« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

With Tribune in Bankruptcy, a Tone-Deaf Request for Bonuses

Posted on October 5th, 2009 at 19:05 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote:]

Let’s say that a group of corporate executives uses scads of debt to take over a struggling company, sells off some profitable assets, lays off thousands of employees while achieving miserable results. And then, less than a year after saddling the company with $8 billion in debt, they opt for bankruptcy.

You’d expect them to walk the plank, or at the very least, spend a good stretch of time in the naughty corner. But you wouldn’t expect the top 700 managers to collect $66 million in bonuses.

But that’s just what might happen at the Tribune Company. A week ago Friday, lawyers for the company, which publishes The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago Tribune, The Baltimore Sun, and owns other newspapers and television stations, were in Federal Bankruptcy Court in Delaware suggesting that the proposed 2009 bonuses were critical for the health and survival of the company.

[..]

At a hearing on the bonuses, a union accountant testified that if the maximum incentives were paid, they would eat up 15.5 percent of operating cash flow.

The bonus plan, which is an effort to replace awards of equity given to managers in the past, was announced in February, just about the time that the company was issuing memos about wage freezes and “shared sacrifice.” At a hearing in May on the previous year’s bonuses, which the bankruptcy judge granted, Mr. Bigelow said, “I will tell you that not being rewarded for hard work and hard effort is demotivating.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Reward for hard work? Isn’t that called regular pay? And at their level the motivation is meant to be intrinsic. It’s not like they are risking their lives or anything.
    …Clearly they should get no bonus this year…or better yet…Off with their heads!

At Simmons, Bought, Drained and Sold, Then Sent to Bankruptcy

Posted on October 5th, 2009 at 13:52 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote:]

Simmons says it will soon file for bankruptcy protection, as part of an agreement by its current owners to sell the company — the seventh time it has been sold in a little more than two decades — all after being owned for short periods by a parade of different investment groups, known as private equity firms, which try to buy undervalued companies, mostly with borrowed money.

For many of the company’s investors, the sale will be a disaster. Its bondholders alone stand to lose more than $575 million. The company’s downfall has also devastated employees like Noble Rogers, who worked for 22 years at Simmons, most of that time at a factory outside Atlanta. He is one of 1,000 employees — more than one-quarter of the work force — laid off last year.

But Thomas H. Lee Partners of Boston has not only escaped unscathed, it has made a profit. The investment firm, which bought Simmons in 2003, has pocketed around $77 million in profit, even as the company’s fortunes have declined. THL collected hundreds of millions of dollars from the company in the form of special dividends. It also paid itself millions more in fees, first for buying the company, then for helping run it. Last year, the firm even gave itself a small raise.

Wall Street investment banks also cashed in. They collected millions for helping to arrange the takeovers and for selling the bonds that made those deals possible. All told, the various private equity owners have made around $750 million in profits from Simmons over the years.

How so many people could make so much money on a company that has been driven into bankruptcy is a tale of these financial times and an example of a growing phenomenon in corporate America.

Every step along the way, the buyers put Simmons deeper into debt. The financiers borrowed more and more money to pay ever higher prices for the company, enabling each previous owner to cash out profitably.

But the load weighed down an otherwise healthy company. Today, Simmons owes $1.3 billion, compared with just $164 million in 1991, when it began to become a Wall Street version of “Flip This House.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Stand up, and a round of applause to John for this lovely. Well worth a gander at the link, as there are a series of videos which expand the print story.

    Warning: Do not open link while eating lunch, you may lose your appetite. The only chuckle was the Board, as a perk, paying the CEO’s yacht captain’s salary. No report as to where the vessel was registered!

Well, that clearly worked, then.

Posted on October 5th, 2009 at 12:16 by John Sinteur in category: Funny!

[Quote:]

A Ministry of Defence guide to preventing information leaking into the public domain has leaked into the public domain.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. In reality, any information stored on a computer that is directly or indirectly connected to the external world is ipso facto public information. To think otherwise is to play ostrich.

The Politics of Spite

Posted on October 5th, 2009 at 7:49 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

There was what President Obama likes to call a teachable moment last week, when the International Olympic Committee rejected Chicago’s bid to be host of the 2016 Summer Games.

“Cheers erupted” at the headquarters of the conservative Weekly Standard, according to a blog post by a member of the magazine’s staff, with the headline “Obama loses! Obama loses!” Rush Limbaugh declared himself “gleeful.” “World Rejects Obama,” gloated the Drudge Report. And so on.

So what did we learn from this moment? For one thing, we learned that the modern conservative movement, which dominates the modern Republican Party, has the emotional maturity of a bratty 13-year-old.

But more important, the episode illustrated an essential truth about the state of American politics: at this point, the guiding principle of one of our nation’s two great political parties is spite pure and simple. If Republicans think something might be good for the president, they’re against it — whether or not it’s good for America.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. To be honest, the people of Chicage cheered at the decision too.
    One less project to steal money from the public – yes, the Chicago gov. guaranteed that if it costs more than the original estimate, the city will pay the difference.

    Want to bet it would have costed more?

  2. @Roland Hesz, SOME of the people of Chicago cheered at losing out, but that’s not really the point here.

    The point is, the GOP cheers every snag Obama/the Democrats hit, and they’re not even doing it because they prefer the outcome. They’re doing it because they’ve become the grumpy old men of the political world — “Obama’s for it, its got to be wrong, and we’re against it.” They’ve become absolutely knee-jerk anti-whatever.

  3. I agree, but it is unfair to blame only the right wing. The left wing does the same. And it’s not that they “have become”. They have been like this for ages. The same happened under Clinton, the old Bush, etc.
    The whole political scene is full of people like that. Neither side thinks, they just pull out the same old cards each and every time.

  4. Imagine a world where 9/11 happened on Obama’s watch instead of Bush’s. Do you really think the bipartisanship that grew up in that wake (whether it was good or bad) would have happened on Obama’s watch? Or would Fox News immediately start hypothesizing a Muslim conspiracy theory? I mean, Loose Change didn’t come out until 2005 for God’s sake!

  5. Who knows? I can imagine both yes and no.
    I know that blaming everything on the GOP is convenient, just as convenient as blaming everything on the Dems.
    And I see that it makes both sides happy as they are basically cut of the same cloth. Divide and rule.
    They did.

  6. See above political cartoon.

Expandable to 16k!

Posted on October 5th, 2009 at 7:13 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

50 years ago today, IBM announced the 1401 Data Processing System.
Originally designed as a spooling system for the larger machines, the 1401 became very popular as a mainframe in its own right, eventually being called ‘The Model T of Computers’. By the end of 1961, the number of 1401s installed in the United States alone had reached 2,000 – representing about one fourth of all computers installed by all manufacturers at that time. 15- 20,000 were eventually built.

The Computer History Museum in Mountain View is having a 50th anniversary celebration on November 10th.

Here’s what $125,600 (or $2500/month rent) would get you:

1401- 6-bit processor with 1400 bytes of core storage. Clock speed 87KHz

1402- combination card reader (800 cards per minute) & punch (250 cards per minute)
1403- 600 lpm printer

If you’re willing to spend more you could get up to 16k of memory by getting a 1406
Then you might want some 729s (featured here) for card to tape or tape to print operations, at $30k-60k apiece.
If you need some disk space, you could try the 1405, for up to 20MB.

The processor was approximately 30″x58″x58″, and used a 30A, 208V power connector (3 phase). The entire system needed 23,000 BTU of cooling per hour.

The Computer History Museum has been restoring two systems for the last 5 years, the second of which it acquired from a father and son who were using it to operate a billing service business until 1995 out of their home in Darien, Connecticut.

Those without access to their own 1401 can download an emulator.

(You might need reference material, or at least the reference card).
Here’s a Hello World to get you started.


Write a comment

Linus calls Linux ‘bloated and huge’

Posted on October 5th, 2009 at 5:55 by John Sinteur in category: Software

[Quote:]

Linux creator Linus Torvalds says the open source kernel has become “bloated and huge,” with no midriff-slimming diet plan in sight.

During a roundtable discussion at LinuxCon in Portland, Oregon this afternoon, moderator and Novell distinguished engineer James Bottomley asked Tovalds whether Linux kernel features were being released too fast, before the kernel is stabilized.

Citing an internal Intel study that tracked kernel releases, Bottomley said Linux performance had dropped about two per centage points at every release, for a cumulative drop of about 12 per cent over the last ten releases. “Is this a problem?” he asked.

“We’re getting bloated and huge. Yes, it’s a problem,” said Torvalds.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I hope we can put the Tanenbaum vs Linus discussion to rest now.
    http://oreilly.com/catalog/opensources/book/appa.html
    http://www.cs.vu.nl/~ast/reliable-os/

  2. it’s great they finaly realize this.

    btw. dont you do wp anymore? any update on your antispam plugin?

    tnx

  3. No, it’s basically made obsolete by akismet, and some of the blacklists I queried don’t exist any more.