« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories |

Lesser-Known Trolley Problem Variations

Posted on April 25th, 2015 at 15:14 by John Sinteur in category: News


There’s an out of control trolley speeding towards Immanuel Kant. You have the ability to pull a lever and change the trolley’s path so it hits Jeremy Bentham instead. Jeremy Bentham clutches the only existing copy of Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Kant holds the only existing copy of Bentham’s The Principles of Morals and Legislation. Both of them are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.


Bonus: the Trolly Hall Problem

Write a comment


  1. I’d split the difference and try to take them both out – 2 philosophers with one stone!


Posted on April 25th, 2015 at 14:58 by John Sinteur in category: News


Mervyn O’Gorman was 42 when he took these pictures of his daughter, Christina O’Gorman at Lulworth Cove, in the English county of Dorset. He photographed Christina wearing a red swimming costume and red cloak, a colour particularly suited to the early color Autochrome process. Autochrome was one of the first colour photo technologies, which used glass plates coated in potato starches to filter pictures with dye. To his friends, Mervyn O’Gorman was “O.G.” He had qualified as an electrical engineer and worked for cabling companies, and in 1909 he became superintendent of the Royal Balloon Factory, later the Royal Aircraft Factory. He was an enthusiastic early motorist, and published O’Gorman’s Motoring Pocket Book in 1904. Yet O’Gorman’s hobby was photography. He took these images in 1913.


Write a comment

The Armenian Genocide

Posted on April 25th, 2015 at 3:46 by Sueyourdeveloper in category: News


Ages ago, when I was a history graduate student doing research about Turkey’s role in the First World War, I got into the Turkish General Staff archives in Ankara and found the actual telegrams (written in the old riqa script) that went back and forth between Istanbul and eastern Anatolia in the spring of 1915.

Later on I saw the British and Russian documents on their plans for joint action with Armenian revolutionaries in the spring of 1915, so I also know the context in which the Turks and Armenians were acting. And I can say with some confidence that both sides are wrong.

Write a comment

40 Styles, 10 Seconds Each: Rap God

Posted on April 24th, 2015 at 18:56 by John Sinteur in category: News

Write a comment

EU leaders to declare: ‘We cannot take more migrants’

Posted on April 23rd, 2015 at 22:47 by John Sinteur in category: News

Okay, warning, I’m wearing my cynical hat right now


One of the messages the EU heads of state and government are expected to deliver at their extraordinary summit today (23 April) is that the Union cannot absorb any more mass arrivals of migrants, as they risk undermining it economically, and destroying it politically.

“destroying it politically” meaning the politicians run the risk of losing their job. boo-hoo-hoo

Diplomats said that the summit will come up with four main messages. The first is that the EU is ready to save lives. Indeed, leaders are likely to agree on doubling the cash and equipment available to two Union border patrol missions in the Mediterranean, a senior diplomat said.

Italy spent about 9 million euro / month on a similar mission before they gave up and let the EU take over. The mission they now are going to “double” had a 2 million / month budget. Do the math.

The second message is to traffickers, with EU leaders making it clear that “their business model would be destroyed”. It is expected that the the summit will authorise EU foreign affairs chief Federica Mogherini to immediately begin preparations for a possible security and defence policy operation against human traffickers in Libya.

To “begin preparation” for a “possible policy”… so they will start thinking about something they might decide is something they do or do not want to happen… and that helps, how exactly?

The third message will be for migrants, whom the EU will try to discourage from coming to Europe. “Europe has its limits, the individual member states, the individual societies have their limits,” a diplomat said, adding that further arrivals of migrants are unsustainable economically and risk destroying the EU.

Okay – if you are fleeing for war, that’s a message that will really make you go somewhere else… no, wait, it won’t.

The fourth message is an internal one: that more solidarity between member states was needed in terms of burden-sharing, though it is not actually expected.

So, listen, guys… no, really, listen. Please help. I know you won’t and I don’t expect you to, but, please, help?

What a bunch of failures. So nothing will happen.

Write a comment


  1. This is the defining issue of our species, imo. How do we turn this around?

    The Canadian government agreed to take, wait for it…1300 Syrian refugees! A drop in the ocean. No leadership, no help, no hope. I am so…angry.

    Suggest we give to MSF & Red Cross, and perhaps help churches sponsor some more refugees…

  2. A, yes, the Sun. Here’s what you need to know about British papers:

  3. Did Bernard say, “Tits?” Scandalous!

House passes bill allowing corporations to share your data

Posted on April 23rd, 2015 at 20:20 by John Sinteur in category: News


The issue appears to be the bill’s lack of specificity. The PCNA would allow for data to flow between corporations via a government intermediary. Crucially, there are provisions that would allow the government to use these data outside of cyber threats. The civil liberties groups criticize the bill for allowing any data to also be used with the Espionage Act, making it ripe for abuse for things such as surveillance of journalists and their sources. While all this is going on, there’s still the very real threat of more large scale attacks on corporations that could expose this very same data to anyone on the internet. The bill is still being finalized as it awaits approval from the Senate.

Write a comment


  1. Well, the US voters put these assholes in office, so all of us are going to suffer the consequences! The corrupting influences, mostly the Koch brothers and their ilk, pouring billion$ of ill-got gains into the election. I hope they remember the time-honored adage that what goes around, comes around, and trust me, they will get their just desserts! I think it will be sh!t on a shingle!

  2. I foresee unanimous support for this bill. A truly bipartisan effort. After all, any government that sanction war as a economy booster is capable of anything.

  3. And if you are not American, I presume you’re fair game.

  4. Damn right, Sue, everyone should be prepared to sacrifice for the American Dream.

  5. Oh good. Please don’t bomb my country. If you want it, give us some of that money you print (or we’ll give you terms).

WSU statistician sues seeking Kansas voting machine paper tapes

Posted on April 23rd, 2015 at 7:36 by John Sinteur in category: News


A Wichita State University mathematician sued the top Kansas election official Wednesday, seeking paper tapes from electronic voting machines in an effort to explain statistical anomalies favoring Republicans in counts coming from large precincts across the country.

Write a comment

Dr. Oz ‘Will Not Be Silenced’

Posted on April 22nd, 2015 at 20:17 by John Sinteur in category: News


Dr. Mehmet Oz, the host of The Dr. Oz Show who has come under fire by 10 prominent doctors for “promoting quack treatments and cures in the interest of personal financial gain,” told his audience on Tuesday that he “will not be silenced.” “This month, we celebrate my 1000th show,” Oz said. “I know I’ve irritated some potential allies in our quest to make America healthy. No matter our disagreements, freedom of speech is the most fundamental right we have as Americans. And these 10 doctors are trying to silence that right…So I vow to you right here and right now: we will not be silenced, we will not give in.” The 10 doctors have called for Oz to resign from his faculty position at Columbia University.

I can’t remember where I heard this, but someone once said that defending a position by citing free speech is sort of the ultimate concession; you’re saying that the most compelling thing you can say for your position is that it&’s not literally illegal to express.

Write a comment


  1. My first thought before reading your comment was “Why didn’t he just say that he stands by his recommendations?” It had nothing to do with free speech.

Our Response To Sony Sending Us A Threat Letter For Reporting On The Company’s Leaked Emails

Posted on April 22nd, 2015 at 11:09 by John Sinteur in category: News


Yesterday we wrote about how Sony’s high-powered lawyer on retainer, David Boies, had apparently been sending major media properties an idiotic letter warning them not to report on the leaked Sony hack emails. And then, what did we find in our mail on Monday afternoon? A copy of the same damn letter of our very own. How thoughtful of David Boies to send us a personally signed copy. I’ve asked my staff to frame it and hang it on the wall. I hope that he’s charging Sony top dollar to send us a letter we’d already mocked as ridiculous, wrong on the law and pointless.

Anyway, given that we’ve now personally received our own copy, I feel semi-obligated to respond — and to respond in public.

So, David, Leah and Sony Corp. — our official response is: go pound sand.

Write a comment


  1. Just remember, you don’t get the justice you deserve. You get the justice you can buy.

Here she is

Posted on April 22nd, 2015 at 9:39 by John Sinteur in category: News


One of those “luck-seekers” – stepped on a boat to “steal” our wealth, to cause unrest in our society, and drag down Europe into misery.

Look at her. Perhaps she was planning a terrorist attack. Because that’s what “those” people do, right? Muslim and therefore terrorist.

Goddamn LOOK at her. These are people. Not statistics, but people with dreams and fears. With the will to search for improvements in live.

A few hours before she was likely sitting on her mothers lap. A mother who no doubt told her all would be well. That there was a whole new world waiting for her. A better world, without fear, without violence. That somewhere there are people who would help, arrange bed, bread and bath. Education. Because the world isn’t just war and misery. Because there are countries where people live who care about their fellow human beings.

Look at her. That could be her favorite dress, but more likely it’s her only one. And realize her mother was wrong. A painful realization, but true nonetheless.

Europe should be ashamed. And if you too think “they” should stay away, shame on you.

(photo credit: VICE (documentary still). Post credit Chris Klomp)

Write a comment


  1. Thanks for this.

My heart goes out to the family in their hour of knead.

Posted on April 20th, 2015 at 20:46 by John Sinteur in category: News


Write a comment


  1. Doh! That’s just too many mixed metaphors!

  2. And what if he rises again? I guess then it is Pastafarian News?

How Corporate America Invented Christian America

Posted on April 19th, 2015 at 15:38 by John Sinteur in category: News


Handsome, tall, and somewhat gangly, the 41-year-old Congregationalist minister bore more than a passing resemblance to Jimmy Stewart. Addressing the crowd of business leaders, Fifield delivered a passionate defense of the American system of free enterprise and a withering assault on its perceived enemies in Franklin D. Roosevelt’s administration. Decrying the New Deal’s “encroachment upon our American freedoms,” the minister listed a litany of sins committed by the Democratic government, ranging from its devaluation of currency to its disrespect for the Supreme Court. Singling out the regulatory state for condemnation, he denounced “the multitude of federal agencies attached to the executive branch” and warned ominously of “the menace of autocracy approaching through bureaucracy.”

It all sounds familiar enough today, but Fifield’s audience of executives was stunned. Over the preceding decade, as America first descended into and then crawled its way out of the Great Depression, the these titans of industry had been told, time and time again, that they were to blame for the nation’s downfall. Fifield, in contrast, insisted that they were the source of its salvation.

They just needed to do one thing: Get religion.

Fifield told the industrialists that clergymen would be crucial in regaining the upper hand in their war with Roosevelt. As men of God, ministers could voice the same conservative complaints as business leaders, but without any suspicion that they were motivated solely by self-interest. They could push back against claims, made often by Roosevelt and his allies, that business had somehow sinned and the welfare state was doing God’s work. The assembled industrialists gave a rousing amen. “When he had finished,” a journalist noted, “rumors report that the N.A.M. applause could be heard in Hoboken.”

It was a watershed moment—the beginning of a movement that would advance over the 1940s and early 1950s a new blend of conservative religion, economics and politics that one observer aptly anointed “Christian libertarianism.” Fifield and like-minded ministers saw Christianity and capitalism as inextricably intertwined, and argued that spreading the gospel of one required spreading the gospel of the other. The two systems had been linked before, of course, but always in terms of their shared social characteristics. Fifield’s innovation was his insistence that Christianity and capitalism were political soul mates, first and foremost.

Write a comment


  1. Remember how we laughed when Mrs. Clinton talked about a vast right-wing conspiracy?

  2. Well money is god and capitalism is the religion.

Islamic State Files Show Structure of Islamist Terror Group

Posted on April 19th, 2015 at 13:27 by John Sinteur in category: News


Even his best-known pseudonym, Haji Bakr, wasn’t widely known. But that was precisely part of the plan. The former colonel in the intelligence service of Saddam Hussein’s air defense force had been secretly pulling the strings at IS for years. Former members of the group had repeatedly mentioned him as one of its leading figures. Still, it was never clear what exactly his role was.

But when the architect of the Islamic State died, he left something behind that he had intended to keep strictly confidential: the blueprint for this state. It is a folder full of handwritten organizational charts, lists and schedules, which describe how a country can be gradually subjugated. SPIEGEL has gained exclusive access to the 31 pages, some consisting of several pages pasted together. They reveal a multilayered composition and directives for action, some already tested and others newly devised for the anarchical situation in Syria’s rebel-held territories. In a sense, the documents are the source code of the most successful terrorist army in recent history.

Write a comment

An ‘Uber For Weed’ App Has Raised Over $10 MILLION On It’s Startup Campaign, And Is Backed By Snoop Dogg

Posted on April 18th, 2015 at 18:55 by John Sinteur in category: News


Basically, you go on your app, order weed, it tells you how long it’ll be, then it gets dropped off. Simple, but very effective. Weed delivered in a quarter of an hour. Beats waiting in the cold on a street corner for a divvy in his car to pull up half an hour late, blaring Dr Dre and making it as on top as possible.

Eaze is currently operating in 35 cities, but the huge cash injections mean that it can expand massively.

Really? “Uber for weed”? How about Instagram? Tweeder? Facebake? Plantdora?

Write a comment


  1. “Uber for ” is an established meme.

  2. “Uber for foo” is an established meme.

Who makes less than $15 per hour, in 3 charts

Posted on April 18th, 2015 at 11:38 by John Sinteur in category: News


It’s easy to assume that workers earning less than $15 is a small subset of the workforce. But, in fact, 42% of all workers in the United States fit this bill. Just over half of all African Americans earn less than $15 an hour, and nearly 60% of Latinos make that hourly sum.

Write a comment

Man, Chewie is looking old!

Posted on April 16th, 2015 at 21:50 by John Sinteur in category: News

Write a comment


  1. Wow – didn’t notice this at first!


Taxation Without Representation

Posted on April 15th, 2015 at 23:50 by John Sinteur in category: News


In the last 5 years, the 200 most politically active companies in the US spent $5.8 billion influencing our government with lobbying and campaign contributions. Those same companies got $4.4 trillion in taxpayer support — earning a return of 750 times their investment. If you can afford to buy access, times have never been better.

Write a comment


  1. 750 times? 75,000 percent? This ROI is probably unmatched, er…since the Conquistadors.

  2. Congress is just a bunch of expensive whores. I apologize to the whores for insulting them.

When Is Cheryl’s Birthday?

Posted on April 15th, 2015 at 20:09 by John Sinteur in category: News


Albert and Bernard just met Cheryl. “When’s your birthday?” Albert asked Cheryl.

Cheryl thought a second and said, “I’m not going to tell you, but I’ll give you some clues.” She wrote down a list of 10 dates:

May 15, May 16, May 19

June 17, June 18

July 14, July 16

August 14, August 15, August 17

“My birthday is one of these,” she said.

Then Cheryl whispered in Albert’s ear the month — and only the month — of her birthday. To Bernard, she whispered the day, and only the day.

“Can you figure it out now?” she asked Albert.

Albert: I don’t know when your birthday is, but I know Bernard doesn’t know, either.

Bernard: I didn’t know originally, but now I do.

Albert: Well, now I know, too!

When is Cheryl’s birthday?

Write a comment


  1. Same as Orville Redenbacher?

  2. It’s August 17. The fact that Bernard doesn’t know means that it’s not a unique day. So not May 19 or June 18. This means that if the month is June Albert would know the answer, but he doesn’t. So it’s not June 17, leaving August 17 as the only one with a unique day. The fact that Bernard now knows the answer means it’s this unique day, a conclusion that Albert can also draw, after he hears that Bernard knows the answer.

  3. After reading the NYT and the Guardian, I think they are both wrong:

    ‘Thus, for this statement by Albert to be true means that Cheryl did not say to Albert, “May” or “June.”’

    This only goes up for June, because after eliminating the unique days, May still has two possibilities.

  4. The key is in the ‘…but I know Bernard doens’t know’ bit. Because of this, we know that Albert hasn’t been told it’s June or May. Would he have been told either, then he could believe it might be the 18th or 19th in which case Bernard already know’s the exact date. It’s not about eliminating the unique days, it’s about eliminating the months that have unique days because Albert doesn’t know the date but knows Bernard doesn’t know the month. Bernard now figuring it out means it can’t be the 14th, leaving only 15, 16 and 17. As Albert now knows too it must be the one date in July left: July 16. The big question is not Cheryl’s birthday, but why she’s being all mysterious about it and why Albert and Bernard don’t just tell each other what she said. Weird folk, these three.

    But ehm, Maarten, did you not sleep well or do I need to be worried here? You used to be able to do this in your sleep.

  5. Jim, you are right. I missed the first step, as you said ‘but I know Bernard doesn’t know’ and that changes it. But I don’t know about your big question, people like to play games don’ they?

The Tangled History of Soviet Computer Science

Posted on April 15th, 2015 at 11:46 by John Sinteur in category: News


The centrally planned Soviet economy was poorly prepared for computerization. Its cumbersome bureaucracy was too slow to implement rapid changes in production and distribution, and it was ruled by industrial ministries which, like separate fiefdoms, did not want to share their information or decision-making power. Each ministry therefore created its own information management system, disconnected from and incompatible with the others. Instead of transforming the top-down economy into a self-regulating system, bureaucrats used their new cybernetic models and computers to protect their power. Expensive and largely useless information management systems were strewn across the country.

The results of top-down computerization were devastating. New computer systems accumulated ever-increasing amounts of raw data and generated terrifying heaps of paperwork. In the early 1970s, roughly 4 billion documents per year circulated through the Soviet economy. By the mid-1980s, after Herculean efforts to computerize the bureaucratic apparatus, this figure rose by a factor of 200 to about 800 billion documents, or 3,000 documents for every Soviet citizen. All this information still had to pass through narrow channels of centralized, hierarchical distribution, squeezed by institutional barriers and secrecy restrictions. Management became totally unwieldy. To get an approval for the production of an ordinary flat iron, for example, a factory manager had to collect more than 60 signatures. Technological innovation became a bureaucratic nightmare.

Big Brother, who wanted to see everything and know everything, became overwhelmed with information that was often distorted by lower-level officials trying to present a rosy picture. Vast clogs of inaccurate information paralyzed the decision-making mechanism, while accurate information was exchanged only locally, like black-market goods or forbidden books in the samizdat. Computers, once vilified and now championed, were constant in one thing: They amplified the virtues and deficits of the system that implemented them. After all, the key idea behind cybernetics was control via feedback. In the hands of self-motivated free agents, it was a powerful economic engine. In the hands of a single controlling agency, it brought stagnation. Or, as computer scientists like to say, “garbage in, garbage out.” Called in to prove the superiority of socialism, information technology eventually proved the ineffectiveness of the Soviet regime.

The irony of the situation was not lost on Soviet humor. As one joke tells it, Brezhnev is gifted with the latest in artificial intelligence, so he asks it “When will we have built communism?” The computer responds, “In 17 miles.” Brezhnev thinks, “There must be something wrong,” and repeats the question. The computer again replies, “In 17 miles.” Angered by the incomprehensible reply, Brezhnev orders a technician to investigate the machine. “Everything is correct,” replies the technician after some time. “You said it yourself: Every five-year plan is one step toward communism.”

Write a comment


  1. So I kept waiting for the punchline – that this was really about the 500 different security/intelligence/surveillance systems here in the US and worldwide that intentionally don’t share info or resources and are buried in white noise… that’s a good thing, amirite?

Suspicious lawyer finds malware on external hard drive supplied by police lawyer in discovery

Posted on April 15th, 2015 at 0:17 by John Sinteur in category: News


An Arkansas lawyer is seeking sanctions after his computer expert found malware on an external hard drive supplied in response to a discovery request.

Lawyer Matthew Campbell of North Little Rock says he became suspicious when he received the hard drive by Federal Express in June 2014 from a lawyer for the Fort Smith Police Department, the Northwest Arkansas Democrat Gazette reports. Previous evidence in the police whistleblower case had been provided by email or a cloud-based Internet storage service, or had been shipped through the U.S. Postal Service.

“I thought, ‘I’m not plugging that into my computer,’ ” Campbell told the Northwest Arkansas Democrat Gazette. “Something didn’t add up in the way they approached it, so I sent it to my software guy first.”

The technology expert found four Trojans on the hard drive. “These Trojans were designed to steal passwords, install malicious software and give someone else command and control of the infected computer,” Campbell says in a brief supporting his motion for sanctions (PDF).

Write a comment


  1. Anarchism is not a romantic fable but the hardheaded realization, based on five thousand years of experience, that we cannot entrust the management of our lives to kings, priests, politicians, generals, and county commissioners.

    — Edward Abbey

Hillary Clinton To Nation: ‘Do Not Fuck This Up For Me’

Posted on April 13th, 2015 at 21:25 by John Sinteur in category: News


After several seconds spent sitting motionless and glaring directly into the camera, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reportedly began Sunday’s video announcing her 2016 presidential bid by warning the nation not to fuck this up for her. “Listen up, assholes, ’cause I’m only saying this once: I’ve worked way too goddamn hard to let you morons blow this thing for me,” said Clinton, repeatedly jabbing her index finger toward the viewers at home while adding that if they thought she was going to simply sit back and watch them dick her over like they did in 2008, they were out of their fucking minds. “Seriously, don’t you dare even think about it. If you shitheads can just get in line, we can breeze through this whole campaign in 19 months and be done with it. Or, if you really want, we can do this the hard way. Because make no mistake, I’m not fucking around. Got it?” Clinton then ended her announcement by vowing to fight for a better future for all working-class families like the one she grew up in.

Write a comment


  1. Is it already time to post the presidential speech from idiocracy again?

What if, when Petunia Dursley found a little boy…

Posted on April 13th, 2015 at 20:58 by John Sinteur in category: News


When Harry met Ron on the Hogwarts Express, Ron told him he had five older brothers and Harry said, “I have one.”

Write a comment


  1. Have you read HPMOR?

  2. yes.

The 73-year-old reserve cop who mistook his gun for a Taser

Posted on April 13th, 2015 at 19:09 by John Sinteur in category: News


Why was a 73-year-old insurance company executive playing cop?

That’s the simple question many are asking more than a week after an undercover Tulsa police operation went wrong — and a white reserve deputy sheriff shot and killed an unarmed black man, apparently by accident. He has not been charged with a crime.

Write a comment


  1. Apparently he’s now been charged.

Con una katana, se enfrentó sólo a 3 delincuentes armados

Posted on April 11th, 2015 at 18:08 by John Sinteur in category: News


El hecho ocurrió esta madrugada en Córdoba, luego de que 3 delincuentes armados ingresaran a la casa. En un descuido, el dueño tomó una katana, de esas que suelen colgar en la pared, y los enfrentó. Los delincuentes fueron detenidos e internados. También fueron atendidos los dueños de la casa que recibieron varios golpes durante el robo.

Picture gallery here.

Write a comment


  1. Eww! Definitely a “Not safe for eating supper warning!”

Recall victim: GM shouldn’t get a tax break from settlement

Posted on April 11th, 2015 at 12:39 by John Sinteur in category: News


“Our kids dying should not be a tax deduction.”

That’s the message from Laura Christian, mother of Amber Marie Rose the teen who was killed in July 2005 in an accident while driving a GM (GM) car outfitted with a defective ignition switch .

Christian has written to GM and several senators objecting to a tax deduction the automaker is getting for the $400 million compensation fund it set up to pay victims and their families.

Most fines and settlements that corporations pay to settle cases, including the billions paid by major banks since the financial crisis, are generally tax deductible. Christian said that she’d like to see the U.S. tax code changed so that all these fines and settlements are no longer tax deductible, but that her highest priority is any payments related to an injury or death.

“If GM is taking a deduction for these ignition switch settlements, then taxpayers, including GM victims, are literally paying General Motors for the deaths it caused,” she said in the letter to GM.

Write a comment


  1. “Corporations are people too, my friend”. Just awful people, in this case.

The Science of Happy Design

Posted on April 10th, 2015 at 19:57 by John Sinteur in category: News


As someone who attempts to make experiences with technology better, it makes me sad to think that my work might be making people unhappy. There has been some research to show that rising tech correlates to happiness, but most studies are designed to reinforce the idea that technology seems to erode happiness. If you look at what makes people happy rarely is an app or a website in the mix. Happiness, it seems, is not a screen.

Yet, I’ve seen first-hand that a website can provide moments of joy. I’ve observed people smiling at their smartphones. I’ve listened to stories about how an app changed someone’s life in a positive way. While there has been wise discussion about how design makes us happy or how good design demonstrates some of the principles of positive psychology, there is not a lot of data about it available.

With this in mind, two years ago I began tracking happiness and design in an online study, hoping to understand what makes people happy online. My company created a purpose-built app to capture an event stream, collect data about interactions, create opportunities for describing the experience, and ask questions – about happiness, but also ease of use, engagement, and likelihood to return to or recommend. All of these measures have helped me test my hypothesis that happiness in the short-term might influence behavior in the long-term.

Write a comment


  1. On a different point about advances in technology, we have just been throwing away old recepts: in 1984 we spent >$6000 on an IBM PC (2 floppy disk drives, monitor, printer, software, MSDOS 2.0, MSWord 1.0, woo!)

    In 2015, we bought a Teensy arduino which is equivalently powerful for $19.

    That makes us happy… :-)

Energy and climate change minister accepts £18,000 from climate sceptic

Posted on April 10th, 2015 at 19:16 by John Sinteur in category: News


Conservative energy and climate change minister Matthew Hancock has taken £18,000 from a key backer of the UK’s leading climate sceptic lobby group, the Guardian can disclose.

According to official records, Hancock has accepted five donations over the years from City currency manager Neil Record, who has given money to the Global Warming Policy Foundation, and is on the board of its campaigning arm.


Asked whether Hancock had ever discussed energy policy with Record and declared the link to the Department for Energy and Climate Change, a spokeswoman for the minister said: “All donations are declared publicly and proper process followed.”

So there are proper procedures when you want to buy a UK politician…

Write a comment


  1. And they’re cheap, too! Until it was revealed, the return on that tiny investment could be huge.

Everything The Police Said About Walter Scott’s Death Before A Video Showed What Really Happened

Posted on April 9th, 2015 at 18:22 by John Sinteur in category: News


Between the time when he shot and killed Scott early Saturday morning and when charges were filed, Slager — using the both the police department and his attorney — was able to provide his “version” of the events. He appeared well on his way to avoiding charges and pinning the blame on Scott.

Write a comment


  1. Every police officer who shoots and kills another person should be tried for manslaughter at the least. Let the jury decide, and make sure the prosecution is not just another FOTP (friend of the police).

US Police Kill More Civilians In March Than UK Police Killed In 100 Years

Posted on April 9th, 2015 at 13:51 by John Sinteur in category: News


A new report by ThinkProgress.com unearthed disturbing figures when it came to the number of police-related deaths that occurred in America in the month of March alone.

Just last month, in the 31 days of March, police in the United States killed more people than the UK did in the entire 20th century. In fact, it was twice as many; police in the UK only killed 52 people during that 100 year period.

According to the report by ThinkProgess, in March alone, 111 people died during police encounters — 36 more than the previous month.

This high number in March increased the average for police killings from every 8.5 hours, to nearly 1 police killing every 6.5 hours in the US.

China, whose population is 4 and 1/2 times the size of the United States, recorded 12 killings by law enforcement officers in 2014.

On average, US police kill people at a rate 70 times higher than any of the other first world countries as they “protect and serve” the American citizens.

Write a comment


  1. Ok, but you have to ask yorself: What would you do if you were a police officer in a country where literally anybody can have a weapon? I would also be very nervous and keep my finger on the trigger.
    Another downside to the liberal weapon laws in the US.

  2. “Protect and serve” … on a platter with a side of potatoes and a nice sorbet after…

South Carolina Officer Is Charged With Murder in Black Man’s Death

Posted on April 8th, 2015 at 14:36 by John Sinteur in category: News


A white police officer in North Charleston, S.C., was charged with murder on Tuesday after a video surfaced showing him shooting in the back and killing an apparently unarmed black man while the man ran away.

The officer, Michael T. Slager, 33, said he had feared for his life because the man had taken his stun gun in a scuffle after a traffic stop on Saturday. A video, however, shows the officer firing eight times as the man, Walter L. Scott, 50, fled. The North Charleston mayor announced the state charges at a news conference Tuesday evening.

Write a comment


  1. Oh no, the U.S. is not police state. The rule of law governs. Innocent till proven guilty…Bullshit. Witness here a trial by a militarized official of the police state. Witness here a summary execution. And one wonders why they are called PIGS. And one wonders why they are so disrespected? And one wonders why the U.S. is so laughed at on the world stage when it preaches democracy and the rule of law? Shame! Shame!

  2. It looks to me like this ‘police officer’ is totally disconnected from reality. He shoots the guy 8 times in the back, and then shouts to him to put his hands on his back?? What did het think the bullets would do? And then he plants a weapon besides the dead guy. In the Netherlands most police are sissy’s, but these US cops think they are in the movies or something…..

  3. U.S. Cops: Shoot first, ask questions later

« Older Entries