« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Abstract Photos of Bullets Fragmented on Bulletproof Plexiglass

Posted on April 16th, 2012 at 21:14 by Paul Jay in category: Great Picture

[Quote]:

For her project “The Big Bang“, photographer Deborah Bay captured macro photographs of plexiglass sheets that had various types of firearms fired at them. After having professional law enforcement officers fire bullets into the glass, she brought the sheets into a studio and “shot” them again with a Contax 645 and a 120 macro lens. She writes,

I began thinking about “The Big Bang” after seeing a sales display of bullet-proof plexiglas that had projectiles embedded in it. The plexiglas captured the fragmentation of the bullets and provided a visual record of the energy released on impact. As I began to explore this concept further, I also was intrigued by the psychological tension created between the jewel-like beauty and the inherent destructiveness of the fragmented projectiles. Many of the images resemble exploding galaxies, and visions of intergalactic bling sublimate the horror of bullets meeting muscle and bone. In fact, Susan Sontag described the camera as “a sublimation of the gun” — load, aim and shoot.


Write a comment

My Trousers and Airport Security

Posted on April 16th, 2012 at 19:51 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

“Sir, your trousers.”

“Pardon?”

“Sir, please take your trousers off.”

A pause.

“No.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I loved the Edith Evans bit, but can you imagine anyone who was not white doing this and getting away with it?

Harms of Post-9/11 Airline Security

Posted on April 16th, 2012 at 19:47 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

He wants us to trust that a 400-ml bottle of liquid is dangerous, but transferring it to four 100-ml bottles magically makes it safe. He wants us to trust that the butter knives given to first-class passengers are nevertheless too dangerous to be taken through a security checkpoint. He wants us to trust the no-fly list: 21,000 people so dangerous they’re not allowed to fly, yet so innocent they can’t be arrested. He wants us to trust that the deployment of expensive full-body scanners has nothing to do with the fact that the former secretary of homeland security, Michael Chertoff, lobbies for one of the companies that makes them. He wants us to trust that there’s a reason to confiscate a cupcake (Las Vegas), a 3-inch plastic toy gun (London Gatwick), a purse with an embroidered gun on it (Norfolk, VA), a T-shirt with a picture of a gun on it (London Heathrow) and a plastic lightsaber that’s really a flashlight with a long cone on top (Dallas/Fort Worth).

At this point, we don’t trust America’s TSA, Britain’s Department for Transport, or airport security in general. We don’t believe they’re acting in the best interests of passengers. We suspect their actions are the result of politicians and government appointees making decisions based on their concerns about the security of their own careers if they don’t act tough on terror, and capitulating to public demands that “something must be done.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I can’t see that there an exit from this mess. Perhaps if everyone…nah.

  2. From the same piece:

    The goal of terrorism is not to crash planes, or even to kill people; the goal of terrorism is to cause terror. Liquid bombs, PETN, planes as missiles: these are all tactics designed to cause terror by killing innocents. But terrorists can only do so much. They cannot take away our freedoms. They cannot reduce our liberties. They cannot, by themselves, cause that much terror. It’s our reaction to terrorism that determines whether or not their actions are ultimately successful. That we allow governments to do these things to us — to effectively do the terrorists’ job for them — is the greatest harm of all.

    (…) Respond to terrorism not with fear but with indomitability. Refuse to be terrorized.

What Amazon’s ebook strategy means – Charlie Stross

Posted on April 16th, 2012 at 12:47 by Desiato in category: Commentary, Intellectual Property

[Quote]:

DRM on ebooks is dead. (Or if not dead, it’s on death row awaiting a date with the executioner.)

It doesn’t matter whether Macmillan wins the price-fixing lawsuit bought by the Department of Justice. The point is, the big six publishers’ Plan B for fighting the emerging Amazon monopsony has failed (insofar as it has been painted as a price-fixing ring, whether or not it was one in fact). This means that they need a Plan C. And the only viable Plan C, for breaking Amazon’s death-grip on the consumers, is to break DRM.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. From comment #4 – quote:
    “I think that global corporations have reached a stage of development which is like a hybrid of cancer and morbid parasitism – corporations are driven by their primitive growth programming to expand, push, corrupt, and devour the surrounding socio/economic fabric, yet a certain self-preservation keeps them (or some of them) from overreaching and killing the host.”

  2. Very interesting, thanks. All the disruption and disintermediation that was predicted years ago is happening a lot more slowly and irregularly than many people expected. The Death of the Novel is unlikely though.

    The value-added by publishers, in terms of choosing good ideas and above all editing can presumably be done in other ways. Some style gurus will promote stuff they like. Editing can still happen, perhaps on contract to authors perhaps for a share of the proceeds.

    Unfortunately this may end up with the likes of Oprah’s picks and Neal Stephenson’s books. (I refuse to think that any editor has had their hands on his works. Sorry if you like them. It’s just an example.)

  3. Gruber:

    I think [Stross is] right, but I don’t think it’s going to happen. DRM is a religion for old-growth media executives. Rational thought could lead them to this solution, but won’t, because they’re starting with an irrational bedrock assumption: that there can exist a technical solution to defeat piracy. Their belief in DRM is a matter of faith, not logic.

Government trying to deny Megaupload fair legal representation

Posted on April 16th, 2012 at 10:01 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property

[Quote]:

The United States government has adopted a take-no-prisoners attitude in its prosecution of Megaupload, seeming to raise every conceivable objection to Megaupload’s efforts to defend itself. We’ve already covered the government’s attempts to block Megaupload from spending money to preserve servers that the company says contains data needed for its defense.

Now, the government has adopted a new tactic: making it as difficult as possible for Megaupload to obtain legal counsel. The prominent law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan has sought permission to represent Megaupload in the case. But in a legal document filed on Wednesday, the government raised several objections to freeing up money to allow the law firm to represent Megaupload in court.

As Quinn Emanuel noted in a Thursday response, the government’s objections are so broad that they would effectively prevent Megaupload from hiring any lawyer with experience litigating major copyright cases. Indeed, they could could make it impossible to hire any lawyer at all. It’s hard to see how Megaupload could get a fair trial if the government’s objections are sustained by the court.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Archeologists have recently uncovered a little known document from US history. One passage was found stating “innocent until proven guilty”. Experts are still trying to figure out what that means.

Steve Jobs Art: The Weird And The Wonderful

Posted on April 16th, 2012 at 7:41 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

“I think part of what made the Macintosh great was that the people working on it were musicians, poets, artists, zoologists and historians who also happened to be the best computer scientists in the world,” Steve Jobs once said.

Many of Jobs’ admirers are also artists.

Some of them are artists with a great big sense of humor.

Combine those together and you get a wacky and wonderful collection of art depicting Apple’s visionary CEO.


Write a comment