« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Why is Obama So Chicken, Unwilling to Even Address the Question of Pot and the Failed Drug War?

Posted on February 1st, 2012 at 23:24 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

When voting closed on January 28th, marijuana related questions accounted for 105 out of the top 160 questions and received more than 72,000 votes in total. Individual reposts of NORML’s question netted well over 20,000 combined.

[..]

We waited with anticipation until last night when President Obama took to his webcam and began addressing the questions. After about an hour came and went with some unsubstantial discussion about jobs, a question from an internet comedian, talk of the Obama’s upcoming wedding anniversary, and the President offering to check out the resume of an attendee’s spouse, the “interview” ended, with not a single word spoken about marijuana prohibition. It seems they found silence to be more effective than censorship.

[..]

President Obama once stated that marijuana legalization is an entirely “legitimate topic for debate.” The American people are clearly ready for that debate, Mr. President. When will you be?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Yeah, it’s not like he’d lose any votes if he mentioned it. The anti-legalization brigade are solidly in the other camp. Perhaps he just can’t stand the hysterical screeching that would ensue.

  2. You might be surprised. My parents are solid democrats who believe that marijuana might as well be crack cocaine.

  3. Assuming he wins re-election, wait until after that. I suspect he’ll change his tune…

  4. With Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, Obama waited for the military to say that they advised changing the policy so he didn’t have to fight them on it. He may not act on this until law enforcement circles ask him to… and that may not happen soon.

  5. Obama simply has no balls. Think guantanamo.

Facebook IPO could come with surprise twist

Posted on February 1st, 2012 at 23:11 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote]:

In “really hot IPOs,” 90 percent of the shares go to institutional investors and 10 percent to everyday investors, Sweet says. It’s a perk for the banks’ biggest clients, like Fidelity Investments or T. Rowe Price or hedge funds.

The funds pay big commissions to the banks for regularly trading large blocks of stocks or bonds. Those relationships are deep and long-lasting – and lucrative for the banks. The funds expect to be rewarded.

But Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, the banks expected to guide the Facebook IPO, are in an awkward place: They don’t want to tick off 800 million Facebook users – but they don’t want to tick off Fidelity, either.

Most IPOs are underpriced, and the stock usually shoots up the first day. Lucky large investors get the basement price and usually a big payday if they sell on the first day. Smaller investors buy on the open market, after the price has spiked, and pay more.

And most early investors do sell. One university research paper found that about 70 percent of the new stock changes hands in the first two days. Groupon introduced 35 million shares, but on the first day its shares were traded almost 50 million times.

Ann Sherman, associate professor and IPO expert at DePaul University, raised the possibility that Facebook could set aside a portion of its shares for the small investor and use a lottery system if there is a lot of demand.

She says the U.S. is the only country without IPO rules that put traditional investors on an equal footing.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Look, it’s rigged. Don’t even think about it.

  2. Rigged – agreed – and been going on for a long time. The efficient market theory is just that: all theory.

  3. The devil is in the details http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_19877305
    (excerpted)

    The numbers in Facebook’s IPO filing on Wednesday give us the picture of a juggernaut, but not an unstoppable one.
    But there are four areas where the company shows clear vulnerability. In fact, it’s not exaggerating to say that, in some cases, these issues could sabotage the company’s growth, if not derail it completely:
    – Mobile: For me, this subject was the most startling and revealing. Facebook said it had 425 million monthly active users affected."who access Facebook through a smartphone, tablet or some other mobile product. That’s more than half of the 845 million who use Facebook.
    The problem: Facebook serves no ads on its mobile products. And therefore, it makes no money directly from those mobile users.
    –Zynga: We’ve long known that the San Francisco-based creator of social games such as FarmVille and CityVille has been one of the most popular attractions on Facebook. Still, the IPO filing revealed that 12 percent of Facebook’s revenues come through ads and payments from Zynga games. What’s more, that’s up from 10 percent the previous year.
    Zynga, for its part, had an IPO last December, and had already revealed that it’s still primarily dependent on revenue from its Facebook games. But now we learn that Facebook seems to need Zynga almost as much, making it one of the most intriguing and symbiotic relationships on the Web.
    So Facebook needs Zynga to keep making hit games almost as much as Zynga does. And Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and Zynga founder Mark Pincus need to keep the other smiling.
    – User growth: The company has built its remarkable revenue growth by insisting that it was mainly focused on building its user base. The strategy has paid off, and Facebook has silenced the doubters.
    But there are only so many people online, about 2 billion, and Facebook has 845 million of them. Subtract the 500 million in China, and there aren’t many left to get. So, inevitably, growth slows.

    — Governance: I put this last. But it will no doubt give investors some serious night sweats. Zuckerberg has arranged extraordinary agreements that allow him to vote the shares of his biggest investors. That gives him final say on just about all strategic decisions and corporate governance issues.

    In an era where the trend is to push for greater shareholder democracy, Zuckerberg has created something closer to a dictatorship, albeit a benevolent one. Or so he says.

    That’s fine as long as things are hunky-dory and growth and profits are headed up and to the right. But if there is a stumble, all the criticism is likely to fall on Zuckerberg’s shoulders. The pressure from the markets will be intense. And when that happens, his ideals will be tested to a degree that it may be hard for him to imagine.

    I think we are seeing the formation of an Internet Oligopoly that must be resisted and eventually broken if the internet is to survive as an innovative place. In some respects it is too late as what once the home of more academic, technical and creative folks has now become the electronic equivalent of k-mart and all that this implies.

  4. SEC statement. Read the Risks section

A Swarm of Nano Quadrotors

Posted on February 1st, 2012 at 22:25 by Paul Jay in category: News


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Oh my. We are so screwed. How long till we need to worry about this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUunz9haOL0

  2. Or this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=901lYbPmqu4

    Damn scientists. Where is my hoverpack?

  3. This technology didn’t work out very well in Michael Chricton’s universe.

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_(novel)

Greatest Italian riders

Posted on February 1st, 2012 at 22:16 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Er…the odd one out is bottom left. We can see the stern of all the others.

  2. That is, bottom right.

Active duty cop: ‘The war on drugs is a war on people’

Posted on February 1st, 2012 at 21:35 by Paul Jay in category: News

[Quote]:

Speaking to Raw Story recently, an active duty police officer who asked not to be named threw down the gauntlet over the part of his job he hates most: the drug war.

“I did not get in law enforcement to destroy a person’s future because that person had marijuana or a pill in their pocket,” the officer explained. “Why would you want to destroy that person’s future and cause them great harm because of that? It’s not worth it.”

Like many Americans, the reality of the drug war was was nothing like what he’d been taught to believe in his youth. But statistics like a citizen being arrested for drugs every 19 seconds in 2010, and 1.6 million people incarcerated over drugs in 2009, were nothing compared to what he actually experienced in the front lines of the drug war on America’s users.

 

But for those officers who put their lives on the line every day to protect the public from dangerous, violent criminals, the drug war isn’t always just another part of the job. For this officer in particular, it’s much more than that: “The war on drugs is a war on people,” he claimed.

“I just didn’t see problems from illegal drug users that I’d been led to believe,” the officer explained. “Most of the calls that we get on drug use, as police, are alcohol related. Alcohol is a serious drug that can be abused, but I just didn’t see the calls on other drugs like I had been led to believe. I didn’t see these drug-crazed people out there doing crazy things… Even growing up before entering law enforcement, I was always led to believe that the drug war was meant to stop all these people from doing crazy things. But on the street, that’s not what you see. That’s a lie.”

In his view, the officer said that the American public would be much better off if the government would “regulate drugs and keep the control out of the hands of the black market criminals.”

“The cartels have been running a serious drug operation in America for decades, and I don’t think most Americans are really aware of it,” he said. “The money comes from the prohibition of drugs. These criminals are making their money because of the prohibition. If you legalize and regulate it, their profits go to zero.”

For more than two decades in law enforcement, he said that he’s carried an immense guilt: his first drug arrest.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. ..and the war on people is not just on U.S. citizens,. The corruption and violence this “war” continues to spawn in Latin America is criminal in its own right. Those “officials” who continue to support this war should be tried for crimes against humanity.

White House Says It Can’t Comment On Possible Chris Dodd Investigation

Posted on February 1st, 2012 at 21:32 by Paul Jay in category: News

[Quote]:

This isn’t a huge surprise, but following the popularity of the petition asking the White House toinvestigate Chris Dodd (after Dodd’s own statements suggesting that he expects politicians who get Hollywood money to pass Hollywood’s preferred bills no questions asked), the White House has officially stated that it can’t comment on the matter. As per the terms of the White House’s “We the People” petition site, it can refuse to address issues that deal with law enforcement:

consistent with the We the People Terms of Participation and our responses to similar petitions in the past, the White House declines to comment on this petition because it requests a specific law enforcement action.

I’m sure the White House has no interest in getting involved in this in any way, and that if it was actually investigating any of this activity, it wouldn’t want to talk about it publicly until later. Still, I think the petition — and the publicity it got — did serve a key purpose: to highlight the public’s disgust with the MPAA’s form of crony capitalism, and the hubris of folks like Chris Dodd who think that as long as they donate enough money, politicians should be working for the MPAA, rather than the public.


Write a comment

Angry Birds boss: ‘Piracy may not be a bad thing: it can get us more business’

Posted on February 1st, 2012 at 21:30 by Paul Jay in category: News

[Quote]:

Rovio Mobile learned from the music industry’s mistakes when deciding how to deal with piracy of its Angry Birds games and merchandise, chief executive Mikael Hed told the Midem conference in Cannes this morning.

“We have some issues with piracy, not only in apps, but also especially in the consumer products. There is tons and tons of merchandise out there, especially in Asia, which is not officially licensed products,” said Hed.

“We could learn a lot from the music industry, and the rather terrible ways the music industry has tried to combat piracy.”


Write a comment

The Pirate Bay Moves to .SE Domain To Prevent Domain Seizure

Posted on February 1st, 2012 at 21:19 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property

[Quote]:

After the court case against the founders of The Pirate Bay was concluded today, the operators of the site quickly moved to change their domain name from .ORG to the Swedish .SE. A Pirate Bay insider informed TorrentFreak that this move was made to prevent the US authorities from seizing the domain, which is a serious risk now the court case has completed.


Write a comment

Scientists close to entering Vostok, Antarctica’s biggest subglacial lake

Posted on February 1st, 2012 at 21:00 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

After drilling for two decades through more than two miles of antarctic ice, Russian scientists are on the verge of entering a vast, dark lake that hasn’t been touched by light for more than 20 million years.


Write a comment

Doing the math on Obama’s deficits

Posted on February 1st, 2012 at 20:27 by Desiato in category: Indecision 2012, News

[Quote]:

How much has Obama added to the debt, anyway?

There are two answers: more than $4 trillion, or about $983 billion. The first answer is simple and wrong. The second answer is more complicated but a lot closer to being right.

When Obama took office, the national debt was about $10.5 trillion. Today, it’s about $15.2 trillion. Simple subtraction gets you the answer preferred by most of Obama’s opponents: $4.7 trillion.

But ask yourself: Which of Obama’s policies added $4.7 trillion to the debt? The stimulus? That was just a bit more than $800 billion. TARP? That passed under George W. Bush, and most of it has been repaid.

There is a way to tally the effects Obama has had on the deficit. Look at every piece of legislation he has signed into law. Every time Congress passes a bill, either the Congressional Budget Office or the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates the effect it will have on the budget over the next 10 years. And then they continue to estimate changes to those bills. If you know how to read their numbers, you can come up with an estimate that zeros in on the laws Obama has had a hand in.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Seen this?

  2. Yeah, that’s included in the article I posted. (Same parent site.)

FBI cuts down Mass. mom’s door in wrong-home raid

Posted on February 1st, 2012 at 18:21 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

A Massachusetts mother says the FBI used a chain saw blade to cut through her door and held her at gunpoint for at least 30 minutes before agents realized they were conducting a raid at the wrong home.

Judy Sanchez, of Fitchburg, says she awoke to heavy footsteps in the stairwell on Jan. 26 and walked into her kitchen in time to see a blade chop through her door.

She says she was held facedown on the floor at gunpoint while her 3-year-old daughter cried in another room.

It turns out agents were after the other tenant on the floor of the multiunit building who is suspected of dealing drugs.

Sanchez says she and her daughter now have trouble sleeping.

The FBI has apologized and is paying for the damage.

We are at war with drugs. We have always been at war with drugs.


Write a comment

Catholic Church Says ‘De-baptism’ Is ‘Impossible’

Posted on February 1st, 2012 at 3:02 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote]:

An official from the Roman Catholic Church says that it is “impossible” to undergo “de-baptism” as a growing number of people in Western Europe and the United States request such a process.

Jeannine Marino, program specialist for evangelization & catechesis at the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, told CP that atheists who seek to be “de-baptized” or “un-baptized” cannot technically do so.

“From the Church’s perspective, it is impossible to ‘un-baptize’ or ‘de-baptize’ someone because we believe that baptism permanently seals the person to Christ and the Church,” said Marino.

“People can stop participating in the Church, but we believe the grace of the sacrament has marked them forever.”

Marino explains that with baptism, “no matter how long they have been away from the Church” an individual “can return to the faith.”

Why is it that these fucking morons know their own doctrine so badly?

Matthew 12:31-32


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Or is this some new doctrine whereby excommunication doesn’t really do anything but exempt someone from having to tithe to the church?

  2. Technically, hmmmmm. Well since we are being technical perhaps the bishop can come up with an empirical test to tell (without asking) the difference between a de-baptised and a never baptised person, or even a baptised person? I mean where exactly is this ‘mark of the sacrament’?

    As has been pointed out many times before the invisible and non-existent look a lot alike.

The US Elections

Posted on February 1st, 2012 at 1:47 by John Sinteur in category: News

What a show.. Have each candidate spend a billion dollars to convince the voters they know best how to spend the country’s money.

Brilliant.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. It keeps the citizenry arguing about trivia while the real world carries on. I can predict the result: an American will be president.

  2. Other aspects I’m enjoying:

    The candidate with the multiple wives *isn’t* the Mormon candidate.

    The GOP says rich people are “job creators”, except when they’re running against one.

    Gingrich calls himself a DC outsider. Priceless!

    The top 2 candidates have both previously endorsed health plans similar to Obamacare,the thing the GOP says they hate the most.

    Let’s see, what else…?

Viagra regs paired with abortion rules

Posted on February 1st, 2012 at 1:30 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Virginia state Sen. Janet D. Howell (D-Fairfax) doesn’t think much of a bill that would require women to have an ultrasound before undergoing an abortion.

When the proposed legislation came up for a preliminary vote in the Senate Monday, Howell offered a floor amendment that just about floored her colleagues.

“Prior to prescribing medication for erectile dysfunction, a physician shall perform a digital rectal examination and a cardiac stress test,” Howell said, reading the amendment aloud. “Informed consent for these procedures shall be given at least 24 hours before the procedures are performed.

“I just think we should have a little gender equity here,” Howell added.

A digital rectal exam is actually a medically beneficial procedure, and should probably be indicated in cases of erectile dysfunction; it fails. A sonogram before an abortion is just legislated emotional bullying; it passes.


Write a comment

Possibly the Most Incompetent TSA Story Yet

Posted on February 1st, 2012 at 1:08 by John Sinteur in category: Security

[Quote]:

The storyline:

  1. TSA screener finds two pipes in passenger’s bags.

  2. Screener determines that they’re not a threat.

  3. Screener confiscates them anyway, because of their “material and appearance.”

  4. Because they’re not actually a threat, screener leaves them at the checkpoint.

  5. Everyone forgets about them.

  6. Six hours later, the next shift of TSA screeners notices the pipes and — not being able to explain how they got there and, presumably, because of their “material and appearance” — calls the police bomb squad to remove the pipes.

  7. TSA does not evacuate the airport, or even close the checkpoint, because — well, we don’t know why.

I don’t even know where to begin.

Feel safer yet?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Perhaps a step in the story was omitted?

    4A. Several screeners gather in a checkpoint bathroom and combust some of the material.

    Hence, step 5.