« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Gadhafi blames Osama bin Laden for savage clashes across Libya

Posted on February 24th, 2011 at 16:49 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

Mr. Gadhafi accused al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden of being behind the uprising in Libya, in a rambling phone call to state TV.


Write a comment

Charges initiated against Pope for crimes against humanity

Posted on February 24th, 2011 at 16:39 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote]:

TWO GERMAN lawyers have initiated charges against Pope Benedict XVI at the International Criminal Court, alleging crimes against humanity.

Christian Sailer and Gert-Joachim Hetzel, based at Marktheidenfeld in the Pope’s home state of Bavaria, last week submitted a 16,500-word document to the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court at the Hague, Dr Luis Moreno Ocampo.

Their charges concern “three worldwide crimes which until now have not been denounced . . . (as) the traditional reverence toward ‘ecclesiastical authority’ has clouded the sense of right and wrong”.

They claim the Pope “is responsible for the preservation and leadership of a worldwide totalitarian regime of coercion which subjugates its members with terrifying and health-endangering threats”.

They allege he is also responsible for “the adherence to a fatal forbiddance of the use of condoms, even when the danger of HIV-Aids infection exists” and for “the establishment and maintenance of a worldwide system of cover-up of the sexual crimes committed by Catholic priests and their preferential treatment, which aids and abets ever new crimes”.

They claim the Catholic Church “acquires its members through a compulsory act, namely, through the baptism of infants that do not yet have a will of their own”. This act was “irrevocable” and is buttressed by threats of excommunication and the fires of hell.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. In Italy there is a sentence of the Constitutional Court that states that any religious choice of an individual cannot be taken by anyone else than the individual himself.

    Its self evident that pedobaptism (baptism of infants, that’s the technical name) is not a choice of the individual, so it is plain illegal. The sentence (n. 239/84) has never been disputed, and may be used as a non-binding precedent.

  2. When I read this headline, I thought, finally, someone is charging the pope with covering up and aiding child rape. Instead it is a case that is gone to waste everyone’s time, and achieve nothing.

Christchurch earthquake – The Big Picture

Posted on February 24th, 2011 at 15:46 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture

[Quote]:

With hundreds still missing, and 75 already confirmed dead, rescuers struggled to find survivors on the second night after a devastating earthquake struck Christchurch, New Zealand’s second largest city Tuesday. Buildings crumbled into the streets after the 6.3 magnitude earthquake, which geologists consider an aftershock to a 7.1 earthquake that caused no casualties in September. Tuesday’s temblor was more devastating and deadly because it was centered only six miles from the city’s center and hit during the middle of a workday. The Government has declared a national state of emergency. Officials estimated there could be 100 people trapped in the CTV building alone. — Lane Turner (36 photos total)


20
The collapsed Pyne Gould Guinness building trapped dozens of people. “We’ve been pulling 20 or 30 people out of those buildings right throughout the night,” police Superintendent Russell Gibson said Wednesday morning. (Mark Mitchell/AFP/Getty Images) #


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Earthquake in Christchurch… your god almighty may be trying to tell you something

Despite 861.5 Percent Growth, Android Market Revenues Remain Puny

Posted on February 24th, 2011 at 15:44 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote]:

You read the headline “Android Market grows a staggering 861.5 per cent”, and you think, “Wow, Android is really on a tear.” But then you look at the fine print, and you realize that Android Market revenues are still barely registering, and that the only reason they grew so much in 2010 was because in 2009 they were nearly non-existent.

According to a chart making the rounds from UK-based research firm IHS, Android Market revenues in 2010 came in at an estimated $102 million, up from $11 million the year before.

And how did that compare to revenues from Apple’s App Store? Apple App Store revenues came in at an estimated $1.7 billion in 2010, almost 20 times bigger than Android. And Apple App Store revenue grew at a not-too-shabby 131.9 percent rate. More importantly, Apple accounts for 83 percent of the total estimated app store revenues.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Any time you see 800% growth, you don’t think “wow, that’s on a tear”, you think, “wow, must’ve started from almost nothing”. Duh.

  2. True, but they’ll have to continue triple-digit growth for at least two more years before I’ll consider writing android software. And that’s quite something..

  3. May I point out that Android apps are often less expensive than Apple counterpart, and that there is plenty of very good free software?
    I guess Apple policy may have an influx on this fact, since no one asks you money if you want to write something for Android.

    Oh, and let me point out another thing. Most people I know using android use the devices as phones and email reader. I know of very few of my friends who clutter the device with pay-per-play games, fart apps and organizers that replicate the same features built in the android OS. I have 4-5 free games, 5 useful apps and honestly I feel I do not need anything else. My wife and colleagues with an iphone or a touch have a completely different approach.

    I admit Android users may be cheaper people, too. If we were trigger happy with our money, we would have spent three-to-five times the cost of our Android device in a iPhone 4 to begin with …

  4. I have no problem with people deciding Android is the best for them – the more competition to Apple the better these devices will get. And if it works better for you than an iPhone, more power to you!

    I just said I won’t be writing software for it…

  5. I’d like to point out that free apps — both on Android and the iPhone — are underwritten through ads in the apps themselves. For Android, that’s exclusively through google-owned Ad Mob. I’m not sure of the formula that pays the developers but surely Google is the big beneficiary of your free apps.

  6. I’ll be surprised if they have less than triple digit growth in Android app sales the next two years. Even with competition from ad supported apps and with fragmentation between app stores, I’d bet on 100+% growth.

  7. 100% two years running would put them at $400m. I find that likely as well, and would not be surprised if they didn’t surpass that significantly. Still, that’s way, way short of the $1.7b Apple is pulling in right now, despite the fact that the Android market share is (in the US at least) bigger than the iOS market share. Google will have to do something about this…

  8. Android’s current market share may be bigger, but their installed base is not. If the marketshare comes to substantially outpace Apple’s, they’ll catch up soon enough. Don’t need to “do” much of anything.

    Also, selling apps isn’t Google’s main business model. They may prefer free, ad-supported apps?

Julian Assange to be extradited to Sweden

Posted on February 24th, 2011 at 13:38 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is to be extradited to Sweden to face allegations of rape and sexual assault. Assange will appeal, his legal team confirmed. If this is unsuccessful, he will be extradited to Sweden in 10 days.


Write a comment

Tennessee bill would jail Shariah followers

Posted on February 24th, 2011 at 13:08 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

A bill in the Tennessee General Assembly would make following the Islamic code known as Shariah law a felony, punishable by 15 years in jail.

Two legislators introduced the same bill in the Senate and House last week. It calls Shariah law a danger to homeland security and gives the attorney general authority to investigate complaints and decide who’s practicing it.

[..]

“What do you mean, really, by saying I can’t abide by Shariah law?” he said. “Shariah law is telling me don’t steal. Do you want me to steal and rob a bank?”

The Attorney General’s Office had no comment.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. It would be much better to outlaw ANY collection of religious laws which are in contradiction to the constitution and the human rights, and which are proveably a danger to society. Or at least strongly regulate these texts (make it unlawful to distribute these harmful texts to minors; selling such material only allowed with warning stickers, etc.)

    Examples for such material: The 10 commandments, huge parts of the bible, the shariah, or ‘dianetics’

  2. I’ll bite–which part of the Ten Commandments is in conflict with the US Constitution or with human rights?

  3. @Desiato:

    “Do not have any other gods before me.

    You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.

    You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, punishing children for the iniquity of parents, to the third and the fourth generation of those who reject me,

    [...]

    You shall not make wrongful use of the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not acquit anyone who misuses his name.”

    I see several violations of the constitution and of basic human rights here.

    “Freedom of Religion” is only one of them. Freedom of Speech is blatantly violated. Punishing somebody for something he has not done, this is a strong violation of “due process”. “Freedom of the Arts”.

    The danger for society: There are influential weirdos in the US who claim that the Ten Commandments are the basis of our judicial system, and they want to transform society after these anachronistic rules from the bronze-age.

  4. 1a. Thou shall not be gay.
    2b. Thou shall not use recreational drugs.
    3c. Thou shall kill your enemies if you are in the armed forces.
    4f. Thou shall steal if god tells you to do it (Israel).

  5. Steffen, I think you fundamentally misunderstand the Bill of Rights. It protects the citizens from their government only, not fro
    a religion they might choose to join.

  6. @Desiato: Nope, it rather you who misunderstood the whole matter.

    The constitution and the Declaration of Human Rights guarantee Freedom of Religion. Nobody must be forced into practicing any religion he does not like.

    The Ten Commandments (explicitly No. 1,2 and 3) are in direct violation of this principle. It says clear without ambiguity: “I am your God. You shall have no other Gods. You shall not make wrongful use of the name of the Lord your God”. The “God” who is speaking here the Judeo-christian god. In other words: *Everybody* in this club must follow the Judeo-christian god. Any speaking against this god is strictly forbidden. The bible is full of gruesome threats to people who don’t submit to this god.

    Anybody is of course completely free to submit himself under a religion. But the Ten Commandments don’t speak of freedom. They speak of an obligation, without exception, and this is the violation of Human Rights. Would the Christian Taliban seize power and transform the state after the Ten Commandments, this would unambiguously mean: A Theocracy.

  7. The First Amendment says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech (…)”

    This was later, by the Supreme Court, extended to apply to the States as well, and has since spread farther down by judicial fiat, not because the Constitution says so.

    It’s a common misconception that the freedom of speech (in the U.S.) applies broadly, e.g. that companies are required to uphold it. That’s not the case. If I run a web forum, I’m free to delete postings I don’t like, you don’t get the right to freedom of speech there.

    Remember that the Constitution was written largely by Christians and at the very least (if you want to argue that some or many were Deists) in a context deeply steeped in Christianity. The Founders knew what the Ten Commandments say. They clearly did not think the internal commandments of the religion conflicted with the external right not to have the government dictate a state religion.

    Beyond that you’re making an argument that Christianity is illegal or invalid because you feel its commandments are addressed to those outside the religion. I find it hard to argue this rationally since it’s so silly, but I’ll just say that there’s a difference between saying something and enforcing it in practice. How does the Catholic church punish you if you don’t follow the commandments? You get excommunicated. The people who don’t follow the religion get barred from participating in it further and are told they’re no longer welcome. Doesn’t that kinda contradict your entire argument?

  8. Oh, and while you’re responding can you let us know whether the Catholic Church gets Freedom of Speech? (to publish the Bible, that is…)

  9. It wasn’t the SCOTUS. It was the 13th amendment that enforced the national constitution on the states.

Are you better off today than you were four, no, forty years ago?

Posted on February 24th, 2011 at 10:46 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Average incomes in the US grew $2,388

The Most Shocking/Depressing/Enraging Interactive Infographic You Will See Today unless you’ve been in the “top 10%” since 1969.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. At the risk of cherry-picking the data here:

    1969-1976: Presidents Nixon (R) and Ford (R): Decline of $473, Bottom 90% absorbed 20%

    1976-1979: President Carter (D): Growth of $1,756, Bottom 90% shared 47% of growth

    1980-1987: Reagan (R): Growth of $2,580, Bottom 90% shared 2% of growth
    1988-1991: Bush-41 (R): Decline -$2,820, Bottom 90% absorbed 42% of the decline

    1992-1999: Clinton (D): Growth of $12,224, Bottom 90% shared 33% of growth

    2000-2007: Bush-43 (R): Growth of $1,460, Bottom 90% declined

Captain Picard uses Android smartphones with an unlimited data plan

Posted on February 24th, 2011 at 10:21 by John Sinteur in category: Funny!


Write a comment

Middle East

Posted on February 24th, 2011 at 9:21 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture


Write a comment

What happens after Yahoo acquires you

Posted on February 24th, 2011 at 8:24 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Whether it’s Flickr, Delicious, MyBlogLog, or Upcoming, the post-purchase story is a similar one. Both sides talk about all the wonderful things they will do together. Then reality sets in.


Write a comment

Libya’s Gaddafi wages bloody war against protesters

Posted on February 24th, 2011 at 8:17 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

"The only thing we can do now is not give up, no surrender, no going back. We will die anyways, whether we like it or not. It is clear that they don’t care whether we live or not. This is genocide," said Mahry, 42.


Write a comment

Beddington goes to war against bad science

Posted on February 24th, 2011 at 8:15 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Government Chief Scientific Adviser John Beddington is stepping up the war on pseudoscience with a call to his fellow government scientists to be “grossly intolerant” if science is being misused by religious or political groups.

In closing remarks to an annual conference of around 300 scientific civil servants on 3 February, in London, Beddington said that selective use of science ought to be treated in the same way as racism and homophobia. “We are grossly intolerant, and properly so, of racism. We are grossly intolerant, and properly so, of people who [are] anti-homosexuality…We are not—and I genuinely think we should think about how we do this—grossly intolerant of pseudo-science, the building up of what purports to be science by the cherry-picking of the facts and the failure to use scientific evidence and the failure to use scientific method,” he said.

Beddington said he intends to take this agenda forward with his fellow chief scientists and also with the research councils. “I really believe that… we need to recognise that this is a pernicious influence, it is an increasingly pernicious influence and we need to be thinking about how we can actually deal with it.

”I really would urge you to be grossly intolerant…We should not tolerate what is potentially something that can seriously undermine our ability to address important problems.

“There are enough difficult and important problems out there without having to… deal with what is politically or morally or religiously motivated nonsense.”


Write a comment

Puzzle

Posted on February 24th, 2011 at 8:09 by John Sinteur in category: News


Write a comment

Opt out, opt in, sell out, capitulate?

Posted on February 24th, 2011 at 6:41 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

Apple’s new App Store rules now mandate that users themselves must decide whether they want to give their own personal info to publishers when they subscribe.

[..]

Put simply, publishers don’t want readers to opt in, because they know readers will prefer to opt out. Transparency is not a friend of publishers who for decades made a mint by selling out readers to advertisers and list brokers. Most readers may not be aware of this, but those who are don’t like it. Publishers know that and hate Apple for calling their bluff. If personal info harvesting isn’t essential for publishers’ business model and it is in the interest of readers, then why would they be against an instant referendum in the form of the opt in button?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Nice to see that Apple is reaching Android standards…

    (Android apps explicitly state the permissions and info required when you download or update them)

InduceBrowserCrashForRealz

Posted on February 23rd, 2011 at 19:12 by John Sinteur in category: Google

This should crash your browser if you’re using Chrome.

Yes, that’s intended behavior.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. No. It didn’t. I’m using 9.0.597.98 on Scientific Linux (RHEL) 6.

  2. javascript;void(0); ?

    Sadly it does nothing on 9.0.597.98 on my ancient Win XP Dell Mini. I’m all for crashing things…

    Actually I like it that when Chrome does blow up, the messages are apologetic and fairly sensible, e.g. “This plug-in has crashed.”

  3. Try putting “about:inducebrowsercrashforrealz” in the address bar manually…

  4. Ok. That shut it down. At least when you restart Chrome, it knew where you were and lets you restore all your tabs, etc.

  5. Heh, heh…those darn interns :-)

  6. Gotta wonder if that is a remnant of testing code. Some known way to shut down the browser directly so they could test the recovery mechanisms? I tried various permutations and nothing else would cause this behavior. Not an exhaustive search, for sure, but enough to make we wonder.

Oracle: ‘Eight Android files are decompiled Oracle code’

Posted on February 23rd, 2011 at 19:04 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

Oracle has claimed that Google derived its Android code from the specifications for "hundreds" of Oracle’s copyrighted Java files, and that at least eight Android files are actually decompiled Oracle object code.

[..]

But it went a few steps further in its letter (PDF) to the court. Well-known open source watcher Florian Muller called it “the single most interesting document in this whole lawsuit to date as far as the copyright part of the case is concerned “.

Oracle says that in the case, it has identified fifty-one Java API packages – about a third of Java’s APIs – that contain numerous class files under Oracle copyright. All told, the company has pinpointed 14 Java copyrights infringed by Google, and it “expects” that case discovery will reveal more. “Thus, contrary to Google’s ‘we only took a little bit’ argument, Google derived its Android code from the specifications for hundreds of Oracle’s copyrighted Java files,” the letter reads. The emphasis is Oracle’s.


Write a comment

The Beatles performing Smack My Bitch Up

Posted on February 23rd, 2011 at 19:02 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Best bit of blasphemy I have seen in ages.

$40 billion ‘missing’ from Iraq accounts

Posted on February 23rd, 2011 at 13:09 by Paul Jay in category: News

[Quote]:

BAGHDAD, Feb 21, 2011 (AFP) – Around $40 billion are “missing” from a post-Gulf War fund that Iraq maintains to protect the money from foreign claims, its parliamentary speaker said on Monday.

“There is missing money, we do not know where it has gone,” Osama al-Nujaifi said at a news conference in Baghdad. “The money is around $40 billion in total.”

“It may have been spent somewhere, but it does not appear in our accounts, so parliament will investigate where this money has gone.”

Nujaifi did not say when or how the discovery had been made regarding the missing money. He said two investigative committees had been formed to track down the cash.


Write a comment

Petraeus’s comments on coalition attack reportedly offend Karzai government

Posted on February 23rd, 2011 at 9:37 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

To the shock of President Hamid Karzai’s aides, Gen. David H. Petraeus suggested Sunday at the presidential palace that Afghans caught up in a coalition attack in northeastern Afghanistan might have burned their own children to exaggerate claims of civilian casualties, according to two participants at the meeting.


Write a comment

Prepare Spaceball 1 for immediate departure.

Posted on February 23rd, 2011 at 9:35 by John Sinteur in category: News

And change the combination on my luggage.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Isn’t it kind of atheist superstition to highlight this? :-)

  2. And I looked at my own token and it had the number 053829 on it. What are the odds that this very number might appear right when we looked at it?

    (snarky answer 1 in 100000, I know)

Mark your calendar!

Posted on February 23rd, 2011 at 9:30 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Terrible speller, that Lord…do you think he may have got the day wrong too?

  2. Drat! And I had plans for that day! Oh well, I guess I can just bend over and kiss…

  3. It’s kind of blurry, but does the sticker above the line on the bumper that reads “Read the bible” say “48 days left”? If so, then he needs to learn how to count, too….

Gabon: The forgotten protests, the blinkered media

Posted on February 23rd, 2011 at 8:56 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

The global media’s attention is focused on the revolutions sweeping through North Africa and the Middle East, with Egypt – and to a lesser extent Tunisia – being most prominent. But not all revolutions are blessed with this level of attention. The West African nation of Gabon is currently also in popular revolt. What, you haven’t heard about it yet?


Write a comment

Warship defects to Malta

Posted on February 23rd, 2011 at 8:35 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

A Libyan warship arrived in Malta on Tuesday after its crew refused to carry out orders to bomb Benghazi, the satellite network Al Jazeera reported.

A second Libyan ship has also reportedly been sighted in the area, the network reported.

You know, if W had just waited a few years, you’d have seen a similar uprising in Baghdad…


Write a comment

Deepak Chopra answers a question.

Posted on February 23rd, 2011 at 6:51 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Boom! Back of the net =)

Arizona jury condemns anti-immigration activist to death

Posted on February 23rd, 2011 at 6:50 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

A jury on Tuesday sentenced the leader of a small Arizona group opposed to illegal immigration to die for her role in the home invasion shooting deaths of a father and his 9-year-old daughter.

The jury of 11 women and one man returned the death penalty verdict for Shawna Forde, 43, the founder and leader of the Minutemen American Defense group, for the May 30, 2009, killings of Brisenia Flores, 9, and her father, Raul Junior Flores, 29, in Arivaca, in southern Arizona.

The case now automatically goes to the Arizona Supreme Court for an appeal.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I think the headline should read “Arizona jury condemns double-murderer to death” and maybe mention the aggravated assault and robbery special circumstances. I’m actually kinda surprised prosecutors didn’t put hate-crime provisions in there too, but I guess it was unnecessary.

K/G/Q(h)ad(d)(h)a(f)fi!

Posted on February 22nd, 2011 at 21:55 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture

(top line reads “this we agree on”)

Why don’t they just use his name: معمر القذافي‎


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Or as his people refer to him, that murdering $^$%$£&£$.

  2. Have you checked his Facebook page to see how he spells it himself?

Egyptian dad names child ‘Facebook’

Posted on February 22nd, 2011 at 17:55 by Paul Jay in category: News

[Quote]:

A man in Egypt has named his newborn daughter "Facebook" in honor of the role the social media network played in bringing about a revolution, according to a new report.

Gamal Ibrahim, a 20-something, gave his daughter the name "to express his joy at the achievements made by the January 25 youth," according to a report in Al-Ahram, one of Egypt’s most popular newspapers.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. “20-something names his child Facebook” doesn’t have the same ring to it. He should have called her Revolution. Or even Courage. But who am I?

  2. John, is there just a little part of you that hopes one day to have some fan name their kid ‘Irrelevant’?

    :)

  3. Ah…
    Good for him!

  4. John, is there just a little part of you that hopes one day to have some fan name their kid ‘Irrelevant’?

    please note the ‘author’ line below the post title

    Let me make the obvious joke here: I think it’s irrelevant what other parents call their kids… :-)

BP Says Settlement Terms in Spill Are Too Generous

Posted on February 22nd, 2011 at 15:57 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

In the eight months since Kenneth R. Feinberg took over the $20 billion fund to compensate victims of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, he has been attacked by many of those filing claims and by coastal state politicians who argue that the process is opaque, arbitrary and slow. Many of them have also argued that Mr. Feinberg’s recently published estimates of future damage to those in the gulf are too optimistic, and thus his offer of compensation in a final settlement is too low.

Now he is getting complaints from another quarter: BP.

The oil giant is arguing that if anything, Mr. Feinberg’s proposed settlements are too generous. The planned payments far exceed the extent of likely future damages because they overstate the potential for future losses, the company insists in a strongly worded 24-page document that was posted on the fund’s Web site Thursday morning.

[Quote]:

BP has reneged on promises made in November to negotiate early payments to Louisiana to help rebuild oyster beds, repair damaged wetlands and build a fish hatchery to allow the state to respond immediately to the collapse of commercial fisheries in the wake of the BP Gulf oil spill, state officials said Monday.

[..]

Instead, he said, the company has clearly moved from a public relations strategy to one focusing on litigation over whether damage to the state’s oyster beds was BP’s fault. The state contends that its decision to open many freshwater diversions along the Mississippi River to full blast at the height of the oil spill kept oil from entering the oyster beds, though the fresh water killed the oysters, requiring the beds to be restocked with cultch, oyster shell deposited beneath the water on which oyster larvae grow.

“Their response today was that we see no evidence of oil injuring the oysters,” Barham said. U.S. Sen. David Vitter, R-La., had asked BP to pay $15 million for new oyster cultch, and even that would not have been enough money to restock all the beds that were damaged in St. Bernard, Plaquemines, Jefferson and Lafourche parishes, he said.

BP clearly thinks the public relation storm is over, and it’s back to business as usual.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. And, y’know, they are probably right. Astonishing.

Cartoons

Posted on February 22nd, 2011 at 9:05 by John Sinteur in category: Cartoon


Write a comment

What would Feynman do?

Posted on February 22nd, 2011 at 8:22 by John Sinteur in category: Software

[Quote]:

"how well would the late Nobel-Prize-winning physicist Dr. Richard P. Feynman do in a technical interview at a software company?"


Write a comment


« Older Entries Newer Entries »