« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

NeXT vs Sun

Posted on July 21st, 2014 at 17:17 by John Sinteur in category: Apple -- Write a comment

[Quote]:

In 1991 Steve Jobs’ company commissioned an head-to-head programming competition to show how much faster and easier it was to program a NeXT computer vs a Sun workstation. The NeXT operating system went on to be the foundation for Apple’s Macintosh OS-X about a decade later.

  1. Well, would I rather have learned to use NeXTstep or Devguide? Not sure. For the type of programs shown here, relative simple GUI plus simple key-value storage, sure, but for writing all the other stuff, not sure. But what I don’t get is that the Sun guy can’t display Postscript on a NeWS system using Devguide? That looks fishy. Personally, I would have used neither NeXTstep nor Devguide and saved a lot of money off the bat. My code would have been somewhat portable. ;-P I wonder what would happen nowadays if a free/open source buff would take on this challenge, as a web-app, against a seasoned Visual Studio coder.

  2. Why a web-app? How about a three-way battle between the Microsoft platform (Visual Studio and all the technologies that go along with it), XCode and all the Apple technologies, and Google?

    And have the requirements be something modern as well – with a social/mobile part (perhaps location based, sales people in the field exchanging some information, with push notifications and all that), scalable to millions of users, with user interfaces for at least three device families (phone/tablet/PC)?

    Then web technologies would be just a small part of the task. We’ve come a long way since 1991, let the challenge reflect that.

previous post: How did the Snowden revelations impact behaviour?

next post: Malaysia Airlines diverts flight from Ukraine – to Syria