« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Will voters buy the idea that GOP is sabotaging economy?

Posted on November 3rd, 2011 at 21:26 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Steve Benen flags what seems to be a first: A poll gauging whether voters are prepared to believe that Republicans are deliberately sabotaging the recovery in order to take back the White House. With the Obama campaign and Democrats signaling that this argument will be central in 2012, this seems like a relevant question.

The poll, which surveyed Florida voters, was conducted by Suffolk University. I tracked down the poll’s internals, and here’s the relevant question:

Do you think the Republicans are intentionally stalling efforts to jumpstart the economy to insure that Barack Obama is not reelected?

Yes 49

No 39

Undecided 12


Write a comment

Windows Phone Is Back, Full of Great Tricks

Posted on November 3rd, 2011 at 21:10 by John Sinteur in category: Microsoft

[Quote]:

Windows Phone 7.5 is gorgeous, classy, satisfying, fast and coherent. The design is intelligent, clean and uncluttered. Never in a million years would you guess that it came from the same company that cooked up the bloated spaghetti that is Windows and Office.

Most impressively, Windows Phone is not a feeble-minded copycat. Microsoft came up with completely fresh metaphors that generally steer clear of the iPhone/Android design (grid-spaced icons that scroll across home pages).


Write a comment

Cartoons

Posted on November 3rd, 2011 at 16:44 by John Sinteur in category: Cartoon


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. It is tragic that Americans, so many Americans, do not understand that you go to college to learn and develop critical thinking that can, yes, help you get and do higher paying jobs, but that is only part of why one needs to expand their mind and develop the skills necessary to understand complex things. The mindset that it is just about getting a job and making money shows how far along our society is to the flock of sheep the 1% and their police are seeking.

  2. Although the cartoon is probably meant to be ironic, the education industry is just as guilty of pushing excessive loans on naive individuals as banks on homeowners during the worst excesses of the U.S. housing bubble.

The sods must be crazy: OLPC to drop tablets from helicopters to isolated villages

Posted on November 3rd, 2011 at 16:34 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

The One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project has devised a bizarre plan for deploying its new XO-3 tablet. The organization plans to drop the touchscreen computers from helicopters near remote villages in developing countries. The devices will then be abandoned and left for the villagers to find, distribute, support, and use on their own.

[..]

“We’ll take tablets and drop them out of helicopters into villages that have no electricity and school, then go aback a year later and see if the kids can read,” Negroponte told The Register.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Interesting. A lot of people in the education world say that OLPC is misguided because they believe technology alone can’t fix education, that you need to address the bigger picture, including teachers, teacher attendance, etc. This seems like an attempt by Negroponte to disprove those claims, to show that technology alone can educate kids.

    It does seem like you open yourself up to criticism if you don’t measure whether the kids could read beforehand, and it seems less than ideal to drop in the tablets to be appropriated by the nearest alpha male who wants the baubles for himself. Otherwise seems like it might be a mostly harmless experiment.

  2. @Desiato: “Alpha male?” “Baubles?” I doubt it. In a world where most adults are so busy that kids are the best ones to work out how to operate a TV remote control, and having used the first OLPC product, I think it will take any grown person less than a couple of days to get bored with this device, regardless of their state of education (rms notwithstanding).

    As you say, these guys seem harmless, but previously they helped push notebook/tablet development.

G20: Bill Gates adds his weight to calls for Robin Hood tax

Posted on November 3rd, 2011 at 16:12 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Bill Gates will tell the G20 group of developed and developing countries on Thursday that they could raise an extra $48bn (£30bn) a year to fight global poverty by levying a small tax on share and bond trading.

Despite hostility from Britain and the US, the Microsoft founder will add weight to the growing campaign for a so-called Robin Hood tax when he tells the two-day summit in Cannes that a levy on finance would help hard-pressed rich nations to meet their aid pledges to the poor.

Gates will acknowledge the lack of G20 unanimity for a financial transaction tax when he presents a report – Innovation with Impact – commissioned by Nicolas Sarkozy in a 75-minute session on development on Thursday afternoon.But the study concludes that aid budgets would be boosted by $9bn even were the FTT limited to the larger European economies, such as Germany and France, which back the idea.

Speaking to the Guardian on the eve of the summit, Gates said: "It is very plausible that certain kinds of FTTs could work. I am lending some credibility to that. This money could be well spent and make a difference. An FTT is more possible now than it was a year ago, but it won’t be at rates that magically raise gigantic sums of money."


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Robin Hood tax :D We had one in 2008 and 2009 (not sure about exact dates). It was an 8% tax on the income of companies working in the energy industry. Both producers and vendors – oil companies, gas companies, petrol stations, etc.
    The expected revenue was 30bn – though in HUF not GBP. :)
    Robin Hood is a popular person.

Why the Mac App Sandbox makes me sad | Naming Things

Posted on November 3rd, 2011 at 16:12 by Desiato in category: Apple

[Quote]:

Apple announced today that, starting in March 2012, all apps on the Mac App Store will be required to run in the so-called “App Sandbox”.

The sandbox is an environment that locks down the Mac in ways that match (and exceed) the limitations found on iOS. A sandboxed app doesn’t have direct access to any files or frameworks on the system. It can’t access the network or any devices.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. But it’s Apple! It’s awesome!

  2. Roland, Desiato is just about the last person I’d accuse of being an apple fanboy.

  3. I doubt Roland thought this was posted because the *poster* thought it was so awesome. :)

    I have deeply mixed feeling about it. I can see why Apple wants to go this way, to make quality control for the App Store easier for them (Apple), and to further ensure that Mac OS remains free from malware. I think the lack of malware and viruses is a key strategic advantage over Windows, supporting the “just get a Mac” attitude. But I really don’t like these highly controlled ecosystems where users and developers are at the whim of a single gatekeeper.

  4. It wasn’t aimed at the poster, my take away from the post was that he wasn’t really thrilled by this development – more mixed.

    It was just a little sarcasm, shout in the air, not aimed at anyone – was intended to be read “Bit it’s Apple! It’s awesome! (how can you feel anything else than being oooverjoyed?)”. Chastising the poster for not feeling the holy aura :) )

    Although, I have to admit that I am well known of not being an Apple fanboy – even less since I bought my iMac -, so I can see how it can be misread. Sorry about that.

  5. Roland, no worries, I’ll keep it in mind for your next apple remark :-)

    I’m deeply mixed too – however, it’ll be fine as long as other ways of getting apps on your computer are kept alive. This way, you get a grandma-safe computer on the one hand, and I, as a developer, can still muck about as much as I want to. From a principled point of view I’d rather see the app store idea not happening at all, but I understand where it comes from. I also know I won’t be using it.

  6. I also know I won’t be using it.

    By this I think you don’t mean you’ll never get apps through the Mac App Store but that you won’t be *selling* apps through it, right? Cos as far as I know you’re otherwise going to be out of luck on getting Xcode, and thus won’t be an iPhone developer any longer.

    it’ll be fine as long as other ways of getting apps on your computer are kept alive.

    But will they? For a large percentage of software? You already can’t get the most popular Twitter client any way other than through the App Store. (That’s Twitter’s own, former Tweetie.)

    How many OS versions before Apple locks down software installs to App Store-only by default? Want to take bets?

  7. Here is an excellent article about it.