Kucinich: None or very few. How many insured Americans go without needed care due to high cost of health care which is due to health insurance companies?

Gratzer: (Pause) Am I allowed to answer, or are we just going to continue to…

Kucinich: If you have an answer, you can answer. But if you don’t, I’ll answer. What’s your answer?

Gratzer: Go for it, sir.

Kucinich: What’s your answer?

Gratzer: Why don’t you answer your question, sir?

Kucinich: What’s your answer?

Gratzer: My answer…

Kucinich: How many insured Americans go without needed care due to the high cost of health care which is due to health insurance companies?

Gratzer: (Silence)

Kucinich: The witness isn’t responding.

Gratzer: The witness is delighted to speak further on those statistics and other statistics, but you keep cutting me off, sir.

Kucinich: You respond, if you have an answer. You didn’t give an answer to the other one.

Gratzer: I don’t want to be led down a garden path. If you’d like to ask me a question, I’d be…

Kucinich: You’ve shown a garden here to members of this committee and to the audience. There’s another side to this picture you don’t seem to be aware of even though you want to be an expert on Canada. Can you provide us with an answer on this one about America?

Gratzer: My position is respectable, and I dislike your comment, sir.

Kucinich: Do you have an answer? How many insured Americans, insured, go without needed care due to high costs of health care due to health insurance companies?

Gratzer: (Silence)

Kucinich: He has no answer. Well what the answer is is that it’s one out of every four. So we’re trying to make a case here that somehow Canada is in a mess, but we’re not focusing on the fact that in the United States there are people who aren’t getting needed care, and this gentleman has expected us to believe that rationing is worse in Canada. I don’t know how we can buy that. Now if single payer is so bad, maybe the gentleman – the doctor – can explain to us why sixty percent of U.S. doctors want it according to the peer-reviewed Annals of Internal Medicine, April, 2008.

(off camera voice): Are you going to let him answer this one?

Kucinich: He can answer it, if he can answer it.

Gratzer: I would suggest that many physicians in the United States are unsatisfied with their system, and rightly so. I would suggest that many physicians are looking for reform, and rightly so. But I would suggest that many physicians are unaware of what really goes on single payer systems, perhaps illustrated well by some of the comments that you’ve already made…

http://edlabor.house.gov/hearings/2009/06/examining-the-single-payer-hea.shtml

Millions of Americans would rather die in the poorhouse than go to bed at night knowing that someone, somewhere is receiving something they helped pay for.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Some official talking head said recently on PBS’s the News Hour that Single Payer would mean health insurance companies would be outlawed. That private insurance would be against the law. What a lot of BS. In the UK there is Single Payer and private health insurance companies thrive, making huge profits – from those citizens who can afford private insurance and wish to pay for it. Those millions of others who cannot afford it have national health. I know one elderly woman who has survived colon cancer, liver cancer and lung cancer over the past three years and has not paid a red penny. Her daughter, an executive, pays for private insurance so she can go to the doctors she chooses and to avoid the long waits and queues.

    The Health Insurance industry in the U.S. is a text book example of cancer at work in our society. Nothing but evil greed.

  2. A biologist would have no trouble classifying the American Health Care system. Living organisms can be divided by function into saprophytic or parasitic. The same can be said about health care delivery systems…

Wal-Mart’s Twitter Account Comes with a 3,379-word Terms of Use Agreement

Posted on July 9th, 2009 at 10:55 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?

[Quote:]

Only lawyers, EULA collectors and legal obsessives will find this funny, but it cracked me up: care to access the 140-character pearls of wisdom streaming forth from Wal-Mart’s Twitter account? Well, first you have to agree to the 3,379-word Terms of Use agreement that comes with it. I know, I know, a lot of big corporate entities on social networking sites likely put forth equally verbose TOUs, but — a “Twitter Discussion Policy“? Awesome overkill. It all starts here.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Ok I admit I didn’t read it but I’m guessing it prohibits tweets regarding hiring/promotion policies, any reference to organized labor, health care for Wal Mart employees, and any mention of the Walton family fortune.

  2. It looks to me like the Discussion Policy merely describes what WalMart does and does not intend to do with Twitter, and the ToS is for “use of the Site”, so it doesn’t apply if you simply follow them through Twitter itself. Yawn?