« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Skeptics discount science by casting doubts on scientist expertise

Posted on September 28th, 2010 at 16:34 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

The people behind the new study start by asking a pretty obvious question: "Why do members of the public disagree—sharply and persistently—about facts on which expert scientists largely agree?"

[..]

So, it’s not just a matter of the public not understanding the expert opinions of places like the National Academies of science; they simply discount the expertise associated with any opinion they’d rather not hear.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. By and large Americans are raised to believe in magical thinking. They believe any belief that props up their own prejudice and wishful thinking. Anything is possible, they are told, because God could snap his fingers and make the world in six days and make it LOOK like it took billions of years and he could snap his fingers tomorrow and make dogs turn into igloos and apples sprout pink feathers.

    Even those who had such childhood superstition curbed by school-taught logic and awareness still have a hard time giving up cherished beliefs. One study says wild American salmon is safe but farmed European salmon isn’t and Americans switch to wild salmon by the thousands. A later, broader study finds Norwegian farmed salmon much safer than wild American salmon – those same Americans refuse to believe the findings. And look how the study linking a diet high in tofu with Alzheimer’s was ridiculed without anyone attempting to replicate the findings.

    When science confirms something they “know” it isn’t so, because they wish it weren’t. As Dr. Sagan was fond of pointing out, Belief is the opposite of knowledge.

iPhone fanbois run off road in CoolBrand race

Posted on September 28th, 2010 at 15:51 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

Fanbois will be crying tears of frustration over their iPhones today at the revelation they no longer possess the UK’s most coveted product.

The CoolBrands survey, which delineates the most desirable consumer brands, has declared Aston Martin is this year’s coolest brand, driving the iPhone off the number one spot.

Apple fans will be aghast that a fabulously expensive car driven by no less than James Bond is somehow considered cooler than a phone which has downloadable farts and is mercifully free of porn.


Write a comment

Wall-E-mart

Posted on September 28th, 2010 at 12:56 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture


Write a comment

Eh, what?

Posted on September 28th, 2010 at 12:53 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

East Jakarta Police are investigating a case where a martial arts expert was able to break her underage lesbian lover out of protective custody where she was being “cured” of her attraction to women.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. This is awesome.. I know some kickboxing lesbians.. some of those women could give chuck norris a run for his money.

Former Air Force personnel disclose UFO, alien-related threats

Posted on September 28th, 2010 at 9:11 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

A press conference was held this afternoon at the National Press Club in Washington, where at least a dozen former U.S. Air Force personnel, mostly officers who worked on secret projects connected to sensitive nuclear weapons sites, are admitting that they were privy to UFO and alien-related incidents — that occurred during their time of service.

In this clip, you will hear from: Retired Air Force Captain Robert Salas, Former Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Dwayne Arneson and Former Air Force Official Bill Jameson.

The military is so powerful and secretive that it covered up contacts with aliens, but it’s also powerless to stop these guys from having a press conference.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. That lip syncing is so bad!

  2. They didn’t really fail the last 40 years. The most impressive press conference was in 2001. Which NO media reported. That’s not powerless.

    A very old NY Times article:

    ‘Admiral Hillenkoetter said that “behind the scenes, high-ranking Air Force officers are soberly concerned about the UFO’s.”
    “But through official secrecy and ridicule, many citizens are led to believe the unknown flying objects are nonsense,” the retired admiral said.
    He charged that “to hide the facts, the Air Force has silenced its personnel” through the issuance of a regulation.

    http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F50A12F9345D1A728DDDA10A94DA405B808AF1D3

  3. Yeah, Paul Jay, of course.

    No media reported the conference. Except the NY times, of course.

    C’mon, who read the NY Times these days? Who read an article from NY times *available online*? No more than 2 people, for sure. Keep it secret!

Atheists, agnostics most knowledgeable about religion, survey says

Posted on September 28th, 2010 at 7:49 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote]:

If you want to know about God, you might want to talk to an atheist.

Heresy? Perhaps. But a survey that measured Americans’ knowledge of religion found that atheists and agnostics knew more, on average, than followers of most major faiths. In fact, the gaps in knowledge among some of the faithful may give new meaning to the term "blind faith."

[..]

The Rev. Adam Hamilton, a Methodist minister from Leawood, Kan., and the author of “When Christians Get it Wrong,” said the survey’s results may reflect a reluctance by many people to dig deeply into their own beliefs and especially into those of others.

“I think that what happens for many Christians is, they accept their particular faith, they accept it to be true and they stop examining it. Consequently, because it’s already accepted to be true, they don’t examine other people’s faiths. … That, I think, is not healthy for a person of any faith,” he said.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Well, I had a discussion with my father (who is a deeply religious person, roman catholic) some months ago.

    He is deeply religious, but exactly of that ‘blind’ kind. I call these people ‘somehow faithful’. Faith, but no clue what their faith is all about. The only thing that matters to these people is that it ‘feels religious’.

    In this discussion, he was rocksteadily convinced that reincarnation is 100% compatible with conservative roman catholicism. Unbelievable. I hadn’t any chance to convince him otherwise. I as an atheist am much more familiar with theology than a faithful follower of catholicism. How pathetic is that?

    But our styles of discussion weren’t compatible, anyway. I tried to make intellectual solid arguments, but from his side only logical fallacies, ‘argumentum ad hominem’, bursts of emotion and anger, the whole enchilada.

    These people only want to ‘feel’. They don’t want to think, and knowledge makes them afraid.

  2. I tried to make intellectual solid arguments

    There’s your problem right there. You can’t reason people out of a position they weren’t reasoned into.

  3. This actually underscores something I’ve felt for a long time: that I don’t think it’s possible to read — and I mean truly read/study/critique — a holy book and walk away with a stronger faith. More likely, you’ll get the sense that it’s a work of fiction.

    It’s either sad or paradoxical (or both), then, that, in order to say “I don’t believe in…” {whatever}, you really need to know and understand what {whatever} is.

  4. Most religious people treat the Bible like an End User Agreement: they don’t read it but just scroll to the bottom and click “I agree”

  5. Most religious people treat the Bible like an End User Agreement: they don’t read it but just scroll to the bottom and click “I agree.”

    OK, John, that’s officially the Quote of the Day!

  6. @Mudak You still can have a strong faith, that’s how religions fork. Read the Holy Book, discover the gaps, create a separate branch, write a new Holy Book.

    And that quote Johm is brilliant :D

Stop the Internet Blacklist!

Posted on September 28th, 2010 at 5:44 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Just the other day, President Obama urged other countries to stop censoring the Internet. But now the United States Congress is trying to censor the Internet here at home. A new bill being debated this week would have the Attorney General create an Internet blacklist of sites that US Internet providers would be required to block.

This is the kind of heavy-handed censorship you’d expect from a dictatorship, where one man can decide what web sites you’re not allowed to visit. But the Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to pass the bill this week — and Senators say they haven’t heard much in the way of objections!

Obviously the Senators don’t live on the same planet as the rest of us.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I live in China where blocked websites are routine. Just about every American younger than 40 I’ve ever met out here knows all about proxy servers and all the other ways around site-blocking. Does Washington DC really think that terrorists access to any particular website will be blocked by methods like this?