« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Overbroad Censorship & Users

Posted on December 18th, 2011 at 10:07 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property -- Write a comment

[Quote]:

The harm that does to ordinary, non-infringing users is best described via a hypothetical user: Abe. Abe has never even so much as breathed on a company’s copyright but he does many of the things typical of Internet users today. He stores the photos of his children, now three and six years old, online at PickUpShelf* so that he doesn’t have to worry about maintaining backups. He is a teacher and keeps copies of his classes accessible for his students via another service called SunStream that makes streaming audio and video easy. He engages frequently in conversation in several online communities and has developed a hard-won reputation and following on a discussion host called SpeakFree. And, of course, he has a blog called “Abe’s Truths” that is hosted on a site called NewLeaflet. He has never infringed on any copyright and each of the entities charged with enforcing SOPA know that he hasn’t.

And yet, none of that matters. Under SOPA, every single one of the services that Abe uses can be obliterated from his view without him having any remedy. Abe may wake up one morning and not be able to access any of his photos of his children. Neither he, nor his students, would be able to access any of his lectures. His trove of smart online discussions would likewise evaporate and he wouldn’t even be able to complain about it on his blog. And, in every case, he has absolutely no power to try to regain access. That may sound far-fetched but under SOPA, all that needs to happen for this scenario to come true is for the Attorney General to decide that some part of PickUpShelf, SunStream, SpeakFree and NewLeaflet would be copyright infringement in the US. If a court agrees, and with no guarantee of an adversarial proceeding that seems very likely, the entire site is “disappeared” from the US internet. When that happens Abe has NO remedy. None. No way of getting the photos of his kids other than leaving the United States for a country that doesn’t have overly broad censorship laws.

  1. He does have a choice. He could use proxy servers or other means to get to his stuff. He only needs to learn the tools of the trade. Which no doubt will make him “a hacker” by law, eligible to go to jail.

  2. Or he could immediately quit being apathetic and raise his voice loud and clear and begin protests about this and other sad state of affairs in the U.S. corporatocracy.

  3. I have told many friends that the cloud (the internet) is not a safe place to store stuff if you want to keep it. There are too many ways to lose access to or completely lose your data.

previous post: Pastafarians to put up holiday display in Leesburg, VA town square

next post: Did Perry Overstate Budget Cut?