« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Lego Captain America

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 21:32 by John Sinteur in category: News


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Perfect – fits well ‘the solve all issues via violence’ obsessed psyche of the US military state and their Hollywood mouth peaces.

Muslim: Quip led to terror probe | The Chronicle Herald

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 21:20 by Desiato in category: Foyer of Ennui (just short of the Hall of Shame), News

[Quote]:

A casual text message to work colleagues encouraging them to "blow away" the competition at a trade show allegedly plunged a Muslim man into a terrorism probe.Telecommunications sales manager Saad Allami says the innocent message, aimed at pumping up his staff, has had devastating consequences on his life.The Quebec man says he was arrested by provincial police while picking up his seven-year-old son at school. A team of police officers stormed into his home, telling his wife she was married to a terrorist. And his work colleagues were detained for hours at the U.S. border because of their connection to him.

It’s getting safer in Canada, too.


Write a comment

Cartoons

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 18:51 by John Sinteur in category: Cartoon


Write a comment

Why Susan Linn and the Campaign for a Commercial Free Childhood Terrify Child Advertisers

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 18:35 by John Sinteur in category: If you're in marketing, kill yourself

[Quote]:

And Kunkel, the University of Arizona professor, says that scientific studies have shown that children under eight cannot understand the persuasive intent of advertising. At a fundamental level, then, advertising to children is simply unfair.


Write a comment

European Commission Slip Reveals Censorship In ACTA

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 18:33 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property

[Quote]:

In an inadvertent slip, the European Commission reveals that ACTA will indeed bring censorship to the Internet. As usual, they say this in the calmest soothing tone of voice.


Write a comment

Apple’s iPhone Business Alone Is Now Bigger Than All Of Microsoft

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 17:07 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Microsoft

[Quote]:

Tech writer MG Siegler just noted a remarkable fact:

Apple’s iPhone business alone is now bigger than Microsoft.

Not Windows. Not Office. Microsoft.

Think about that.

Remember when Balmer said the iPhone would never amount to anything? Good times…


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I’m about to make what may be one of the least bold predictions for the future you can possibly make:

    Sometime in the next six months, Microsoft’s Board of Directors is going to oust Steve Ballmer.

Koch Brothers, Allies Pledge $100 Million At Private Meeting To Beat Obama

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 17:00 by John Sinteur in category: Indecision 2012

[Quote]:

At a private three-day retreat in California last weekend, conservative billionaires Charles and David Koch and about 250 to 300 other individuals pledged approximately $100 million to defeat President Obama in the 2012 elections.

A source who was in the room when the pledges were made told The Huffington Post that, specifically, Charles Koch pledged $40 million and David pledged $20 million.

Aren’t super-PACs terrific?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. IMO, the Koch brothers should be arrested and tried for sedition… These are two of the most vile and malevolent people on the planet, who unfortunately have the $$ wherewithal to propagate their fascist leanings.

2 Army brigades to leave Europe in cost-cutting move

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 16:47 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

The Obama administration has decided to remove two of the four U.S. Army brigades remaining in Europe as part of a broader effort to cut $487 billion from the Pentagon’s budget over the next decade, said senior U.S. officials.

[..]

“In the briefing we’ve been giving the Europeans, we have made clear that there is going to be this rotational presence there that will be conducting exercises,” Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta said in an interview.

“As a matter of fact, they will probably see more of the Americans under the new strategy because the brigades that were there were actually fighting in Afghanistan and weren’t even there. . . . What you are going to have is two [brigades] plus this large rotational presence that is going to be there.”

So… to cut costs they are going to station MORE troops? How does that work, exactly?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Nooo, to cut cost they will reduce the number of troops, but to compensate they will move the remaining troops around a lot, making it look like there still are plenty of US troops. I wonder why that last bit is in any way important… Why on earth would we want to ‘see more of the Americans’?

Orly Taitz loses birther case to an empty table

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 16:36 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Orly Taitz represented one of four plaintiffs challenging President Obama’s eligibility for placement on the Democratic ballot in Georgia. The President and his counsel were subpoenaed to appear in court to defend against these challenges, but the President’s attorney issued a nice letter to the judge stating that the Court had no business or jurisdiction even hearing the case and therefore the defense would not be in attendance.

So Taitz and her fellow attorneys presented their best arguments without challenge from the defense, and requested a summary judgment on the merits.

And the Court’s judgment: the plaintiffs have no case and no credible evidence, and there is no law to support their claims. Judgment for the defendant, represented only by an empty table, on the merits. Or in this case, utter lack thereof.

From the ruling: “Ordinarily, the Court would enter a default order against a party that fails to participate in any stage of a proceeding. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. 616-1-2-.30(1) and (5). Nonetheless, despite the Defendant’s failure to appear, Plaintiffs asked this Court to decide the case on the merits of their arguments and evidence. The Court granted Plaintiffs’ request.”

These birthers are dumber than a bag of bricks. 95+ cases brought, 0 won.


Write a comment

Tigard businessman blocked from returning to U.S. after humanitarian trip to Libya

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 15:01 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

But he later refused after another FBI employee tried to get him to sign a paper without reading it, his daughter said. When he finally saw it, she said, it appeared to be a waiver of his constitutional rights, which angered him.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. So, Hitler won WW2 after all. It just took him 60 years or so after his demise to do it… :-( So, when are are going to people of Muslim origins to internment camps “for their protection”? Accountability? Our government no longer has to worry about that!

  2. Oopsie! “when are are going to people” -> “when are we going to send people”

  3. Dang keyboard! It just keeps misunderstanding me! It is kind of like HAL from 2001. I say “Open the pod bay doors, Hal!” and it comes back and says “I don’t understand Spiff. Did you say ‘Open the odd pay roars, hell’”?

  4. Can a person really waive their Constitutional rights?

JPMorgan, BofA Sued by New York Over Use of Mortgage Database

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 14:23 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote]:

JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co. were sued by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman over the use of a mortgage database that the state said led to improper foreclosures.

The banks’ use of the database, known as MERS, misled homeowners, undermined foreclosure proceedings and created uncertainty about ownership interests in properties, the state said in the complaint filed yesterday in New York State Supreme Court in Brooklyn.

“The banks created the MERS system as an end-run around the property recording system, to facilitate the rapid securitization and sale of mortgages,” Schneiderman said in a statement. “Once the mortgages went sour, these same banks brought foreclosure proceedings en masse based on deceptive and fraudulent court submissions.”

The purpose of MERS is to cheat your county government out of money for recording fees. Think about this the next time your county doesn’t have enough money for roads or parks or whatever.


Write a comment

Romney Isn’t Concerned

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 1:28 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

If you’re an American down on your luck, Mitt Romney has a message for you: He doesn’t feel your pain. Earlier this week, Mr. Romney told a startled CNN interviewer, “I’m not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there.”

Faced with criticism, the candidate has claimed that he didn’t mean what he seemed to mean, and that his words were taken out of context. But he quite clearly did mean what he said. And the more context you give to his statement, the worse it gets.

First of all, just a few days ago, Mr. Romney was denying that the very programs he now says take care of the poor actually provide any significant help. On Jan. 22, he asserted that safety-net programs — yes, he specifically used that term — have “massive overhead,” and that because of the cost of a huge bureaucracy “very little of the money that’s actually needed by those that really need help, those that can’t care for themselves, actually reaches them.”

This claim, like much of what Mr. Romney says, was completely false: U.S. poverty programs have nothing like as much bureaucracy and overhead as, say, private health insurance companies. As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has documented, between 90 percent and 99 percent of the dollars allocated to safety-net programs do, in fact, reach the beneficiaries. But the dishonesty of his initial claim aside, how could a candidate declare that safety-net programs do no good and declare only 10 days later that those programs take such good care of the poor that he feels no concern for their welfare?


Write a comment

Are you not entertained?!

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 0:57 by John Sinteur in category: News


Write a comment

U.S. Press Freedom Fell 27 Places Last Year to 47th in the World

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 0:54 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Here are a few of the countries that, according to watchdog Reporters Without Borders, currently enjoy greater press freedom than the United States: Ghana, South Africa, El Salvador, Niger, Mali, Jamaica, Slovakia, Uruguay, and virtually all of the developed world, from Western Europe to East Asia. Out of 179 countries, the U.S., which found independence and democracy on the back of the printing press, is now the 47th most free. Fortunately, we are still ranked ahead of Latvia and Haiti, though just barely.


Write a comment

Stephen Colbert is winning the war against the Supreme Court and Citizens United.

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 0:50 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

When President Obama criticized Citizens United two years ago in his State of the Union address, at least three justices came back at him with pitchforks and shovels. In the end, most court watchers scored it a draw. But when a comedian with a huge national platform started ridiculing the court last summer, the stakes changed completely. This is no pointy-headed deconstruction unspooling on the legal blogs. Colbert has spent the past few months making every part of Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion in Citizen United look utterly ridiculous. And the court, which has no access to cameras (by its own choosing), no press arm, and no discernible comedic powers, has had to stand by and take it on the chin.

It all started when Colbert announced that, as permitted by Citizens United, he planned to form a super PAC (“Making a better tomorrow, tomorrow”). As he explained to his viewers, his hope was that “Colbert Nation could have a voice, in the form of my voice, shouted through a megaphone made of cash … the American dream. And that dream is simple. That anyone, no matter who they are, if they are determined, if they are willing to work hard enough, someday they could grow up to create a legal entity which could then receive unlimited corporate funds, which could be used to influence our elections.”

Then last June, like a winking, eyebrow-wagging Mr. Smith, Colbert went to Washington and testified before the FEC, which granted him permission to launch his super PAC (over the objections of his parent company Viacom) and accept unlimited contributions from his fans so he might sway elections. (He tweeted before his FEC appearance that PAC stands for “Plastic And/Or Cash.”) In recent weeks, Colbert has run several truly insane attack ads (including one accusing Mitt Romney of being a serial killer). Then, with perfect comedic pitch, Colbert handed off control of his super PAC to Jon Stewart (lampooning the FEC rules about coordination between “independent PACS” and candidates with a one-page legal document and a Vulcan mind meld). Colbert then managed to throw his support to non-candidate Herman Cain in the South Carolina primary, placing higher on the ballot than Rick Perry, Jon Huntsman, and Michele Bachmann.

The line between entertainment and the court blurred even further late last month when Colbert had former Justice John Paul Stevens on his show to discuss his dissent in Citizens United. When a 91-year-old former justice is patiently explaining to a comedian that corporations are not people, it’s clear that everything about the majority opinion has been reduced to a punch line.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I read that article before I saw it here and couldn’t figure out in what sense Colbert is having an impact that can seriously be described as “winning”. I mean, The Daily Show makes the Republican party look ridiculous every day, but is Jon Stewart “winning” against the GOP? No, right? So… what real impact is Colbert having? It’s not like his actions have led to discussion of alternative regulation as the article claims–that discussion has been around much longer.

Bath Christian group’s ‘God can heal’ adverts banned

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 0:40 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote]:

A Christian group has been banned from claiming that God can heal illnesses on its website and in leaflets.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said it had concluded that the adverts by Healing on the Streets (HOTS) – Bath, were misleading.

It said a leaflet available to download from the group’s website said: “Need Healing? God can heal today!”

It turns out Jesus never finished medical school…


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. As of Mark 7, Jesus even declared basic hygiene to be unneccessary, where he ridiculed the old tradition of washing hands and cups before eating, and declared that (Mark 7,15) “Nothing outside a person can defile them by going into them.”

    Physicians who wanted to introduce hygiene in hospitals in the 19th century faced fierce resistance. I can imagine that the christian ideology “all humans are sinful, only the salvation of the soul is what matters, the body is insignificant, suffering is good” played a significant role in this resistance and was (again) responsible for unneccessary suffering and countless deaths.

  2. I guess they could amend the wording to, “Hypochondriac hysteric? God can heal today!”
    Not saying the healing is permanent though.

One Nation, Under Guard

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 0:18 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Our tax dollars are being used to put our friends and neighbors in prison. Our money is used to turn 14-year-old boys into sexual offenders and incarcerate large numbers of minorities. It’s extracted complicity and as long as those in power continue to see no reprisal for these actions, it will continue until it’s truly too late.


Write a comment

Bay of Pigs

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 0:12 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Late last year, the Central Intelligence Agency explained to Judge Kessler of the US District Court in Washington DC that releasing the final volume of its three-decade-old history of the 1961 Bay of Pigs debacle would “confuse the public,” and should be withheld because it is a “predecisional” document.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Aha! They actually still have the smoking gun…

  2. Translation: yes, every accusation is true, we did all of that.

France labels Scientology a business, not a church

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 0:02 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

A French court has slapped a fraud sentence on the Church of Scientology, saying it targets vulnerable people for commercial gain. The ruling is a major setback for Scientologists in France, and it marks the first time here that the Church of Scientology has been convicted of organized fraud.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Can the other religions be far behind?

  2. @itspast: In France, a deeply Catholic country? Yes.

  3. Is France a deeply Catholic country? Probably like Hungary. According to the Catholic church.
    According to the people, over 60% atheist.

    I know a not representative sample of french people, 11. None of them are Catholic.