« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

‘My First Hardcore Song’ by 8yr old Juliet

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 21:45 by Paul Jay in category: awesome


Write a comment

Shit New Yorkers Say

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 19:05 by John Sinteur in category: News


Write a comment

Biologists replicate key evolutionary step

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 18:47 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

More than 500 million years ago, single-celled organisms on Earth’s surface began forming multicellular clusters that ultimately became plants and animals. Just how that happened is a question that has eluded evolutionary biologists.

[..]

It all started about two years ago with a casual comment over coffee that bridging the famous multi-cellularity gap would be “just about the coolest thing we could do,” recall postdoctoral researcher Will Ratcliff and associate professor Michael Travisano, both from the Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior.

So they decided to give it a try. Then came the big surprise. It wasn’t actually that difficult. Using yeast cells, culture media and a centrifuge, it only took them one experiment conducted over about 60 days, says Travisano, who is senior author on the PNAS paper.

“I don’t think anyone had ever tried it before,” says lead author Ratcliff. “There aren’t many scientists doing experimental evolution, and they’re trying to answer questions about evolution, not recreate it.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. God’s a centrifuge?

  2. Nope, we’re just God’s yeast infection.

  3. Crikey Mark, put some ointment on it!

CEO of FoxConn: ‘Managing One Million Animals Gives Me A Headache’

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 18:39 by Desiato in category: Apple, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

According to WantChinaTimes, Terry Gou, the head of Hon Hai Foxconn, the largest contract manufacturer in the world, had this to say at a recent meeting with his senior managers:"Hon Hai has a workforce of over one million worldwide and as human beings are also animals, to manage one million animals gives me a headache," said Hon Hai chairman Terry Gou at a recent year-end party, adding that he wants to learn from Chin Shih-chien, director of Taipei Zoo, regarding how animals should be managed.

Apparently there are no psychologists in China.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. So he’s not happy with his slaves’ behaviour. Poor baby.
    Perhaps there are limits to the size of human organizations.

You know you messed up bad when they’re taking pictures from space.

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 18:32 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture

Here


Write a comment

Pirate Bay press release

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 17:23 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property

[Quote]:

INTERNETS, 18th of January 2012.
PRESS RELEASE, FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE.

Over a century ago Thomas Edison got the patent for a device which would “do for the eye what the phonograph does for
the ear”. He called it the Kinetoscope. He was not only amongst the first to record video, he was also the first person
to own the copyright to a motion picture.

Because of Edisons patents for the motion pictures it was close to financially impossible to create motion pictures
in the North american east coast. The movie studios therefor relocated to California, and founded what we today call
Hollywood. The reason was mostly because there was no patent.
There was also no copyright to speak of, so the studios could copy old stories and make movies out of them – like
Fantasia, one of Disneys biggest hits ever.

So, the whole basis of this industry, that today is screaming about losing control over immaterial rights, is that they
circumvented immaterial rights. They copied (or put in their terminology: “stole”) other peoples creative works,
without paying for it. They did it in order to make a huge profit. Today, they’re all successful and most of the
studios are on the Fortune 500 list of the richest companies in the world. Congratulations – it’s all based on being
able to re-use other peoples creative works. And today they hold the rights to what other people create.
If you want to get something released, you have to abide to their rules. The ones they created after circumventing
other peoples rules.

The reason they are always complainting about “pirates” today is simple. We’ve done what they did. We circumvented the
rules they created and created our own. We crushed their monopoly by giving people something more efficient. We allow
people to have direct communication between eachother, circumventing the profitable middle man, that in some cases take
over 107% of the profits (yes, you pay to work for them).
It’s all based on the fact that we’re competition.
We’ve proven that their existance in their current form is no longer needed. We’re just better than they are.

And the funny part is that our rules are very similar to the founding ideas of the USA. We fight for freedom of speech.
We see all people as equal. We believe that the public, not the elite, should rule the nation. We believe that laws
should be created to serve the public, not the rich corporations.

The Pirate Bay is truly an international community. The team is spread all over the globe – but we’ve stayed out of the
USA. We have Swedish roots and a swedish friend said this:
The word SOPA means “trash” in Swedish. The word PIPA means “a pipe” in Swedish. This is of course not a coincidence.
They want to make the internet inte a one way pipe, with them at the top, shoving trash through the pipe down to the
rest of us obedient consumers.
The public opinion on this matter is clear. Ask anyone on the street and you’ll learn that noone wants to be fed with
trash. Why the US government want the american people to be fed with trash is beyond our imagination but we hope that
you will stop them, before we all drown.

SOPA can’t do anything to stop TPB. Worst case we’ll change top level domain from our current .org to one of the
hundreds of other names that we already also use. In countries where TPB is blocked, China and Saudi Arabia springs to
mind, they block hundreds of our domain names. And did it work? Not really.
To fix the “problem of piracy” one should go to the source of the problem. The entertainment industry say they’re
creating “culture” but what they really do is stuff like selling overpriced plushy dolls and making 11 year old girls
become anorexic. Either from working in the factories that creates the dolls for basically no salary or by watching
movies and tv shows that make them think that they’re fat.

In the great Sid Meiers computer game Civilization you can build Wonders of the world. One of the most powerful ones
is Hollywood. With that you control all culture and media in the world. Rupert Murdoch was happy with MySpace and had
no problems with their own piracy until it failed. Now he’s complainting that Google is the biggest source of piracy
in the world – because he’s jealous. He wants to retain his mind control over people and clearly you’d get a more
honest view of things on Wikipedia and Google than on Fox News.

Some facts (years, dates) are probably wrong in this press release. The reason is that we can’t access this information
when Wikipedia is blacked out. Because of pressure from our failing competitors. We’re sorry for that.

THE PIRATE BAY, (K)2012


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Hey John, uh, just curious, what aspect of this made it worth posting to you?

  2. The comparison to early hollywood.

  3. I was thinking about this some more and am curious to get reactions to the below.

    As I understand it, the book industry in the U.S. got its start printing illegal copies of books published in Britian. Does that mean the book industry should make no claim to copyright protection now? After all, they got their start without it.

    (As a humorous aside–Steve Jobs once made money selling equipment that enabled people to defraud phone companies. Should we all have felt justified shop-lifting iPhones from Apple Stores?)

    I think you (John, but also most other regulars here) agree that corporations aren’t people; corporations (in the US) are bundles of contracts and entities that encapsulate shareholder interests. If that’s the case, the responsibility for the actions of the early movie studios lies with their management, right? The companies have different management now. Should these people be bound and limited by what their predecessors did 100 years ago? Does that make any sense? (Or you might say the responsibility lies ultimately with the shareholders, but those have necessarily turned over too, as the original shareholders are all dead.)

    So when TPB argues “well, you guys got your start pillaging the public domain for story ideas”, I think the question is, are they still doing that? (To a substantial extent?) I don’t see any merit in saying “some of your predecessors did that 100 years ago, so now you have to put up and shut up”. It’s not OK to invade Germany just because they did it to us ~60 years ago.

    [Disclaimer: none of the above should be read as supportive of SOPA, the MPAA, or movie industry in general. I'm strictly discussing the arguments put forth by The Pirate Bay, not the bigger picture of how the movie industry has gone about protecting its business.]

  4. Look at it this way: at one time Hollywood was about circumventing IP through new technology.

    Today, they are complaining that people are circumventing IP through new technology.

    Pot, meet kettle.

  5. To extend the analogy….the fire needs to be turned up even more to not only defend the internet, but bring down the public and private institutions that continued to support both the transparent and non transparent buying of “lawmakers” for all “causes”.

  6. John, you rephrased what the PB press release said without responding in any way to my arguments.

    As an aside, I don’t even think your statement is true in itself. Hollywood tried to circumvent IP by moving out of its reach. If they had new technology, that would in itself circumvent the patents in a completely legitimate way.

  7. Back then, “moving out of reach” basically was new technology. That I can jump on a jet and be in Curacao nine hours later is something relatively recent.

  8. So corporations *are* people, then.

  9. Corporations can move. People can move. Therefore corporations are people?

    Hmmm.

  10. No, my previous comment was French for “You still haven’t responded to my arguments in #3.”

    (Whereas your argument in #4 seems to pretty much be, ‘The Germans invaded us, so now it’s OK for us to invade them.’)

  11. ‘The Germans invaded us, so now it’s OK for us to invade them.’

    No – “the Germans invaded us, so don’t mind us if we laugh away their complaints about being invaded”

    And I honestly don’t know why I should respond to #3. I’m not interested in who is responsible for the decisions today or back then. All I am saying is that their argument lacks merit because of things that happened in the past.

  12. Really? So let’s say Putin decides to annex Germany and invades. Your response would be “aw, shucks, you had that coming!”? Despite the fact that (roughly) none of the actual people involved in Germany’s aggression are alive anymore?

  13. Your response would be “aw, shucks, you had that coming!”?

    No, that would not be my response to the invasion.

    However, if Germany started making an argument like “But invasion is wrong” I might laugh at that specific argument (and only the argument) if and only if Germany had not clearly shown it had learned from its own invasions earlier.

    Since Germany clearly has learned from its own invasions, the entire comparison breaks down.

    I would also condemn Putin for the invasion.

Maddox: I hope SOPA passes.

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 15:12 by Desiato in category: Commentary, Intellectual Property

[Quote]:

My problem with this huge online protest against SOPA, and the reason I rarely take part in such protests, is because it doesn’t address any problems, only the symptom. The problem isn’t this shitty bill, it’s the people who sponsored it. So we protest this bill today, bang enough pots and pans to shame a few backers into not letting this bill pass, then what? Those same dipshits who wrote this legislation still have jobs.

(…)

It needs to get worse before it gets better. We need a really shitty piece of legislation like SOPA in this country to be the spark that ignites the lazy, idle tinders of protest.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Hey Desiato, uh, just curious, what aspect of this made it worth posting to you?

  2. That’s a rheorical question, right?

up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, B, A

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 14:58 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. All girl action, you dastard!

SOPA

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 14:47 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property

███████ everything ████ ████ ██ is █ ██████ ██ fine ██████ █████ ███. ██████’█ ██ ████████. The ████ ███ █ government █████ ████ ██ knows ████ ████ best █ █████ ██.


Write a comment

2 Fast 2 Fourier

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 13:45 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

The Fourier transform is one of the most fundamental concepts in the information sciences. It’s a method for representing an irregular signal — such as the voltage fluctuations in the wire that connects an MP3 player to a loudspeaker — as a combination of pure frequencies. It’s universal in signal processing, but it can also be used to compress image and audio files, solve differential equations and price stock options, among other things.

The reason the Fourier transform is so prevalent is an algorithm called the fast Fourier transform (FFT), devised in the mid-1960s, which made it practical to calculate Fourier transforms on the fly. Ever since the FFT was proposed, however, people have wondered whether an even faster algorithm could be found.

At the Association for Computing Machinery’s Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA) this week, a group of MIT researchers will present a new algorithm that, in a large range of practically important cases, improves on the fast Fourier transform. Under some circumstances, the improvement can be dramatic — a tenfold increase in speed. The new algorithm could be particularly useful for image compression, enabling, say, smartphones to wirelessly transmit large video files without draining their batteries or consuming their monthly bandwidth allotments.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Crikey! Thanks for this.

The Bark Side

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 13:44 by John Sinteur in category: If you're in marketing, kill yourself

I can’t help being bothered by the Imperial March followed by “That’s the power of German engineering”..


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Ha ha ha ha! That whippet at the end, that’s awesome.

  2. Not the first time VW uses the Imperial March:

‘Get on Board’ Italian Cruise Ship Meme Goes Viral

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 13:39 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

“Vada A Bordo, Cazzo!” is the latest meme circulating the web. It translates to “get on board, d__k.”

[..]

In the aftermath of the captain’s shameful episode, Italians took to Twitter and Facebook to express their disappointment. By Wednesday, the saying was already on T-shirts and the hashtag #vadaabordocazzo was popular on Twitter.


Write a comment

Supreme Court Says Congress May Re-Copyright Public Domain Works

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 11:16 by Desiato in category: Intellectual Property

[Wired]:

Congress may take books, musical compositions and other works out of the public domain, where they can be freely used and adapted, and grant them copyright status again, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.

In a 6-2 ruling, the court said that, just because material enters the public domain, it is not “territory that works may never exit.” (.pdf)

(…)

In dissent, Justices Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito said the legislation goes against the theory of copyright and “does not encourage anyone to produce a single new work.” Copyright, they noted, was part of the Constitution to promote the arts and sciences.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. “Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power” – Benito Mussolini

  2. Reading a bit more, this is about works that are under copyright in countries other than the US – this ruling gives congress the opportunity to follow the Berne convention and give those works the same protection they are having elsewhere.

    Not as big a deal as this summary would indicate.

  3. Perhaps not as big a deal as you thought from the summary, but I think (a) it’s indicative of the mindset at the SCOTUS about not observing the intent of copyright (referred to the the latter part I quoted), and (b) one wonders if they’d rule any differently if this WAS about regular US works being extended retroactively. (I did not read the opinion to see if they indicate.)

How long does the average share holding last? Just 22 seconds

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 9:29 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote]:

The consensus suggest that investors dabbling shares should be in it for the long-term, yet the average holding is less than a minute thanks to computer driven ‘high frequency’ trading.

Michael Hudson, a former Wall Street economist at Chase Manhattan Bank who also helped establish the world’s first sovereign debt fund recently said: “Take any stock in the United States. The average time in which you hold a stock is – it’s gone up from 20 seconds to 22 seconds in the last year.

“Most trades are computerised. Most trades are short-term. The average foreign currency investment lasts – it’s up now to 30 seconds, up from 28 seconds last month. The financial sector is short term, yet they talk as if they’re long term.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I’d love to read a decent explanation of how HFT is beneficial to society at large. Yeah, “more liquidity”, but how does that work and aren’t we well beyond diminishing returns on the benefit of more liquidity?

  2. I don’t believe that the “market” is now a good place to “invest”.

    Perhaps a financial transaction tax that would penalize fast trading might help?

    The alternative is that we rebuild capitalism from the ground up. Lend only to individuals. That you know.

  3. How about a tax of 100% divided by the number of minutes the stock is held? At 1000 minutes that would mean 0.1% tax rate. Keep it shorter than a minute and you’ll pay a multiple of the value.

  4. Good idea. Especially if the term of 1000 minutes was, say, 1000 days. Some investments have “back-end loads” which are financial penalties for early withdrawal of term deposits. Perfectly feasible to implement. As if.