« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

I am getting hungary too

Posted on January 24th, 2013 at 19:09 by John Sinteur in category: Funny!

rHr5e98


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. What a mouthful! I have little appetite for this class of tripe.

Titzkrieg

Posted on January 24th, 2013 at 17:46 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Men: have you always wanted to develop one— and only one— breast on the left side of your chest? Well, if you have an elite military training background, live in Germany or are willing to move there, you can now fulfill your dreams of single-boobery. But you have to act fast.

Dozens of soldiers it the Wachbataillon (German for man with one breast, you know how concise German words are) unit, which performs drill displays at official events, are developing breasts on their left side because of the way they drill. It turns out that repeatedly slapping your chest in the same exact spot with heavy rifles can stimulate glands to produce hormones and cause a condition called one sided gynecomastia. (I’m sure the Germans have a single word for it but I don’t know what it is.) The condition has been diagnosed in 74 % of Wachbataillon members who have gone to army medics because of their “developments.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Drill, baby, drill!

Why Did the Justice System Target Aaron Swartz?

Posted on January 24th, 2013 at 16:55 by John Sinteur in category: News

[Quote]:

Last month, Rolling Stone’s Matt Taibbi noted the absurdity of HSBC bankers skating on serious drug money laundering charges while hundreds of thousands of Americans sit behind bars for petty drug offenses. The Secret Service’s involvement in hunting down a 26-year-old charged with downloading too many scholarly articles is just another example of our justice system’s chillingly warped priorities.


Write a comment

Record quarter, so better dump that stock!

Posted on January 24th, 2013 at 3:02 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

Screen Shot 2013-01-23 at 22.01.59


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Stock prices are not about past earnings, but about expected future earnings, so this reaction is not as illogical as it may seem on a first glimpse. When a stock drops after record earnings, this is a very bad sign that people with insider knowledge are maybe dumping now their stocks to people who got greedy by seeing the glorious days of the past, and ignore that very rough times may lay ahead for Apple.

    It is the eternal cycle of the stock market: “Smart money” playing their game with the “Dumb money”

  2. Record *revenue* but same profit as the year earlier quarter.

    Interesting one analyst said it was lagging iMac sales that had the biggest negative impact.

    Analyst price targets still $600, $650, $750, $875, $1100…

  3. @Desiato: All good points. Still, I can’t quite fathom the P/E for Amazon being 290 times greater than that for Apple.

  4. @SjG: I don’t really get it either. Although Amazon’s profit is artificially low since they’re plowing all their cash back into developing their business. The stock reflects expected earnings growth, which for Amazon is still thought to be potentially quite large, and for Apple people are worrying that they’re running into the laws of physics. So I guess I get some part of it. But Apple at P/E around 10, yeah, crazy.

  5. I think THIS is why their stock price took a hit in spite of record revenues and profits. Exactly the kind of thing Wall Street does not approve of.

  6. John, do you have anything to substantiate the claim that Wall Street cares about that? Sounds highly, highly dubious to me. To put it politely. :)

In malpractice case, Catholic hospital argues fetuses aren’t people

Posted on January 24th, 2013 at 1:44 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News

[Quote]:

Lori Stodghill was 31-years old, seven-months pregnant with twin boys and feeling sick when she arrived at St. Thomas More hospital in Cañon City on New Year’s Day 2006. She was vomiting and short of breath and she passed out as she was being wheeled into an examination room. Medical staff tried to resuscitate her but, as became clear only later, a main artery feeding her lungs was clogged and the clog led to a massive heart attack. Stodghill’s obstetrician, Dr. Pelham Staples, who also happened to be the obstetrician on call for emergencies that night, never answered a page. His patient died at the hospital less than an hour after she arrived and her twins died in her womb.

[..]

But when it came to mounting a defense in the Stodghill case, Catholic Health’s lawyers effectively turned the Church directives on their head. Catholic organizations have for decades fought to change federal and state laws that fail to protect “unborn persons,” and Catholic Health’s lawyers in this case had the chance to set precedent bolstering anti-abortion legal arguments. Instead, they are arguing state law protects doctors from liability concerning unborn fetuses on grounds that those fetuses are not persons with legal rights.

So life needs protection from conception (and thus we can’t have abortion) except when it costs the church money?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Straight from the department of hypocracy department…

  2. Hypocracy = rule by the low. Sounds about right.