« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

NASA Announces Game-Changing Energy Breakthrough

Posted on January 16th, 2012 at 23:52 by Paul Jay in category: News

[Quote]:

NASA has announced a game-changing energy technology:

Narrator: While the world is drastically dependent on fossil fuel, researchers at NASA Langley Research Center are working on another way of producing energy-efficient nuclear power.

Dr Zawodny: This other form of nuclear power releases energy by adding neutrons. Eventually they gain a sufficient number of neutrons that they spontaneously decay into something of the same mass but a different element.

Narrator: The different element is cleaner than traditional nuclear fuels, and can be produced by raw materials such as nickel, carbon and hydrogen.

Dr. Zawodny: It has the demonstrated ability to produce excess amounts of energy, cleanly, without hazardous ionizing radiation, without producing nasty waste.

Narrator: This clean form of energy is also powerful, able to support everything from transportation systems to infrastructure.

Dr. Zawodny: The easiest implementation of this would be for the home. You would have a unit that would replace your water heater. And you would have some sort of cycle to derive electrical energy from that.

And then it would dump its waste heat into the water or air handing system for the building. So it would be a dual use thing. It would be sitting there producing heat; and you’d drive electricity from it to run your electronics, power the house, power the building, power the light industry. And then the waste heat would be used for environmental control [i.e. heating, air conditioning, etc.] and warm water.”

Narrator: NASA’s method for Enhancement of Surface Plasmon Polaritons to Initiate And Sustain LENR in Metal Hydride Systems, a clean nuclear energy for your power- operated technology.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. LENR, Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, is what was previously known as “cold fusion” but for some reason they’re not using that term. :)

    This bit from Zawodny’s blog gives some perspective:

    There has been a lot of work done in the past 20+ years. When considered in aggregate I believe excess power has been demonstrated. I did not say, reliable, useful, commercially viable, or controllable. If any of those other terms were applicable I would have used them instead.

Corruption in Iraq: ‘Your son is being tortured. He will die if you don’t pay’

Posted on January 16th, 2012 at 18:31 by John Sinteur in category: Mess O'Potamia

[Quote]:

“You pay $300,000 to buy a post as a security chief or military commander of a neighbourhood for a year and you have to get your money back. It’s like an investment. But you can never trust anyone in this country – they take your money and a year later they conspire against you and throw you in jail. They are like wolves.”

One of his subordinates explained how the officers procured their positions. “The commander of the district buys his post from the politicians or the office of the commander-in-chief. Then the commander rents the post of interrogation officer to his juniors for $10,000 to $15,000 per month, depending on the area. For a Sunni neighbourhood you have to pay a lot of money; for Shia not that much, because most of the arrests take place in the Sunni areas. Then you get your money back from the detainee.

“Sometimes you get really lucky and actually detain someone who is in al-Qaida, and then you can get your full investment in one go: you arrange for him to escape for half a million dollars.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Sounds like the same capitalism that we have in the US.

Quote

Posted on January 16th, 2012 at 18:13 by John Sinteur in category: Quote

“It wasn’t Satan, it was me. Quit giving him credit.”

-Jessica Ahlquist


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Sounds like a swede…? But I don’t think I’ve heard of her…

  2. here.

DHS’ X-ray scanners could be cancer risk to border crossers

Posted on January 16th, 2012 at 16:03 by John Sinteur in category: Security

[Quote]:

Even though a public outcry has prompted Homeland Security to move away from adding X-ray machines to airports–it purchased 300 body scanners last year that used alternative technology instead–it appears to be embracing them at U.S.-Mexico land border crossings as an efficient way to detect drugs, currency, and explosives.

[..]

For its part, Homeland Security says the dose is safe and based on commonly accepted government standards established by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement, which would permit 2,500 scans a year for each person.

I suggest, to make sure these devices are properly calibrated, the Director/CEO of the TSA and his family should undergo 2,500 scans a year.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. “Society will pay a huge price in cancer because of this,” John Sedat, professor of biochemistry and biophysics at the University of California at San Francisco.”

    Feel safer?

  2. I have read that the risk of cancer from these scanners is approximately the risk a terrorist blows up the plain, so fairly low, but also a complete waste of time.

Nokia sells over 450 patents to a patent troll

Posted on January 16th, 2012 at 14:38 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property

[Quote]:

Sisvel is a company you’ve probably never heard of, and to give you an idea of what they do just read their slogan: “We protect ideas.” Yes folks, they’re a patent troll, which is a defined as a company that buys up patents and then proceeds to bring other companies to court for infringing on said patents. They’ve just announced that they’re acquiring 47 patent families from Nokia, giving them more than 450 new patents that they can add to their arsenal. What’s surprising is that 33 of the patent families, which come in at somewhere over 350 patents, are defined by Nokia as essential to 2G, 3G, and 4G technologies.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I’d say this was a bad sign. It’s interesting that the end of hi-tech booms lately have resulted in this crap being polished off by such scavengers. In Ottawa, Nortel is now defunct, and it and the former ecosystem of companies around it are being gradually acquired by U.S.-based companies, basically for the IP and the right to enter the legal battles. Hard to know who is fooling who sometimes.

I’ve heard they are all bipolar

Posted on January 16th, 2012 at 14:12 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture


Write a comment

Picture from André Kuipers aboard ISS

Posted on January 16th, 2012 at 14:07 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture

first one to state the location wins an internet


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Um…Planet Earth?

  2. Could you be more specific?

  3. Curaçao? Not only more specific, but warmer.

  4. Bingo – With Bonaire and Aruba visible as well. The land mass top right is Venezuela.

  5. John, could you please put my internet back in the hat for the next contest. The one I’ve got is doing fine for the moment. Many thanks.

  6. I will do that. It is still in its wrapper, so it will stay fresh in storage…

Cartoon

Posted on January 16th, 2012 at 12:24 by John Sinteur in category: Cartoon


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I can’t tell you how bad I wanted to hear those words come out of Tebow’s mouth. I did a write up of him on my blog today.

India threatens to block Google, Facebook and chums

Posted on January 16th, 2012 at 12:21 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Google, Facebook and other internet companies have been warned by India’s High Court that their websites could be blocked if they fail to remove “offensive, objectionable” content from their sites.

The Delhi High Court told representatives from Facebook and Google yesterday that the firms “must have a stringent check” in place to help prevent supposedly offensive material from being published on their networks.

“Otherwise, like in China, we may pass orders banning all such websites,” said the court.

[..]

At the time, India’s minister of communications and information technology, Kapil Sibal, denied that the demand amounted to censorship and instead claimed that the world’s largest democracy with a population of 1.2 billion needed to protect the “sensibilities of our people”. Sibal provided various examples of “unacceptable” content: faked naked pictures of Indian political leaders and religiously sensitive images.


Write a comment

Controversial online piracy bill shelved until ‘consensus’ is found

Posted on January 16th, 2012 at 11:27 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property

[Quote]:

House Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said early Saturday morning that Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) promised him the House will not vote on the controversial Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) unless there is consensus on the bill.

“While I remain concerned about Senate action on the Protect IP Act, I am confident that flawed legislation will not be taken up by this House,” Issa said in a statement. “Majority Leader Cantor has assured me that we will continue to work to address outstanding concerns and work to build consensus prior to any anti-piracy legislation coming before the House for a vote.”

The announcement comes just hours after Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas), SOPA’s sponsor, made a major concession to the bill’s critics by agreeing to drop a controversial provision that would have required Internet service providers to block infringing websites.

[..]

“Right now, the focus of protecting the Internet needs to be on the Senate where Majority Leader Reid has announced his intention to try to move similar legislation in less than two weeks,” he said.

Classic trickery, we’re now between step 2 and 3.

1: Make crazy offer (SOPA)
2: People rejects crazy offer
3: Make a “reasonable” offer (PIPA)
4: People accept offer because it seems reasonable compared to crazy offer.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. OTOH, an election year is not a time to annoy any group that can be bothered to go out to vote.

Top Ten Legal Drugs Linked to Violence

Posted on January 16th, 2012 at 9:56 by Paul Jay in category: News

[Quote]:

When people consider the connections between drugs and violence, what typically comes to mind are illegal drugs like crack cocaine. However, certain medications — most notably, some antidepressants like Prozac — have also been linked to increase risk for violent, even homicidal behavior.

A new study from the Institute for Safe Medication Practices published in the journal PloS One and based on data from the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System has identified 31 drugs that are disproportionately linked with reports of violent behavior towards others.

10. Desvenlafaxine (Pristiq) An antidepressant which affects both serotonin and noradrenaline, this drug is 7.9 times more likely to be associated with violence than other drugs.

9. Venlafaxine (Effexor) A drug related to Pristiq in the same class of antidepressants, both are also used to treat anxiety disorders. Effexor is 8.3 times more likely than other drugs to be related to violent behavior. (More on Time.com: Adderall May Not Make You Smarter, But It Makes You Think You Are)

8. Fluvoxamine (Luvox) An antidepressant that affects serotonin (SSRI), Luvox is 8.4 times more likely than other medications to be linked with violence

7. Triazolam (Halcion) A benzodiazepine which can be addictive, used to treat insomnia. Halcion is 8.7 times more likely to be linked with violence than other drugs, according to the study.

6) Atomoxetine (Strattera) Used to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Strattera affects the neurotransmitter noradrenaline and is 9 times more likely to be linked with violence compared to the average medication.

5) Mefoquine (Lariam) A treatment for malaria, Lariam has long been linked with reports of bizarre behavior. It is 9.5 times more likely to be linked with violence than other drugs.

4) Amphetamines: (Various) Amphetamines are used to treat ADHD and affect the brain’s dopamine and noradrenaline systems. They are 9.6 times more likely to be linked to violence, compared to other drugs.

3) Paroxetine (Paxil) An SSRI antidepressant, Paxil is also linked with more severe withdrawal symptoms and a greater risk of birth defects compared to other medications in that class. It is 10.3 times more likely to be linked with violence compared to other drugs.

2) Fluoxetine (Prozac) The first well-known SSRI antidepressant, Prozac is 10.9 times more likely to be linked with violence in comparison with other medications.

1) Varenicline (Chantix) The anti-smoking medication Chantix affects the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, which helps reduce craving for smoking. Unfortunately, it’s 18 times more likely to be linked with violence compared to other drugs — by comparison, that number for Xyban is 3.9 and just 1.9 for nicotine replacement. Because Chantix is slightly superior in terms of quit rates in comparison to other drugs, it shouldn’t necessarily be ruled out as an option for those trying to quit, however.

Where is the evil and dangerous Marijuana in this list?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Two things–first, it’s a list of approved medications and marijuana is not federally approved so it would not appear in the lis evenif it made people violent. Second, “5x more likely to be violent” is uninteresting if you don’t tell me what the absolute level of the baseline is. 5 x 0.00000001 is still basically zero.

  2. In addition, these drugs may be administrated with more frecuency to violent people or situations. A person that quits smoking is more nervous/anxious/stressed and is more prone to violence.

  3. @Desiato

    toke…toke…toke
    I’d beat you up for being such an asshat, but I’m feeling too mellow right now… :-)

  4. ‘Ignoring Asshats makes me mellow’

  5. Headline: “Stoners can’t be bothered to stone those who disagree with them.” Wait, did I just make that up or was it in The Onion? :)

    I’m for legalizing marijuana (beyond medical use); I think a comparison with alcohol makes a lot of sense. But not with prescription medication. Medicine has side effects that are tolerated because the main treatment effect is considered to outweigh the side effects…

  6. A comparison with alcohol makes sense?
    Alcohol causes way more addiction, violence and death.
    We all know why useful medicine in nature is illegal and not approved as medicine.
    Money and power.

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070417193338.htm
    http://www.webmd.com/pain-management/news/20100830/marijuana-relieves-chronic-pain-research-show
    This list is endless but it can’t cure ignorance.

  7. Yes, a comparison with alcohol makes sense because it has virtually no therapeutic use, has lots of associated abuse and societal ills, AND YET it is legal to produce, sell, and consume. Alcohol is legal and we know that alcohol prohibition didn’t work and led to crime, so marijuana should be legal too. And not just as a prescription medicine. Or conversely, if marijuana is illegal, alcohol certainly should be too.