« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Ignoring P2Pers costs music biz dear

Posted on November 1st, 2009 at 21:22 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property

[Quote:]

The Demos report, sponsored by Virgin Media, suggests file sharers aren’t the wreckers of civilization they’re painted to be – but failing to convert them into paying punters has cost the industry dear.

[..]

Unsurprisingly the research finds a strong propensity to use unlicensed services amongst music fans – people who spend the most on music. And the opposite too: people who aren’t interesting in acquiring music legitimately, as you’d expect, don’t bother looking for it on the interwebs.

That’s no surprise, but an uncomfortable statistic for the music business is that two-thirds of people polled never touch an unlicensed service at all – their hands (and mice) are clean. This makes it harder to argue that P2P Pirates have brought the industry to its knees, rather than other factors such as unbundling or failing to innovate.

It’s equally an uncomfortable figure for anti-copyright campaigners who argue that file sharing is now the norm. The “Everybody does it” argument is hard to sustain, when two thirds of people don’t. But money talk may win the day. Since P2P-ers are already spending on replay TV services (72 per cent) and Skyplayer (24 per cent) – it suggests that failing to turn this group into paying punters is a costly error.

[..]

A couple of interesting price points emerge from the research. The revenue-maximising price for individual downloads should be 45p, but only a fiver a month for an unlimited download service.

Instead they’d rather consider every customer to be a thief. Morans.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. And if they did allow unlimited downloads for a reasonable monthly fee, they’d probably encumber them with DRM so that if you stopped paying the vigorish your music files would stop playing… Screw that. I’m no longer purchasing from the music labels, but rather directly from the artists. I’d rather pay the artist $15USD for a CD at a concert than $10USD to the labels from Amazon or at the music store. That way, at least the artist gets paid a decent amount ($15 less production and material costs of $1-2 per disc), and I generally get a signed copy as well.

Texas Officially Makes The Universe Ageless

Posted on November 1st, 2009 at 11:00 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote:]

How old is the universe? Scientists agree that the answer is somewhere around 14 billion years (give or take a few million)… unless you happen to be a student in the state of Texas.


Write a comment

Lapses Kept Scheme Alive, Madoff Told Investigators

Posted on November 1st, 2009 at 10:49 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

Nobody was more surprised that the Securities and Exchange Commission did not discover Bernard L. Madoff’s enormous Ponzi scheme years ago than Mr. Madoff himself.

After all, it would have been pretty simple, he said in a transcript of a jailhouse interview that is part of a trove of official exhibits released on Friday by the S.E.C.’s inspector general, H. David Kotz.

In the interview, Mr. Madoff said that the young investigators who pestered him over incidentals like e-mail messages should have just checked basics like his account with Wall Street’s central clearinghouse and his dealings with the firms that were supposedly handling his trades.

“If you’re looking at a Ponzi scheme, it’s the first thing you do,” he said.


Write a comment

Venn Diagram Jezus

Posted on November 1st, 2009 at 10:36 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

VennDiagram_jesus


Write a comment

An Epidemic of Fear: How Panicked Parents Skipping Shots Endangers Us All

Posted on November 1st, 2009 at 9:08 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote:]

As a result, Offit has become the main target of a grassroots movement that opposes the systematic vaccination of children and the laws that require it. McCarthy, an actress and a former Playboy centerfold whose son has been diagnosed with autism, is the best-known leader of the movement, but she is joined by legions of well-organized supporters and sympathizers.

This isn’t a religious dispute, like the debate over creationism and intelligent design. It’s a challenge to traditional science that crosses party, class, and religious lines. It is partly a reaction to Big Pharma’s blunders and PR missteps, from Vioxx to illegal marketing ploys, which have encouraged a distrust of experts. It is also, ironically, a product of the era of instant communication and easy access to information. The doubters and deniers are empowered by the Internet (online, nobody knows you’re not a doctor) and helped by the mainstream media, which has an interest in pumping up bad science to create a “debate” where there should be none.

[..]

At this year’s Autism One conference in Chicago, I flashed more than once on Carl Sagan’s idea of the power of an “unsatisfied medical need.” Because a massive research effort has yet to reveal the precise causes of autism, pseudo-science has stepped aggressively into the void. In the hallways of the Westin O’Hare hotel, helpful salespeople strove to catch my eye as I walked past a long line of booths pitching everything from vitamins and supplements to gluten-free cookies (some believe a gluten-free diet alleviates the symptoms of autism), hyperbaric chambers, and neuro-feedback machines.

To a one, the speakers told parents not to despair. Vitamin D would help, said one doctor and supplement salesman who projected the equation “No vaccines + more vitamin d = no autism” onto a huge screen during his presentation. (If only it were that simple.) Others talked of the powers of enzymes, enemas, infrared saunas, glutathione drips, chelation therapy (the controversial — and risky — administration of certain chemicals that leech metals from the body), and Lupron (a medicine that shuts down testosterone synthesis).

Offit calls this stuff, much of which is unproven, ineffectual, or downright dangerous, “a cottage industry of false hope.” He didn’t attend the Autism One conference, though his name was frequently invoked. A California woman with an 11-year-old autistic son told me, aghast, that she’d personally heard Offit say you could safely give a child 10,000 vaccines (in fact, the number he came up with was 100,000 — more on that later). A mom from Arizona, who introduced me to her 10-year-old “recovered” autistic son — a bright, blue-eyed, towheaded boy who hit his head on walls, she said, before he started getting B-12 injections — told me that she’d read Offit had made $50 million from the RotaTeq vaccine. In her view, he was in the pocket of Big Pharma.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. The anti-vaccine crowd are idiots in my book too, but what’s with the “former Playboy centerfold” character murder? It undermines the whole piece; talk about shooting yourself in the foot.

  2. There ARE definitely vaccines you need to get, like say, for polio.
    Unfortunately right now the misinformation and confusion relating to H1N1 is causing chaos.
    For that scenario a more objective assessment is in order, along the lines of:
    http://www.healthzone.ca/health/newsfeatures/swineflu/article/717085–h1n1-is-serious-but-no-need-to-panic
    But I suppose if you happen to be in government, it’s a wonderful way to draw attention away from other things.

  3. Sure, I think we can all agree that there is no need to panic, but the H1N1 vaccine is safe and will save lives. Even if it just keeps you out of bed for a week, it would still be worthwhile…