« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Apple’s iPhone Business Alone Is Now Bigger Than All Of Microsoft

Posted on February 4th, 2012 at 17:07 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Microsoft

[Quote]:

Tech writer MG Siegler just noted a remarkable fact:

Apple’s iPhone business alone is now bigger than Microsoft.

Not Windows. Not Office. Microsoft.

Think about that.

Remember when Balmer said the iPhone would never amount to anything? Good times…


Write a comment

Apple Scotland

Posted on February 2nd, 2012 at 0:05 by John Sinteur in category: Apple


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Burnistoun Eleven.

  2. Rofl thats hilarious

Watching Apple win the world

Posted on January 27th, 2012 at 0:04 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

Apple’s last quarter was the second most profitable quarter of any company ever in US history. Only ExxonMobile topped them slightly in 2008 when oil was at an all-time high. That’s an astounding and awe-inspiring accomplishment.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Awesome indeed–especially in light of the fact that its business model isn’t predicated on extracting a never-renewable resource from the Earth and burning it.

Apple, America and a Squeezed Middle Class – NYTimes.com

Posted on January 22nd, 2012 at 15:09 by Desiato in category: Apple, News

This article is about Apple and iPhone manufacturing, but it explains in general why people say “nothing is made in America anymore”. I’m quoting more extensively than we usually do, but I think it’s worth it. What that means, of course, is that I think you should read the whole article.

[Quote]:

Apple executives say that going overseas, at this point, is their only option. One former executive described how the company relied upon a Chinese factory to revamp iPhone manufacturing just weeks before the device was due on shelves. Apple had redesigned the iPhone’s screen at the last minute, forcing an assembly line overhaul. New screens began arriving at the plant near midnight.

A foreman immediately roused 8,000 workers inside the company’s dormitories, according to the executive. Each employee was given a biscuit and a cup of tea, guided to a workstation and within half an hour started a 12-hour shift fitting glass screens into beveled frames. Within 96 hours, the plant was producing over 10,000 iPhones a day.

“The speed and flexibility is breathtaking,” the executive said. “There’s no American plant that can match that.”

(…)

“We sell iPhones in over a hundred countries,” a current Apple executive said. “We don’t have an obligation to solve America’s problems. Our only obligation is making the best product possible.”

(…)

In part, Asia was attractive because the semiskilled workers there were cheaper. But that wasn’t driving Apple. For technology companies, the cost of labor is minimal compared with the expense of buying parts and managing supply chains that bring together components and services from hundreds of companies.

For Mr. Cook, the focus on Asia “came down to two things,” said one former high-ranking Apple executive. Factories in Asia “can scale up and down faster” and “Asian supply chains have surpassed what’s in the U.S.” The result is that “we can’t compete at this point,” the executive said.

(…)

It is hard to estimate how much more it would cost to build iPhones in the United States. However, various academics and manufacturing analysts estimate that because labor is such a small part of technology manufacturing, paying American wages would add up to $65 to each iPhone’s expense. Since Apple’s profits are often hundreds of dollars per phone, building domestically, in theory, would still give the company a healthy reward.

But such calculations are, in many respects, meaningless because building the iPhone in the United States would demand much more than hiring Americans — it would require transforming the national and global economies. Apple executives believe there simply aren’t enough American workers with the skills the company needs or factories with sufficient speed and flexibility.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Just to make sure this doesn’t devolve into an “Apple is evil” comment thread, here is a list of Foxconn customers. Among them Acer, Amazon, IBM, Lenovo, Logitech, Microsoft, Motorola, Netgear, Nintendo, Nokia, Asus, Cisco, Panasonic, Dell, Sharp, HP, Intel, Toshiba

  2. Oh, and I would happily pay $65 more for my phone if I knew it would go to higher wages.

  3. Yeah. I was going to say I’d happily wait another 6 (or 12…) weeks for a new iPhone model if it meant people wouldn’t get pulled out of bed at midnight and got to work reasonable shifts.

  4. Suppose good wages were a given, and suppose it wouldn’t be “wake up at midnight” but 8:30 the next business day – where in the US would you be able to get 8000 assembly line workers that fast?

  5. I read the entire article. While I agree it is largely about the money, I did not miss the piece on the glass factory. The Chinese government funded the development of the factory before the contract was awarded. That is industrial policy in action. In the U.S. , “industrial policy’ is a dirty phrase. Imagine in the current polarized environment, the Obama administration funding a factory build out in “anticipation” of a contact? Never happen. Without solid industrial policy, the 1% will continue to sell out as they are citizens of no country and have no loyalty to workers or country (to loosely quote a commenter to that article). This is the result of “leave it to the market” that everyone screams is so great. While free markets have benefits, they need to be tempered by industrial policy. That is what the Chinese government is doing and the world is see the results.

  6. “where in the US would you be able to get 8000 assembly line workers that fast?”

    Detroit.

  7. Hopefully, there is an accounting some day and the executives, the live ones anyway, end up living in China.

  8. Something like that will eventually happen, itspast. We’ve seen it in the automotive industry. Most of the Toyotas, Nissans, BMWs, Mercedes, etc that are sold in America are built in America. There will be some pressure on Apple and others to start providing some of the high wages needed to purchase their products.

Students’ math scores jumped 20% with iPad textbooks, publisher says

Posted on January 21st, 2012 at 9:42 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

On the heels of Apple’s e-textbook announcement in New York City this week, publisher Houghton Mifflin Harcourt announced the results of its “HMC Fuse: Algebra I” pilot program at Ameila Earhart Middle School in California’s Riverside Unified School District. The Algebra I digital textbook is touted as the world’s first full-curriculum algebra application developed exclusively for Apple’s iPad.

In its test run, the “HMH Fuse” application helped more than 78 percent of students score “Proficient” or “Advanced” on the spring 2011 California Standards Test. That was significantly higher than the 59 percent of peers who used traditional textbooks.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Nice anecdote. Let’s see what happens as usage spreads. There definitely should be a degree of skepticism from the whole “act of observing changes that which is being observed” bit going on. Definitely justification for wider testing but let’s not be too hasty about the benefits.

  2. I was just listening to an interview with a neuroscience researcher who was commenting on some odd gender effects. She described an experiment where if a math teacher started a quiz by saying it was a geometry test, the boys would do better than the girls, and if the teacher said it was a drawing and design test, the girls would do better than the boys… for the very same quiz. So yeah, there can be a lot of placebo effect.

  3. One of the interesting things about all this is that students can be strongly motivated to succeed by many different strategies. In the experiment above the subjects know they are doing something new and interesting. This is almost always going to lead to better effort, and better results.

    However I think this is great. It’s long past time that there was more automation and data collection in schools (which is what this is all about).

Apple’s mind-bogglingly greedy and evil license agreement | ZDNet

Posted on January 20th, 2012 at 9:41 by Desiato in category: Apple, News

[Quote]:

I read EULAs so you don’t have to. I’ve spent years reading end user license agreements, EULAs, looking for little gotchas or just trying to figure out what the agreement allows and doesn’t allow.

I have never seen a EULA as mind-bogglingly greedy and evil as Apple’s EULA for its new ebook authoring program.

(…)

Exactly: Imagine if Microsoft said you had to pay them 30% of your speaking fees if you used a PowerPoint deck in a speech.

(…)

The nightmare scenario under this agreement? You create a great work of staggering literary genius that you think you can sell for 5 or 10 bucks per copy. You craft it carefully in iBooks Author. You submit it to Apple. They reject it.

Under this license agreement, you are out of luck. They won’t sell it, and you can’t legally sell it elsewhere. You can give it away, but you can’t sell it.

The positive spin would be that this is exactly like the well-accepted iOS App Store: you’re gambling that Apple will accept your app(/book), and if they don’t then you’re completely out of luck as you have no other way to sell it without rewriting it entirely for another platform. It’s not as simple as copy/pasting text and pictures into another authoring tool if you’ve done anything interactive that involves iOS code.

You could also say “well, that’s what you give up to get iBooks Author for free.”

But is this the world we want to move into? Where Amazon controls whether you can continue to read the books you’ve bought from them? And where Apple can reject your work after months of effort and leave you stranded?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. What a surprise.

  2. “well, that’s what you give up to get iBooks Author for free.”

    Bullshit.

    iBooks Author can author in several formats. One of them is the iBook format. Another is pdf.

    If you want to receive money for this one format called iBook, you can only do it through Apple. If you want to receive money through the other formats, nobody is stopping you. If you want to give your iBook format away for free, nobody is stopping you.

    What you’re saying is that if you want to sell through Apple, you are forced to follow Apple’s rules. What a surprise.

    Well, don’t sell through Apple then. Use a non-iBook format, which is supported by iBooks Author.

  3. Your excerpt is a bit misleading though.
    It gives the impression that the actual book can’t be sold, not the book exported to the ibook format, when in fact only the .ibook format is limited from distribution.

    “By “it,” I am referring to the book, not the content. The program allows you to export your work as plain text, with all formatting stripped. So you do have the option to take the formatting work you did in iBooks Author, throw it away, and start over. That is a devastating potential limitation for an author/publisher. Outputting as PDF would preserve the formatting, but again the license would appear to prohibit you from selling that work, because it was generated by iBooks Author.”

  4. There’s good commentary on this on Daring Fireball. I buy the part of “if you make a profit from content produced with our tool, we want a cut”. The part that I think is bothersome is “but we get to decide whether or not you get to sell it AFTER you do a lot of work”.

  5. In any event, do they really deserve 30% of everything that flows through their portals?

CEO of FoxConn: ‘Managing One Million Animals Gives Me A Headache’

Posted on January 19th, 2012 at 18:39 by Desiato in category: Apple, What were they thinking?

[Quote]:

According to WantChinaTimes, Terry Gou, the head of Hon Hai Foxconn, the largest contract manufacturer in the world, had this to say at a recent meeting with his senior managers:"Hon Hai has a workforce of over one million worldwide and as human beings are also animals, to manage one million animals gives me a headache," said Hon Hai chairman Terry Gou at a recent year-end party, adding that he wants to learn from Chin Shih-chien, director of Taipei Zoo, regarding how animals should be managed.

Apparently there are no psychologists in China.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. So he’s not happy with his slaves’ behaviour. Poor baby.
    Perhaps there are limits to the size of human organizations.

‘Time to Sell Apple’

Posted on January 18th, 2012 at 20:49 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

Let me get this straight. Apple entered the phone business five years ago with a strategy completely different than any other handset maker: treating the user as the customer, rather than the carriers. With this strategy, Apple has now captured two-thirds of the profit in the worldwide handset market. And but now, according to Lee, what Apple should do is start acting like all the other handset makers.

Where do they find these guys?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Actually, the guy’s name is Kee, not Lee, as in Thomas H. Kee Jr.

  2. Screw phones. Apple’s apparently got plans for other media now. This iAuthor is gonna devastate the sleepy, gentlemanly backwater that is educational publishing. Then what? All text publishing?

  3. Yes. And individual publishing. Everybody will be an author.

  4. For regular text publishing, Apple will have to line up behind Amazon, who are doing self-published books, both print-on-demand and direct-to-Kindle, and also have started their own imprint. The publishing industry is in for some disruption.

Tim Cook’s stock grant

Posted on January 11th, 2012 at 19:07 by Desiato in category: Apple, Foyer of Ennui (just short of the Hall of Shame), Robber Barons

You’ve probably seen those headlines about Tim Cook making $378 million in Apple stock last year. Those articles are mostly a bit confused. He was awarded restricted stock, to vest over the next 10 years. Apple is just reporting the whole grant to the SEC in the year it was made.

OK, that seems a bit more reasonable than a $378 million payday, right?

Well, let’s do a thought experiment to see how much Cook actually might make with those 900,000 shares he will receive if he doesn’t get fired or leave before then.

I’m sure Apple’s Board would be happy if Cook kept Apple growing as much as it has the last 10 years. That seems like a good benchmark.

From Fall of 2001 to Fall of 2011), Apple stock increased from about $9 to $378, or 42x.

If Cook is successful and the stock tracks along, then in the Fall of 2021 his stock price will be 42 * $378, and Cook was not given options (where you only make money if the stock goes up) but actual stock, so he makes the full value, or 42 * $378 * 900k.

Per year Cook would make 1.4 billion dollars.

PER YEAR.

Minus tax.

(He only has to do roughly 1/4th as well as the past 10 years to make roughly $378 million per year.)


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Honestly, I think the chance to produce the x42 growth without Steve Jobs seems fairly slim.
    No offense to Tim, and I might be wrong, but it doesn’t seem likely.

  2. Well, if he’s only as good as Ballmer and the stock stays flat for 10 years, he still makes $37.8 million per year.

  3. I was with you until the “That seems like a good benchmark.”

    I think that’s up there somewhere around the best-case scenario.

  4. Wait, let me try that…

    DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS!

    Yes, I thought so. I can be just as good as Balmer. Can I have my $37.8 million now?

  5. Monkeyman!!!

  6. I’m sure we can get you 900,000 shares in Dubbele.com…

Apple, RIM deny claims of data backdoor for Indian government

Posted on January 10th, 2012 at 10:54 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

Apple and RIM have denied providing the Indian government with backdoor access to customers’ data, after the release of a memo that appears to suggest that they and Nokia did a deal in exchange for access to the Indian smartphone market.


Write a comment

Open Letter to Apple Shareholders

Posted on January 7th, 2012 at 9:20 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

Paying a dividend and burning down our war chest would jeopardize all of that.

You see, one day a competitor will come along and cut our core product line out from underneath us. We will need all the cash we can muster to fend them off. When that cash is done, we will mortgage the company. The first several times we may be successful. However, as is always the case, eventually time will get the best of us and we will be unable to meet our creditors demands.

We will go bankrupt. Our creditors will seize the equity and the shareholders will be left with nothing and having made zero return on their investment.

Right. Makes total sense. And I want some of the same glue this guy is sniffing, it must be great!


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. This letter has to be a joke. If not, where did it come from?

  2. The fact that it makes no sense is the point, right? The implied argument is “only a crazy BS argument could be used to try to explain why Apple isn’t paying out some of its crazy cash hoard to its share holders”.

  3. One could argue that the hoard of cash makes Apple a more interesting take-over target, and that’s why I suspect Apple has dropped hints that they may start paying a dividend. But this, claiming that they are hoarding cash because they are about to go broke makes so little sense I have no idea…

  4. (Aside: the quoted text does not claim Apple is “about to” go broke. It says that if Apple holds on to the cash, then “one day” they’ll find a way to waste it.) (Given that Apple already almost went broke in the 90s, it’s not much of a stretch to argue that this is a long term possibility.))

    I’m intrigued by your mention of take-over noise. It may be obvious that having cash makes any company a “more” interesting take-over target, in the narrow sense of “more so than if they didn’t have cash and traded at the same stock price”.

    But is Apple a feasible take-over target in any sense? Since Apple is quite profitable and the stock has done well, you’d have to offer a serious premium over the current stock price. Market cap is $400bln these days. Even subtracting out the $80bln in cash and assuming a 50% premium, the take-over bid would have to be $480bln (ie. minimally 51% thereof in hand to get control). Where would that come from? There’s no other company that could offer its stock in a deal. The Chinese government deciding it’d like to own Apple? I can’t think of many other players at that level. And I don’t think you can make it work by selling off parts of the company to finance it–Apple would be hard to split up. So I’d be curious to read a serious argument that Apple is a take-over target.

  5. Market cap is $400bln these days. It is. And today that’s fine – but if it ever were to drop, say, 15% in a month, the 50% premium would evaporate overnight, and suddenly you’re talking a much, much lower take-over bid, where the $80bln in cash makes a big dent in that amount, and it’s probably better to lower it a bit to, say, $40bln over a few years by giving out significant dividends.

    And since European banks park $500bln of their assets overnight at the ECB right now because they’re afraid to borrow to each other and probably don’t really know what else to do with it, I’m not too sure that lower take-over bid wouldn’t be easier to assemble than you’d think.

  6. Can you support the claim that a stock price drop would make the 50% premium evaporate? I don’t agree with that at all. Of course it depends on the cause of the drop (i.e. does the stock drop because of material news about the company). But Apple regularly fluctuates by ~10%. That doesn’t change the fact that it’s a high-growth, high-profit company, which is the reason it would command a premium.

    Just some reference points: HP paid a 23% premium for Palm, which was dying. Microsoft offered a 62% premium for Yahoo! which was far from its prime. You think Apple will fetch less of a premium than Yahoo, even if the stock dips a bit?

    The fact that dozens of banks park a combined $500bln of liquid assets is no argument. First, banks rarely team up in high profile corporate take-overs. Second, banks can’t randomly convert liquid cash into long term holdings. You’d need to find a private equity fund with hundreds of billions in cash. Hint: Berkshire-Hathaway’s market cap is $190bln, and Buffett tends to do deals up to single-digit-billions.

    This whole logic that a company’s cash can be used to buy it doesn’t work for every company. Companies tend to be valued primarily for their future earnings potential. When the expected earnings are very uncertain (say, AOL or B&N), the valuations-from-earnings may drop towards zero and thus cash on hand will become significant. The key is that the new management think they can produce dramatically better earnings.

    None of this is the case for Apple, right? Future earnings are expected to be huge. Other management is very unlikely to do better. An acquisition would send important talent scurrying for the door. The company might immediately start using its cash on hand to start driving up the stock price. You’d have to offer a HUGE premium to get shareholders to sell.

    Nah.

  7. That’s the problem with the current system. The moment they took the dividends out of the system, it all turned into this short term oriented finance we came to know.

  8. @Roland: Exactly!

‘The Sims’ Designer Creating New Game for Real Life

Posted on January 4th, 2012 at 0:02 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

“It’s kind of remarkable. I’ve set up a couple of PCs and a few TVs over the last couple of years. Buying a new television and setting it up is far more complicated now than buying a computer and setting it up.”

No wonder people expect Apple to start selling TV sets.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Having set up two new TVs in the past 3 years, I have no idea what he’s talking about. What the heck does he do with his TV?

  2. Depends on brand, I think. I set up a sony for my dad, and it was horrible.

  3. Well, I guess in Holland you have (or used to have) the weirdness of having to manually map broadcast channels to buttons on the TV. I haven’t seen that anywhere else and would think it has gone away with modern cable boxes. (?) What parts of the Sony setup were hard?

  4. Figuring out where the hell they hid the “do the automatic setup” bit. Mind you, it is possible that a first power on jumps there automatically, I didn’t get to see that one.

Domo Arigato, Mr Roboto

Posted on January 4th, 2012 at 0:00 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote]:

“I can’t wake up one morning and say, ‘Screw the letter B,’” type designer Matthew Carter told me last year when I interviewed him for the Economist, just after he had received a MacArthur Foundation “genius” fellowship. Carter, arguably the leading living creator and adapter of fonts in the Western world, was talking about the limits of pushing legibility and readability.

I thought of his comment when a recent furor erupted over the new “house” font for Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich), called Roboto. Roboto is a bespoke sans-serif font, created by a Google employee and used throughout Android’s user interface (UI) as part of the larger user experience (UX) overhaul. The intent is to make Android more intuitive, cohesive, and fluid, and work better on a variety of screen sizes, especially tablets.

Roboto was almost immediately branded a Frankenfont, a multi-headed hydra, and many other names by font purists and tyros alike, because of what seems to be a borrowing of identifiable features of several well-known fonts, including Helvetica. Stephen Coles at Typographica singled out characters he felt quite similar in form from Helvetica, Myriad, Universe, FF DIN, and Ronnia.


Write a comment

Bullshit

Posted on December 31st, 2011 at 11:46 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote]:

Everyone has their bullshit. You can simply decide whose you’re willing to tolerate.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. See the link at the previous post. :)

Jonathan Ive is knighted in New Year Honours list

Posted on December 31st, 2011 at 7:58 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

Apple’s chief designer Jonathan Ive has been appointed a Knight Commander of the British Empire (KBE) in the Queen’s New Year’s Honours list.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Arise , Sir Jonathan. Great design is the happy marriage of form and function. Think of a sailboat – the more beautiful and simple the form, the more efficiently it sails. Sir Jonathan has consistently married simplicity and beauty with the highest degree of functionality. This is one knighthood that is thoroughly deserved. The other one was for David Attenborough, another great man. Among the time-servers, functionaries and party donors they stand out like iMacs in a big box store.

Samsung: no ICS upgrade for Galaxy S and Galaxy Tab because of TouchWiz

Posted on December 23rd, 2011 at 20:57 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote]:

Samsung has just distributed the worst news of this Ice Cream Sandwich upgrade cycle: the popular Galaxy S smartphone that sold 10 million units last year and the 7-inch Galaxy Tab tablet won’t be upgraded to Android 4.0.

[Quote]:

it’s a development platform, not a computing platform. That’s why tech commentators can’t see the difference.

iOS for iPhone and iPad is a platform. Android is not. Android is something companies use to develop products. Anything done on Android after release of a product that has no relation whatsoever to the product. This is no different from iOS, except the company who developed iOS and the product is one and the same, and that has effects on what they think customers may expect from them. No wonder people are more loyal to Apple.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. That’s the point, TC. The day Apple quits support to its old 3Gs devices, People (including my wife) will be stranded with his old handset.
    The day Samsung or Google quits support on my Nexus S, I’ll just download and compile the ROM that best suits my needs.

RIM now worth less than Apple’s App Store alone

Posted on December 19th, 2011 at 21:02 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

Research in Motion’s struggles in the smartphone market have driven its stock price so low that the company is worth less than the estimated value of just Apple’s App Store.


Write a comment

Why the iPad Is the Most Hated Gadget Ever

Posted on December 18th, 2011 at 11:46 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote]:

Here’s the under-appreciated reality of all this: HP, RIM and Amazon have all moved millions of touch tablets into the market at below cost. This has caused two problems for the market. First, it’s created a domino effect. HP’s fire sale on the TouchPad cut demand for the BlackBerry PlayBook, reducing unit sales. That contributed to RIM’s need for a fire sale of its own. (Plus, Amazon has probably long intended to sell below cost.)

All this crazy, unexpected discounting has both artificially taken market share away from the various Android tablets, and re-set consumer expectations about how much a touch tablet is supposed to cost.

Now, the only way to sell a non-iPad tablet in any significant quantity is to sell it below cost.

Android tablet makers are faced with the choice between making a little money on each tablet but selling few, or losing money on each tablet and selling many.

It’s a horrible state of affairs for the tablet industry, unless you’re Apple or Amazon. And it’s almost entirely the fault of the iPad.

The iPad’s reception convinced the industry that they could succeed, too. The success of the iPad made HP and RIM vastly over-estimate demand. And the success of the iPad made it impossible to compete against the iPad in the market, forcing companies to ultimately dump inventory at below cost and, in doing so, nearly destroy the Android tablet market.

That’s why the consumer tablet industry hates the iPad. But they’re not the only ones.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. So iSuppli estimated on release of the iPad1 that its COG was $260. Amazon comes out a year later (meaning parts should be getting cheaper) with a device that’s clearly cheaper to make (7″ vs 10″ display to begin with) and is said to be losing money on it at $199. ($185 parts, $201 incl manufacturing) I know that Apple gets discounts for economies of scale and is a tough negotiator, but Amazon is no slouch and wasn’t ordering small quantities.

    Samsung can make most of the parts in-house and thus should be able to produce comparable hardware at the same cost or less, and compete on price. But the Galaxy Tab 10 still sells for $460. I guess I find the $260 COG for the iPad hard to believe. Something here doesn’t add up anyway.

  2. Maybe they should quit making so many clones and concentrate on making one right. Oh yeah, that’s the iPad.

  3. I haven’t heard much about app development for Android tablets. What, if anything, is google doing to encourage it?

  4. Not that I am aware of. Amazon is pushing really hard to remove some features from apps I have so it will run on the Fire. Not bloody likely…

  5. As an owner of both android and apple devices, I think that who bothers about availability of apps under android has never ever seen android market. There are almost all the most known apps available under iOS, many more, they are usually cheaper and some big names (such as Autodesk) now publish their products on Android Market well before iPhone…

  6. Every report by developers I’ve seen indicates iOS sales way larger than Android sales, so apparently most people do not bother about availability of apps under android..

  7. I definitely bother about availability of apps.
    And when there are no good quality, easy to use and useful apps for free, then I even consider buying one – as I did with the London Tube and Bus Map for example.
    Unfortunately the Android market is full of good quality, easy to use and useful apps that are free.
    And £0.00 is cheaper than £2.49.

Pair of Robbers Want Only iPhones, No BlackBerries

Posted on December 16th, 2011 at 19:35 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

A pair of would-be robbers targeting Columbia students in upper Manhattan seem to be rather picky as they prowl.

Twice at 526 114th St., and once at 556 114th St., the suspects demanded the victims hand over their iPhones, police said.

The first victim complied, but the second only had a Droid, according to police. The thieves apparently didn’t want a Droid — so they took cash instead.

[Quote]:

It gets under my skin because it is a pompous, privileged, insulting, and myopic viewpoint which reeks of class warfare — and it is indicative of a growing sentiment I see amongst people in the tech community.

(source)


Write a comment

So that’s why I prefer the iPhone…

Posted on December 16th, 2011 at 8:59 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google, Quote

[Quote]:

It looks like a human was involved in choosing what went where,” Marissa told them. “It looks too editorialized. Google products are machine-driven. They’re created by machines. And that is what makes us powerful. That’s what makes our products great.

– Marissa Mayer addressing Google designers, as quoted in “In The Plex” by Steven Levy


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. *jawonfloor*

    Well, I suppose it’s heartening to know that it wasn’t a human designer that came up wiih the crap that is the new Google Reader UI.

Apple made Galaxy Tab a ‘household name’

Posted on December 15th, 2011 at 9:05 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote]:

In an interview today Samsung Australia’s vice president of telecommunications, Tyler McGee, would not say how many sales Samsung missed out on as a result of Apple’s temporary ban on the Galaxy Tab.

But when asked whether the court action – which Apple launched after claiming Samsung "slavishly copied" its iPad – was the best marketing Samsung could hope for, McGee was under no illusions about the boost Apple’s case, and the subsequent media coverage, provided.

"At the end of the day the media awareness certainly made the Galaxy Tab 10.1 a household name compared to probably what it would’ve been based on the investment that we would’ve put into it from a marketing perspective," he said.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. IE, there is no such thing as bad publicity… :-)

  2. Yes, we call it the “Table that Apple got mightily scared of”.
    So it must be good. More Galaxies around here than iPads at the moment.

  3. Something similar happened a few decennia ago. Some radicals demolished a few gas station pumps of a certain gas brand because of this brand’s alleged exploitation of people in Africa. The third time this happened, the one national news broadcast did a 10 minute item on this, and interviewed a spokesperson for the gas brand. All he said was something along the lines of: Hey, our brand got mentioned at least three times in this 10 minute prime-time news item… We can’t buy publicity like this! I don’t recall any more gas stations being attacked (for the same reason) after that.
    Although I don’t think Apple will be scared off that easily, the publicity is undoubtedly priceless. Samsung will certainly be pleased: get your ‘Apple doesn’t want you to have this’ tablet now. It must really be good then. ;)

Measuring corporate “evilness” by scraping litigation results from google scholar

Posted on December 9th, 2011 at 7:57 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google, Microsoft

[Quote]:

One way we can measure a company’s “evilness” is by how important litigation is to corporate strategy. We’ll open this series by comparing today’s three tech giants: Microsoft, Google, and Apple. Which company gets sued the most? And more importantly, which company sues others the most?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Be sure to read the disclaimers about the data that’s missing. Then note that they go on to claim that none of those issues really matter, but they don’t address the fact that some companies will be more inclined to settle (skewing the data), nor the fact that companies involved in more litigation will be more inclined to jump through hoops like forming shell companies.

    And that lovely conclusion about Apple not being involved in many cases… that doesn’t seem so up-to-date, does it?

    My conclusion: not worth your time or your brain cells.

Android glitch allows hackers to bug phone calls

Posted on December 5th, 2011 at 23:02 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google, Security

[Quote]:

Computer scientists have discovered a weakness in smartphones running Google’s Android operating system that allows attackers to secretly record phone conversations, monitor geographic location data, and access other sensitive resources without permission.

Handsets sold by HTC, Samsung, Motorola, and Google contain code that exposes powerful capabilities to untrusted apps, scientists from North Carolina State University said. These “explicit capability leaks” bypass key security defenses built into Android that require users to clearly grant permission before an app gets access to personal information and functions such as text messaging. The code making the circumvention possible is contained in interfaces and services the device manufactures add to enhance the stock firmware supplied by Google.

[..]

Unlike out-of-the-box iPhones, which allow users to install only apps that have been approved by Apple, the official Android Market performs no security checks on the wares it offers. To compensate, Google built the permission-based security model into the mobile OS to give users control over the personal information apps get to access. Before a new program runs for the first time, it lists the sensitive resources it will access. Users who are uncomfortable with the permissions then have an opportunity to cancel the installation.

The researchers found that the manufacturer-supplied enhancements offer a way to circumvent this permissions-based model.

Again, not Google’s fault - unless you count allowing others to modify your software before release.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. C’mon, it’s open source. Open source wins. Open source is safest, most dependable and all round best :)

  2. It is odd to see Microsoft has been bashed a lot for having a huge market share, and protecting it by not being very open about it’s system and basically being able to determine who writes software that will run on Windows, whilst nowadays Apple is being cheered for not being very open about it’s system, for determining what it allows to run on iPhones, and for having a huge market share (tablets). It’s odd to see Windows has been bashed for not being open and Linux embraced as the superior platform because it was open source, yet when downsides to open source appear in Google’s Android software, immediately it is pointed out that Apple has a superior closed system. I believe (pun intended) that Apple’s marketing appears to resemble the faith of those in a superior being (aka God) and it’s followers will tell you their device/god is the only one/best one, despite the sometimes overwhelming evidence there is this cannot be true.

  3. Jim, how can a posting against the closed way telco providers act be the cause of an anti-apple-fanboi comment?

Twitter / @csoghoian

Posted on December 5th, 2011 at 21:16 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote]:

Prediction: within 2 weeks, all US carriers will ditch Carrier IQ. Within 2 months, Carrier IQ will change its name.


Write a comment

Microsoft tempts with WinPho demo on… iPhone

Posted on November 30th, 2011 at 15:13 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google, Microsoft

[Quote]:

Microsoft has pieced together an HTML 5-based demo of its Windows Phone OS’ Metro user interface, giving iOS and Android users a taste of what life’s like on the other side.

[..]

If you’re an Android or iPhone user and fancy giving it a go, visit http://aka.ms/wpdemo from your handset’s browser. Let us know how you get on.

Very nice – first time I get to see bits of Metro. Looks like Microsoft came up with something good!


Write a comment

Steve Jobs and NeXT

Posted on November 28th, 2011 at 16:28 by John Sinteur in category: Apple


Write a comment

TellMe vs Siri

Posted on November 27th, 2011 at 23:24 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Microsoft


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. That’s really more than a little bit sad. Both services will get better with time; I just don’t see this as something Microsoft can catch up on.

  2. Just open the pod bay doors Hal!

I’m a PC, I’m a Mac…

Posted on November 25th, 2011 at 8:17 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, If you're in marketing, kill yourself

You know, some people compare the above ad to the Mac vs PC ads that Apple did. There’s subtle difference: the Apple ads was heckling the actual devices – the PC – and this ad is heckling the users of said devices. Does anyone really think it’s smart to insult the people you are trying to win over?


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I wouldn’t compare the two. While both ads heckle the users of the device, this one actually builds on the truth ;)

Mobile Safari on LG

Posted on November 24th, 2011 at 13:41 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, If you're in marketing, kill yourself

Let me freeze-frame that for you:

Here are the iPhone and the Optimus browsers side by side:

“LG — None of us actually use our own phones, so we don’t spot mistakes like this until it’s too late.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. So called “creatives” only know about Apple products, so the mistake was inevitable.

    Just kidding, maybe.

The Sketchbook of Susan Kare, the Artist Who Gave Computing a Human Face

Posted on November 23rd, 2011 at 17:48 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, awesome

[Quote]:

Inspired by the collaborative intelligence of her fellow software designers, Kare stayed on at Apple to craft the navigational elements for Mac’s GUI. Because an application for designing icons on screen hadn’t been coded yet, she went to the University Art supply store in Palo Alto and picked up a $2.50 sketchbook so she could begin playing around with forms and ideas. In the pages of this sketchbook, which hardly anyone but Kare has seen before now*, she created the casual prototypes of a new, radically user-friendly face of computing — each square of graph paper representing a pixel on the screen.


Write a comment


« Older Entries