« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Banks told to comply on bonuses or lose UK banking licences in shock FSA ultimatum

Posted on February 5th, 2010 at 13:38 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons -- Write a comment

[Quote:]

Investment banks have been told that every bonus issued must comply with the regulatory guidelines – or they face having their licences to operate in Britain revoked.

In an extraordinary ultimatum that has shocked some of the City’s biggest companies, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) told bank bosses that 60pc of all pay must be deferred, with no exceptions, even for those whose contracts conflicting with the edict.

Many of the global players have in recent weeks made representations to the City watchdog, in particular about pre-existing employment contracts that guarantee bonuses over a year or more. But their appeals have been met with the FSA’s toughest yet response.

One pay executive in a major bank told The Daily Telegraph: “The message came back that while the FSA agreed that it does not have jurisdiction over contractual law, it does have jurisdiction over issuing bank licences in London, and that we should go away and unwind the contracts.”

[..]

One headhunter said: “Many of these contracts have guarantees that 50pc of the bonus will be paid in cash. These are tricky things to unpick. But cleverly, the FSA has put the onus on the banks to unwind the contracts, rather than itself getting embroiled in a complex legal row.”

So a “you fucked up, you fix it” attitude is now called “cleverly”?

Oh, and you have to love this:

One executive faced with dealing with the new ultimatum said: “It was pretty amazing but we actually chuckled because it’s the sort of hard ball we would have played if we’d been in the FSA’s shoes.”

previous post: Bill O’Reilly Interviews Jon Stewart

next post: Law official: Airline bomb suspect flips on cleric