« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

You can’t block Facebook using Windows 8′s hosts file

Posted on August 19th, 2012 at 17:40 by John Sinteur in category: Microsoft

[Quote]:

While you can still add any host you want to the hosts file and map it to an IP, you will notice that some of the mappings will get reset once you open an Internet browser. If you only save, close and re-open the hosts file you will still see the new mappings in the the file, but once you open a web browser, some of them are removed automatically from the hosts file.

Two of the sites that you can’t block using the hosts file are facebook.com and ad.doubleclick.net, the former the most popular social networking site, the second a popular ad serving domain.

Anybody have Windows 8 installed and to try this?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. To correct the misinformation:
    turning off Windows Defender, which basically is Microsoft Security Essentials, in Windows 8 will resolve the issue. It appears that the program has been designed to protect some hosts from being added to the Windows hosts file. To turn off Windows Defender press the Windows key, type Windows Defender and hit enter. This launches the program. Switch to Settings here and select Administrator on the left. Locate Turn on Windows Defender and uncheck the preference and click save changes afterwards.

    If you do not want to disable Windows Defender completely, you can alternatively add the hosts file to the list of excluded files and processes. You do that with a on Settings > Excluded files and locations. This basically blocks Windows Defender from scanning or manipulating the hosts file in the operating system.

  2. Sounds like a bug if this is the only way it can distinguish FB from malware.

This voter probably is not undecided…

Posted on August 19th, 2012 at 17:15 by John Sinteur in category: Indecision 2012


Write a comment

Heat Shield, Meet Mars

Posted on August 19th, 2012 at 17:13 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

This sequence of images shows the heat shield from NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory hitting the ground on Mars and raising a cloud of dust. The images were taken by the Mars Descent Imager on the mission’s Curiosity rover while the rover was still suspended on a parachute, after the spacecraft had jettisoned the heat shield.

A dark spot, the shadow of the heat shield, enters the scene from lower left, moving toward the center. The bright heat shield itself is also apparent just before the shadow and hardware meet in the impact on the surface. The area of ground visible in the images is about six-tenths of a mile (1 kilometer) across. The frames shown here are cropped portions of full-frame images from the Mars Descent Imager.

The sequence includes 25 frames, repeated in five run-throughs for this presentation. The action is full speed in the first, fourth and fifth run-throughs. It is one-half and one-eighth speeds in the second and third run-throughs.


Write a comment

kitten vs TWO scary things (котенок против ДВУХ неведомых хреней)

Posted on August 19th, 2012 at 16:36 by John Sinteur in category: News


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Gives a new meaning to the term “The Green Monster”! :-)

Out of all the rocks on Mars

Posted on August 19th, 2012 at 16:31 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

The Curiosity rover is preparing to use its rock vaporizing laser for the first time, on a rock labelled as N165. Rock N165 has a twitter account. People are chatting to it.


Write a comment

Phone book publisher tries to silence critic with legal bullying

Posted on August 19th, 2012 at 16:19 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Phone bookEverybody in the Netherlands still receives the paper phone guide once every year, whether they want to or not, even though in these days of Google and the Internet it is nothing but a vehicle for advertisements.

To help stop this form of harassment, a guy called Alexander Klöpping has registered a URL called sterftelefoongidssterf.nl (diephonebookdie) which redirects to the phone book cancellation form. In other words, if you want the phone book to be eliminated (‘die’) from your life, follow that link. (Actually don’t follow it, De Telefoongids are known to ignore your cancellation request anyway.)

Last Monday Klöpping received a threatening e-mail by the publishers of the phone book, a subsidiary of European Directories, that tells him he is engaged in trademark violation and that he must cease and desist.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I hope he responded with a hearty “Die! Die! Die!”, or at least a good “Screw you!”. And now, I’d like to introduce Klöpping to the Streisand Effect…

  2. I would have simply answered with “We refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram”

Limousine Horse

Posted on August 19th, 2012 at 11:48 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture


Write a comment

And Now Facebook’s Bankers Are Divvying Up The $100 Million They Made Shorting Facebook’s Stock

Posted on August 19th, 2012 at 11:23 by John Sinteur in category: Robber Barons

[Quote]:

Wall Street bankers were paid extremely handsomely to sell the $16 billion of stock they sold on the Facebook IPO. Specifically, they were paid $176 million in fees.

(Investors who bought Facebook’s stock on the IPO, meanwhile, have since lost $8 billion).

But that was only the beginning.

Right now, reports Lynn Cowan of the Wall Street Journal, while Facebook investors digest the fact that the stock has now dropped to $19 from an IPO price of $38, Facebook’s bankers are divvying up another $100 million they made on the Facebook stock, this time in a much less visible fashion.

How did the bankers make this second bonanza?

By shorting Facebook’s stock.

(and the fun part is: this is by design, and expected. It’s called a Green Shoe, based on the first company IPO they did this on)


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. IPO pricing is a losing game. If you get it right and the stock doesn’t move right afterwards, people complain. If you have it to low, you “leave money on the table” for the company. If it’s too high you’re defrauding the stock buyers.

    Everybody had the opportunity to short the stock and make that $100 million.

  2. “Everybody had the opportunity to short the stock and make that $100 million.”

    Read the article, this is not classic shorting – which given that they set the IP is a form of insider trading anyway. This is worse, they sell excess shares they haven’t bought. If the shares rise they just collect the fees, if the stocks drop they buy the shares at a lower price and sell it for the higher. So no, no one else has this opportunity.

  3. When the stock continues to go down (as it did here) and they cover their position by buying stock on the open market, it actually DOES work out exactly to classic shorting. What’s different is that they’re protected from the risk that the stock might go up. If you were correctly convinced the stock was going to take a dive, you COULD have done exactly the same thing.

    Seems to me that people get screwed in the scenario where the stock goes up after IPO, and depending on how you look at it, either the IPO’ing company gets below market value for the extra 15% shares, and/or people flipping the stock shortly after IPO get shafted because the price is somewhat suppressed by the extra supply. But volatility control is exactly the purpose of the arrangement here, so arguably it’s all by design.

    I’m not arguing that the investment banks don’t have a ridiculously cushy position. They do. But unless they were engaging in the shorting based on insider info, I don’t see much reason to cry foul here.

Stride Mintacular

Posted on August 19th, 2012 at 11:20 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, If you're in marketing, kill yourself


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Sad, sad bastards.

Non-voters prefer Obama

Posted on August 19th, 2012 at 10:02 by John Sinteur in category: Indecision 2012

[Quote]:

But what about the nearly 40% of adult American citizens (both registered and unregistered) who choose not to vote? That’s 80 million people who are eligible to vote but can’t be bothered. What do they think? Do they even know who is running? Why don’t they vote?

In a ground-breaking study, Suffolk University ran a poll of American adults and then selected out the unlikely voters, rather than the likely voters, for analysis. They are not a politically aware bunch: 61% could not name the current Vice President. Also noteworthy is that 59% said they don’t pay attention to politics because nothing ever gets done. It is just a bunch of empty promises. Of these nonvoters, 55% view President Obama favorably while only 25% view Mitt Romney favorably. Clearly, Obama doesn’t have to convince them he is the better candidate. He only has to convince them that he could make a difference in their lives.

The top reason for not voting is that they have no time. The recent spate of state laws passed by Republican-controlled legislatures to reduce early voting, require voter ID cards, and create other barriers to voting are all designed to discourage these 80 million people from voting. They know that if this huge group starts voting in large numbers, they are doomed, so the motto here is: “Let sleeping dogs lie.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. “The top reason for not voting is that they have no time.”

    Right. Because spending one Saturday afternoon every 4 years with voting takes time away from a whole lot of things.
    I call bullshit on that reason. Find a better excuse for being bothered.
    “they don’t pay attention to politics because nothing ever gets done.”
    That sounds like a more valid reason.

    Have no time. Pull the other one.

  2. I call bullshit on that reason

    You’re forgetting the voter registration process, which is being made as time consuming as possible by Republicans.

  3. Saturday? Voting in the U.S. happens mostly on Tuesdays, you don’t get the day off from work to do it, and lines can be quite long.

    (Mail-in ballots are becoming more common in some states, but I don’t know how wide-spread that is, e.g. in Republican-controlled states.)

    But in the end it’s the combination of the two, right? If you perceive voting as not being very effective, you’re going to put up with less hassle to do it.

Bill Gates invests in solar-powered toilet

Posted on August 19th, 2012 at 1:19 by Sueyourdeveloper in category: News

Quote

US billionaire and philanthropist Bill Gates is investing in a solar-powered toilet for the developing world that will use little or no water.

The need for a new type of toilet is an important part of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s push to improve health in the developing world, officials familiar with the project said.

Now that is a good use of all that money I’ve spent on Microsoft products over the last 20 years.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Jobs said it best about Gates: “Bill has realised that the goal isn’t to be the richest dead in the cemetery”