[Quote]:
Michael DeGusta:I went back and found every Android phone shipped in the United
States up through the middle of last year. I then tracked down
every update that was released for each device – be it a major OS
upgrade or a minor support patch — as well as prices and release
and discontinuation dates. I compared these dates and versions to
the currently shipping version of Android at the time. The
resulting picture isn’t pretty — well, not for Android users.This took a lot of effort, and his resulting infographic is striking. Many Android phones ship on day one with an old version of the OS and never catch up at any point. Fantastic work. Pretty good analysis too:
In other words, Apple’s way of getting you to buy a new phone is
to make you really happy with your current one, whereas apparently
Android phone makers think they can get you to buy a new phone by
making you really unhappy with your current one. Then again, all
of this may be ascribing motives and intent where none exist —
it’s entirely possible that the root cause of the problem is
just flat-out bad management (and/or the aforementioned
spectacular dumbness).
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by incompetence.
|
Getting an untethered HTC was my best choice. It has the newest stable Android OS, always updating. My brother has a Samsung with a T-Mobile contract, laggin far far behind.
He has way more crapware too.
I think it’s not really Apple versus Android, it’s more like Old time phone makers vs. new phone makers.
Or, those who get it vs. those who don’t.
But you probably have to make sure the HTC keeps up-to-date yourself? I know I have to with my untethered Desire I bought for development. Problem is, 99.9% of users don’t know or don’t want to put in that effect. So, yes, it really is Old time phone makers vs.
new phone makersAppleNope, it just displays a message: New update available and then it downloads. Then it asks if I want to restart it when the update is finished.
I don’t know much about Android and its ecosystem, but when I read this on DF, I wondered if it matters as much as everyone is pretending it does. I noticed that Motorola is the worst in providing OS updates. But don’t they have a substantive shell built on top of Android? Do the users get updates to the Moto shell instead?
Think about the Kindle Fire. It’s based on Android 2.x, right? It may never move forward to newer versions of Android. Is anyone going to care when the thing pretty much hides Android UI and provides its own shell? The only place I can think of where it matters is if apps start requiring new OS versions and those apps won’t work on the Fire (and thus presumably won’t appear in its app store). I suppose that’s an issue with two sharp edges: enough fragmentation, and developers may get discouraged.