« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Judge Rules Memo on Targeted Killing Can Remain Secret

Posted on January 3rd, 2013 at 19:19 by John Sinteur in category: News -- Write a comment

[Quote]:

A federal judge in Manhattan refused on Wednesday to require the Justice Department to disclose a memorandum providing the legal justification for the targeted killing of a United States citizen, Anwar al-Awlaki, who died in a drone strike in Yemen in 2011.

The ruling, by Judge Colleen McMahon, was marked by skepticism about the antiterrorist program that targeted him, and frustration with her own role in keeping the legal rationale for it secret.

“I can find no way around the thicket of laws and precedents that effectively allow the executive branch of our government to proclaim as perfectly lawful certain actions that seem on their face incompatible with our Constitution and laws while keeping the reasons for their conclusion a secret,” she wrote.

“The Alice-in-Wonderland nature of this pronouncement is not lost on me,” Judge McMahon wrote, adding that she was operating in a legal environment that amounted to “a veritable Catch-22.”

So the Constitution of the United States of America explicitly forbids the executive branch from executing American citizens without a trial, even on high charges such as treason, they do so anyway, and that’s OK?

  1. It’s not liked they killed a model citizen…. They guy was a terrorist. You could see this as self defense, like a policaman can shoot somebody without a trial to defend himself.

  2. @Yoho: A policeman can do that, but there should then be a thorough and open investigation to make sure that the officer was justified in such action.

    I’m not saying there are no witches to be burnt; but allowing a state to be judge, jury and executioner is not justice.

previous post: Oregon officials propose per-mile tax for gas sippers

next post: Nicolas Sarkozy DID take $50 million of Muammar Gaddafi’s cash, French judge is told