« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

S is for Sodomy

Posted on January 27th, 2012 at 23:27 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Copy & Paste strikes again

  2. I wish I could like comments here!

    This video seems slightly relevant to this post:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkd5dJIVjgM

Abortion a bigger problem than joblessness, says Catholic Church

Posted on January 8th, 2012 at 12:20 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, Pastafarian News

[Quote]:

During his Boxing Day sermon, the Bishop of Córdoba, Demetrio Fernández, said there was a conspiracy by the United Nations. “The Minister for Family of the Papal Government, Cardinal Antonelli, told me a few days ago in Zaragoza that UNESCO has a program for the next 20 years to make half the world population homosexual. To do this they have distinct programs, and will continue to implant the ideology that is already present in our schools.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. It should read: Dementio Fernandez. What is it with the Red Hat Society? Must you be batshit crazy to be enrolled these days?

  2. Gotta hand it to UNESCO. 5 billion happy queers will be better for the world than any number of grumpy child molesters.

  3. Doesn’t the Catholic church have a program for the next decades to make much more people in the world catholic? As far as I know, the church has distinct programs to do this, and is continuing to implant its ideology that is already present in our schools.

    And in contrast to the Bishop of Cordobas weird ramblings, this is no crazy conspiracy theory, but unfortunately it is reality.

  4. That’s just an excuse of why half the catholic church is homosexual. They been subverted by the UNESCO

WTF? What the Fawkes?

Posted on January 1st, 2012 at 14:18 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, Privacy

[Quote]:

I had gone to court to listen to our legal team argue a case to protect the First Amendment rights of our client, Twitter user @p0isAn0n, aka Guido Fawkes. That user, who wishes to remain anonymous throughout the proceedings, was the target of a Suffolk County Assistant District Attorney’s administrative subpoena to Twitter, dated December 14, 2011. As we wrote last week, the subpoena asked Twitter to hand over @p0isAn0n’s subscriber information, including our client’s IP address, which can be used to help track down someone’s physical residence.

[..]

The known knowns: the scrum of lawyers, defense and prosecution, addressed the judge. I saw the judge speak to the lawyers. Then I saw our attorneys return to their bench, closer to where I was sitting, out of earshot of the sidebar. But the ADA stayed with the judge. He spoke to her, with his back to the courtroom, for about ten minutes. Our attorneys didn’t get to hear what he said to her, didn’t have a chance to respond to whatever the government was saying about our client, about the case. It was frankly shocking.

After those ten minutes of secret government-judge conversation, our attorneys were invited back to the sidebar, whereupon the scrum of lawyers spoke with the judge for another ten or fifteen minutes. Then they dispersed. The judge uttered not one word to the open court. And that was it.

Stunned, I followed a group of reporters outside and listened as Attorney Krupp attempted to answer their questions. It was then I realized that the judge had impounded all the court records related to the case, and mandated complete secrecy governing the proceedings. The public wasn’t even to know whether our motion to quash had been approved or denied.

The press scrum was Kafkaesque to say the least.

‘Can you tell us what the judge decided?’

‘No.’

‘Did the judge grant your motion to quash the subpoena?’

‘I can’t say.’


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. You can not have democracy or justice without transparency.

  2. “Heil Hitler!” (heels snap together with open palm and outstretched arm)

  3. Surely not another case of nazional security?

  4. I am asked from time to time why I don’t move to the USA. I could get contracts there, be well paid, etc.
    And I’m always thinking: I am very lucky, to live most of my life after the Soviet era. So thank you, I don’t intend to return to those times.

No, I don’t know either

Posted on December 28th, 2011 at 9:03 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. What was that joke about llama’s an’ rubber boots?

US judge rules Iran responsible for 9/11

Posted on December 24th, 2011 at 20:47 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

A US judge has signed a default judgment finding Iran, the Taliban and al-Qaida liable for the September 11, 2001 attacks.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Let’s hope that Iraq doesn’t sue us now.

  2. All historic children of the CIA.

  3. The prelude to war

  4. I thought the winners were supposed to write history, not the losers.

Oh, the innocence

Posted on December 22nd, 2011 at 19:11 by Desiato in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote Newsweek Jan. 13, 1958:]:

A ‘cleaned-up’ hydrogen bomb, according to the AEC, may someday trim mountains, melt icecaps, and thus change world wind patterns.

Hurricane fury might be blunted, even diverted from land, by enormous heat updrafts from fuel oil poured on ocean surface and lighted.

Harmless, tasteless chemicals spread on water surfaces could slow down evaporation, reducing rainfall on adjacent land areas.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. let’s hope in 50 years they will not look back on our ideas about gen modification and nano technology in the same way.

Nearly a Third of Americans Are Arrested by 23, Study Says

Posted on December 20th, 2011 at 1:12 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

By age 23, almost a third of Americans have been arrested for a crime, according to a new study that researchers say is a measure of growing exposure to the criminal justice system in everyday life.

The study, the first since the 1960s to look at the arrest histories of a national sample of adolescents and young adults over time, found that 30.2 percent of the 23-year-olds who participated reported having been arrested for an offense other than a minor traffic violation.

That figure is significantly higher than the 22 percent found in a 1965 study that examined the same issue using different methods. The increase may be a reflection of the justice system becoming more punitive and more aggressive in its reach during the last half-century, the researchers said. Arrests for drug-related offenses, for example, have become far more common, as have zero-tolerance policies in schools.

The study did not look at racial or regional differences, but other research has found higher arrest rates for black men and for youths living in poor urban areas.

The US must be a nation full of criminals!


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. That’s crazy. And I’m amazed it was as high as 22% in 1965. I’d really like to see a breakdown of the leading arrest charges.

  2. Come on. It is a police state with a rich book of of frivolous laws from which to persecute the citizenry. One needs to look no further than the useless war on drugs. And back in the 60′s? They arrested you for even saying the word Vietnam in the wrong tone, let alone protesting against that bone thrown at the military industrial complex. And a nations of criminals? True but in the “leadership” mostly – look no further than the corporatocracy.

  3. There was no war on drugs yet and Vietnam protests didn’t start until 1965 so they had not had a big impact on cumulative arrests.

  4. @Desiato – your comment is said with such certainty. Unfortunately, historical evidence is not on your side.

    May 1963, the first coordinated Vietnam War protests occur in London and Denmark. These protests are mounted by American pacifists during the annual remembrance of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings.
    May 2, In the first major student demonstration against the war, hundreds of students march through Times Square in New York City, while another 700 march in San Francisco. Smaller numbers also protest in New York; Seattle; and Madison, Wisconsin.
    May 12, twelve young men in New York publicly burn their draft cards to protest the war.[1][2]
    August: the Gulf of Tonkin Incident and Gulf of Tonkin Resolution.
    In December 1964, Joan Baez leads six hundred people in an antiwar demonstration in San Francisco.[3]

    The war on drugs goes back further http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_Drugs

  5. Sorry, I misphrased my comment, I meant to say protests “didn’t *really* start until” 1965. The point was that they didn’t contribute substantially to the national arrest rate, and coming back with mention of protests by “hundreds” of people doesn’t contradict that. You’re totally arguing with my literal comment rather than looking at all at what I’m trying to say.

    Sure, repression of drug use goes back to Prohibition and before. But how actively was it being pursued in the 1960s before Nixon actually invented the “War on Drugs” phrase in 1971? Do you have anything to support your claim in #2 that one need look no further to explain 22% of young adults having an arrest record?

    What I found with a quick search didn’t go back further than the 1970s, but indicates that the arrest numbers did not start to increase greatly until the 1980s, and when I look at the magnitude of the increases, I think, wow, if drug arrests are 4X what they were in 1970 (accounting for population growth), and the overall cumulative arrest rate only grew from 22% to 30%, there must be a lot of other arrests going on. (Or tons of repeat arrests, or…?)

    So notice that I’m not disputing that the War on Drugs is a huge factor in today’s arrest rates (& more so incarceration rates)–it clearly is. But it’s completely not obvious that it was a major factor in the early 1960s, which was your claim.

    [1] “In 1973, there were 328,670 arrests logged in the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) for drug law violations.”

    [2]“1970: Adult 322,300, Juvenile 93,300″

  6. Well technically you are right. The term war on drugs was not coined until ’71. Back then it was just the defacto war on blacks and statistics will bare me out. I think part of the reason (for the increase) is much better record keeping and as you said, re-arrests. Still, I concede the volley to you on this, as indeed, it has become much worse. My point is that US was in practice (not in name) a police state in ’65 and is even worse now. Back then the justification for the police tactics was inner city unrest (read fear of blacks) along with the growing civil unrest by the white middle class (anti Vietnam, and later joining the civil rights movements). Today the justification is in the name of terrorism which is statistically a red herring. Add to that the continue war on blacks renamed the drug wars, the war on immigration, and you some of reasons for the increase. With the recent trends in the militarization of civilian police, it (the police state) will only get worse. And besides, there is, unfortunately, simply too much money that wants to keep it this.

North Koreans weeping hysterically over the death of Kim Jong-il

Posted on December 19th, 2011 at 15:22 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

Footage taken from North Korean state media.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Whoah!!! Brilliant.

  2. A german satirical magazine’s (similiar to The Onion) “news message” on this video:

    “Pyongyang. Tens of thousands of North Koreans gathered in the capital to collectively grieve and shed tears for the loss of their Beloved Leader.

    Now to economy news: World market prices for tear gas soared this monday, after an unknown east asian buyer bought out nearly all available stockpile.”

Norway a ‘pimp’ for prostitute

Posted on December 14th, 2011 at 9:15 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

Norway’s tax office risks facing pimping charges if it insists on taxing a 29-year-old Lithuanian prostitute, the woman’s lawyer has said.


Write a comment

Man Sues Couple He Kidnapped

Posted on November 30th, 2011 at 7:24 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

Something like that may have been in the mind of Jesse Dimmick, who sued Jared and Lindsay Rowley last month. Dimmick was convicted in May 2010 of four felonies, including two counts of kidnapping, for a 2009 incident in which he held the Rowleys against their will for several hours. Dimmick was fleeing a murder charge in a stolen van when he drove over some spikes laid by Topeka police. The van came to rest in the Rowleys’ front yard, and Dimmick then invited himself in at knifepoint to enjoy some involuntary hospitality.

Patch Adams (the movie)This report doesn’t say how long the standoff lasted, but it was at least 115 minutes. "A neighbor told the Topeka Capital-Journal in September 2009 that the couple gained [Dimmick's] trust by eating Cheetos and drinking Dr. Pepper with him while watching the movie ‘Patch Adams,’" the 1998 film in which Robin Williams earned a Golden Globe nomination for his portrayal of the unorthodox doctor/clown. Whether it was "Patch Adams" or just the passage of time that put Dimmick to sleep is unclear, but sleep he did and out the Rowleys went. The police then entered, and Dimmick was accidentally shot in the back while he was being subdued.

Various lawsuits followed. Dimmick sued the city of Topeka over the shooting, and (possibly because of the prospect that he might get money from that suit) the Rowleys sued Dimmick last September for trespass, intrusion and negligent infliction of emotional distress. That seems to have given Dimmick the idea to sue the Rowleys, and he brought a counterclaim against them for breach of contract.

You see, Dimmick alleges that, after breaking into the Rowleys’ home with a knife and gun, they all then sat down and hashed out a deal under which they would hide him from police (the police who were right outside) for an unspecified amount of money. "Later," he complained, "the Rowleys reneged on said oral contract, resulting in my being shot in the back by authorities." Ergo, breach of contract.


Write a comment

Brief Details Jury Nullification Case Against Julian Heicklen

Posted on November 29th, 2011 at 17:27 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

Julian P. Heicklen, a 79-year-old retired chemistry professor, has often stood on a plaza outside the United States Courthouse in Manhattan, holding a “Jury Info” sign and handing out brochures that advocate jury nullification, the controversial view that if jurors disagree with a law, they may ignore their oaths to follow it and may acquit a defendant who violated it.

Then, last year, federal prosecutors had Mr. Heicklen indicted, charging that his activity violated the law against jury tampering. Lawyers assisting him have sought dismissal of the case on First Amendment grounds.

But now prosecutors are offering their first detailed explanation for why they charged Mr. Heicklen, arguing in a brief that his “advocacy of jury nullification, directed as it is to jurors, would be both criminal and without Constitutional protections no matter where it occurred.”

“His speech is not protected by the First Amendment,” prosecutors wrote.


Write a comment

Customers hit by pepper spray at Wal-Mart describe scene of chaos

Posted on November 25th, 2011 at 15:54 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

Matthew Lopez went to the Wal-Mart in Porter Ranch on Thursday night for the Black Friday sale but instead was caught in a pepper-spray attack by a woman who authorities said was "competitive shopping."


Write a comment

ATS Sues City Over Right Turn Ticket Money

Posted on November 24th, 2011 at 11:03 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

C. Crews TownsendAutomated ticketing vendor American Traffic Solutions (ATS) filed suit Tuesday against Knoxville, Tennessee for its failure to issue tickets for turning right on a red light — and that is costing the company a lot of money. A state law took effect in July banning the controversial turning tickets, but the Arizona-based firm contends the law should not apply to their legal agreement with the city, which anticipated the bulk of the money to come from this type of tickets.

[..]

ATS asked the Chancery Court for Knox County to declare the right turn law unconstitutional because it discriminates against traffic camera companies.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. And this is different in what way from the privatization of prisons?

  2. Ah, of course – that’s why the marihuana laws cannot be revoked! It would be unconstitutional because it discriminates against prisons incarcerating offenders!

L.A. Hospital Denies Liver Transplant to Medical Marijuana User Despite Prescription from Its own Doctor

Posted on November 21st, 2011 at 16:55 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

Diagnosed with inoperable liver cancer in 2009, Norman B. Smith, 63, has been treated at Cedars-Sinai by oncologist Steven Miles, who approved medicinal marijuana in part to help his patient cope with the effects of chemotherapy. Smith became eligible for a liver transplant last year, but was removed from the list in February after testing positive for marijuana.


Write a comment

To Save America: Stopping Obama’s Secular-Socialist Machine

Posted on November 17th, 2011 at 17:58 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Lets not Newter America! Gingrich is such a prat, that if he is somehow elected President, we will welcome back the hypocrisy of Obama, and the brainlessness of G. Dubya Bush…

  2. Funny, I thought that was Cheney dream of a corporate Police State and Wolfowitz’s fantasy of the U.S. as the next great world empire that was the greatest danger.

  3. Clearly this man has earned a fortune for his antics. That it has the unfortunate effect of pouring gasoline on the overheated debates within American society seems to be of no concern to him.

BBC drops Frozen Planet’s climate change episode to sell show better abroad

Posted on November 15th, 2011 at 17:54 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

British viewers will see seven episodes, the last of which deals with global warming and the threat to the natural world posed by man.

However, viewers in other countries, including the United States, will only see six episodes.

The environmental programme has been relegated by the BBC to an “optional extra” alongside a behind-the-scenes documentary which foreign networks can ignore.

Let’s not educate people about global warming, because they’re uneducated about global warming.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. There are two kind of people.
    1) Already believe in climate change
    2) Will never believe in climate change.

  2. @Roland, by Rick Perry’s standards, wouldn’t that be three kinds of people?

  3. No, the third kind of people are…

    Er…

    Hang on…

    The EPA?

  4. @Mudak dang, true, my only excuse is that 1) I’m sick 2) At the moment more involved in Hungarian politics 3) EPA.

Occupy Denver elects leader

Posted on November 10th, 2011 at 20:09 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

In response to Denver Mayor Michael Hancock’s insistence that Occupy Denver choose leadership to deal with City and State officials, and drawing inspiration from the notion that corporations are people, Occupy Denver’s General Assembly has elected a leader: Shelby, a three year old Border Collie. “Shelby is closer to a person than any corporation: She can bleed, she can breed, and she can show emotion. Either Shelby is a person, or corporations aren’t people,” said a Shelby supporter at the time of her election.

Occupy Denver reserves the right to alter leadership status, but for now, Shelby exhibits heart, warmth, and an appreciation for the group over personal ambition that Occupy Denver members feel are sorely lacking in the leaders some of them have voted for on national, state, and local levels. Accordingly, Occupy Denver looks forward to communication with Mayor Hancock and Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper sometime this week to introduce their leadership.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. And she’s smarter than about 80% of the members of the US Congress and Senate…

  2. And how are things in Denver?

    RUFF!

    Oh, you knew SOMEONE was going to say it…

  3. That’s the thing with the Occupy movement, all bark and no bite.

  4. Well the bite is there. One form is the focusing the discontent on the millions who are not on the street, but are disgusted with the 1% and the corrupt corporatocracy.

  5. Barking up the wrong tree again, Desiato? =)

  6. @Simon: Bite me! ;-) ;-)

  7. @Mykolas: that still sounds like barking to me.

  8. @Desiato – I would advise you not to carpe ossis, you may indeed get bit.

Meanwhile in Japan….

Posted on November 8th, 2011 at 18:58 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, If you're in marketing, kill yourself

This is from a commercial for East Japan Railway. Because nothing says “safe, reliable and rapid public transportation” like synchronized ostrich skiing.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Well, strictly speaking a commercial doens’t *have* to do anything with the product advertised, but it *has* to create a memorable experience. Skiing ostrichs? Synchronized. Now that’s something you remember.
    Plus:

    The TV Commercial titled JAPAN SNOW PROJECT was done by Tugboat advertising agency for product: Snow Leisure Promotion (brand: Japan Snow Project) in Japan. It was released in the Dec 2005.

    SO it is not a commercial for East Japan Railway.

The sods must be crazy: OLPC to drop tablets from helicopters to isolated villages

Posted on November 3rd, 2011 at 16:34 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

The One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project has devised a bizarre plan for deploying its new XO-3 tablet. The organization plans to drop the touchscreen computers from helicopters near remote villages in developing countries. The devices will then be abandoned and left for the villagers to find, distribute, support, and use on their own.

[..]

“We’ll take tablets and drop them out of helicopters into villages that have no electricity and school, then go aback a year later and see if the kids can read,” Negroponte told The Register.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Interesting. A lot of people in the education world say that OLPC is misguided because they believe technology alone can’t fix education, that you need to address the bigger picture, including teachers, teacher attendance, etc. This seems like an attempt by Negroponte to disprove those claims, to show that technology alone can educate kids.

    It does seem like you open yourself up to criticism if you don’t measure whether the kids could read beforehand, and it seems less than ideal to drop in the tablets to be appropriated by the nearest alpha male who wants the baubles for himself. Otherwise seems like it might be a mostly harmless experiment.

  2. @Desiato: “Alpha male?” “Baubles?” I doubt it. In a world where most adults are so busy that kids are the best ones to work out how to operate a TV remote control, and having used the first OLPC product, I think it will take any grown person less than a couple of days to get bored with this device, regardless of their state of education (rms notwithstanding).

    As you say, these guys seem harmless, but previously they helped push notebook/tablet development.

Promoting Innovation and Competitive Markets through Quality Patents

Posted on November 1st, 2011 at 17:11 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, Intellectual Property

The White House answered the “please stop issuing software patents” petition.

It is a textbook demonstration of “pricks pretending to care”, as I said before.

They take three paragraphs to obfuscate their “No” and add a paragraph about Open Source, which has just about nothing to do with the worries about software patents. The trolls at Lodsys must be laughing their pants of with this statement by the White House.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. There is of course the bit explaining “But it’s important to note that the executive branch doesn’t set the boundaries of what is patentable all by itself.” Given that there are court precedents on the patentability of software inventions, it’s not clear to me that the White House can do much.

    And hey, at least they know what open source is and use it. (Note the Drupal favicon for the site itself… oops.)

  2. But it’s important to note that the executive branch doesn’t set the boundaries of what is patentable all by itself

    I translate that as “we’re not willing to write a law that is constitutional”. Because you know, the executive branch does set the boundaries. That’s what laws are. The minutiae of where those boundaries are exactly is indeed up to the courts. The court precedents on patentability of software inventions are based on current law, which is exactly what the petition asked to change.

  3. After all, it’s not the first time a change in a law rewrote what “property” is.

  4. The White House can write all the laws it wants, but can’t enact them, and as you know right now there’s little chance of getting anything intesting through Congress. Since the number of people who understand this issue and who care is close to zero, the White House will understandably pick other battles. It’d be idiotic not to.

  5. It is actually much worse than you describe. The “number of people who understand this issue” is low, but the same cannot be said for the marijuana petition, so there’s something else going on as well.

    Obama assumes (mostly correctly) that the (Democratic) voters who think this, and weed, is an issue will never vote for a Republican candidate anyway, so there’s less need to pander to them than the unaffiliated voter. Just like R candidates will never really create an anti-abortion law when they get into office. The two-party system effectively means that whoever you vote for will never really work for the issues you voted for.

    The system is desperately broken.

  6. But with more than two parties you get gridlock and you risk that nothing can get done!

    Oh, wait…

  7. With more than two parties it often happens that one party gets their way on an issue nobody else supports just because their support for other issues is required. I assume you’re following dutch politics, so I’ll leave you with a “Mauro”.

  8. more pointless wanking.

  9. I must admit that this one is gaining votes quite fast:

    “Actually take these petitions seriously instead of just using them as an excuse to pretend you are listening”

  10. I thought that was the most pointless of the bunch. :)

  11. Of course it is. At most you can hope for a “fuck, they’re on to us”.

    This one is fun as well: “Offer a response to marijuana legalization petitions that isn’t written by someone legally required to oppose them.”

  12. Uhm, that last one is the one I linked to before in #8. Did you read it before posting that it was more pointless wanking? :)

  13. I’ve been doing too many things today – chalk that one up to loss of short term memory and reserve a spot for me in an institution…

Government Could Hide Existence of Records under FOIA Rule Proposal – ProPublica

Posted on October 25th, 2011 at 17:21 by Desiato in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, News

[Quote]:

A proposed rule to the Freedom of Information Act would allow federal agencies to tell people requesting certain law-enforcement or national security documents that records don’t exist – even when they do.

Under current FOIA practice, the government may withhold information and issue what’s known as a Glomar denial that says it can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records.

The new proposal – part of a lengthy rule revision by the Department of Justice – would direct government agencies to “respond to the request as if the excluded records did not exist.”

Open-government groups object.

Change, as brought to you by Mr. Obama.


Write a comment

Michele Bachmann Says Iraq Should Reimburse U.S. For War Expenses

Posted on October 24th, 2011 at 9:24 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, Mess O'Potamia

[Quote]:

You know how every time Michele Bachmann opens her mouth it’s kind of exciting because you never know what’s going to come out, but then it’s also terrifying because you’re worried whatever she says will be taken seriously? Well, brace yourselves because today she’s dropped a real doozy: she thinks the people of Iraq should pay us back for all of the money we spent invading them.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Why stop there? They should go and demand the same thing from Vietnam – corrected with inflation and of course applying the interest.
    Also the Philippines and Korea – South Korea most likely.

  2. Maybe Cheney and Rumsfeld should be reimbursing us. They’re the ones who distorted the intelligence.

  3. Ah…so hard to collect from Iraq when you’ve already delivered the service for which you want payment (and they have a fair amount of oil resources that you need).

    Better to threaten that if the world doesn’t pay you, you won’t invade them.

  4. Sue, did you mean to say, “Better to threaten that if the world doesn’t pay you, you WILL invade them”?

  5. lol…Ms. B. always reminds me of Doug and Dinsdale Piranha.

Tree Stump Worshipped in Rathkeale

Posted on October 22nd, 2011 at 23:21 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, Pastafarian News

Really? Really??

Can somebody please tell me the difference with this?

And while we’re at it:


Write a comment

“Scared, Jesus hid in a closet.”

Posted on October 22nd, 2011 at 22:01 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

"We don’t need a warrant, we’re ICE," and, gesturing to his genitals, "the warrant is coming out of my balls."

They’re called “ICE” because “Gestapo” is too hard to spell for them.


Write a comment

Google’s Andy Rubin Makes a Flawed Case Against Siri

Posted on October 21st, 2011 at 12:24 by Desiato in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, Google, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

In an interview with AllThingsD’s Ina Fried, Google’s Andy Rubin made a two-line case against Siri, Apple’s new voice-controlled ‘virtual assistant’ for the iPhone 4S. “Your phone is a tool for communicating,” Rubin said. “You shouldn’t be communicating with the phone; you should be communicating with somebody on the other side of the phone.”

Wow. That’s up there with Steve Jobs saying the Kindle was irrelevant because “people don’t read anymore”.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I am considering the new iPhone for the sole reason of it having Siri.

    At the moment experimenting with Android ones, not too successful.
    “Create text message” – comes out with a “Roland, I heard the following: Clean test massage”.
    Hilarious, but not too productive :D

    I heard Siri being way better with speech recognition :) )

  2. (I forgot to mention in the post that Google has of course long had Voice Actions for Android. I’m sure that that’s tooooootally different.)

$12,000 fine for insulting Victorian Gaming Minister Michael O’Brien

Posted on October 18th, 2011 at 15:26 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, Foyer of Ennui (just short of the Hall of Shame)

[Quote]:

STATE Parliament is set to pass new legislation making it a criminal offence to "insult" Gaming Minister Michael O’Brien.

Fines of up to $11,945 will be given to anyone found guilty of upsetting the minister and his staff under the extraordinary new offence.

The Baillieu Government is seeking changes to the Gaming Regulation Act which it says are "reasonably necessary to respect the rights and reputation of the minister and authorised persons". If passed, the ruling will become law.

The amendment proposed to the Act will make it an offence to "assault, obstruct, hinder, threaten, abuse, insult or intimidate" the minister or authorised persons exercising "due diligence" in monitoring gambling systems such as pokies.

State Labor has seized on the extraordinary amendment, with Opposition gaming spokesman Martin Pakula branding the minister "Windscreens O’Brien – because this proves he’s got a glass jaw".

"Is the minister so precious that he now needs legislation to protect him from insults?" he said.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Just put a bigger, tougher, nastier bloke on that duty.

  2. Is “Crikey!” strong enough?

  3. Is your supreme court as useless as our?

Police called to Gatwick to calm passengers stranded on plane

Posted on October 17th, 2011 at 18:05 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Imagine an Indian accent]:

Good afternoon thank you for calling Air India staff helpline, my name is Richard Realcaucasian-Honest, how may I help you?

Hi Richard, I’m the co-pilot on today’s Mumbai-Heathrow flight and stuck in Gatwick on the runway at the moment because of fog, can you please advise?

Thank you very much for the information sir please wait while I work out the best answer for you.

Ok thanks…

Ok sir, could you please tell me which gate in Heathrow you have parked your plane at?

Uhh, no I said we are at Gatwick airport, on the runway. We have been here for 2 hours now. Can you please advise us with directions?

Oh I see sir my apologies. Please hold on one moment

… uhh, ok…

Right, can you please tell us which terminal in Mumbai airport you left from?

Terminal 3.

Thank you sir. And what time did you arrive in Heathrow today?

I have not arrived in Heathrow yet, I already said we are in Gatwick! I need advice so we can get the passengers off the plane and to their destination!

But sir your flight information says your flight is destined for Heathrow airport

Yes it was. But we’re not there.

Ok sir thank you for the information, so can you tell me which airport are you at right now?

……….. G.A.T.W.I.C.K ………..

Thank you sir, can you please hold for a short time while I speak to my colleague? hold music begins

………


Write a comment

Nokia Tune Remake

Posted on October 11th, 2011 at 16:34 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

Nokia Tune is one of world’s most recognized audio brand assets and is estimated to be heard over one billion times a day. Nokia is launching a global crowdsourcing campaign to find a fresh version of the Nokia Tune.

And the first winner is in.

Although I wonder what tone deaf ten thumbed talentless noise polluter invented this aural piece of excrement and, just as important, which bunch of cunts voted it to win?

Or perhaps it just shows how what Nokia marketeers like is inversely proportional to what everyone else likes…


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Now I understand why Nokia is falling behind as a cell phone maker…!
    Even “The Great Marvelous” sounded better.

  2. They are roadkill…don’t get me started on the lost opportunities they had with N770, 800. Farkwits.

U.S. Drug Policy Would Be Imposed Globally By New House Bill

Posted on October 8th, 2011 at 10:20 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ

[Quote]:

The House Judiciary Committee passed a bill yesterday that would make it a federal crime for U.S. residents to discuss or plan activities on foreign soil that, if carried out in the U.S., would violate the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) — even if the planned activities are legal in the countries where they’re carried out. The new law, sponsored by Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) allows prosecutors to bring conspiracy charges against anyone who discusses, plans or advises someone else to engage in any activity that violates the CSA, the massive federal law that prohibits drugs like marijuana and strictly regulates prescription medication.

“Under this bill, if a young couple plans a wedding in Amsterdam, and as part of the wedding, they plan to buy the bridal party some marijuana, they would be subject to prosecution,” said Bill Piper, director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance, which advocates for reforming the country’s drug laws. “The strange thing is that the purchase of and smoking the marijuana while you’re there wouldn’t be illegal. But this law would make planning the wedding from the U.S. a federal crime.”

The law could also potentially affect academics and medical professionals. For example, a U.S. doctor who works with overseas doctors or government officials on needle exchange programs could be subject to criminal prosecution.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. More evidence that numerous elements of the US gov think and behave as imperialists. Now there’s a shock. How about this – EU passes a law that forbids all US citizens to travel to EU or over fly its airspace until the US agrees to carbon reduction targets.

  2. As far as I remember I am to observe the laws of Hungary while travelling abroad. That means if it is illegal to consume marijuana in Hungary – it was until a few years ago – I can’t consume marijuana in Amsterdam.
    As a citizen of Hungary, the laws of Hungary applies to me everywhere.

    I suppposed it is a global thing, but maybe not.

  3. Yes, checked it, BTK 3. § (1) and my passport has this information under “Things to keep in mind”.

  4. So if you moved to, say, Texas for a year, and bought a gun during that time, only to sell it again before leaving, you’d never be able to get back home in fear of being arrested for gun ownership?

Home Secretary: scrap the Human Rights Act

Posted on October 2nd, 2011 at 17:29 by John Sinteur in category: ¿ʞɔnɟ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ, Foyer of Ennui (just short of the Hall of Shame)

[Quote]:

Theresa May, the Home Secretary, risks an explosive rift inside the Coalition with an explicit call for the scrapping of the Human Rights Act.

[..]

“I’d personally like to see the Human Rights Act go because I think we have had some problems with it,” she says.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Well, she would say that wouldn’t she? A politician in power would always like to rule without considering those silly rights and laws. Those “problems” are also safeguards.


« Older Entries