« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Apple’s iPhone Business Alone Is Now Bigger Than All Of Microsoft

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 17:07 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Microsoft

[Quote]:

Tech writer MG Siegler just noted a remarkable fact:

Apple’s iPhone business alone is now bigger than Microsoft.

Not Windows. Not Office. Microsoft.

Think about that.

Remember when Balmer said the iPhone would never amount to anything? Good times…


Write a comment

Apple Scotland

Posted on February 2nd, 2012 at 0:05 by John Sinteur in category: Apple


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Burnistoun Eleven.

  2. Rofl thats hilarious

Watching Apple win the world

Posted on January 27th, 2012 at 0:04 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

Apple’s last quarter was the second most profitable quarter of any company ever in US history. Only ExxonMobile topped them slightly in 2008 when oil was at an all-time high. That’s an astounding and awe-inspiring accomplishment.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Awesome indeed–especially in light of the fact that its business model isn’t predicated on extracting a never-renewable resource from the Earth and burning it.

Mobile Apps Put the Web in Their Rear-view Mirror

Posted on January 25th, 2012 at 12:27 by Desiato in category: Commentary, Software

[Quote]:

Our analysis shows that, for the first time ever, daily time spent in mobile apps surpasses desktop and mobile web consumption. This stat is even more remarkable if you consider that it took less than three years for native mobile apps to achieve this level of usage, driven primarily by the popularity of iOS and Android platforms.

As a note of interest, Facebook has increasingly taken its share of time spent on the Internet, now making up 14 of the 74 minutes spent per day by consumers, or about one sixth of all Internet minutes.

The chart clearly shows that Games and Social Networking categories capture the significant majority of consumers’ time. Consumers spend nearly half their time using Games, and a third in Social Networking apps. Combined, these two categories control a whopping 79% of consumers’ total app time.

I think it’d be valuable to break out some of this data by age group; there’s a big question of how much of the additional time is from under-18yos. (e.g. people handing the iPad to their kids to keep them from fussing, teens spending time online, etc.)

So I’m not convinced that the following is actually fully right, but it’s thought-provoking and worth sharing, I think:

[Quote]:

What the headline should be is that consumers are leaving web developers behind. And so those that can follow quickly have a HUGE opportunity. Forget a few hundred thousand, there are going to be tens of millions of mobile apps available to consumers in the next few years. App goldrush over? Difficult to be visible on mobile? I don’t think so – not even close.


Write a comment

Apple, America and a Squeezed Middle Class – NYTimes.com

Posted on January 22nd, 2012 at 15:09 by Desiato in category: Apple, News

This article is about Apple and iPhone manufacturing, but it explains in general why people say “nothing is made in America anymore”. I’m quoting more extensively than we usually do, but I think it’s worth it. What that means, of course, is that I think you should read the whole article.

[Quote]:

Apple executives say that going overseas, at this point, is their only option. One former executive described how the company relied upon a Chinese factory to revamp iPhone manufacturing just weeks before the device was due on shelves. Apple had redesigned the iPhone’s screen at the last minute, forcing an assembly line overhaul. New screens began arriving at the plant near midnight.

A foreman immediately roused 8,000 workers inside the company’s dormitories, according to the executive. Each employee was given a biscuit and a cup of tea, guided to a workstation and within half an hour started a 12-hour shift fitting glass screens into beveled frames. Within 96 hours, the plant was producing over 10,000 iPhones a day.

“The speed and flexibility is breathtaking,” the executive said. “There’s no American plant that can match that.”

(…)

“We sell iPhones in over a hundred countries,” a current Apple executive said. “We don’t have an obligation to solve America’s problems. Our only obligation is making the best product possible.”

(…)

In part, Asia was attractive because the semiskilled workers there were cheaper. But that wasn’t driving Apple. For technology companies, the cost of labor is minimal compared with the expense of buying parts and managing supply chains that bring together components and services from hundreds of companies.

For Mr. Cook, the focus on Asia “came down to two things,” said one former high-ranking Apple executive. Factories in Asia “can scale up and down faster” and “Asian supply chains have surpassed what’s in the U.S.” The result is that “we can’t compete at this point,” the executive said.

(…)

It is hard to estimate how much more it would cost to build iPhones in the United States. However, various academics and manufacturing analysts estimate that because labor is such a small part of technology manufacturing, paying American wages would add up to $65 to each iPhone’s expense. Since Apple’s profits are often hundreds of dollars per phone, building domestically, in theory, would still give the company a healthy reward.

But such calculations are, in many respects, meaningless because building the iPhone in the United States would demand much more than hiring Americans — it would require transforming the national and global economies. Apple executives believe there simply aren’t enough American workers with the skills the company needs or factories with sufficient speed and flexibility.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Just to make sure this doesn’t devolve into an “Apple is evil” comment thread, here is a list of Foxconn customers. Among them Acer, Amazon, IBM, Lenovo, Logitech, Microsoft, Motorola, Netgear, Nintendo, Nokia, Asus, Cisco, Panasonic, Dell, Sharp, HP, Intel, Toshiba

  2. Oh, and I would happily pay $65 more for my phone if I knew it would go to higher wages.

  3. Yeah. I was going to say I’d happily wait another 6 (or 12…) weeks for a new iPhone model if it meant people wouldn’t get pulled out of bed at midnight and got to work reasonable shifts.

  4. Suppose good wages were a given, and suppose it wouldn’t be “wake up at midnight” but 8:30 the next business day – where in the US would you be able to get 8000 assembly line workers that fast?

  5. I read the entire article. While I agree it is largely about the money, I did not miss the piece on the glass factory. The Chinese government funded the development of the factory before the contract was awarded. That is industrial policy in action. In the U.S. , “industrial policy’ is a dirty phrase. Imagine in the current polarized environment, the Obama administration funding a factory build out in “anticipation” of a contact? Never happen. Without solid industrial policy, the 1% will continue to sell out as they are citizens of no country and have no loyalty to workers or country (to loosely quote a commenter to that article). This is the result of “leave it to the market” that everyone screams is so great. While free markets have benefits, they need to be tempered by industrial policy. That is what the Chinese government is doing and the world is see the results.

  6. “where in the US would you be able to get 8000 assembly line workers that fast?”

    Detroit.

  7. Hopefully, there is an accounting some day and the executives, the live ones anyway, end up living in China.

  8. Something like that will eventually happen, itspast. We’ve seen it in the automotive industry. Most of the Toyotas, Nissans, BMWs, Mercedes, etc that are sold in America are built in America. There will be some pressure on Apple and others to start providing some of the high wages needed to purchase their products.

Students’ math scores jumped 20% with iPad textbooks, publisher says

Posted on January 21st, 2012 at 9:42 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

On the heels of Apple’s e-textbook announcement in New York City this week, publisher Houghton Mifflin Harcourt announced the results of its “HMC Fuse: Algebra I” pilot program at Ameila Earhart Middle School in California’s Riverside Unified School District. The Algebra I digital textbook is touted as the world’s first full-curriculum algebra application developed exclusively for Apple’s iPad.

In its test run, the “HMH Fuse” application helped more than 78 percent of students score “Proficient” or “Advanced” on the spring 2011 California Standards Test. That was significantly higher than the 59 percent of peers who used traditional textbooks.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Nice anecdote. Let’s see what happens as usage spreads. There definitely should be a degree of skepticism from the whole “act of observing changes that which is being observed” bit going on. Definitely justification for wider testing but let’s not be too hasty about the benefits.

  2. I was just listening to an interview with a neuroscience researcher who was commenting on some odd gender effects. She described an experiment where if a math teacher started a quiz by saying it was a geometry test, the boys would do better than the girls, and if the teacher said it was a drawing and design test, the girls would do better than the boys… for the very same quiz. So yeah, there can be a lot of placebo effect.

  3. One of the interesting things about all this is that students can be strongly motivated to succeed by many different strategies. In the experiment above the subjects know they are doing something new and interesting. This is almost always going to lead to better effort, and better results.

    However I think this is great. It’s long past time that there was more automation and data collection in schools (which is what this is all about).

Apple’s mind-bogglingly greedy and evil license agreement | ZDNet

Posted on January 20th, 2012 at 9:41 by Desiato in category: Apple, News

[Quote]:

I read EULAs so you don’t have to. I’ve spent years reading end user license agreements, EULAs, looking for little gotchas or just trying to figure out what the agreement allows and doesn’t allow.

I have never seen a EULA as mind-bogglingly greedy and evil as Apple’s EULA for its new ebook authoring program.

(…)

Exactly: Imagine if Microsoft said you had to pay them 30% of your speaking fees if you used a PowerPoint deck in a speech.

(…)

The nightmare scenario under this agreement? You create a great work of staggering literary genius that you think you can sell for 5 or 10 bucks per copy. You craft it carefully in iBooks Author. You submit it to Apple. They reject it.

Under this license agreement, you are out of luck. They won’t sell it, and you can’t legally sell it elsewhere. You can give it away, but you can’t sell it.

The positive spin would be that this is exactly like the well-accepted iOS App Store: you’re gambling that Apple will accept your app(/book), and if they don’t then you’re completely out of luck as you have no other way to sell it without rewriting it entirely for another platform. It’s not as simple as copy/pasting text and pictures into another authoring tool if you’ve done anything interactive that involves iOS code.

You could also say “well, that’s what you give up to get iBooks Author for free.”

But is this the world we want to move into? Where Amazon controls whether you can continue to read the books you’ve bought from them? And where Apple can reject your work after months of effort and leave you stranded?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. What a surprise.

  2. “well, that’s what you give up to get iBooks Author for free.”

    Bullshit.

    iBooks Author can author in several formats. One of them is the iBook format. Another is pdf.

    If you want to receive money for this one format called iBook, you can only do it through Apple. If you want to receive money through the other formats, nobody is stopping you. If you want to give your iBook format away for free, nobody is stopping you.

    What you’re saying is that if you want to sell through Apple, you are forced to follow Apple’s rules. What a surprise.

    Well, don’t sell through Apple then. Use a non-iBook format, which is supported by iBooks Author.

  3. Your excerpt is a bit misleading though.
    It gives the impression that the actual book can’t be sold, not the book exported to the ibook format, when in fact only the .ibook format is limited from distribution.

    “By “it,” I am referring to the book, not the content. The program allows you to export your work as plain text, with all formatting stripped. So you do have the option to take the formatting work you did in iBooks Author, throw it away, and start over. That is a devastating potential limitation for an author/publisher. Outputting as PDF would preserve the formatting, but again the license would appear to prohibit you from selling that work, because it was generated by iBooks Author.”

  4. There’s good commentary on this on Daring Fireball. I buy the part of “if you make a profit from content produced with our tool, we want a cut”. The part that I think is bothersome is “but we get to decide whether or not you get to sell it AFTER you do a lot of work”.

  5. In any event, do they really deserve 30% of everything that flows through their portals?

CEO of FoxConn: ‘Managing One Million Animals Gives Me A Headache’

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 18:39 by Desiato in category: Apple, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

According to WantChinaTimes, Terry Gou, the head of Hon Hai Foxconn, the largest contract manufacturer in the world, had this to say at a recent meeting with his senior managers:"Hon Hai has a workforce of over one million worldwide and as human beings are also animals, to manage one million animals gives me a headache," said Hon Hai chairman Terry Gou at a recent year-end party, adding that he wants to learn from Chin Shih-chien, director of Taipei Zoo, regarding how animals should be managed.

Apparently there are no psychologists in China.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. So he’s not happy with his slaves’ behaviour. Poor baby.
    Perhaps there are limits to the size of human organizations.

‘Time to Sell Apple’

Posted on January 18th, 2012 at 20:49 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

Let me get this straight. Apple entered the phone business five years ago with a strategy completely different than any other handset maker: treating the user as the customer, rather than the carriers. With this strategy, Apple has now captured two-thirds of the profit in the worldwide handset market. And but now, according to Lee, what Apple should do is start acting like all the other handset makers.

Where do they find these guys?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Actually, the guy’s name is Kee, not Lee, as in Thomas H. Kee Jr.

  2. Screw phones. Apple’s apparently got plans for other media now. This iAuthor is gonna devastate the sleepy, gentlemanly backwater that is educational publishing. Then what? All text publishing?

  3. Yes. And individual publishing. Everybody will be an author.

  4. For regular text publishing, Apple will have to line up behind Amazon, who are doing self-published books, both print-on-demand and direct-to-Kindle, and also have started their own imprint. The publishing industry is in for some disruption.

Google IP Vandalizing OpenStreetMap

Posted on January 17th, 2012 at 19:03 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

Preliminary results show users from Google IP address ranges in India deleting, moving and abusing OSM data including subtle edits like reversing one-way streets.

Two OpenStreetMap accounts have been vandalizing OSM in London, New York and elsewhere from Google’s IP address, the same address in India reported by Mocality.

[Quote]:

Update: Google sent the following statement to ReadWriteWeb on Tuesday morning. “The two people who made these changes were contractors acting on their own behalf while on the Google network. They are no longer working on Google projects.”

Well – that must have been an awkward conversation…


Write a comment

Pakistan mourns young genius Arfa Karims demise

Posted on January 15th, 2012 at 14:03 by John Sinteur in category: Microsoft

[Quote]:

In what could simply be described as an enormous loss for Pakistan, Arfa Karim, the world’s youngest Microsoft Certified Professional (MCP), Saturday night, lost the battle of life after remaining admitted here at Combined Military Hospital for 26 days, Geo News reported.

Arfa Karim was only sixteen years old.

Her funeral prayers will be offered on Sunday at 10 AM in Cantt area.

Arfa Karim remained in intensive care at Combined Military Hospital (CMH) after suffering an epileptic seizure and cardiac arrest a few weeks ago. After battling for life for 26 days, one of Pakistan’s brightest brains left this world for good.


Write a comment

Microsoft Bans Linux On ARM PCs

Posted on January 15th, 2012 at 0:48 by John Sinteur in category: Microsoft

[Quote]:

When I talked to Linus Torvalds he said that Secure Boot is a good thing, but can be used in a bad ways. That’s proving to be true.

When Microsoft published The Certification Requirements for Windows 8 it was evident that the company wanted to use the secure boot to lock Linux out of such hardware, thus creating a Windows only hardware. The discovery lead to a strong protest from the FLOSS community. Microsoft allowed the non-ARM hardware to be able to run Linux if the hardware vendors chooses to allow that. But as we saw the arrival of ARM on desktop Microsoft “wasted no time in revising its Windows Hardware Certification Requirements to effectively ban most alternative operating systems on ARM-based devices that ship with Windows 8.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Eh, what? My PC – Windows AND Linux side by side. Noone bans Linux from my machine.

  2. Oh, for heaven’s sake…

  3. Response 1: Seems like an excellent way to motivate a lot of hackers to break Secure Boot.

  4. Response 2: Gee, if Apple kept people from running Linux on the iPad, they’d never sell so many of them. How can that not be obvious to Microsoft?

  5. I’d like to make a prediction. This is going to backfire on Microsoft. When you go after the open source community, they fight back. It won’t be pretty. As we have seen in the past, when enough sales are affected then decisions are reversed. Scenario: I boot up a new PC. I read MS’s user agreement and decide that I don’t want the OS loaded. Now what? Send the PC back to the seller because it is useless to me? This is a can of worms just waiting to be opened.

Google, what were you thinking?

Posted on January 14th, 2012 at 10:18 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

Since October, Google’s GKBO appears to have been systematically accessing Mocality’s database and attempting to sell their competing product to our business owners. They have been telling untruths about their relationship with us, and about our business practices, in order to do so. As of January 11th, nearly 30% of our database has apparently been contacted.

Furthermore, they now seem to have outsourced this operation from Kenya to India.

“Do No Evil” apparently doesn’t apply to Africa?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Google corporate is now at least saying the right things about the incident:

    We were mortified to learn…. …and as soon as we have all the facts, we’ll be taking the appropriate action with the people involved.

    http://paidcontent.org/article/419-google-investigating-kenyan-client-poaching-allegations/

  2. I’ll bet that when all of the facts are shaken out of the tree it will be found that some over-zealous area manager waaaay overstepped their authority to do this. It is so egregious, that I cannot believe for a minute (a second, perhaps) that the Google corporate entity would support it. No doubts, heads will fall, people will be fired, and the legal department will have more work to do because some pinhead was, well, a pinhead…

  3. Or, what you say will all happen to the designated “in case we are found out” scapegoats.

Businessweek: “Steve Ballmer Reboots”

Posted on January 12th, 2012 at 23:31 by Desiato in category: Funny!, Microsoft

[Quote]:

Steve Ballmer Reboots

With the stock hung for 10 years, no one thought to reboot Ballmer until now?!


Write a comment

Misdirection, Doublespeak, Non-Answers, and Straight-Up Bad Decisions

Posted on January 12th, 2012 at 8:39 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

It’s one thing for Google to tightly integrate their own social network with their web search results, using their monopoly (or, if you prefer, monopsony) to give Google Plus a significant competitive advantage over Facebook and Twitter. Some see this as anticompetitive behavior; others see this as good clean competitive hardball. Are they unfairly abusing a monopoly, or fairly using their best strength to their own advantage? That’s up for debate.

But to deny that they’re doing it at all? It defies belief.

I honestly don’t know what’s worse: if Google is so institutionally delusional that they actually believe this isn’t giving Google Plus a tremendous advantage (fair or unfair) over every other social network in the world, or if Google thinks so poorly of everyone outside the company that they think anyone is actually going to buy this line of bullshit. The best case scenario for Google is that Eric Schmidt, in his new role as chairman, has turned into a loose cannon who should just shut the fuck up.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. If Facebook and Twitter thought it was an advantage to have their site indexed by Google, they would let Google index their sites. Twitter was doing it, and decided to stop.

    Since Facebook and Twitter think it’s better to not be indexed by Google, obviously indexing by Google is a disadvantage for Google+.

Tim Cook’s stock grant

Posted on January 11th, 2012 at 19:07 by Desiato in category: Apple, Foyer of Ennui (just short of the Hall of Shame), Robber Barons

You’ve probably seen those headlines about Tim Cook making $378 million in Apple stock last year. Those articles are mostly a bit confused. He was awarded restricted stock, to vest over the next 10 years. Apple is just reporting the whole grant to the SEC in the year it was made.

OK, that seems a bit more reasonable than a $378 million payday, right?

Well, let’s do a thought experiment to see how much Cook actually might make with those 900,000 shares he will receive if he doesn’t get fired or leave before then.

I’m sure Apple’s Board would be happy if Cook kept Apple growing as much as it has the last 10 years. That seems like a good benchmark.

From Fall of 2001 to Fall of 2011), Apple stock increased from about $9 to $378, or 42x.

If Cook is successful and the stock tracks along, then in the Fall of 2021 his stock price will be 42 * $378, and Cook was not given options (where you only make money if the stock goes up) but actual stock, so he makes the full value, or 42 * $378 * 900k.

Per year Cook would make 1.4 billion dollars.

PER YEAR.

Minus tax.

(He only has to do roughly 1/4th as well as the past 10 years to make roughly $378 million per year.)


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Honestly, I think the chance to produce the x42 growth without Steve Jobs seems fairly slim.
    No offense to Tim, and I might be wrong, but it doesn’t seem likely.

  2. Well, if he’s only as good as Ballmer and the stock stays flat for 10 years, he still makes $37.8 million per year.

  3. I was with you until the “That seems like a good benchmark.”

    I think that’s up there somewhere around the best-case scenario.

  4. Wait, let me try that…

    DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS!

    Yes, I thought so. I can be just as good as Balmer. Can I have my $37.8 million now?

  5. Monkeyman!!!

  6. I’m sure we can get you 900,000 shares in Dubbele.com…

Apple, RIM deny claims of data backdoor for Indian government

Posted on January 10th, 2012 at 10:54 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

Apple and RIM have denied providing the Indian government with backdoor access to customers’ data, after the release of a memo that appears to suggest that they and Nokia did a deal in exchange for access to the Indian smartphone market.


Write a comment

Open Letter to Apple Shareholders

Posted on January 7th, 2012 at 9:20 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

Paying a dividend and burning down our war chest would jeopardize all of that.

You see, one day a competitor will come along and cut our core product line out from underneath us. We will need all the cash we can muster to fend them off. When that cash is done, we will mortgage the company. The first several times we may be successful. However, as is always the case, eventually time will get the best of us and we will be unable to meet our creditors demands.

We will go bankrupt. Our creditors will seize the equity and the shareholders will be left with nothing and having made zero return on their investment.

Right. Makes total sense. And I want some of the same glue this guy is sniffing, it must be great!


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. This letter has to be a joke. If not, where did it come from?

  2. The fact that it makes no sense is the point, right? The implied argument is “only a crazy BS argument could be used to try to explain why Apple isn’t paying out some of its crazy cash hoard to its share holders”.

  3. One could argue that the hoard of cash makes Apple a more interesting take-over target, and that’s why I suspect Apple has dropped hints that they may start paying a dividend. But this, claiming that they are hoarding cash because they are about to go broke makes so little sense I have no idea…

  4. (Aside: the quoted text does not claim Apple is “about to” go broke. It says that if Apple holds on to the cash, then “one day” they’ll find a way to waste it.) (Given that Apple already almost went broke in the 90s, it’s not much of a stretch to argue that this is a long term possibility.))

    I’m intrigued by your mention of take-over noise. It may be obvious that having cash makes any company a “more” interesting take-over target, in the narrow sense of “more so than if they didn’t have cash and traded at the same stock price”.

    But is Apple a feasible take-over target in any sense? Since Apple is quite profitable and the stock has done well, you’d have to offer a serious premium over the current stock price. Market cap is $400bln these days. Even subtracting out the $80bln in cash and assuming a 50% premium, the take-over bid would have to be $480bln (ie. minimally 51% thereof in hand to get control). Where would that come from? There’s no other company that could offer its stock in a deal. The Chinese government deciding it’d like to own Apple? I can’t think of many other players at that level. And I don’t think you can make it work by selling off parts of the company to finance it–Apple would be hard to split up. So I’d be curious to read a serious argument that Apple is a take-over target.

  5. Market cap is $400bln these days. It is. And today that’s fine – but if it ever were to drop, say, 15% in a month, the 50% premium would evaporate overnight, and suddenly you’re talking a much, much lower take-over bid, where the $80bln in cash makes a big dent in that amount, and it’s probably better to lower it a bit to, say, $40bln over a few years by giving out significant dividends.

    And since European banks park $500bln of their assets overnight at the ECB right now because they’re afraid to borrow to each other and probably don’t really know what else to do with it, I’m not too sure that lower take-over bid wouldn’t be easier to assemble than you’d think.

  6. Can you support the claim that a stock price drop would make the 50% premium evaporate? I don’t agree with that at all. Of course it depends on the cause of the drop (i.e. does the stock drop because of material news about the company). But Apple regularly fluctuates by ~10%. That doesn’t change the fact that it’s a high-growth, high-profit company, which is the reason it would command a premium.

    Just some reference points: HP paid a 23% premium for Palm, which was dying. Microsoft offered a 62% premium for Yahoo! which was far from its prime. You think Apple will fetch less of a premium than Yahoo, even if the stock dips a bit?

    The fact that dozens of banks park a combined $500bln of liquid assets is no argument. First, banks rarely team up in high profile corporate take-overs. Second, banks can’t randomly convert liquid cash into long term holdings. You’d need to find a private equity fund with hundreds of billions in cash. Hint: Berkshire-Hathaway’s market cap is $190bln, and Buffett tends to do deals up to single-digit-billions.

    This whole logic that a company’s cash can be used to buy it doesn’t work for every company. Companies tend to be valued primarily for their future earnings potential. When the expected earnings are very uncertain (say, AOL or B&N), the valuations-from-earnings may drop towards zero and thus cash on hand will become significant. The key is that the new management think they can produce dramatically better earnings.

    None of this is the case for Apple, right? Future earnings are expected to be huge. Other management is very unlikely to do better. An acquisition would send important talent scurrying for the door. The company might immediately start using its cash on hand to start driving up the stock price. You’d have to offer a HUGE premium to get shareholders to sell.

    Nah.

  7. That’s the problem with the current system. The moment they took the dividends out of the system, it all turned into this short term oriented finance we came to know.

  8. @Roland: Exactly!

‘The Sims’ Designer Creating New Game for Real Life

Posted on January 4th, 2012 at 0:02 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

“It’s kind of remarkable. I’ve set up a couple of PCs and a few TVs over the last couple of years. Buying a new television and setting it up is far more complicated now than buying a computer and setting it up.”

No wonder people expect Apple to start selling TV sets.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Having set up two new TVs in the past 3 years, I have no idea what he’s talking about. What the heck does he do with his TV?

  2. Depends on brand, I think. I set up a sony for my dad, and it was horrible.

  3. Well, I guess in Holland you have (or used to have) the weirdness of having to manually map broadcast channels to buttons on the TV. I haven’t seen that anywhere else and would think it has gone away with modern cable boxes. (?) What parts of the Sony setup were hard?

  4. Figuring out where the hell they hid the “do the automatic setup” bit. Mind you, it is possible that a first power on jumps there automatically, I didn’t get to see that one.

Domo Arigato, Mr Roboto

Posted on January 4th, 2012 at 0:00 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote]:

“I can’t wake up one morning and say, ‘Screw the letter B,’” type designer Matthew Carter told me last year when I interviewed him for the Economist, just after he had received a MacArthur Foundation “genius” fellowship. Carter, arguably the leading living creator and adapter of fonts in the Western world, was talking about the limits of pushing legibility and readability.

I thought of his comment when a recent furor erupted over the new “house” font for Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich), called Roboto. Roboto is a bespoke sans-serif font, created by a Google employee and used throughout Android’s user interface (UI) as part of the larger user experience (UX) overhaul. The intent is to make Android more intuitive, cohesive, and fluid, and work better on a variety of screen sizes, especially tablets.

Roboto was almost immediately branded a Frankenfont, a multi-headed hydra, and many other names by font purists and tyros alike, because of what seems to be a borrowing of identifiable features of several well-known fonts, including Helvetica. Stephen Coles at Typographica singled out characters he felt quite similar in form from Helvetica, Myriad, Universe, FF DIN, and Ronnia.


Write a comment

Nokia Lumia 800

Posted on January 2nd, 2012 at 11:35 by John Sinteur in category: Microsoft

Just got myself one, and I’ve been playing with it for 10 minutes, and I’m pleasantly surprised. Microsoft managed to create a decent user interface, and I like it. Now there’s an unexpected thing for me to say, right?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Not really, John. You’ve always been willing to provide reasonably fair assessments of products despite past experience.

    The real question is whether or not this means you’ll sign on to develop apps for the platform.

  2. Maybe. I will most certainly install all the dev tools and play around. Market share is an issue as well. We’ll see.

  3. Where are the pictures???

  4. Here?

Bullshit

Posted on December 31st, 2011 at 11:46 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote]:

Everyone has their bullshit. You can simply decide whose you’re willing to tolerate.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. See the link at the previous post. :)

Programmers

Posted on December 31st, 2011 at 11:43 by John Sinteur in category: Software

[Quote]:

If you are hiring programmers, you should pay them $200/hr.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. So now we know that this guy sells his family 200USD/hour.
    Thanks, not going there. :)

Jonathan Ive is knighted in New Year Honours list

Posted on December 31st, 2011 at 7:58 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

Apple’s chief designer Jonathan Ive has been appointed a Knight Commander of the British Empire (KBE) in the Queen’s New Year’s Honours list.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Arise , Sir Jonathan. Great design is the happy marriage of form and function. Think of a sailboat – the more beautiful and simple the form, the more efficiently it sails. Sir Jonathan has consistently married simplicity and beauty with the highest degree of functionality. This is one knighthood that is thoroughly deserved. The other one was for David Attenborough, another great man. Among the time-servers, functionaries and party donors they stand out like iMacs in a big box store.

Norton

Posted on December 30th, 2011 at 16:36 by John Sinteur in category: Software

[Quote]:


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. John, check out mashable.com/2011/12/30/go-daddy-now-officially-opposes-sopa/

  2. Wow. Poor GoDaddy – that must really have hurt!

  3. GoDaddy is doomed. Who’s next!?

The Definition Of Open Is… Missing

Posted on December 29th, 2011 at 9:32 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

A few minutes ago, Android chief Andy Rubin sent out his 6th tweet. A milestone. Never mind that they’re all self-serving promotion with Rubin never responding to anything or really giving anything in the way of context. They’re all awesome. Kudos.

But wait. I thought this was his 7th tweet…

That was the response I kept getting after noting Rubin’s milestone. But I counted and counted again. Six.

Not so fast.

Turns out, the people are right. This was actually Rubin’s 7th tweet, but he deleted one of them… 

Interesting. Okay, so which one? One Twitter follower, MentionOnly noticed it and appropriately, Google cache confirms:

the definition of open: “mkdir android ; cd android ; repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git ; repo sync ; make”

Yes, Rubin for some reason has deleted his most famous tweet. His first tweet! One that led to stories by myself and others. 

That tweet no longer exists. His first one listed is now from December 2010, trumpeting, what else: Android activations!!!!

Where did the initial tweet go? Who knows. But it sure looks like he deleted it. Deleted it in an “open” way, I’m sure.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Why aren’t they all like Apple? Sigh…… So noble, so goodhearted.

  2. “one of a number of tweets that twitter lost due to a bug that occurring during maintenance”

    Yeah, right – anybody know of any other tweet that had the same fate?

Samsung: no ICS upgrade for Galaxy S and Galaxy Tab because of TouchWiz

Posted on December 23rd, 2011 at 20:57 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote]:

Samsung has just distributed the worst news of this Ice Cream Sandwich upgrade cycle: the popular Galaxy S smartphone that sold 10 million units last year and the 7-inch Galaxy Tab tablet won’t be upgraded to Android 4.0.

[Quote]:

it’s a development platform, not a computing platform. That’s why tech commentators can’t see the difference.

iOS for iPhone and iPad is a platform. Android is not. Android is something companies use to develop products. Anything done on Android after release of a product that has no relation whatsoever to the product. This is no different from iOS, except the company who developed iOS and the product is one and the same, and that has effects on what they think customers may expect from them. No wonder people are more loyal to Apple.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. That’s the point, TC. The day Apple quits support to its old 3Gs devices, People (including my wife) will be stranded with his old handset.
    The day Samsung or Google quits support on my Nexus S, I’ll just download and compile the ROM that best suits my needs.

Mozilla and Google Sign New Agreement for Default Search in Firefox

Posted on December 21st, 2011 at 9:22 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

The specific terms of this commercial agreement are subject to traditional confidentiality requirements, and we’re not at liberty to disclose them.

It’s a good thing Firefox is “open”, just like Android.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Bizarre spin using the word “traditional” – why not “normal”, “usual”, etc. Someone must have had too many “traditional” seasonal beverages.

  2. Is “open” as in “you can have any search engine you want by typing two lines of code or downloading a precompiled code in about three seconds, and you can spot if we do anything dirty”. Good luck with that on your apple things.

RIM now worth less than Apple’s App Store alone

Posted on December 19th, 2011 at 21:02 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

Research in Motion’s struggles in the smartphone market have driven its stock price so low that the company is worth less than the estimated value of just Apple’s App Store.


Write a comment

British Telecom sues Google over six U.S. patents allegedly infringed by Android and various Google services

Posted on December 19th, 2011 at 10:18 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

After Apple, Oracle, Microsoft, and eBay, British Telecommunications plc (commonly referred to as "British Telecom" or simply "BT") has just become the fifth large publicly-traded company to bring patent infringement litigation against Android.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Actually when reading the details it struck me that issue is not so much infringement but the issuance of such generic patents in the first place. I mean in many respects is its tantamount to issuing a patent on walking by humans and then suing every ambulatory person on earth.


« Older Entries