« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

We Have To Throw Bankers In Jail Or The Economy Won’t Recover

Posted on November 6th, 2010 at 17:47 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote]:

As economists such as William Black and James Galbraith have repeatedly said, we cannot solve the economic crisis unless we throw the criminals who committed fraud in jail.
And Nobel prize winning economist George Akerlof has demonstrated that failure to punish white collar criminals – and instead bailing them out- creates incentives for more economic crimes and further destruction of the economy in the future. See this, this and this.

Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz just agreed.


Write a comment

Comments:

The Star Trek Rule

Posted on November 6th, 2010 at 17:44 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote]:

You may think that when you start quoting the Bible by chapter and verse, you are causing us atheists to take a surprised pause and reconsider our place in the universe. In fact, we’re not doing that. Have you ever seen this Far Side cartoon, where the man is scolding his dog Ginger, but all the dog hears is “blah blah blah GINGER blah blah blah GINGER”? That’s pretty much what atheists hear when you start quoting the Bible: “blah blah blah.” To be perfectly honest, I don’t even read that stuff anymore. My eyes just slide right over those paragraphs as I skim down to try and figure out if you have a point buried in there somewhere.

Now you’re probably already snickering “Hee hee, Kazim just admitted that atheists are as dumb as dogs!” Nope, that’s not it. Think of it like this. Imagine you’re trying to have a conversation with some guy who really loves Star Trek. Every time you try to discuss something with him, he suddenly perks up and babbles random Star Trek references. He’ll say: “You know, in episode 45/4211.4, Captain Kirk said ‘The only solution is…a balance of power. We arm our side with exactly that much more. A balance of power…the trickiest, most difficult, dirtiest game of them all. But the only one that preserves both sides.’” Sometimes the Star Trek quotes make sense in context, and sometimes he just says things that appear to be a complete non sequitur. But he always quotes them with great significance, as if the words of Captain Kirk are the greatest pearls of wisdom that have ever been offered to the world.

After a while, wouldn’t you stop paying attention to what this guy says? I mean, not that there’s anything particularly wrong with Star Trek, but it is, after all, a fictional story written by some guys in Hollywood in order to make a paycheck.

That’s what we think of your Bible.


Write a comment

Nobody expects the Spanish Inkissition

Posted on November 6th, 2010 at 17:23 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote]:

Spanish gays and lesbians will welcome Pope Benedict XVI to their country at the weekend with a massive homosexual kiss-in to be staged in front of Barcelona’s cathedral.

Organisers have invited gays and lesbians from around Spain to congregate in Barcelona during the papal visit on Sunday to form what, on their Facebook page, they call a "queer kissing flashmob".

The plan is for participants to meet at the city’s gothic cathedral and start kissing as soon as the pope steps out of the building at 10am.


Write a comment

Belgium’s embattled archbishop gets pie in face

Posted on November 6th, 2010 at 17:21 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote]:

Belgian media says the country’s ultraconservative Roman Catholic archbishop was hit by a pie in the face during an All Saints Day service.

Footage of the incident released Saturday showed a young man approaching Archbishop Andre Leonard on Monday and smacking him with a pie. A church official says the archbishop will not press charges against the unknown attacker.

The incident came amid growing turmoil within Belgium’s Roman Catholic church, which faces an investigation into hundreds of cases of sexual abuse of children by Catholic priests. Leonard himself shocked Catholics by sympathizing with priests accused of pedophilia and by saying that homosexuals deserved to get AIDS.

On Tuesday, Leonard’s spokesman quit his job, saying he could no longer speak for a "loose canon."


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I can understand why the church doesn’t like going to the police.

Alleged hit-and-run driver may not face felony

Posted on November 6th, 2010 at 9:50 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote]:

A financial manager for wealthy clients will not face felony charges for a hit-and-run because it could jeopardize his job, prosecutors said Thursday.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. The law plays no favorites… Right, and I live on Mars in a strawberry palace with hot and cold running concubines.

  2. Reminds me of a political joke from the GDR (the former communist part of Germany):

    “A high functionary of the Party was involved in a car accident. Intoxicated, he ran over two pedestrians. One of the pedestrians smashed through the car window, while the other was hurled 20 meters through the air.

    One of the pedestrians was sentenced to 6 months in prison for damaging of property, while the other was sentenced to 2 years in prison for fleeing the scene of an accident.”

Why Didn’t Anybody Tell Me?

Posted on November 6th, 2010 at 9:48 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. there needs to be another term besides atheism to describe those that have separated from the traditional teachings of religions and are enlightened and humbled by the awesomeness of our universe. it is a word that has always left a negative taste as it leaves my mouth. and i am not a negative person. i, too, do not belong to any religion for many obvious reasons, though i do believe in god. and not the male god of most religions with a white beard and wearing a toga. not a female god of temperament and understanding. god to me is the earth, the universe, male and female, from the loneliest protozoa and misunderstood subatomic particle, to the galaxies and the universe complete. that is what god means to me. it is the enlightening embrace of spirituality and science, come together. i understand that to equal out the balances, we tend to have to go the opposite extreme, though it seems odd that in order to define atheism you first have to define theism. i know i am arguing semantics, mainly the definition of god, though i wish there were a better term for those that choose to live spiritually and not religiously.

    to believe that science has somehow proven that god does not exist, is to be a fool. the only thing science has proven is that god and the true essence of the enlightened mind, individually and collectively, is more complex than ever really known. we are at a point in our evolution where we can go on acting as we are the center of the universe, or we can realize another possible truth, that we are all dust particles in space, and that a dust particle is just as beautiful and important as the sun light that reveals it, or the mind that contemplates it.

  2. The opposite view is also possible: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkGhv58OhrE ;-)

Oklahoma voters may have accidentally outlawed the 10 Commandments

Posted on November 6th, 2010 at 8:43 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

It looks like voters in Oklahoma just ratified the law of unintended consequences.

Lawmakers in the Sooner State put a constitutional amendment banning the application of Islamic law by Oklahoma courts on the ballot for Tuesday’s election.

But the amendment, which also banned the use of international law in judicial decision-making, might force Oklahoma judges to ignore all laws that were conceived on foreign soil, including the 10 Commandments.

"I would like to see Oklahoma politicians explain if this means that the courts can no longer consider the Ten Commandments. Isn’t that a precept of another culture and another nation?" said a University of Oklahoma law professor. "The result of this is that judges aren’t going to know when and how they can look at sources of American law that were international law in origin. Many of us who understand the law are scratching our heads this morning, laughing so we don’t cry."


Write a comment