« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Florida Republican Party Chairman Jim Greer slams Obama — but touts GOP views at schools

Posted on September 6th, 2009 at 21:20 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

There once was a political operative who loved to tell crowds he had a simple way of explaining to children the difference between Republicans and Democrats.

“Republicans get up and go to work,” he would tell his son. “Democrats get up and go down to the mailbox to get their checks.”

This man not only talked to his son about Republican values, he went into public-school classrooms and talked about them as well.

That man is Jim Greer — the same Jim Greer who, as chairman of the Republican Party of Florida, just threw a nationwide hissy fit, claiming that the classroom is no place for politics and Barack Obama’s “indoctrination.”

One Seminole County mother, Barbara Wells, remembers the day Greer spoke to her son’s sixth-grade class. “My son said he made some sort of Hillary Clinton joke,” she recalled.

But you know what? Wells didn’t pitch a fit.

She didn’t call up the local TV station to scream about Republican indoctrination.

Instead, she advised her son: “Whatever you are told in life, remember there are two sides to every story.”

In fact, Wells didn’t even think much about Greer’s foray into her son’s classroom until she saw him on TV complaining about Obama.

There’s no longer any question: Greer is a hypocrite.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. AS THE PROUD REPUBLICAN THAT MR GREER CLAIMS TO BE, HOW MUCH CREDIT DOES HE TAKE FOR FLORIDA RANKING IN THE LOWEST RANKINGS OF STATE EDUCATION AND GRADUATION RATE????? YEA FCAT’S. LET’S FOLLOW MR GREER OF THE EDGE OF HIS FLAT EARTH !!!!!!

Parents Throwing Swine Flu Parties

Posted on September 6th, 2009 at 10:44 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote:]

It isn’t a trend exactly sweeping the nation, but some parents are throwing “Swine Flu” parties so their children will intentionally be exposed to the illness. Doctors warn parents these parties can be extremely harmful to children. Some parents say they believe if their kids are exposed to the H1N1 strain early, they’ll only come down with a more mild case.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I wonder how much overlap there is between these parents and the ones who won’t get their daughters vaccinated against cervical cancer because it could lead them to being more sexually active…

and let’s face it, in a country of 300 million people, there are a lot of stupid people too

Posted on September 6th, 2009 at 10:39 by John Sinteur in category: News


Write a comment

Here Comes Science!

Posted on September 6th, 2009 at 10:35 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote:]

This is why the accommodationist strategy is doomed to failure. There is no gentle demurral from religion that will not offend someone — even fun songs about science are expected to pretend that angels are real.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I just loved this part:

    “This guy must be one of those thin-skinned elf worshippers.

    As a Christian I’m offended by comparing unicorns, elves with angels. Unicorns and Elves are fiction, and angels are biblical. End of story.

    (Shhh. Don’t tell him about Numbers 23:22 and 24:8, Deuteronomy 33:17, Job 39:9,10, Psalms 22:21 and 29:6 and 92:10 or Isaiah 34:7. Unicorns are biblical, too.)”

    Why is it that a lot of times, atheist scientists know the Bible more than the believers?
    It always cracks me up :D

Wall Street Pursues Profit in Bundles of Life Insurance

Posted on September 6th, 2009 at 10:18 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote:]

After the mortgage business imploded last year, Wall Street investment banks began searching for another big idea to make money. They think they may have found one.

The bankers plan to buy “life settlements,” life insurance policies that ill and elderly people sell for cash — $400,000 for a $1 million policy, say, depending on the life expectancy of the insured person. Then they plan to “securitize” these policies, in Wall Street jargon, by packaging hundreds or thousands together into bonds. They will then resell those bonds to investors, like big pension funds, who will receive the payouts when people with the insurance die.

[..]

The idea is still in the planning stages. But already “our phones have been ringing off the hook with inquiries,” says Kathleen Tillwitz, a senior vice president at DBRS, which gives risk ratings to investments and is reviewing nine proposals for life-insurance securitizations from private investors and financial firms, including Credit Suisse.

“We’re hoping to get a herd stampeding after the first offering,” said one investment banker not authorized to speak to the news media.

And from the “what could possibly go wrong” department:

Indeed, what is good for Wall Street could be bad for the insurance industry, and perhaps for customers, too. That is because policyholders often let their life insurance lapse before they die, for a variety of reasons — their children grow up and no longer need the financial protection, or the premiums become too expensive. When that happens, the insurer does not have to make a payout.

But if a policy is purchased and packaged into a security, investors will keep paying the premiums that might have been abandoned; as a result, more policies will stay in force, ensuring more payouts over time and less money for the insurance companies.

“When they set their premiums they were basing them on assumptions that were wrong,” said Neil A. Doherty, a professor at Wharton who has studied life settlements.

Indeed, Mr. Doherty says that in reaction to widespread securitization, insurers most likely would have to raise the premiums on new life policies.

So, in effect, they’ve found another way to transfer cash from citizens to their own pocket.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Money is also getting transferred to the citizens who sell off their policies.

  2. Yes, just like before, except now the premiums are higher.

  3. Insurance companies aren’t stupid – and they’re not in business to pay out money. Wherever they can get income, they will, and wherever they can avoid payout, they will.

    With that in mind, the insurance companies likely have sophisticated models of how many policies lapse, and how likely any given demographic is to let their policy lapse. Those models help predict what price they can charge for the premiums.

    Now, assume that an investor comes along and “buys” the policy – essentially paying the person insured to change the beneficiary to the investor. The investor now assures that the policy won’t lapse – which cost is added in ahead of time against potential profit, to calculate the maximum amount they can pay for the beneficiary transfer and still come out ahead. However, the policy is almost guaranteed now not to lapse – which changes the financial model of the life insurance policy. Insurance companies will not be able to bet on policies lapsing, which means they will be forced to charge more, pay less, or otherwise restrict the transaction to poison it against investment.

    In short, Wall Street is going to drive up the price of life insurance, so they can sell securities to corporate investors. Large companies will trade more money with each other, and the source of that money is consumers. It should have as much benefit for consumers as oil futures speculation did during the Bush-43 years, when the cost of gasoline tripled.

    Like John said, it’s just another way that companies are sucking money from people. Humans are legal people who survive by circulating blood. Corporations are legal people who survive by circulating money. Both receive their nutrients by eating smaller things: people eat meat from animals, and corporations suck money from people. In both cases, the activity is widely regarded as normal and healthy, and those who speak up in favor of protecting the victims are generally regarded as annoying but irrelevant.

    (Not meant in offense but in tribute.)

  4. Thank you – I just found a new explanation why this blog is called the “daily irrelevant”… :-)

Quote

Posted on September 6th, 2009 at 10:07 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News, Quote

“To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin.”

- Cardinal Bellarmine at Gallileo’s trial, 1615.

“E pur si muove!”


Write a comment