« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

CEO of FoxConn: ‘Managing One Million Animals Gives Me A Headache’

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 18:39 by Desiato in category: Apple, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

According to WantChinaTimes, Terry Gou, the head of Hon Hai Foxconn, the largest contract manufacturer in the world, had this to say at a recent meeting with his senior managers:"Hon Hai has a workforce of over one million worldwide and as human beings are also animals, to manage one million animals gives me a headache," said Hon Hai chairman Terry Gou at a recent year-end party, adding that he wants to learn from Chin Shih-chien, director of Taipei Zoo, regarding how animals should be managed.

Apparently there are no psychologists in China.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. So he’s not happy with his slaves’ behaviour. Poor baby.
    Perhaps there are limits to the size of human organizations.

Boing Boing is right: Hollywood locates barrel’s bottom

Posted on December 11th, 2011 at 9:07 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. That’s kinda cute, actually. A tribute to traditional slapstick. It’s pretty awesome!

The Muppets Are Communist, Fox Business Network Says

Posted on December 5th, 2011 at 21:06 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

It ain’t easy being green, but according to Fox Business, Kermit the Frog and his Muppet friends are reds.

Last week, on the network’s "Follow the Money" program, host Eric Bolling went McCarthy on the new, Disney-released film, "The Muppets," insisting that its storyline featuring an evil oil baron made it the latest example of Hollywood’s so-called liberal agenda.

Bolling, who took issue with the baron’s name, Tex Richman, was joined by Dan Gainor of the conservative Media Research Center, who was uninhibited with his criticism.

"It’s amazing how far the left will go just to manipulate your kids, to convince them, give the anti-corporate message," he said.

So there you have it – the Muppets are the enemy of Fox.


Write a comment

Scenes from the GOP’s “Commander in Chief” Debate | Mother Jones

Posted on November 14th, 2011 at 18:28 by Desiato in category: awesome, Can you Trump this?, Indecision 2012, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

What would I cut? I think, really, what I would want to do is be able to go back and take a look at Lyndon Baines Johnson’s The Great Society. The Great Society has not worked, and it’s put us into the modern welfare state. If you look at China, they don’t have food stamps. If you look at China, they save for their own retirement security. They don’t have pay FICA. They don’t have the modern welfare state. And China’s growing. And so what I would do is look at the programs that LBJ gave us with The Great Society, and they’d be gone.

A Republican candidate for President suggests the U.S. take hints for domestic policy from a Communist country.


Write a comment

Drug-sniffing dogs come to Wolcott High School, with a twist.

Posted on October 24th, 2011 at 10:54 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

At Wolcott High School one morning this week, an urgent announcement crackled over the intercom: a threatening intruder was in the building and students were told to immediately take refuge in classrooms.

Doors were locked and police, with dogs, moved in. Students stayed huddled in classrooms where they were told to stay away from the windows.

But what sounded like a frightening situation was just a search for narcotics. Drug-sniffing dogs combed the school while students stayed in locked classrooms, believing that an attacker was roaming the halls.

[..]

“After 10 minutes we say this is a drill and at that point we started a search for drugs,” McCary said. “We are providing a safe and secure nurturing environment.”

No drugs turned up in the search.

[..]

Andrew Schneider, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut, called it a “terrible policy. It will cause more trouble in the long run. Young people will learn not to trust the police.”

“It’s a terrible civics lesson.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. “Safe, secure, nurturing.” Someone should pick up a dictionary, because “I don’t think that means what you think it means”.

Google’s Andy Rubin Makes a Flawed Case Against Siri

Posted on October 21st, 2011 at 12:24 by Desiato in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, Google, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

In an interview with AllThingsD’s Ina Fried, Google’s Andy Rubin made a two-line case against Siri, Apple’s new voice-controlled ‘virtual assistant’ for the iPhone 4S. “Your phone is a tool for communicating,” Rubin said. “You shouldn’t be communicating with the phone; you should be communicating with somebody on the other side of the phone.”

Wow. That’s up there with Steve Jobs saying the Kindle was irrelevant because “people don’t read anymore”.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I am considering the new iPhone for the sole reason of it having Siri.

    At the moment experimenting with Android ones, not too successful.
    “Create text message” – comes out with a “Roland, I heard the following: Clean test massage”.
    Hilarious, but not too productive :D

    I heard Siri being way better with speech recognition :) )

  2. (I forgot to mention in the post that Google has of course long had Voice Actions for Android. I’m sure that that’s tooooootally different.)

The people on Alpha Centauri 7 are not pleased

Posted on October 13th, 2011 at 10:59 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture, What were they thinking?


Write a comment

Nokia Tune Remake

Posted on October 11th, 2011 at 16:34 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

Nokia Tune is one of world’s most recognized audio brand assets and is estimated to be heard over one billion times a day. Nokia is launching a global crowdsourcing campaign to find a fresh version of the Nokia Tune.

And the first winner is in.

Although I wonder what tone deaf ten thumbed talentless noise polluter invented this aural piece of excrement and, just as important, which bunch of cunts voted it to win?

Or perhaps it just shows how what Nokia marketeers like is inversely proportional to what everyone else likes…


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Now I understand why Nokia is falling behind as a cell phone maker…!
    Even “The Great Marvelous” sounded better.

  2. They are roadkill…don’t get me started on the lost opportunities they had with N770, 800. Farkwits.

Police to protest supporters: Honk if you’d like a ticket

Posted on October 9th, 2011 at 14:01 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

Police experimented with a new tactic Friday night as they responded to a weeklong Occupy Seattle demonstration at Westlake Park — ticketing drivers who honked in support of protesters.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I do not care what rubbish they say about a noise ordinance, this is suppression of free speech. The United Police States servants on the job, ever faithful to corporate machine run governments of their employ. A small step from here to a Stasi equivalent (and I do not mean just this incident but so many others in the U.S. these days.)

    My hope is some ACLU lawyer takes this and drags this through the courts causing the City of Seattle financial harm. It would also be nice if the citizens rose up in mass and demanded the resignation of John Diaz, Seattle chief of police Chief of Police. But fat chance that will happen.

    Want to complain? Here is a link: Complaint form: http://www.seattle.gov/police/OPA/Complaintform.htm Their phone is +1 206 625 5011

  2. I noticed that the article said that the ticketing only started after 10:00pm. If their were residences nearby that complained about the noise from car horns then the police would have justification for ticketing. The writer of the article gives no indication of whether he talked to the police or not as to why.

WIPO boss: the Web would have been better if it was patented and its users had to pay license fees

Posted on October 8th, 2011 at 13:51 by John Sinteur in category: Intellectual Property, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

Last June, the Swiss Press Club held a launch for the Global Innovation Index at which various speakers were invited to talk about innovation. After the head of CERN and the CEO of the Internet Society spoke about how important it was that the Web’s underlying technology hadn’t been patented, Francis Gurry, the Director General of the UN’s World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), took the mic to object.

In Gurry’s view, the Web would have been better off if it had been locked away in patents, and if every user of the Web had needed to pay a license fee to use it (and though Gurry doesn’t say so, this would also have meant that the patent holder would have been able to choose which new Web sites and technologies were allowed, and would have been able to block anything he didn’t like, or that he feared would cost him money).

This is a remarkable triumph of ideology over evidence. The argument that there wasn’t enough investment in the Web is belied by the fact that a) the Web attracted more investment than any of the network service technologies that preceded it (by orders of magnitude), and; b) that the total investment in the Web is almost incalculably large. The only possible basis for believing that the Web really would have benefited from patents is a blind adherence to the ideology that holds that patents are always good, no matter what.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I do think the WWW would have been better, at least to all eight it’s users.

Cagefighting…

Posted on September 22nd, 2011 at 19:53 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. What a bunch of idiots.

These are the people who are supposed to be keeping the masses informed.

Posted on August 23rd, 2011 at 18:24 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, What were they thinking?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Obviously, their MEA correspondent works from nice, safe Tripoli, Lebanon. And she is reporting about events in Tripoli, Libya that she saw last night on Al Jazeera. Dangerous work, being a war correspondent.

Easy being green, it is not.

Posted on July 27th, 2011 at 12:40 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?


Write a comment

San Antonio schools spy on cafeteria users

Posted on May 22nd, 2011 at 2:51 by Sueyourdeveloper in category: What were they thinking?

Quote

Of all the wasteful, misguided uses of technology, this has to be one of he strangest; some Texas schools are going to spend $2 million to install cameras in cafeterias to find out why children are getting fat.


Write a comment

Tennessee bill would jail Shariah followers

Posted on February 24th, 2011 at 13:08 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

A bill in the Tennessee General Assembly would make following the Islamic code known as Shariah law a felony, punishable by 15 years in jail.

Two legislators introduced the same bill in the Senate and House last week. It calls Shariah law a danger to homeland security and gives the attorney general authority to investigate complaints and decide who’s practicing it.

[..]

“What do you mean, really, by saying I can’t abide by Shariah law?” he said. “Shariah law is telling me don’t steal. Do you want me to steal and rob a bank?”

The Attorney General’s Office had no comment.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. It would be much better to outlaw ANY collection of religious laws which are in contradiction to the constitution and the human rights, and which are proveably a danger to society. Or at least strongly regulate these texts (make it unlawful to distribute these harmful texts to minors; selling such material only allowed with warning stickers, etc.)

    Examples for such material: The 10 commandments, huge parts of the bible, the shariah, or ‘dianetics’

  2. I’ll bite–which part of the Ten Commandments is in conflict with the US Constitution or with human rights?

  3. @Desiato:

    “Do not have any other gods before me.

    You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.

    You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, punishing children for the iniquity of parents, to the third and the fourth generation of those who reject me,

    [...]

    You shall not make wrongful use of the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not acquit anyone who misuses his name.”

    I see several violations of the constitution and of basic human rights here.

    “Freedom of Religion” is only one of them. Freedom of Speech is blatantly violated. Punishing somebody for something he has not done, this is a strong violation of “due process”. “Freedom of the Arts”.

    The danger for society: There are influential weirdos in the US who claim that the Ten Commandments are the basis of our judicial system, and they want to transform society after these anachronistic rules from the bronze-age.

  4. 1a. Thou shall not be gay.
    2b. Thou shall not use recreational drugs.
    3c. Thou shall kill your enemies if you are in the armed forces.
    4f. Thou shall steal if god tells you to do it (Israel).

  5. Steffen, I think you fundamentally misunderstand the Bill of Rights. It protects the citizens from their government only, not fro
    a religion they might choose to join.

  6. @Desiato: Nope, it rather you who misunderstood the whole matter.

    The constitution and the Declaration of Human Rights guarantee Freedom of Religion. Nobody must be forced into practicing any religion he does not like.

    The Ten Commandments (explicitly No. 1,2 and 3) are in direct violation of this principle. It says clear without ambiguity: “I am your God. You shall have no other Gods. You shall not make wrongful use of the name of the Lord your God”. The “God” who is speaking here the Judeo-christian god. In other words: *Everybody* in this club must follow the Judeo-christian god. Any speaking against this god is strictly forbidden. The bible is full of gruesome threats to people who don’t submit to this god.

    Anybody is of course completely free to submit himself under a religion. But the Ten Commandments don’t speak of freedom. They speak of an obligation, without exception, and this is the violation of Human Rights. Would the Christian Taliban seize power and transform the state after the Ten Commandments, this would unambiguously mean: A Theocracy.

  7. The First Amendment says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech (…)”

    This was later, by the Supreme Court, extended to apply to the States as well, and has since spread farther down by judicial fiat, not because the Constitution says so.

    It’s a common misconception that the freedom of speech (in the U.S.) applies broadly, e.g. that companies are required to uphold it. That’s not the case. If I run a web forum, I’m free to delete postings I don’t like, you don’t get the right to freedom of speech there.

    Remember that the Constitution was written largely by Christians and at the very least (if you want to argue that some or many were Deists) in a context deeply steeped in Christianity. The Founders knew what the Ten Commandments say. They clearly did not think the internal commandments of the religion conflicted with the external right not to have the government dictate a state religion.

    Beyond that you’re making an argument that Christianity is illegal or invalid because you feel its commandments are addressed to those outside the religion. I find it hard to argue this rationally since it’s so silly, but I’ll just say that there’s a difference between saying something and enforcing it in practice. How does the Catholic church punish you if you don’t follow the commandments? You get excommunicated. The people who don’t follow the religion get barred from participating in it further and are told they’re no longer welcome. Doesn’t that kinda contradict your entire argument?

  8. Oh, and while you’re responding can you let us know whether the Catholic Church gets Freedom of Speech? (to publish the Bible, that is…)

  9. It wasn’t the SCOTUS. It was the 13th amendment that enforced the national constitution on the states.

In Soviet Russia, sun orbits you!

Posted on February 10th, 2011 at 11:12 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

Thirty-two percent of Russians reject a sun-centred Solar system, four percent more than in 2007 when a similar survey was conducted, the Russian Center of Public Opinion Research showed.

The survey highlighted scientific superstitions among Russians and was released as Russian President Dmitry Medvedev called this week for national lunar and deep space programmes.

The survey also found 55 percent of Russians believe that radioactivity is a human invention.


Write a comment

The Sarah Palin Battle Hymn

Posted on January 18th, 2011 at 8:56 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?

This is, by far, Werner Herzog’s funniest film.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. …and this is inside a church, I take it? Funny old world.

  2. Please, just shoot me now!

    So, what do we call this, TeaPartaoke?

Kinder Surprise egg seized at U.S. border

Posted on January 12th, 2011 at 17:17 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

Bird said the U.S. government has sent her a seven-page letter asking her to formally authorize the destruction of her seized Kinder egg.

Do I understand this correctly?

In the US, anyone can legally buy and walk around with a gun, but you’ll be fined if you carry a Kinder egg around?

Because they are so DEADLY?


Write a comment

Sony Sues PS3 Hackers

Posted on January 12th, 2011 at 17:03 by John Sinteur in category: Security, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

In late December 2010, fail0verflow, a team of European hackers, demonstrated that the Playstation 3′s security was fundamentally flawed and managed to obtain the encryption key used by the device (see previous discussion). Utilizing the techniques developed by the fail0verflow team, iPhone hacker George Hotz released the encryption key publically, which enables the execution of arbitrary code on the console. Now Sony is suing both George Hotz and members of the fail0verflow team.
Both George Hotz and fail0verflow have updated their websites with the legal papers they’ve received. fail0verflow maintains their innocence, stating that they have never published any keys or code that could be used to breach the PS3, and that their only motivation was to get the OtherOS functionality back on the device.

There’s no way to get the genie back in the bottle, because all PS3s everywhere are absolutely, irrevocably compromised. And so are blu-ray keys, as a consequence.

This is just because they are pissed, and want to burn down the house and salt the ground, to prevent a future PS4 from the same fate. Both the 360 and the Wii have been cracked for a long time, and both seem to be doing just fine, and Blu-Ray was independently cracked years ago. In terms of actual fiscal impact on Sony, it probably wouldn’t matter that much; the real customers will keep buying software. But Sony will be much more dependent on the goodwill of its customers, rather than being able to make them subservient through technical means, and it strikes me that these lawsuits are perhaps not the best way to generate goodwill.

I’m just glad my decision following the Sony rootkit exposure back in 2005 to never, ever buy a Sony product again keeps getting validated.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. “’m just glad my decision following the Sony rootkit exposure back in 2005 to never, ever buy a Sony product again keeps getting validated.” Ditto. I have had a lot of Sony products over the years, TV’s, audio recorders, mini-disc recorders, etc, etc. However, since the rootkit fiasco I have refused to purchase anything from Sony (including videos), or any blu-ray device (Sony gets royalties from all BD device and disc sales), until such time as they have altered their course with regard to DRM and apologize in the most profuse manner possible about the harm they have done to their customers.

“Most Popular” on election night

Posted on November 3rd, 2010 at 12:07 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Finally! The MacRib returns. Now I won’t know what to do. Better have both a BigMac and a MacRib, but hold the lattice please.

Getting your news

Posted on October 30th, 2010 at 10:36 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?


Write a comment

Removing clutter from pages helps users focus their attention on the things that really matter.

Posted on October 13th, 2010 at 5:42 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

They can’t be serious. Are they serious? Holy crap I think they’re serious.


Write a comment

LG Quantum Windows Phone 7: Hands On

Posted on October 12th, 2010 at 22:59 by Paul Jay in category: What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

The LG Quantum could be a quantum of trouble. The first Windows Phone 7 device with a full keyboard that will be sold through U.S. carrier stores, it has a balky sliding mechanism and a really bizarre keyboard layout that could kill its appeal.

Windows Phone 7 also just doesn’t seem to be designed for phones with landscape-format, sliding keyboards yet. Too many of the Windows Phone 7 screens don’t rotate, leaving you craning your neck to try to operate the phone at a 90-degree angle.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Well, that’s one way not to spend too much time “in” the phone….

  2. Dontcha just love Microsoft. Fuckin’ up stuff so you don’t have to.

Sony Reveals Google TV Remote Controller, Not A Joke

Posted on October 6th, 2010 at 17:43 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

Today, ABC Nightline gave us a peek at Sony’s Google TV and in the midst also the remote controller. Now before we move on here we just like to advise readers that this isn’t a joke. What you’re looking at above is in fact the actual remote control you will need to use to operate Sony’s Google TV (unless of course you opt to control the unit with your Android phone instead).


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I think I had one of those radios in the 70′s

  2. Wait, I get it, Google TV is a huge label printer.

  3. Beats the hell out of writing a search using the arrow keys on a remote…

  4. Umm yeah…

    “need” is sort of a misleading term here. You NEED a keyboard if you want to type WORDS. If you don’t need to type words you don’t need a keyboard. I’m not sure how you are expected to search for videos on YouTube on an Apple TV without a keyboard. If it is using voice activated controls like the iPhone has, I think I’d prefer the bulky remote.

    But then, I don’t watch tv.

Visual Basic Comes to Windows Phone 7

Posted on September 30th, 2010 at 16:17 by John Sinteur in category: Microsoft, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

You can now download the Visual Basic CTP for Windows Phone Developer Tools. Provided in this download are all the templates, designer support, emulator (and phone!) support and IntelliSense for Visual Basic.

We’re not formally announcing the schedule for when Visual Basic will be fully supported. We’re giving VB developers early access to the Windows Phone 7 platform so that they can start thinking about what amazing apps they want to build.

The classic definition of “to be amazed” is to be bewildered, made crazy, or stunned.

I guess that’s correct, then.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. The only thing that comes to my mind is “bumfuzzled”… Just what we need, our phones to give us the BSOD.

U.S. Court Finds Corporations Immune From Liability For Human Rights Abuses

Posted on September 19th, 2010 at 17:21 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

“So long as they incorporate (or act in the form of a trust), businesses will now be free to trade in or exploit slaves, employ mercenary armies to do dirty work for despots, perform genocides or operate torture prisons for a despot’s political opponents, or engage in piracy – all without civil liability to victims.” 

In the words of Judge Pierre Leval, who disagreed with his colleagues, that is the result of today’s ruling by a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which concluded that corporations could not be sued for human rights abuses under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS).  The ATS generally allows suits in federal courts for violations of international law – but, according to the Second Circuit, not if the violation was committed by a corporation.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. My first thought is this is just one more pro-business decision reached by our increasingly right-leaning, pro-business court.

    But my second thought is this question: how can a corporation have different standing than an individual as a foundation for this decision, but the decision to allow unlimited corporate funding of elections was because they had freedom of speech EQUAL TO AN INDIVIDUAL. (Though note: individuals are limited in the amount they can give. Go figure.)

    I really, really hope President Obama gets to replace a conservative on the Supreme Court. Replacing one liberal with another doesn’t really change things (especially since he rightly picks moderates — if only a conservative President would do the same we wouldn’t BE in this situation…).

Best Youtube comment ever

Posted on August 29th, 2010 at 9:32 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?

but first watch this,this,this,this, if you can. I couldn’t. Perhaps I’m just getting older but I find myself having this reaction to things more and more.

[Quote]:

To the entire shower of cunts that are even tangentially involved in the production of this: I pray with every fibre of my being that Zombie Walt Disney rises from his grave, tracks each one of you motherfuckers down; and using his zombie strength to overpower and pin you all to the floor, squats over your faces and plants a huge festering 44-year-old fucking zombie shit into each of your cretinous, cancerous mouths


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I hate to bring up idiocracy, but really

BP’s Newest Disaster: Photoshop

Posted on July 22nd, 2010 at 10:06 by John Sinteur in category: Foyer of Ennui (just short of the Hall of Shame), Great Picture, News, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

Now, they’ve gone and done it again with this image of their aerial monitoring from helicopters over the gulf.

[Quote]:

The first thing you might notice out of place is the looming air traffic control tower in the upper left hand side of the photo

Then, direct your attention to where the water abruptly changes shades of blue in a frenzy of pixelation, blurring, and a disappearing vessel

[..]

BP Photoshops Another Official Image TerriblyAnd last, while the helicopter clearly appears to be situated at some height above the boats ahead, the readouts on the dash appear to indicate that that door and ramp are open and the parking brake engaged, not to mention that the pilot appears to be holding a pre-flight checklist


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. BP – the gang that couldn’t shoot straight… :-O

  2. Nice to see the BP pilot has his fingers crossed….wonder what he could possibly be worried about…….. hmmm maybe a small oil leak somewhere!

Redo That Voodoo

Posted on July 17th, 2010 at 9:01 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

For a while, leading Republicans posed as stern foes of federal red ink. Two weeks ago, in the official G.O.P. response to President Obama’s weekly radio address, Senator Saxby Chambliss devoted his entire time to the evils of government debt, “one of the most dangerous threats confronting America today.” He went on, “At some point we have to say ‘enough is enough.’ ”

But this past Monday Jon Kyl of Arizona, the second-ranking Republican in the Senate, was asked the obvious question: if deficits are so worrisome, what about the budgetary cost of extending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, which the Obama administration wants to let expire but Republicans want to make permanent? What should replace $650 billion or more in lost revenue over the next decade?

His answer was breathtaking: “You do need to offset the cost of increased spending. And that’s what Republicans object to. But you should never have to offset the cost of a deliberate decision to reduce tax rates on Americans.” So $30 billion in aid to the unemployed is unaffordable, but 20 times that much in tax cuts for the rich doesn’t count.


Write a comment

Dreamworks Is Just Screwing With Us Now

Posted on July 2nd, 2010 at 11:10 by John Sinteur in category: What were they thinking?

Remember this?

Well, Dreamworks didn’t get the message.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Or they are just mocking us

  2. OMG now they have HUMAN characters that move their eyebrows! SHOCKING.

    uh, what?

  3. Amazing. You can’t make this shit up.


« Older Entries