« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Canadian copyright astroturfers own up: front for US labels

Posted on July 2nd, 2010 at 16:53 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property

[Quote]:

After several weeks of delays, the Balanced Copyright for Canada site which has been engaging in astroturfing on Canadian copyright reforms, revealed its funding and advisory board late on Tuesday night, hours before the Canada Day holiday. The primary source of funding is not a surprise: this is a Canadian Recording Industry Association production.

The composition of the advisory board is interesting. First, of the 13 members, more than half are either record company executives, former record company executives, or lawyers who represent record companies. No surprise given the site’s backing, but not exactly the promised "employees, unions, artists and creators." In fact, it is notable that there are very few prominent creators and not many representatives from creator groups outside the music industry such as authors, performers, directors, or artists. In fact, despite an earlier claim that Loreena McKennitt would be on the advisory board, those plans apparently changed.

The board also includes one lawyer who just three months ago argued in a paper that form letters carry little value in public policy process, yet is now on the board of a site that requires a form letter that cannot be edited in order to participate.


Write a comment

Not so crazy? Reuters probes idea of nuking BP oil well

Posted on July 2nd, 2010 at 16:10 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

His face wracked by age and his voice rasping after decades of chain-smoking coarse tobacco, the former long-time Russian Minister of nuclear energy and veteran Soviet physicist Viktor Mikhailov knows just how to fix BP’s oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico.

"A nuclear explosion over the leak," he says nonchalantly puffing a cigarette as he sits in a conference room at the Institute of Strategic Stability, where he is a director. "I don’t know what BP is waiting for, they are wasting their time. Only about 10 kilotons of nuclear explosion capacity and the problem is solved."


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Please check my past comments…

    (oh, again: the gas deposits are not an issue, except for people who got their instructions from Michael Bay. The nuke is used to compress terrain, not to deflagrate oil.)

UN report calls for world to ditch dollar, migrate to new global currency

Posted on July 2nd, 2010 at 16:09 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

A new United Nations report released on Tuesday calls for abandoning the U.S. dollar as the main global reserve currency, saying it has been unable to safeguard value.

But several European officials attending a high-level meeting of the U.N. Economic and Social Council countered by saying that the market, not politicians, would determine what currencies countries would keep on hand for reserves.

[..]

The report supports replacing the dollar with the International Monetary Fund’s special drawing rights (SDRs), an international reserve asset that is used as a unit of payment on IMF loans and is made up of a basket of currencies.

“A new global reserve system could be created, one that no longer relies on the United States dollar as the single major reserve currency,” the U.N. report said.

The report said a new reserve system “must not be based on a single currency or even multiple national currencies but instead, should permit the emission of international liquidity — such as SDRs — to create a more stable global financial system.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Let’s ditch international borders and nation-states while we are at it. The world is way too small to put up with such BS any longer. We’ll have world peace when we have a unified world government and constitution. Give current nations a status similar to what states in the US enjoy today. They cannot restrict trade, travel, religion, etc. and must adhere to certain common standards and human rights.

  2. I think that plan would fail pretty fast spaceman. And not in the nice way.
    To the article, if not US dollar, then what? Euro? :) )

God can teach lessons, even through atheists

Posted on July 2nd, 2010 at 11:22 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote]:

Maybe God uses even the atheist to teach us a lesson.

If you don’t get the stupidity of the author, replace every occurrence of the word “atheist” in the article with “nigger” and see if you spot the problem then.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I don’t get this post, John. Though I suspect that the author is not too bright, he is pretty fair minded. His only error, as far as I can tell, is taking his belief in God to be self-evident. I’m not sure what relevance your “nigger” substitution has.

  2. is taking his belief in God to be self-evident

    If it were only that, you’d be right, but he’s taking a LOT more as self-evident. That’s where the substitution comes in, because it’s much more visible that way. Because his pre-notions about what an atheist is and is not are so common, it’s more visible if you substitute it with notions that are no longer current, for example those about race.

  3. The authors prejudices already start with the second paragraph: “… but the simple act of not bringing the child to church puts this non-belief in them.”

    Well, I am an Atheist, and I was brought regularly to church, attended religious class etc. I was a very curious child, asking many questions, and I liked (and still do) to think about the world. It was Church what made me an Atheist. When I asked a question about mathematics, the answer made sense. When I asked a question about geography, the answer made sense. When I asked a question about religion, it made no sense at all. I asked more questions, became more and more confused, but was only told to “believe”, “have faith”, and “you cannot explain God rationally, he is in our hearts”

  4. The author seems to say that his prejudice that the Christian faith will lead to a better lifestyle than atheism will has been shown to be unfounded.

  5. Well, I appreciate the Author’s intellectual honesty, if not his curiousity. He begins by basically saying that the values he holds dear come from God (“For most of us, God represents love, peace, humility, kindness, forgiveness.”) And then goes to show how he sees these traits in Atheists, though not always in the believers. I thought it was a display of generosity not often displayed in people who are governed by their prejudices. I read the final line of the piece (“Maybe God uses even the atheist to teach us a lesson.”) to be ironic and insightful. In this sense, were a thinking racist to make your substitution, it could also work.

  6. I agree with John here. The author basically says that some atheists, shockingly, can appear to be good people! WHOA! Then he says that some Christians can be bad people. HOLY CRAP! It’s the most stupidly paternalistic bullshit ever — OK, not *ever*, clearly — and it really reeks of so much prejudice that it reminds me of writings about Negros and Negresses and how their lives often resemble even ours. Some of them might even, and I know I’m going out on a limb here, have the capacity to love their families, just like white/theist people! We can only hope that this will lead the author to reevaluate his basic beliefs about the nature of morality, because if godless people can be moral, then there’s no longer anything specifically threatening about an atheist (ignoring the general threat that atheists present against religion in general, obviously).

  7. Please tell me I’m not the only one who couldn’t finish reading that article; it was so filled with inaccuracies and inanities….

Whistle blower to testify on oil spill worst fear:BP deliberately sinks oil with Corexit as cover up

Posted on July 2nd, 2010 at 11:16 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Testimony before a Senate investigative panel this week is expected to reveal what many have suspected about BP all along; they don’t care about the environment, the animals that are dying, and the lives that are being destroyed by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

In a shocking interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper on June 29th, Allegiance Capitol Corporation V.P. Fred McCallister said that BP is deliberately sinking oil with the toxic chemical disbursant Corexit, to hide the size of the oil spill. By sinking the oil before it can be collected, BP won’t have to pay fines on it.

McCallister said, “Everybody in Europe, where the standard practice is to raise the oil and collect it, is scratching their heads, and quite honestly laughing at what’s happening in the Gulf.” He added, “Everyone is looking at us and wondering why we’re allowing this to happen.”

McCallister is set to appear before a Senate investigative panel on Thursday and testify that BP’s only interests regarding the Deepwater Horizon spill is protectimg their own financial interests. His statements explained why BP has been refusing offers of help from additional foreign skimmers.


Write a comment

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal

Posted on July 2nd, 2010 at 11:14 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News


Write a comment

Dreamworks Is Just Screwing With Us Now

Posted on July 2nd, 2010 at 11:10 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?

Remember this?

Well, Dreamworks didn’t get the message.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Or they are just mocking us

  2. OMG now they have HUMAN characters that move their eyebrows! SHOCKING.

    uh, what?

  3. Amazing. You can’t make this shit up.

RIAA Outraged by YouTube-Viacom Decision

Posted on July 2nd, 2010 at 10:28 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property

[Quote]:

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) on Monday voiced its opposition to the recent decision in the YouTube-Viacom copyright infringement case.

"We believe that the district court’s dangerously expansive reading of the liability immunity provisions of the [Digital Millennium Copyright Act] DMCA upsets the careful balance struck within the law and is bad public policy," Cary Sherman, RIAA president, wrote in a blog post. "It will actually discourage service providers from taking steps to minimize the illegal exchange of copyrighted works on their sites."

And that’s actually good, since they’re service providers, not unpaid RIAA enforcers. Let them do their jobs, and you do your own job.

Oh, and by the way, RIAA, your so-called “illegal exchange” is actually legal UNTIL you’ve issued a take-down notice. So kindly go fuck yourself.

The RIAA may want to look at why iTunes is successful and change their own business model accordingly – I’m pretty sure the reason wasn’t “a bunch of lawsuits”.


Write a comment

Weird Al SHREDS!!!

Posted on July 2nd, 2010 at 6:10 by John Sinteur in category: awesome


Write a comment

Cartoons

Posted on July 2nd, 2010 at 6:02 by John Sinteur in category: Cartoon


Write a comment

BP sued for burning endangered sea turtles alive

Posted on July 2nd, 2010 at 5:32 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Animal welfare groups sued BP for burning endangered sea turtles and asked a federal court to stop the oil giant’s "controlled burns" on the Gulf of Mexico spill.

"It is horrifying that these innocent creatures whose habitat has already been devastated by the oil spill are now being burned alive," Animal Welfare Institute (AWI) President Cathy Liss told the court in Louisiana.

The lawsuit filed by AWI, Center for Biological Diversity, Turtle Island Restoration Network and Animal Legal Defense Fund said BP was violating the Endangered Species Act and other laws with their "controlled burns" in the Gulf of Mexico.


Write a comment