« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

“That will be the end”

Posted on April 14th, 2012 at 22:09 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

A month ago, the Japanese TV show “Morning Bird” discussed the current state of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, and specifically Unit 4, which is in terrible condition. During an interview with Dr. Hiroaki Koide, Research Associate at the Research Reactor Institute of Kyoto University, who explains the immense difficulty in moving the radioactive fuel rods – a process that will not even start until 2013 – the presenter asks what would happen if even a moderate earthquake struck near the plant before the fuel rods can be moved. Koide replies:

That will be the end.


Write a comment

DOUBLE DUTCH DOG BLOWS YOUR MIND

Posted on April 14th, 2012 at 22:07 by John Sinteur in category: News


Write a comment

London’s dystopian Olympics: criminal sanctions for violating the exclusivity of sponsors’ brands

Posted on April 14th, 2012 at 20:02 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property

[Quote]:

As London ramps up for the 2012 Olympics, a dystopian regime of policing and censorship on behalf of the games’ sponsors is coming online. A special squad of “brand police” will have the power to force pubs to take down signs advertising “watch the games on our TV,” to sticker over the brand-names of products at games venues where those products were made by companies other than the games’ sponsors, to send takedown notices to YouTube and Facebook if attendees at the games have the audacity to post their personal images for their friends to see, and more. What’s more, these rules are not merely civil laws, but criminal ones, so violating the sanctity of an Olympic sponsor could end up with prison time for Londoners.

[..]

Each games’ sponsor doubles down on the previous games’ restrictions and surveillance, which suggests that by 2020, the winning bid will include a promise to imprison all non-attendees for the duration of the games, and permanently tattoo sponsors’ logos on the faces and chests of all ticket-buyers.


Write a comment

Bollywood star in US ‘racial profiling’ row

Posted on April 14th, 2012 at 16:07 by Sueyourdeveloper in category: News

Quote

In which it is revealed that having Khan as a last name is quite likely to get one a close inspection at US immigration.  But as it was just a random search, nothing to see here…

The US embassy in India then issues an apology.


Write a comment

Tennessee Senate Approves Bill To Warn Students That Hand-Holding Is A ‘Gateway Sexual Activity’

Posted on April 14th, 2012 at 12:25 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Like any state legislature dealing with 8 percent unemployment and thousands of its residents facing disenfranchisement, the Tennessee Senate is targeting the menace of underage hand-holding.

Last week, the Senate passed SB 3310, a bill to update the state’s abstinence-based sex education curriculum to define holding hands and kissing as “gateway sexual activities.” Just one senator voted against the legislation; 28 voted in favor.

Since the bill specifically bans teachers from “demonstrating gateway sexual activity”, educators would be prohibited from even demonstrating what hand-holding is.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Sure this isn’t a South Park episode or something?

  2. @Marcel-Jan: No, this is real-life in the most stupid country in the world :)

Cartoons

Posted on April 14th, 2012 at 11:51 by John Sinteur in category: Cartoon


Write a comment

Indian skeptic charged with “blasphemy” for revealing secret behind “miracle” of weeping cross

Posted on April 14th, 2012 at 11:31 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote]:

Sanal Edamaruku, an Indian skeptic, went to Mumbai and revealed that a “miraculous” weeping cross was really just a bit of statuary located near a leaky drain whose liquid reached it by way of capillary action. The local Catholic Church demanded that he retract his statements, and when he refused, they had him arrested for blasphemy.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Thus making a sensational international news story out of an obvious observation. What I’d like to know is why do these organizations have such lousy PR?

Why Airport Security Is Broken—And How to Fix It

Posted on April 14th, 2012 at 10:16 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Airport security in America is broken. I should know. For 3½ years—from my confirmation in July 2005 to President Barack Obama’s inauguration in January 2009—I served as the head of the Transportation Security Administration.

You know the TSA. We’re the ones who make you take off your shoes before padding through a metal detector in your socks (hopefully without holes in them). We’re the ones who make you throw out your water bottles. We’re the ones who end up on the evening news when someone’s grandma gets patted down or a child’s toy gets confiscated as a security risk. If you’re a frequent traveler, you probably hate us.

More than a decade after 9/11, it is a national embarrassment that our airport security system remains so hopelessly bureaucratic and disconnected from the people whom it is meant to protect. Preventing terrorist attacks on air travel demands flexibility and the constant reassessment of threats. It also demands strong public support, which the current system has plainly failed to achieve.

Weird how people all of a sudden come down with a bad case of rationality once they leave office.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Actually, one of the bits in this that I found most interesting is how the head of the TSA was unable to make some changes he wanted to make, in part because the bureaucracy resisted him, and in part because of political opposition.

  2. And given the size of this organization, it isn’t going away any time soon. Same for the War on Drugs. Too many jobs at stake.

Fix income inequality with $10 million loans for everyone!

Posted on April 14th, 2012 at 9:31 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

For several years now, the Fed has been making money available to the financial sector at near-zero interest rates. Big banks and hedge funds, among others, have taken this cheap money and invested it in securities with high yields. This type of profit-making, called the “carry trade,” has been enormously profitable for them.

So why not let everyone participate?

Under my plan, each American household could borrow $10 million from the Fed at zero interest. The more conservative among us can take that money and buy 10-year Treasury bonds. At the current 2 percent annual interest rate, we can pocket a nice $200,000 a year to live on. The more adventuresome can buy 10-year Greek debt at 21 percent, for an annual income of $2.1 million. Or if Greece is a little too risky for you, go with Portugal, at about 12 percent, or $1.2 million dollars a year. (No sense in getting greedy.)

Think of what we can do with all that money. We can pay off our underwater mortgages and replenish our retirement accounts without spending one day schlepping into the office. With a few quick keystrokes, we’ll be golden for the next 10 years.

Hey, look, they have gas for less than $4000 here, let’s pull over and fill up!

Although it is obvious to most people how destructive this is, it is equally destructive to be doing the same to big companies and banks, and yet that is being hailed as a saving move. Pumping huge amounts of cash into an economy to be able to keep doing the same stupid shit that got it in trouble in the first place to keep the bad players in business and to keep the same bad business models working. Expect more crashes to come.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Yup, the biggest “industry” in the world today is rent-seeking.

  2. Works for me! One way that the uber-rich avoid paying taxes is to take out loans using their stock as collateral, and then they live on the loan proceeds, paying no taxes until they convert the stock to repay the loan, which they never do until they die and their estate deals with the situation, in a tax-free manner… Oh, they may pay a pittance on the $$ that the loan generates for them from the bank deposit interest. Alternatively, they just establish a line-of-credit and pull from that as necessary. As I understand it, this is pretty much what Steve Jobs was doing for a long time. His $1 salary was under the minimum required for taxes. His stock was worth several very large fortunes, and he lived on loan proceeds using the stock as collateral. So, now he’s dead, the bank gets their money back with accrued interest, and what’s left goes into the estate. Us, the taxpayer? Basically we get shafted! This is why I call it “The Apple Tax” – we are ALL paying it, even if we don’t own any iCruft or Apple stock!