« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Man whose WMD lies led to 100,000 deaths confesses all

Posted on April 2nd, 2012 at 21:50 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

A man whose lies helped to make the case for invading Iraq – starting a nine-year war costing more than 100,000 lives and hundreds of billions of pounds – will come clean in his first British television interview tomorrow.

“Curveball”, the Iraqi defector who fabricated claims about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, smiles as he confirms how he made the whole thing up. It was a confidence trick that changed the course of history, with Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi’s lies used to justify the Iraq war.

He tries to defend his actions: “My main purpose was to topple the tyrant in Iraq because the longer this dictator remains in power, the more the Iraqi people will suffer from this regime’s oppression.”

Let’s offer him immunity in exchange for testimony at the International Court of Justice in The Hague against Bush and Cheney.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I’m suddenly reminded of the words of Bush himself:

    “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on .. Shame .. We won’t get fooled again!”

  2. I’m not following you here. If ‘Curveball’ was lying, how does he present a useful witness against Bush and Cheney? Wouldn’t you have to show that they asked him to lie?

  3. If anyone’s getting arrested please don’t forget to include Tony Blair.

  4. I think there’s at least one other problem, Desiato. People who lie whenever the wind blows one way or the other don’t make credible witnesses.

  5. And he was given the name “Curveball” because he was, perhaps, less than straight?

  6. Meh, US would have gone to war anyway. Cheney had about four different justifications. (911 masterminds were in Iraq, Sadaam killed his own people…). We had a deep need to kill lots of people since Daddy didn’t win term 2.

Colombian Congress Debates New Bill That Decriminalizes Cocaine and Marijuana Cultivation

Posted on April 2nd, 2012 at 14:48 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

A bill before the Colombian congress would decriminalize the cultivation of coca and marijuana in a bid to drive down raw drug prices and encourage peasant farmers to grow other crops. The bill is expected to be debated in the congress in coming days.

[..]

“Let’s see how well the laws of the market work,” said Velasquez, who represented the coca-growing province of Meta. “If there’s excessive production due to the lack of criminal penalties, surely the market will depress the price. We have to tell the United States and other consumers that Colombia has already paid enough, mostly in blood”, he added in remarks reported by the BBC. “It hasn’t worked. It’s time to change the strategy.”


Write a comment

The bizarre calculus of emergency room charges

Posted on April 2nd, 2012 at 14:36 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Gary Larson has a $5,000 deductible insurance plan, but has found that his medical bills are cheaper if he claims he’s uninsured and pays cash. Using that strategy, an MRI scan of his shoulder cost him $350. His brother-in-law went to a nearby clinic for an MRI scan of his shoulder, was billed $13,000, and had to come up with $2,500.

[..]

A single-payer system would address some of this nonsense, but forget it. Even President Obama’s watered-down healthcare reform act, which may well die on the Supreme Court’s operating table, couldn’t be passed if it came up for a vote now.

[..]

Schwarzman has an insurance plan with a high deductible ($7,000). Like Gary Larson (the guy at the top of this column), Schwarzman also paid about $350 for a scan on himself that would have cost much more if he went with his insurance company’s negotiated rate. A couple of years ago, his daughter needed an ultrasound for a possible gallstone. If he’d gone through his insurance company, he would have been charged $3,200, with insurance paying $1,500, leaving him a $1,700 bill. He chose instead to leave insurance out of the equation and pay cash instead. The price was $250.

“It’s outrageous,” Schwarzman said. “I don’t know where they’re coming up with these numbers. Are they picking them out of a hat?”

No, not a hat, I think…


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I can rationally (though not emotionally) understand the cases where the insurance company pays much less than an individual does because they’ve negotiated a good volume deal. I really don’t understand the cases where the insurance companies pay more than the individual rate. How is it that they don’t negotiate those away? I mean, it’s quickly worth hiring an employee to negotiate $13,000 down to $350 or tell your insured party to pay and get reimbursed.

‘He Looks Black’: NBC Launching Investigation into Selective Editing of Zimmerman Police Tape

Posted on April 2nd, 2012 at 13:58 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

NBC has revealed that it is launching an internal investigation into the “editing process” surrounding the conversation between George Zimmerman and a police dispatcher (shortly before Trayvon Martin was shot), where Zimmerman appears to volunteer racial information.

Exposed by Fox News and Newsbusters, NBC played the conversation on the “Today Show” as: “This guy looks like he’s up to no good. He looks black.”

The unabridged version is:

Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. Or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.

Dispatcher: OK, and this guy — is he black, white or Hispanic?

Zimmerman: He looks black.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. MSNBC.. the fox news of the left. :-/

  2. To me, it’s very simple. One guy had a gun, the other guy is dead. But Zimmerman will walk, they had the same justice system in Aruba.

A Quantum Theory of Mitt Romney – NYTimes.com

Posted on April 2nd, 2012 at 11:44 by Desiato in category: Funny!, Indecision 2012

[Quote]:

Before Mitt Romney, those seeking the presidency operated under the laws of so-called classical politics, laws still followed by traditional campaigners like Newt Gingrich. Under these Newtonian principles, a candidate’s position on an issue tends to stay at rest until an outside force — the Tea Party, say, or a six-figure credit line at Tiffany — compels him to alter his stance, at a speed commensurate with the size of the force usually large and in inverse proportion to the depth of his beliefs invariably negligible. This alteration, framed as a positive by the candidate, then provokes an equal but opposite reaction among his rivals.

(…)

In much the same way that light is both a particle and a wave, Mitt Romney is both a moderate and a conservative, depending on the situation (Fig. 1). It is not that he is one or the other; it is not that he is one and then the other. He is both at the same time.

Totally funny and worth reading in its entirety.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Today, Ann Romney was asked about Romney being “too stiff”: “I guess we better unzip him and let the real Mitt Romney out because he is not!”

  2. Rhymes with banker?

  3. cupid stunt?