« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

AFBF pushes for tax relief for wealthy heirs

Posted on October 24th, 2011 at 23:46 by Sueyourdeveloper in category: News

Quote

The secretive American Family Business Foundation is busy pushing for tax relief for those waiting heirs.  It wants the deficit reduction commission to include repeal of the estate tax as a job creating measure

Trying to sell estate tax repeal and the loss of billions of tax revenues as a revenue raiser, on the grounds that cut taxes will be invested in ways that create new jobs, has got to be a new low in the pro-business, anti-government, anti-safety net, pro-tax-cuts-for-the-wealthy arguments that the radicalized right feels free to make now.

And apart from the usual suspects at the Peasant’s Revolt, no-one seems to want to prevent this.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. John, otherwise intelligent people eat it up gladly “if it’s a privately owned company, it can do whatever it wants!” and “tax cuts are good, I am glad to pay for anything, and if I can’t I don’t deserve it!” is something a lot of them earnestly believe.
    It seems they hate being “enslaved by government” but will happily put on a privately owned collar and march into the salve pens if asked by a private company.

  2. Roland, I didn’t post this

WikiLeaks Suspends Operations, May Have To Close

Posted on October 24th, 2011 at 20:17 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Saying that "an arbitrary and unlawful financial blockade … has destroyed 95 percent of our revenue," WikiLeaks has suspended publishing operations and founder Julian Assange says it may have to shut down permanently by year’s end.

The whistle-blowing operation is famous for its uncovering of U.S. diplomatic cables and other materials that governments and corporations wanted to keep secret. But the decision by some U.S.-based financial institutions, including Visa, MasterCard, Western Union and PayPal, to block would-be donors from using their networks to give WikiLeaks money has dramatically reduced its ability to raise funds.

So banks are allowed to coordinate their activities to just shut particular people or organizations out of the banking system for political reasons without some lawful authority.

I guess it’s only illegal if the government doesn’t want you to do it.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. WTF does WikiLeaks have 20 employees for, what the heck do they do, and how have they been getting paid when the org only pulls in a few thousand dollars per month?

    It’s not like they’ve actually been releasing anything lately.

  2. I don’t believe there is any coordination at work. When WikiLeaks started releasing financial correspondence and client data, no bank wanted any part of that. They brought this down on themselves. WikiLeaks donors will have to start paying with checks and cash.

  3. no bank wanted any part of that

    Sure. Now the interesting question: at what point, and how, do you want to regulate institutions like banks? Over here in the NL it is illegal for banks to refuse services to anyone, aside from a few exceptions (such as illegal ventures, and a few other things). Point is, financial services are such a basic part of human life, refusal of said services is something a sane society regulates. There’s a reason WikiLeaks calls the block “unlawful”.

  4. WikiLeaks IS one of those exceptions. Their activities are detrimental to providing one of banking’s absolute core services: Privacy.

    Now for my interesting question: Why isn’t WikiLeaks banking in the NL if, as you say, they can’t be denied?

  5. I don’t know – you’ll have to ask them. And for “privacy”, not really:

    [Quote]:

    So it’s a welcome sign that 11 firms may be on the verge of agreeing to pay billions of dollars in penalties and reveal the names of Americans who used Swiss bank accounts to evade U.S. taxes, according to a Bloomberg News article yesterday. The banks, including Credit Suisse Group AG, the second-biggest Swiss bank, and several foreign institutions doing business in Switzerland, are hardly doing this out of some sense of moral duty. U.S. prosecutors held out the threat of criminal indictments, which is tantamount to a death sentence for a bank.

  6. That’s a whole other thing. In the case you cite, they are not compromising their clients’ privacy willingly. They are doing so under court order. There is a major difference between that and WikiLeaks illegally obtaining and blasting that information all over the internet.

    And it’s pretty rich of WikiLeaks to be using the term “unlawful”. Receiving stolen goods is unlawful and their entire business model is based on it.

  7. There are whistle-blower laws that may very well make it legal for wikileaks to receive the info – at the very least it is currently unclear if they received the info as “stolen goods”.

  8. I’m surprised that Wikileaks haven’t found a large NGO to be their fundraising partner. You’d think Amnesty International might be willing, and having all major transaction processors block AI would be a big stink.

    Why isn’t Wikileaks sourcing donations in Europe through inter-bank transfers? They don’t need VISA, Mastercard, and Paypal in Europe, right?

    But frankly, right now giving money to Wikileaks is giving money to Assange Publishing, Inc. As long as Wikileaks consists of nothing more than Mr Big Ego Martyr, I won’t give them money again. I respect that Assange created this organization and dedicated his life to it, but it needs real governance, a succession plan for when he’s in jail, etc.

    Better to donate to the Manning Defense Fund.

Cartoons

Posted on October 24th, 2011 at 17:48 by John Sinteur in category: Cartoon


Write a comment

New Big Brother: Market-Moving Satellite Images

Posted on October 24th, 2011 at 12:04 by John Sinteur in category: News

In a “perfect market” all the players have the same information.

Unless you own a couple of photo satellites, the stock market is not perfect.


Write a comment

The Last Super

Posted on October 24th, 2011 at 11:53 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. So I see Superman, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, Flash, Hawkman, and (I think) Aquaman – but who are the others? Man, I feel old…

Drug-sniffing dogs come to Wolcott High School, with a twist.

Posted on October 24th, 2011 at 10:54 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

At Wolcott High School one morning this week, an urgent announcement crackled over the intercom: a threatening intruder was in the building and students were told to immediately take refuge in classrooms.

Doors were locked and police, with dogs, moved in. Students stayed huddled in classrooms where they were told to stay away from the windows.

But what sounded like a frightening situation was just a search for narcotics. Drug-sniffing dogs combed the school while students stayed in locked classrooms, believing that an attacker was roaming the halls.

[..]

“After 10 minutes we say this is a drill and at that point we started a search for drugs,” McCary said. “We are providing a safe and secure nurturing environment.”

No drugs turned up in the search.

[..]

Andrew Schneider, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut, called it a “terrible policy. It will cause more trouble in the long run. Young people will learn not to trust the police.”

“It’s a terrible civics lesson.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. “Safe, secure, nurturing.” Someone should pick up a dictionary, because “I don’t think that means what you think it means”.

The Biggest Stars In The Universe

Posted on October 24th, 2011 at 10:34 by John Sinteur in category: News


Write a comment

Michele Bachmann Says Iraq Should Reimburse U.S. For War Expenses

Posted on October 24th, 2011 at 9:24 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, Mess O'Potamia

[Quote]:

You know how every time Michele Bachmann opens her mouth it’s kind of exciting because you never know what’s going to come out, but then it’s also terrifying because you’re worried whatever she says will be taken seriously? Well, brace yourselves because today she’s dropped a real doozy: she thinks the people of Iraq should pay us back for all of the money we spent invading them.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Why stop there? They should go and demand the same thing from Vietnam – corrected with inflation and of course applying the interest.
    Also the Philippines and Korea – South Korea most likely.

  2. Maybe Cheney and Rumsfeld should be reimbursing us. They’re the ones who distorted the intelligence.

  3. Ah…so hard to collect from Iraq when you’ve already delivered the service for which you want payment (and they have a fair amount of oil resources that you need).

    Better to threaten that if the world doesn’t pay you, you won’t invade them.

  4. Sue, did you mean to say, “Better to threaten that if the world doesn’t pay you, you WILL invade them”?

  5. lol…Ms. B. always reminds me of Doug and Dinsdale Piranha.

Microsoft collects license fees on 50% of Android devices, tells Google to “wake up”

Posted on October 24th, 2011 at 8:18 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google, Microsoft

[Quote]:

Google’s complaints about patent-based attacks against Android don’t seem to be doing the company any good. We all know Steve Jobs pledged to destroy Android, claiming it stole its ideas from Apple’s iOS. Yet what is likely an even bigger threat comes from Microsoft, which claims that more than half of all Android devices are now subject to patent licensing agreements.

What does that mean? When you buy an Android phone, there’s a good chance either the vendor whose name is on the device or one of the manufacturers who contributed hardware to it is paying Microsoft a fee for each sale. Today, Microsoft announced an agreement with Compal, an original design manufacturer that produces smartphones and tablets for third parties and takes in $28 billion in annual revenue. This was the “tenth license agreement providing coverage under our patent portfolio for Android mobile phones and tablets,” and the ninth in the last four months, Microsoft lawyers Brad Smith and Horacio Gutierrez write in a blog post.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Lawyers…… from Microsoft……..

    How low can you go in this blog to find a source to quote?