« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

FAA investigating Colo. balloon flight

Posted on October 21st, 2009 at 10:12 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote:]

The Federal Aviation Administration has opened its own investigation into the 50-mile flight of the helium balloon that briefly delayed flights at Denver International Airport after a couple reported that their 6-year-old son may have been on board, an official said Tuesday.

You know about this story, of course, so let me skip right ahead to the really weird part:

Lee said Monday that Heene was “obsessed” with trying to land a TV show and become famous.

“Heene believes the world is going to end in 2012,” she said. “Because of that, he wanted to make money quickly, become rich enough to build a bunker or something underground, where he can be safe from the sun exploding.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. this can’t be serious.

  2. Yes, if the sun explodes, an underground bunker will save you most certainly.
    There is no cure for stupidity.

Another 100 Galleons?

Posted on October 21st, 2009 at 8:52 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote:]

At the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s conference on short selling, there was a fascinating paper presented by professor Nadia Massoud of York University. In it she provided compelling evidence that hedge funds actively short the shares of companies they loan money to directly before the announcement of the loan becomes public and directly before the loan covenants are violated and the terms are made more negative. What I found interesting is that their ability to short on this obviously inside information likely allows them to lend money to companies at a lower rate than a traditional bank as the profit they make from the shorting helps offset the fact that the default likelihood is higher than the rate reflects.

This means that they’re able to win business away from banks by offering a lower rate and then subsidize that rate by basically stealing money from individual investors by trading on the insider information. Based on the research in this paper, which included a robust sampling of hedge fund loans I think it’s extremely likely that the Galleon case is merely the tip of the iceberg


Write a comment

Safety Nets for the Rich

Posted on October 21st, 2009 at 7:55 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote:]

The headlines that ran side by side on the front page of Saturday’s New York Times summed up, inadvertently, the terrible fix that we’ve allowed our country to fall into.

The lead headline, in the upper right-hand corner, said: “U.S. Deficit Rises to $1.4 Trillion; Biggest Since ’45.”

The headline next to it said: “Bailout Helps Revive Banks, And Bonuses.”

We’ve spent the last few decades shoveling money at the rich like there was no tomorrow. We abandoned the poor, put an economic stranglehold on the middle class and all but bankrupted the federal government — while giving the banks and megacorporations and the rest of the swells at the top of the economic pyramid just about everything they’ve wanted.

[..]

We need to make some fundamental changes in the way we do things in this country. The gamblers and con artists of the financial sector, the very same clowns who did so much to bring the economy down in the first place, are howling self-righteously over the prospect of regulations aimed at curbing the worst aspects of their excessively risky behavior and preventing them from causing yet another economic meltdown.

We should be going even further. We’ve institutionalized the idea that there are firms that are too big to fail and, therefore, “we, the people” are obliged to see that they don’t — even if that means bankrupting the national treasury and undermining the living standards of ordinary people. What sense does that make?

If some company is too big to fail, then it’s too big to exist. Break it up.

Why should the general public have to constantly worry that a misstep by the high-wire artists at Goldman Sachs (to take the most obvious example) would put the entire economy in peril? These financial acrobats get the extraordinary benefits of their outlandish risk-taking — multimillion-dollar paychecks, homes the size of castles — but the public has to be there to absorb the worst of the pain when they take a terrible fall.

Enough!


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. “We’ve spent the last few decades shoveling money at the rich like there was no tomorrow”

    No, they took it. Giving implies choice. The government is the rich corporations, they bought it years ago. This discussion has to begin with how do you get your government back, then you can decide what you want it to do.

  2. Well said. But when wasn’t the government the rich corporations? Do you have to go back to the Great Depression? The Panic of 1876? After Andrew Jackson left office and the Easterners regained control?

U.K. Financial Bonuses May Soar 50 Percent in 2009, CEBR Says

Posted on October 21st, 2009 at 7:51 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote:]

Bonuses for financial services employees may rise by 50 percent to 6 billion pounds ($9.9 billion) this year as profit at U.K. banks, brokerages and hedge funds rebounds, according to a Centre for Economics & Business Research Ltd. report.

U.K. finance workers received about 4 billion pounds for 2008, according to CEBR findings released in London today. While the figures show a year-on-year rise, the report also estimates that 2009 bonuses will be 41 percent below 2007’s record figure of 10.24 billion pounds. Even in 2012, bonuses will still be 26 percent lower than in 2007, the report forecast.

“Bonuses are beginning to bounce back but will not reach the levels of 2007 anytime soon,” said Benjamin Williamson, a CEBR economist. “Profits of major financial-sector institutions have jumped sharply; therefore bonuses, which to some extent are a profit sharing scheme, have also risen.”

Anybody here think the economic crisis is behind us?

Bueller?

Bueller?


Write a comment

Vatican moves to poach traditional Anglicans

Posted on October 21st, 2009 at 7:14 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote:]

The Roman Catholic Church today moved to poach thousands of traditional Anglicans who are dismayed by growing acceptance of gays and women priests and bishops.

The Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams admitted that he had been caught out after Pope Benedict XVI announced a new “Apostolic Constitution” to provide a legal framework for the many thousands of Anglicans and former Anglicans who wish “to enter into full visible communion with the Roman Catholic Church”.

The announcement paves the way for thousands of Anglicans worldwide to join the Roman Catholic church while maintaining elements of their own spiritual heritage.

[..]

Traditionalists, including up to six Church of England bishops, had visited and pleaded with Rome to provide some sort of structure inside the Catholic Church for their wing of the Church of England because of liberal moves towards women bishops and gay ordinations.

Reclaiming market share by catering to bigotry. Wow.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Thought this was a story from the Onion…

  2. Here’s another way to look at it: Anglicans who are pissed off that their church has become more accepting of gay priests have decided to join a church that have been more accepting of pedophile priests.

    What an improvement….

  3. I say Bon Voyage! Rome is a good place for them. Now let the rest of us move forward peacefully, please.

  4. Doesn’t this create a scism within a scism. I’m sure that there are still some other sticking points within traditional Anglicanism such as the infallibility of the pope and some others that this conveniently doesn’t address. I just think they want to increase the take on the collection plate.

  5. Poach? As in cook like an egg so that the centers don’t run?
    And we should care what one set of men who dress like ladies thinks of their competitors-why?

Step 1. Make an utterly fantastic game. Step 3. Profit!

Posted on October 21st, 2009 at 7:12 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

2D BOY made around $100,000 in a week. That’s $50,000 each for writing a blog post about a game they finished a year ago. By letting people pay whatever they wanted. 2D Boy stirred up a lot of discussion (previously) about game piracy when they used online scoreboard data to estimate an 82% piracy rate for their fantastic indie game World of Goo (previously).

For World of Goo’s first birthday, they decided to try the Radiohead model and let people buy the game for any price they choose. Now they’ve released extensive data about the results. Short version? “A huge success,” even though the most commonly chosen price was only a penny.


Write a comment

Sir, I salute you!

Posted on October 21st, 2009 at 6:52 by John Sinteur in category: awesome


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. “This is what we fought for in WWII. That idea that we can be different and still be equal.” Amen!

  2. Republican In Name Only. My father-in-law was a Marine who survived Iwo Jima and Saipan and is a lifelong Democrat. He is anti-war, anti-empire, and anti- about everything the Republicans espouse these days. Barry Goldwater would be considered a liberal these days come to that. Cowardly Chicken Hawk politicians, vile cowardly blowhards like Beck and Limbaugh and lying Generals destroyed the Republic these guys thought they were fighting for. A pity.

Rat out your neighbour to iStasi.

Posted on October 21st, 2009 at 6:27 by John Sinteur in category: Security

If you smell somebody drawing a building….


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I kept waiting for the ironic twist / reveal. Now I feel queasy.

  2. The politics of fear. I thought I was watching the new Hitler youth. Americans are so ignorant of world history. If these kids read German, Soviet, Chinese history, etc., I am not so sure they would be so inclined to back this.

  3. Oh, I love this one. I mean, hey, black cars stopping in front of the house at 10PM were fun. My parents and grandparents told me the whole house became so excited every time.