« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Timeo Danaos et dona ferentis

Posted on April 24th, 2012 at 23:22 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Multiple analysts warned of vulnerabilities, but instead of being heeded they were severely punished

After a lengthy DDOS attack, some determined hacking, and repeated attempts to penetrate its hardened security layer, the host was finally rooted by a cunningly designed piece of social and mechanical engineering. When the malware released its payload, not only was the system completely wiped, but the culture that created it as well.

This day in tech: the original Trojan.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I told ‘em that Helen would be the end of us…no-one ever listens to me. Oimoi!

Supernovae blasts shape climate, life on Earth, reckons boffin

Posted on April 24th, 2012 at 21:00 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

A new paper by cosmic ray researcher Henrik Svensmark suggests that the abundance of diversity of biological life on Earth is closely correlated to our planet’s proximity to supernovae.

Svensmark, a professor of physics at the Center for Sun-Climate Research at the Danish Space Research Institute, revealed his work in a paper published by the Royal Astronomical Society.

The prof reconstructed the relative rate at which stars within 850 parsecs of our solar system went supernova over the past 510 million years, and compared it to geophysical and paleobiological records.

He concluded, poetically, that: “…remarkable connections to the long-term histories of life and the carbon cycle have shown up unbidden. Biodiversity, CO2 and the carbon-13 (δ13C) isotope (a proxy for photosynthesis) all appear so highly sensitive to supernovae in our galactic neighbourhood that the biosphere seems to contain a reflection of the sky.”


Write a comment

Ok, that’s close enough you pervert

Posted on April 24th, 2012 at 20:16 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. *sigh* That guy would be on his way to a huge landslide victory to become President of France if he’d kept his “lifestyle” under control (to put it mildly). If Hollande can win, DSK would’ve squooshed Sarkozy.

Should We Kill The Dollar Bill?

Posted on April 24th, 2012 at 19:02 by Desiato in category: News, shutupandtakemymoney

[Quote]:

In its most recent report, the GAO recommends switching to coins, which could make $4.4 billion for the government over 30 years. But the report says the government benefit does not come from the fact that coins are more cost effective. Instead the benefit comes from something called "seigniorage."

Seigniorage is the profit the government makes from having money out in the economy. More money out there means more profit for the government.

Over time, coins earn more seigniorage for the government, but only because we don’t like using them.

"Lots of people when they take coins out of their pocket or purse at the end of the day put them in what we call a coin jar," says the GAO’s Lorelei St. James, who oversaw the agency’s most recent study.

As a result, the GAO estimates that if the government were to eliminate $1 bills and switch to coins, it would have to replace every two bills with three coins, because one of the coins would sit idle.

So more coins means more profit for the government. But where does that profit come from? It comes from us — the public.

I decided not to include the bit where they talk about the fact that the senators proposing the switch to coins are from states where… coins or their raw materials are produced. Surprise!


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Large denomination coins are less likely to sit idle than pennies. And people will get used to them. However if you want to consider seigniorage the most egregious is the issuance of coins and postage stamps in special presentation packs for collectors. They cost very little to print and you can charge more than the face value. Daylight robbery.

  2. Large denomination coins are less likely to sit idle than pennies.

    On the contrary. Back when we still had the guilder, it was a common hobby to collect 5 guilder coins in coin jars.

  3. Isn’t creating coins and stamps for collectors just like any other product with high margins? The people buying it know what’s going on, they’re not being hoodwinked, and the general public doesn’t buy them. Seems less of a rip-off than $25 USB cables…

  4. @John: I knew that ING guy got it from somewhere.

    @Desiato: You know, now you come to mention it, that collection of computer cables in my basement must be really worth something by now. I might be able to retire after all…

Poll: One-Fourth Of Americans Less Likely To Vote Because Of Super PACs

Posted on April 24th, 2012 at 17:16 by John Sinteur in category: Indecision 2012

[Quote]:

A new poll by the Brennan Center of Justice found that one in four Americans is less likely to vote in 2012 because of fears that candidates are catering to interests of super PAC donors.

“Unlimited spending by supposedly independent super PACs is creating widespread perceptions of corruption and undermining public confidence that elected officials serve in the public interest,” Adam Skaggs, senior counsel for the Brennan Center’s Democracy program, said in a statement. “The perception that super PACs are corrupting government is making Americans disillusioned, and an alarming number say they are less likely to vote this year.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. If you pose a question like “Are you more or less likely to vote now that independent SuperPACs are spending lots of money on behalf of candidates?”, I think it’s really likely that a substantial number of people is going to *say* that they’re less likely to vote. How much less likely to vote? Who knows? Not the most compelling data if you ask me…

Led Zeppelin’s John Bonham Drum Out Takes

Posted on April 24th, 2012 at 16:43 by John Sinteur in category: awesome

[Quote]:

Everyone has their take on how the Bonham half-time shuffle should be played. This is from the man himself. John Bonham’s drum track on Led Zeppelin’s Fool in the Rain


Write a comment

Mormon Flow Chart for Your Soul

Posted on April 24th, 2012 at 15:44 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote]:

Seems like there’s a lot of confusion lately over what Mormons actually believe. If you are a befuddled believer or heathen, here’s a handy chart to help you out.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Well, this all seems to be fairly straightforward.

  2. Is this really any goofier than the beliefs of, oh, I don’t know… any other religion?

  3. Give me “Bob” any day! http://www.subgenius.com/websites.htm

  4. Crikey! So this is why honky hetero men act all superior.

Federal judge complicity

Posted on April 24th, 2012 at 15:35 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

One of the most amazing statistics of the last decade: not a single War on Terror victim — not one, whether foreign or American — has been permitted to proceed in an American court in an effort to obtain compensation for illegal treatment by the U.S. Government; instead, American courts have unanimously dismissed those cases at the outset, without reaching their substance. Even when everyone knows and admits that the U.S. Government abducted a totally innocent person and shipped him off to Syria to be tortured, as is true for Arar, American federal judges shut the courthouse door in his face, accepting the claims of the Bush and Obama DOJs that to allow the victim to obtain justice for what was done to him would be to risk the disclosure of vital “state secrets.” They accepted this Kafkaesque secrecy claim even after the Government of Canada published to the world a comprehensive report detailing what happened to Arar.


Write a comment

Kindle prototype

Posted on April 24th, 2012 at 13:25 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture


Write a comment

Quantum decision affects results of measurements taken earlier in time

Posted on April 24th, 2012 at 13:21 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Delayed-choice entanglement swapping consists of the following steps. (I use the same names for the fictional experimenters as in the paper for convenience, but note that they represent acts of measurement, not literal people.)

  1. Two independent sources (labeled I and II) produce pairs photons such that their polarization states are entangled. One photon from I goes to Alice, while one photon from II is sent to Bob. The second photon from each source goes to Victor. (I’m not sure why the third party is named “Victor”.)
  2. Alice and Bob independently perform polarization measurements; no communication passes between them during the experiment—they set the orientation of their polarization filters without knowing what the other is doing.
  3. At some time after Alice and Bob perform their measurements, Victor makes a choice (the “delayed choice” in the name). He either allows his two photons from I and II to travel on without doing anything, or he combines them so that their polarization states are entangled. A final measurement determines the polarization state of those two photons.

The results of all four measurements are then compared. If Victor did not entangle his two photons, the photons received by Alice and Bob are uncorrelated with each other: the outcome of their measurements are consistent with random chance. (This is the “entanglement swapping” portion of the name.) If Victor entangled the photons, then Alice and Bob’s photons have correlated polarizations—even though they were not part of the same system and never interacted.


Write a comment

Wal-Mart shaken by bribery probe, shares plunge

Posted on April 24th, 2012 at 12:10 by John Sinteur in category: Foyer of Ennui (just short of the Hall of Shame)

[Quote]:

Wal-Mart Stores Inc lost $10 billion of its market value on Monday on concerns that a bribery investigation in Mexico could be very costly and hinder its plans to grow.

Reflect on that for a second. Shares didn’t go down because the company committed a crime, or because of unethical behavior, or the way the company behaved when the crime was discovered. No. Shared dropped because it could hinder its plans to grow.

And nobody blinks an eye on that. Society is fucked up.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. And does anyone really believe bribery in some did not happen in other venues? It has. How else could Walmart get their prime locations and ability to wipe out smaller businesses. And I include the dear old U.S. of A in these venues.

  2. Probably. Although if local planning officials make it impossible to get planning permission without getting bribes, bribes will be paid. In much of Canada and the US it’s more insidious. Local governments are so desperate for tax revenue to run their municipalities that they encourage grotesque development, commercial, industrial or residential. And then there are the “tax incentives” in the form of rebates before the development happens. These are bribes paid to companies to move to the jurisdiction. It’s corruption but systemic, not individual corruption. And it is entirely legal…

  3. Share prices are a proxy for future earnings, not of moral merit.

    Should your employer pay you less if you break the speed limit on your way to work, if you fail to recycle, or if you torture small animals?

    Or are you saying it’s fucked up that the discovery of bribery isn’t going to stop people from shopping at Wal-Mart much? ‘Cos that’s the main other way the share price would be affected.

  4. Share prices are a proxy for future earnings, not of moral merit.

    There’s your problem right there.

  5. Is it? How so?

    Should share prices for condom producing companies fall when the Pope says so?

  6. Is it? How so?

    Dollar gains are more important than ethics, and you wonder how that’s a problem?

    Should share prices for condom producing companies fall when the Pope says so?

    I’m not claiming to have any solutions, I’m just elaborating on the Emperor’s wardrobe.

  7. I did *not* say that $gains are more important than ethics.

    I just don’t buy the fact that economic valuation should be entangled with ethical evaluation in the way that you seem to imply. I can’t imagine how it would work or how it would be a good idea, especially given societal disagreements over ethics.

    On the other hand, if customers (and employees) were to flee unethical companies, I think one would get more of the effect you’re hoping for. Why lay the blame with the investors rather than with the consumers? If the consumers prized ethics, unethical companies would lose business and profits.

  8. Here’s another thought – if the regulations had any bite to them, investors would have dumped the stock in fear of the effects of the large fine levied on Walmart.

    Especially if there was such a thing as a corporate death penalty for the really bad crimes (or perhaps a three-strike rule?)

  9. Tim O’Reilly happens to be busy agreeing with you:

    [@JPBarlow:]

    “The capitalist myth holds that the primary corporate responsibility is to maximize shareholder value. And that’s just wrong. – @timoreilly

    [@TimOReilly:]

    Right-on! RT @maradydd: @JPBarlow @timoreilly It also holds that shareholder value is measured only in dollars, which is also wrong.

  10. looks like I’m in good company!

  11. Well, investors did to some extent dump the stock, and you’re blindly trusting here that Reuters knows exactly why they did so.

    Given that we’ve both come up with ways the stock price could be significantly affected when companies misbehave, remind me why the stock price needs to express more than expectations of future profits?

  12. Because stock price is the only thing taken into consideration when talking about “shareholder value” and that’s not enough, it’s too easy to externalize things that hurt society that way.

  13. Well, I’d be curious to read coherent proposals for alternate arrangements.

    I think stricter sanctions would go a long way.

  14. It would be a good start.

  15. The other thing that should happen is a serious shake-up in the senior management of this company, i.e. firings and resignations, not to mention prosecutions. If, indeed, these guys are so valuable that they have to be paid heaps of money, and it’s so hard to get good ones, and if those wonderful leaders have to leave suddenly, then I can see the stock price dropping.

  16. And keep in mind all that the shareholders are not individuals that can make “moral” decisions. They are usually funds or big institutional blocks. Major Holders of WMT (Walmart). These funds are motivated by the same metric – money.

Prototype Quadrotor with Machine Gun!

Posted on April 24th, 2012 at 8:57 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Its a fake viral ad for new Call of Duty.

Seniors get the TSA runaround, lose $300

Posted on April 24th, 2012 at 8:37 by John Sinteur in category: Do you feel safer yet?

[Quote]:

Nobody, he says, is giving him a straight answer. “The police said they went and reviewed the videotapes but they were too blurry,” Petti says. Petti’s son Bill, who is helping his father, doubts that. “You can bet if my father were a terrorist, those videos would not be too blurry.”

But I’m sure they feel much safer, right?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. i don’t understand why security checkpoints are even being video taped if their cameras produce a blurry video that can’t be used by law enforcement.