« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

How TSA provides a valuable public service

Posted on December 25th, 2010 at 16:47 by John Sinteur in category: Funny!


Write a comment

Do It Yourself Doodler

Posted on December 25th, 2010 at 9:20 by John Sinteur in category: awesome

[Quote]:

So I am many things in this world, but an artist is not one of them.  However, David Jablow is just that, and an impressive one no less.  His Flickr stream is hands down one of the most impressive I’ve ever seen.  He’s taken a 1950′s style Peggy Sue magazine model and put different worlds around her using a single template.  The creativity and artistic detail are spectacular.  You should definitely go check out his Flickr stream, but here are some you’ll find there.

Here’s the template:

Now let your imagination go wild before you visit the link


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Something only a dude can properly appreciate! My wife looked at the drawings, shook her head, and walked away mumbling… :-)

Well, John, and how did you spend Christmas eve?

Posted on December 24th, 2010 at 22:28 by John Sinteur in category: News


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Thanks for getting the site back up and for all the trouble you go to on our behalf. Your readers may not often say so but we greatly appreciate being able to visit your site. Your own comments get better and better too. Merry Christmas to you and yours.

  2. Woef! Maar ja, voor Pastafarians telt alleen Ramendan en Pastan.

  3. Ramen!

  4. You lucky bastard! ;-)

  5. After a week or so with the kids, grandkids, and other family arguing and sniping at each other, I’m jealous!

  6. Heathens greetings!

  7. You are my hero…

  8. I can hear you softly singing “Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer, do”

    Have an engaging and enjoyable New Year! And thanks for all the posts during this one.

  9. Thank you for your nice words everybody! Have a great 2011!

WikiLeaks: US Ambassador Planned “Retaliation” Against France Over Ban on Monsanto Corn

Posted on December 24th, 2010 at 12:17 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

The former United States ambassador to France suggested “moving to retaliation” against France and the European Union (EU) in late 2007 to fight a French ban on Monsanto’s genetically modified (GM) corn and changes in European policy toward biotech crops, according to a cable  released by WikiLeaks on Sunday.

The USA – a government by the corporations, for the corporations…


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I don’t think that’s a reasonable comment in this context, John. Ambassadors observe, report, and may make recommendations, but they do not set policy. Many U.S. ambassadors are political appointees, rewards for service to the President’s election campaign, not career diplomats. So what they say internally should be taken with a large grain of salt.

  2. Of course it should – that’s not what I was talking about. My point they making these suggestions makes it difficult to separate US interests from corporate interests..

  3. Really? You seem to have no trouble at all telling the difference.

  4. US and corporate interest are different, or should be in a perfect world. I guess this would make an interesting separate topic.

    Ambassadors buy their positions. The conflict of interest is obvious.

Merry Christmas!

Posted on December 24th, 2010 at 12:12 by John Sinteur in category: News


Write a comment

Woman Arrested for Refusing To Be Groped By TSA at Austin Airport

Posted on December 24th, 2010 at 10:16 by John Sinteur in category: Security

Listen to the interviews at the end – and realize that there are people who feel safer when rape victims with pace makers cannot travel:

“It’s unfortunate that that happened, uhm, and she didn’t get to fly home, but uh, makes me feel a little safer.”

That lady should get the stupid slapped out of her.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. As soon as it becomes known that rape victims with pacemakers can skip security, the next suicide bomber will be a rape victim with a pacemaker. Everyone needs to go through security. NO exceptions. That woman does not have a constitutional right to fly. Millions of people fly every day with no problem. If a handful of obstinate people can’t because they refuse to subject themselves to the same security procedures that all other passengers subject themselves to, we should change the rules? That lady can take a bus.

  2. So for the pure illusion of security it’s OK to harass her? There’s really no other way to check her and she should just stay home?

  3. No one harassed her. She couldn’t or wouldn’t go through the scanner. The next step is a search. She refused that, too. The next step is arrest. She has to go through the same security procedures that everyone else goes through or she has to find another way to get to her destination. She can drive, she can take a bus, she can hitchhike … but she’s not getting on a plane with me if she skips security. I’m OK with that and so are the rest of the passengers on the plane.

    You may be right about illusion, though. A substantial portion of the flying public need the illusion that airport security measures are effective. Flying is one of those everyday activities that people need to know that everyone is doing everything they can to keep it safe.

  4. Statistically I think that we would find that we would be no less safe than now if we dropped back to simple metal detectors and luggage/carry-on xray scanning. The key is better use of intelligence. Keeping me from carrying a pen-knife and bottle of water (or marguerita mix) onboard with me does nothing much to keep it safer for the traveling public.

    The next hijacking will probably occur because someone disarms a federal air marshal and uses their gun to hold the passengers and crew hostage. They won’t need to take anything onboard other than their own marshal arts skills.

  5. Sorry Rob, this does not make anyone safer – in fact TSA is more of a threat to more Americans than anything TSA has uncovered – which is nothing. They should be using intelligent profiling based on interview, like they do in Israel and other places who actually know what they are doing.

  6. Israel is all in, TS, for their very survival. We should all put our affairs in order if America ever gets that desperate. The world as we know it would end. The security measures the TSA is employing, token as they may seem to our betters, is not anything worth complaining about. Nitpick something else.

  7. The security measures the TSA is employing, token as they may seem to our betters, is not anything worth complaining about.

    I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree on this one. The money spent on the TSA doesn’t add any security at all, and would make the world (not just the USA) a lot safer if spent elsewhere. But as long as smart people like you keep insisting we don’t discuss this, expecting things to improve will be hopeless.

  8. It’s not a money thing, John. We don’t have the whole picture. What we’re seeing and what the bad guys are seeing is the visible measures being taken. That will surely discourage the brain-dead terrorists and there are more than a few of those.

  9. Since sept 11 there’s been a Fort Hood shooter and a Washington DC sniper. And a few botched FBI sting attempts. That’s the extent of the terrorism, bad guys, and idiots who managed to do some domestic damage. Zealots who want to do damage are going to do so anyway – if it’s discouragement, and not the money that matters, well, perhaps it’s a better idea to have the TSA guard abortion clinics?

  10. And if discouraging potential extremists is important, how important is it to NOT encourage those who are not yet extremists? You do remember that piece a while ago that showed that the majority of people in Afghanistan hadn’t heard about the little that 9/11 was the reason the US was on the ground? How sure are you that your country isn’t creating more extremists than it is preventing them from hurting you?

    And from where I’m sitting, saying it isn’t about the money just doesn’t fly.

  11. “How sure are you that your country isn’t creating more extremists than it is preventing them from hurting you?”

    The nature of the enemy made that absolutely inevitable, didn’t it?

  12. I have to disagree with you there. I think the nature of the US response has more to do with it. The problem here is that although the initial response of the US to kick out the Taliban was the right one – they’ve since stopped giving material support to Al Qaeda. For example, it would have helped a lot if the US had accepted their offer on October 14, 2006, to hand over Bin Laden. The poppy eradication policy did a lot of damage as well. If the US had told Afghanistan to become the biggest medical morphine producer in the world instead, there would likely not have been an Operation Al Faath.

  13. “I have to disagree with you there.”

    Of course, you do. :)

    Poppy fields are not controlled by Afghanistan. They’re controlled by warlords or the Taliban. There is no one with whom to negotiate that medical morphine pipe dream. 2001, I think you mean, not 2006. I doubt anyone had Bin Laden to turn over in 2006. Probably didn’t have him in 2001, either.

    I’m not in complete agreement with American foreign policy but it has been mostly successful in the most critical area … keeping the violence at arm’s length.

  14. “I doubt anyone had Bin Laden to turn over in 2006. Probably didn’t have him in 2001, either.”

    Hi Rob, I suggest respectfully, you read a little more widely, particularly from sources NOT in the USA. Thereby your “doubts” may be resolved.

    As far as American foreign policy goes, let’s just say that America does some things very well (or used to), but foreign policy has never been on that list.

    BTW – The FBI has (to date) no evidence which would lead to a conviction of Bin Laden. (assuming he is still alive).

  15. It is interesting that nobody commented on this lady being pushed to the floor, handcuffed, and dragged. I would be as much if not more concerned about this. Can anyone explain the being pushed to the floor and dragged? When authorities have the power to needlessly subject citizens to physical abuse then you have the beginnings of a communist party rule such as in North Korea or as was prevalent in Nazi Germany.

  16. Well, as Rob said, “The security measures the TSA is employing, token as they may seem to our betters, is not anything worth complaining about”

    I guess people should be okay with some rough treatment, in the name of safety.

    Oh, and remember, it’s not about the money!

    Sorry, Rob, for picking on you this way – but really, your country can, and should, be way better than this

  17. That’s why I’m here, Irene. I do get outside of the American media bubble. I don’t see conspiracies everywhere and there may be one or two bad things in this entire world that are not America’s fault. You’d have to go outside of your own bubble to notice, though. Bin Laden is radioactive. The only people near him are his true believers. It is and has been a dangerous place to be for a long time. I don’t think anyone, including the Taliban, has “had him” to give up since 9/11.

    The rough treatment Ditzy Doodle received is rather easy to understand. Wants to get on a plane, won’t go through the scanner, won’t submit to a search, and the right response should be to let her go blow up her bomb somewhere else in the airport? One person here suggested Israeli-type security measures. They are a lot rougher.

    That woman is not a martyr on the altar of freedom. She is an idiot.

    I’m a big boy, John. America doesn’t always reach her lofty ideals but she does OK most of the time. The bar on her is set pretty high.

  18. I’ve been in Jordan, Egypt and Israel, and I’d have no problems with going to any country that has the Isreali-type security. I will not travel to the US right now. Take from that what you want…

    Oh, and a happy new year to you all!

Cartoons

Posted on December 24th, 2010 at 10:02 by John Sinteur in category: Cartoon


Write a comment

Capitalism

Posted on December 24th, 2010 at 7:58 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Well, *every* system crashes from time to time. This seems to be one of the only constant, ever reoccurring things in life. Nothing works forever, nothing lives forever. Old things must die, so new fresh things can flourish.

    Crashes are no special feature of capitalism. Every attempt at avoiding system crashes only delays the inevitable, and results in a much more devastating crash.

    One of the most prominent examples: The former eastern bloc.

    Go ahead, install a new system. This seems to be necessary from time to time. But nobody please ever think that everything will be happy and merry afterwards.

    Furthermore, I’d be quite interested in: *What* new system do these protestors want to install? Did they tell this on another sign?

    BTW: There is quite some irony in this protest sign, by referring to a software product of one of the most capitalist corporations of all times…

  2. Don’t worry, your corporate overlords are firmly in control. People get hurt when the crashes occur, but our system ensure the corporations will be spared.

Christmas lights

Posted on December 23rd, 2010 at 22:50 by John Sinteur in category: News

Last year:

And this year:


Write a comment

Common Application Users Find Glitch In Common, Too

Posted on December 23rd, 2010 at 21:26 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, Software

[Quote]:

“A capital W takes up 10 times the space of a period,” he said. “If a student writes 163 characters that include lots of Ws and m’s and g’s and capital letters, their 163 characters are going to take many more inches of space than someone who uses lots of I’s and commas and periods and spaces.”

Asked why the problem had not been fixed, Mr. Killion said, “Believe me, if there’s a way to do it, we’d do it. Maybe there’s a way out there we don’t know about.”

The truncated answers might be funny if the matter at hand were not so serious.


Write a comment

Underhanded C: The Leaky Redaction

Posted on December 23rd, 2010 at 19:50 by John Sinteur in category: awesome, Software

[Quote]:

000 0 0 00 000 000 0 00 000


Write a comment

My blackberry is not working

Posted on December 23rd, 2010 at 19:22 by John Sinteur in category: Funny!


Write a comment

Schoolkids’ peer-reviewed science paper on bee behaviour

Posted on December 23rd, 2010 at 18:08 by Paul Jay in category: awesome

[Quote]:

Elix sez, "Biology Letters, a journal of the Royal Society, has published a paper by a group of schoolchildren at Blackawton Primary School in Devon, England. The 25 kids, aged 8 to 10, in a village of 647 (2001 census), might be the youngest scientists ever to have their work published by peer review."


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. And they’ve now got more published, peer-reviewed papers than anyone claiming to write a paper in support of Intelligent Design….

RIAA, MPAA recruit MasterCard to help them police the Internet

Posted on December 23rd, 2010 at 16:32 by Paul Jay in category: News

[Quote]:

Two weeks ago, MasterCard felt the wrath of Anonymous Operation Payback-style DDoS attacks after refusing to process payments that were intended to fund WikiLeaks, the website which began leaking confidential US diplomatic cables last month. Now, the company is preparing to head down another controversial path by pledging to deny transactions which support websites that host pirated movies, music, games, or other copyrighted content.

MasterCard lobbyists have also been in talks with entertainment industry trade groups, including the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), and have made it clear that the company will support the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA), sources close to the talks have said.

“MasterCard in particular deserves credit for its proactive approach to addressing rogue Web sites that dupe consumers,” RIAA executive vice president of government and industry relations Mitch Glazer said in a statement to CNET when asked about the alliance. “They have reached out to us and others in the entertainment community to forge what we think will be a productive and effective partnership.”


Write a comment

Bruce Sterling on Wikileaks

Posted on December 23rd, 2010 at 11:54 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

The Wikileaks Cablegate scandal is the most exciting and interesting hacker scandal ever. I rather commonly write about such things, and I’m surrounded by online acquaintances who take a burning interest in every little jot and tittle of this ongoing saga. So it’s going to take me a while to explain why this highly newsworthy event fills me with such a chilly, deadening sense of Edgar Allen Poe melancholia.

But it sure does.

And after reading Bruce, read this…

[Quote]:

The fragility of a system is a sign of bad design. If less than five people can bring down your empire, it’s time had come already.

United States diplomacy is built on lies for the benefit of a small group of rich people. If it had been built on honesty for the benefit of US citizens instead, none of these cables would mean anything to anyone. Biden said it himself: "He’s made it more difficult for us to conduct our business with our allies and our friends." He probably had no idea what he was saying, but it’s absolutely true: our diplomacy existed to grease the wheels of American business interests, not to establish peaceful trade with other nations.

Take one instance where we were fully aware that Nigeria’s government was infiltrated by oil industry players who reported all of the government’s moves to headquarters so the government could not effectively govern. That sentiment at it’s core is anti-democratic. The State Department should have immediately punished the oil company and made it public. Instead, it’s buried and ignored in the interest of profits for the American corporation.

So when Bruce states "When diplomats tell foreigners what they really think, war results," I don’t fucking buy it. War happens when all of the secret bullshit the State Department puts together falls apart after one of the secret conspirators stops doing their end of the dirty work, and all of the sudden we flip on the news to learn that the nation we were selling weapons to last week is suddenly our greatest enemy.

The headline in a few years should be this: "Yeah, well, actually we’re going to war in Pakistan because the secular military we’ve been propping up for decades, even to the point of allowing them to develop nuclear weapons, has suddenly been overrun by it’s population that overwhelmingly disagrees with our mercenary warfare over there. So we’re going to call the smaller, illegitimate power the legitimate power, and kill a bunch of people who disagree."

Instead the headline will be this: "Pakistan is the greatest threat to world peace and American Democracy since Iraq." Roll footage of peasants protesting the deaths of another wedding party — see how angry these Muslim terrorists are? they want to kill your family with nukes — write the check for fifty billion dollars (first mill buys body bags, we’ll ask for the rest later) and ramp up the defenders of freedom cutscenes at all the major media outlets. All of the stories about injustice by the Pakistani military will be pushed off of page A26 into the memory hole, and all of the stuff we had been covering up about child rape and religious persecution in friendly provinces that are now controlled by "terrorists" will finally hit the front page, ten years too late.

The problem ain’t the ref who decides to turn on the lights. It’s the fucking game.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Mr. Sterling tedious wanking rant is _so_ smug.
    At first I thought he was going for the point that WL will trigger a huge totalitarian backlash and we should prepare for the intertubes to be shut down to punish us all. (Actually one of my concerns). But after finishing, I think his literary circus tricks were about nothing except how clever he thinks himself to be. Oh, and he doesn’t know how it is all going to end.
    We don’t know how it will all end. Bemoaning the end of the American Empire is a waste of time. Perhaps it will turn out to have been a Golden Age. Courage is about going forward, doing what we believe is the right thing, even though we think it might be difficult or end badly.
    A lot of the WL revelations were already known if a person was educated and took time and effort to be informed. That, with a little imagination and knowledge of human nature. The great thing now is the attention that these scandals are getting from mass media. (Although I know that Mr. Assange’s sex life or lack thereof is getting more column inches :-)
    Thanks for finding that riposte. Brilliant.

Report Suspicious Activity

Posted on December 23rd, 2010 at 11:37 by John Sinteur in category: Privacy, Security


Write a comment

Clueless Sony Launches Music Service That Might Have Been Cool In 2007

Posted on December 23rd, 2010 at 11:36 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Here’s a recipe for failure: Sony has just launched a music subscription service in the U.K. and Ireland, but users can’t get it on their mobile phones.

But it gets worse. Sony actually has two plans. The basic plan at 4 pounds or Euro per month doesn’t even let you pick songs. It’s like Internet radio–think Pandora or Slacker–with the nice feature of being able to skip songs you don’t like.

If you actually want to pick individual songs or albums on demand, that costs 10 pounds or Euro per month. That’s the same price as Spotify Premium, which works on nearly every major phone platform today.


Write a comment

Abusive Homeland Security ‘troll’ attacks anti-TSA website

Posted on December 23rd, 2010 at 11:13 by Paul Jay in category: News

[Quote]:

An activist website devoted to opposing the TSA’s new screening procedures says it’s the victim of an online "troll" from inside the Department of Homeland Security.

WeWontFly.com, which is urging the public to stop flying "until the porno scanners are history," says it has identified abusive comments from someone using a DHS computer.

"F**k you, f**k all you c**ksuckers, you wont change anything," read a comment that has now been deleted from the WeWontFly blog. "Ride the bus, TSA is here to stay there [sic] doing a great job keeping americia [sic] safe."

WeWontFly blogger George Donnelly says he has traced the comment to a dhs.gov server — a computer inside the Department of Homeland Security.

"Some questions come to mind," Donnelly wrote. "Is this an official statement? If not, is it an accurate representation of the DHS position? Was this person on the public dime when he or she posted this? Who posted this and what is their position with DHS?"


Write a comment

Bernie Sanders Puts Barack Obama to Shame

Posted on December 23rd, 2010 at 10:19 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote]:

I was in Washington last week and visited Bernie in his office, mainly to talk about the incredible results of the Federal Reserve audit, about which I’ll be writing more in the upcoming weeks and after the New Year. The audit of the Fed was undertaken because Bernie and a few other members of congress fought very hard during the Dodd-Frank regulatory reform debate to force open Ben Bernanke’s books, and as a result we now know the staggering details of the secret bailout era. We know that Citigroup received $1.6 trillion in loans, and Morgan Stanley $2 trillion, and Goldman Sachs – the same Goldman Sachs that bragged about how quickly it paid back its $10 billion TARP bailout – over $600 billion. We know that hedge fund billionaires who moved their corporate addresses to the Cayman Islands to avoid U.S. taxes were rewarded by their buddies in government with huge Fed loans; we know that the U.S. government likewise has been extending massive loans to a variety of Japanese car companies at a time when many American auto workers in Detroit have seen their wages cut in half, to $14 an hour. There’s that and there’s more on the outrage front, and we know it all because Sanders kicked and screamed and stamped his feet about Fed secrecy until just enough other members of the Senate decided to go along with him.


Write a comment

Homeland Security Presents ‘Evidence’ For Domain Seizures; Proves It Knows Little About The Internet – Or The Law

Posted on December 22nd, 2010 at 23:06 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, Foyer of Ennui (just short of the Hall of Shame)

[Quote]:

Earlier this week, we noted how the owners of the various hiphop blogs and Torrent-Finder, the torrent search engine, that were seized by Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) group still hadn’t been provided the details on why their domains were seized. However, that’s no longer the case. A partial affidavit and the seizure warrant for those sites has been released, and it highlights how ridiculously clueless Homeland Security is on this issue (you can read the whole thing at the bottom of this post). What’s troubling isn’t just that the folks who made the decision to seize these domain names don’t seem to know what they’re talking about, but that they seem to have relied almost exclusively on the MPAA for their (lack of) knowledge on the subject at hand.


Write a comment

Cartoons

Posted on December 22nd, 2010 at 17:34 by John Sinteur in category: Cartoon


Write a comment

Bank of America Wants You to Know Its Executives Don’t Suck

Posted on December 22nd, 2010 at 14:57 by Paul Jay in category: News

[Quote]:

Company defensively registers hundreds of domain names for its senior executives and board members.

As Bank of American awaits a possible release of information from WikiLeaks, it wants to ensure that you don’t think it’s executives suck. Or blow for that matter.

The company has been aggressively registering domain names including its Board of Directors’ and senior executives’ names followed by “sucks” and “blows”.

For example, the company registered a number of domains for CEO Brian Moynihan: BrianMoynihanBlows.com, BrianMoynihanSucks.com, BrianTMoynihanBlows.com, and BrianTMoynihanSucks.com. Just to be sure, it also picked up the .net version of these names and some .orgs as well.

Let’s be creative!

WeSuckAtSpendingYourBailoutTaxPayerMoney.com


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. lol…there are _so_ many combinations…just how much do they have in their marketing budget? Hundreds of millions…oh. Well it’s about as effective as smug, glossy ads in the Economist, and a lot more fun for the public.
    Or does it come under Legal? Hmm.
    I’m looking forward to the release as a tiny bit of payback for the ruin of many, many little people.

  2. Let’s register BrianMoynihanReallySucks.com !

  3. Personally, I’d send them to BrianMoynihanCanBiteMyAss.com

  4. Any one of you two gentlemen already sold those to them? I mean, this almost asks for a (not-quite-extortion) scheme, let’s say a business proposition?

  5. Nah, it’s just their latest investment strategy: register large numbers of crap domain names, then bundle them together and sell shares in them against future revenue from selling the domains to people who want to put up web sites saying what a stupid idea this is.

  6. BrianMoynihanBlowsandSucks.com = still available!

Halliburton settles Nigeria bribery claims for $35 million

Posted on December 22nd, 2010 at 11:30 by Paul Jay in category: News

[Quote]:

(CNN) — Oilfield contractor Halliburton has agreed to pay Nigeria $35 million to settle bribery allegations that led to charges against former Vice President Dick Cheney and other executives, the company announced Tuesday.

Cheney, who was Halliburton’s CEO in the 1990s, and nine others were charged with conspiracy and “distribution of gratification to public officials” in a long-running case involving the company and its Kellogg, Brown and Root subsidiary. Nigerian officials accused the company of paying bribes to secure $6 billion worth of contracts for a liquefied natural gas project in the Niger Delta.

$35 Million for a  $6 Billion crime. That’s a bargain.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I imagine you meant the quote to link to the article below. But where does the $6 Million bit come from?

    http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/africa/12/21/nigeria.halliburton/index.html

  2. [Quote]:

    Saipem Group and Halliburton have agreed to pay criminal fines totalling US$ 67.5 million to resolve an investigation into a consortium of construction firms which bribed Nigerian government officials in order to win construction contracts worth over US$ 6 billion on the Bonny Island LNG facilities.

    Total contract is $6B. Profit is still likely to be way, way above $35m.. or 67.5m, or whatever the fine is.

  3. So… the penalty for exchanging money for political goodwill is… to pay more money for more goodwill?

In space…

Posted on December 22nd, 2010 at 10:26 by John Sinteur in category: News

no one can hear you scroll horizontlly


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Wasn’t Pluto disgraced from being a planet in 2006?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto

  2. lovely…thanks for this…a great way to get things in perspective!

Gotcha Fail: Rep. Frank Turns Tables on CNS

Posted on December 22nd, 2010 at 9:03 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

The conservative Media Research Center-owned website CNSNews.com has a habit of springing loaded questions on members of Congress. For example, it asked Obama administration official John Holdren to explain something he wrote in a book published nearly 40 years ago.

Apparently feeling confident (and sufficiently homophobic), CNS decided to target Rep. Barney Frank with a question about the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell – specifically, whether he thought gay and straight soldiers should shower together.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Forgive me for asking the obvious here, but if the introductory headers to that video essentially hold that this group is dedicated to exposing so-called liberal bias in the media, how does what the rest of the video do that exactly? If anything, it exposes this particular reporter as being at best woefully uninformed and at worst, a complete moron. Either way, it raises questions about how representative he, personally, is, of his entire organization.

  2. Translation: “exposing so-called liberal/conservative bias in the media” means “confirming the bias of the regular viewer”.

    For a lot of people, getting a bias confirmed that way results in lots of returning eyeballs for the station. Lots of returning eyeballs means more money from advertisers.

    The reporters don’t give a flying fuck about being informed or intelligent. They care about getting paid.

The Great Cover-up

Posted on December 22nd, 2010 at 8:57 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture


Write a comment

56 percent of bankers say bonuses ‘not enough’

Posted on December 22nd, 2010 at 8:45 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote]:

Wall Street’s five biggest banks had a banner year in 2010, racking up their second-highest revenues on record, and to celebrate they put aside some $90 billion for year-end bonuses. But an informal poll suggests that more than half of the people receiving those bonuses feel they aren’t getting enough.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I feel I’m not getting enough either. Anyone else?

  2. I feel that way too. You never can get enough bonus money :)

  3. Um…what is wrong with being paid the agreed-upon salary at regular intervals?
    Many of my pals are getting pay cuts, furloughs (with no pay) and lay-offs.
    The Financial Industry (sic) makes nothing itself and has to depend on the underlying economy. Suck too much blood from the host and you’re looking for a new planet.

No loss. No loss at all.

Posted on December 22nd, 2010 at 8:40 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote]:

St Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center in Arizona was a Catholic-affiliated institution, and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Phoenix has just made a major strategic error: they have stripped the hospital of its affiliation.


Write a comment

Why Bolivia stood alone in opposing the Cancún climate agreement

Posted on December 22nd, 2010 at 8:04 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Diplomacy is traditionally a game of alliance and compromise. Yet in the early hours of Saturday 11 December, Bolivia found itself alone against the world: the only nation to oppose the outcome of the United Nations climate change summit in Cancún. We were accused of being obstructionist, obstinate and unrealistic. Yet in truth we did not feel alone, nor are we offended by the attacks. Instead, we feel an enormous obligation to set aside diplomacy and tell the truth.


Write a comment

Chamber Of Commerce Swaps Expert To Join House Ag Committee

Posted on December 22nd, 2010 at 8:02 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote]:

Ryan McKee, a senior director focusing on derivatives regulation at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, has been appointed as a professional staffer at the House of Representatives Committee on Agriculture under Frank Lucas (R., Okla.), the committee’s incoming chairman.

The Chamber of Commerce is a business lobbying group. McKee was best known for defending corporations against harsh new financial regulations that could raise their costs of hedging.

If they ever find Bin Laden, they should put him in charge of homeland security to keep things consistent.


Write a comment


« Older Entries Newer Entries »