| Home | Recent Comments | Categories |

Googlephone sales top, um, 135,000

Posted on March 16th, 2010 at 17:01 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote:]

Google has sold a mere 135,000 Nexus One phones since the smartphone’s much-ballyhooed launch on 5 January, according to the latest numbers from mobile analytics outfit Flurry.

The estimate covers the handset’s first 74 days of existence. By comparison, the inaugural Apple iPhone reached a million sales in its first 74 days.

And the iPad sold 120,000 on its first day of availability (if you define “available” as “for sale” instead of “people actually getting their hands on them”)


Write a comment

Least surprising announcement this week

Posted on March 16th, 2010 at 6:37 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Microsoft

[Quote:]

We just got out of a meeting with Microsoft’s Todd Biggs, who dropped a little bombshell on us: the only official way to get apps on a Windows Phone 7 Series device will be to download them from the just-detailed Windows Phone Marketplace. That means developers will have to abide by Microsoft’s technical and content guidelines in order to make it in, with the very real possibility of rejection — sound familiar?

I wonder of the people who refuse to use the iPhone over this will refuse Phone 7 as well..


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I absolutely will.

  2. What is an iPhone and what is a Phone 7?

  3. Here, grampa:

    iPhone

    Phone 7

  4. I know I will.

  5. IMHO, Palm Pre FTW – but you already knew how I feel about it.

  6. yep I absolutley will refuse.
    Second on the pre!!!

Google runs into a problem with Nexus One trademark application

Posted on March 16th, 2010 at 6:34 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google, Intellectual Property

[Quote:]

Google filed an application for the Nexus One trademark back on 10th December 2009 for use in connection with mobile phones. It would appear however that whoever handled the filing didn’t spend a lot of time on the initial conflict search report, as the Trademark Office has recently issued a notice of refusal:

SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL – LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION

Registration of the applied-for mark is refused because of a likelihood of confusion with the mark in U.S. Registration No. 3554195.

The refusal has been issued on the grounds that the mark could conflict with an existing NEXUS trademark (3554195) granted on December 30, 2008 to Integra Telecom under the same class with a description which includes the provision of telecommunication services and the transmission of voice and data.

So, how did that Cisco iPhone trademark work out?


Write a comment

Battle lines drawn in Apple-Google warfare

Posted on March 15th, 2010 at 20:31 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google, Microsoft

[Quote:]

The battle between Apple and Google is heating up, with execs taking potshots at each other and Silicon Valley insiders choosing sides – some by getting new business cards.

“It’s World War III. Amazing animosity is motivating two of the most powerful people in the industry,” a “well-connected” investor told The New York Times, referring to Apple’s Steve Jobs and Google’s Eric Schmidt. “This is emotional. This is the biggest ego battle in history. It’s incendiary.”

[..]

Microsoft, for its part, is being unusually cordial to its one-time bête noire. First, Steve Ballmer praised Apple’s App Store, and now The Seattle Times reports that Microsoft’s general counsel Brad Smith recently gave “a nod of support” for Apple’s patent-infringement lawsuit against Android-phone maker HTC.

And then there are the persistent rumors that Apple is in talks with Microsoft to dump Google from its privilged spot as the iPhone’s – and the iPad’s? – default search engine and instead promote Redmond’s Bing into that role.


Write a comment

/the/path/of/most/resistance

Posted on March 11th, 2010 at 19:49 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Software

[Quote:]

I began telling them that if they would buy a Mac, I would give them 24/7 tech support without complaint. Initially, they scoffed, but as the Mac became fashionable, I had more and more family members calling to let me know they had switched. Now, most of them are Mac users and the rate of support calls have dropped from several a month to several a year.

These days, tech support calls involve questions of how to do stuff these folks like to do. Because they can now actually use their computers instead of simply restarting them, I’m able to better see how they use them. And the one commonality I’ve seen is that no one knows how to use the file system.

Unfortunately for the average person, the file system is so complex that everything outside of the desktop and the documents folder appears to be a vast labyrinth which most likely hides booby traps and minotaurs.

[..]

In Japanese aesthetics, one of the most striking things is the focus on negative space. The Japanese concepts of “Ma” and “Wabi-sabi” put as much focus on what is omitted as what is added. The result is beautiful art and architecture that invoke a sense of peace and stillness.

Apple is doing something rather daring with their new iPhone OS. They are essentially omitting features that people once took for granted in a typical computer. And one of the biggest things they’ve omitted is the visual file system. Instead, in the iPhone OS, the concept of the file is essentially gone. It’s been replaced by “apps and their stuff.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. “Apple is doing something rather daring with their new iPhone OS. They are essentially omitting features that people once took for granted in a typical computer. And one of the biggest things they’ve omitted is the visual file system. Instead, in the iPhone OS, the concept of the file is essentially gone. It’s been replaced by “apps and their stuff.” ”

    I’ve seen this approach applied to lot of products, from cars to consumer electronics.
    It has nothing to do with “simplification”, “user friendly” and such.
    It’s mostly driven by a “you cannot touch the gears, or we could not screw you and fix that for you for a ripoff price” approach.

  2. That would be the same ripoff price that ensures Apple can pay it’s top exec Timothy Cook TWENTYTWO MILLION DOLLARS BONUS for just over SIX MONTHS OF WORK – replacing Steve Jobs when he was absent due to illness (according to the Wall Street Journal). Crisis? What crisis?

Apple talks tough to handset makers

Posted on March 10th, 2010 at 10:13 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Intellectual Property

[Quote:]

“Starting in January, Apple launched a series of C-Level discussions with tier-1 handset makers to underscore its growing displeasure at seeing its iPhone-related IP [intellectual property] infringed. The lawsuit filed against HTC thus appears to be Apple’s way of putting a public, lawyered-up exclamation point on a series of blunt conversations that have been occurring behind closed doors.

“Our checks also suggest that these warning shots are meaningfully disrupting the development roadmaps for would-be iPhone killers. Rival software and hardware teams are going back to the drawing board to look for work-arounds. Lawyers are redoubling efforts to gauge potential defensive and offensive responses. And strategy teams are working to chart OS strategies that are better hedged.”

[..]

Why pick on HTC? Reiner speculates that as the earliest and most aggressive user of Android, HTC was the perfect proxy for Apple’s real target: Google


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I wish they would stop allowing bogus patents.
    Would make life so much easier.

iPad Application Design

Posted on March 6th, 2010 at 8:25 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote:]

I held a 6-hour workshop at NSConference in both the UK and USA recently, focusing on software design and user experience. Predictably, an extremely popular topic was the iPad, and how to approach the design of iPad applications. I gave a 90-minute presentation on the subject to start each workshop, and I want to share some of my observations here.

Excellent piece on the user interface, go read it!


Write a comment

shakedown!

Posted on March 3rd, 2010 at 9:07 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, If you're in marketing, kill yourself

This!

(you also wouldn’t believe how many advertising networks have contacted me asking me if I want to “monetize” my apps…)


Write a comment

The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs : We’re not litigious — we just like to sue people

Posted on March 3rd, 2010 at 8:38 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Intellectual Property

[Quote:]

Everyone is going nuts because we just sued HTC for violating several hundred of our patents, including our patent for the 12-box keypad (1-9 plus * and #) which we introduced on the iPhone and are now seeing copied everywhere, and our patent on the “audible tone to indicate an incoming call on a telephonic communication device,” which also is just showing up everywhere.

Naturally there’s a risk when you start suing people that people will view you as a kind of bully, but we’re trying to make clear that we are just attempting to defend our rights and protect the innovation and invention that we’ve spent years innovating on inside our incredibly innovative invention labs. Gizmodo says the patents we’ve got are “incredible!” and that HTC had no idea we were going to sue them. AllThingsD provides complete copies of court documents which I recommend you go read, from front to back, right away. TechCrunch says that the suit is actually an attack on Google and Android, which is true. It’s war, people.

Quite. Here is a breakdown of all the claims.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Well, just to add the latest news – Google is backing HTC in this fight:
    http://techcrunch.com/2010/03/02/google-htc-apple-lawsuit/
    Did anyone actually check btw, because Apple really might own the 12 digit software keypad patent.

  2. Skype was using a “12 digit software keypad” back in 2002, and lots of fax/phone software were using that even before.

    ATMs use touchscreen “12 digit software keypad” since a couple of decades.

    It’s obvious that Apple has no right to a patent on preexisting technology.

  3. Apple patented the visual representation of a sliding lock. Why not the visual representation of the keypad? :)

Extrapolate

Posted on February 28th, 2010 at 11:57 by John Sinteur in category: Apple


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Except that the first iPhone came out in ‘07. That kind of skews the timing of the future ones…

  2. Very funny!
    I’m missing the iPlanet ? :P

  3. And next year, the re-realized iCube: a cube of six square iPod Touches.
    Which will be followed quickly by, yes, the iRubik.

Apple uncovers child workers in its plants

Posted on February 27th, 2010 at 8:46 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote:]

Apple has found children were hired to help build some of its products, with one employer in its Mac, iPod and iPhone supply chain falsifying records.

Three facilities were found to have hired 11 workers aged 15 in countries where the minimum work age is 16, as part of the annual audit of companies adhering its supplier code of conduct.

Apple audited 102 companies in 2009, up from 83 the previous year, in China, the Czech Republic, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, and the US.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Anyone know if there’s any real data compiled regarding the actual bottom line savings to corporations that have outsourced work like this? Seems obvious but has it been quantified? Not that similar abuses wouldn’t occur in the US but how much impact on product costs have really been saved – or has it all gone to profits/bonuses/executive salaries? Seems like a company (like Apple) could really generate a lot of goodwill (and sales) if they’d bring the jobs back home and sell that action.

  2. Then you have this: Sweatshops everywhere
    http://www.newsweek.com/id/225629

iMaxi The Apple iPad Case with Protective Wings

Posted on February 25th, 2010 at 14:12 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Funny!

[Quote:]

Introducing Hip Handmaids’ exclusive iMaxi—the only Apple iPad case made with protective wings!

With its durable vinyl outer layer and plush, quilted-cotton sleeve, the iMaxi helps keep your iPad clean and dry. Plus, the iMaxi’s Velcro-latched, advanced wing design wraps snugly around your device, so your iPad always stays where it should. Best of all, it shields it from all those unsightly and embarrassing data leaks that would make any motherboard worry!


Write a comment

iGotaBigAssPocket Concept

Posted on February 24th, 2010 at 7:42 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote:]


Write a comment

How to compete with iPad

Posted on February 18th, 2010 at 6:44 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote:]

Dear Potential iPad Competitors,

[..]

Several of you have announced you’re going to create products that you call tablet computers. I think we’re immediately heading off down the wrong path here, at least if your intention is to compete with iPad and grab a decent chunk of the market. A big part of the reason for all the excitement about the iPad is that, similar to the Nintendo Wii in the videogames industry, it appeals to segments of the market which have not traditionally been targeted. Segments which are nevertheless ready and willing, as with Wii, to buy devices in their hundreds of thousands.

It’s difficult to get our heads around the fact that these non-technologically-savvy users can suddenly constitute a core market for a device, yet that’s the case here. Nintendo saw it, and Apple sees it too. It’s an uncomfortable realisation since these people are so unfamiliar to people like you, as hardware manufacturers, and me as a software engineer. This discomfort leads to a kind of understandable blindness, and more importantly can make us leave money on the table. The relative sales and demand figures for Wii vs PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 over the last several Christmases are indicative of that.

When competing with iPad, you have to realise that, to your new core market, tablets are not computers. There’s no such thing (to your customer) as a “tablet computer”; the very name reduces the likelihood they’ll buy it. The potential of the tablet is that it’s not even seen as a computing device. This is an incredible opportunity to expand into a new market, if you’ll only commit to that mindset.

[..]

There’s been a lot of press about the limitations of the iPad, and you’re probably both frightened and overjoyed by it. Frightened because you don’t want those complaints to be levelled at your product, and overjoyed because you feel that if you overcome those limitations then you’ll have a strong comparative marketing campaign and a shot at the market.

Be very careful. For the most part, those oft-mentioned “limitations” are limitations for a computer. Yes, a computer without multitasking and Flash support and expandable storage and a built-in camera would indeed be relatively undesirable, and vulnerable to competition. But you have to remember that limitations aren’t portable between product categories.


Write a comment

Apple ambushed in Barcelona

Posted on February 15th, 2010 at 17:59 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote:]

The mobile industry – most of it – has finally got its act together to challenge Apple’s dominance of mobile applications.

The “Wholesale Applications Community” can certainly claim wide support – three handset makers, LG, Samsung and Sony Ericsson, along with dozens of carriers and operators including China Telecom, AT&T, Orange and Vodafone. It is expecting more members in coming weeks.

The group, which claims three billion customers, wants to create a single market place for mobile applications regardless of what platform they run on.

So it’s been three years since Apple woke them up, and this is what they figured was needed? They couldn’t be more wrong on the wrongest day of their life if they had an electrified wronging machine.

I’m a mobile developer, and I don’t give a shit about a single market place. I might give a shit about a single development environment, but that probably leaves me with an API that doesn’t cover the device features that aren’t as generic as a monochrome 480×320 pixel display, so I’m perfectly willing to port apps around a bit.

What I do care about is a device where users actually buy shit for. And there have been several attempts (mostly by folks not on this “Wholesale Applications Community” vendor list) to create those devices. Like RIM, Palm, and Google. And how many apps are sold on those platforms? Right now it’s just a rounding error in the numbers Apple is seeing.

Until these idiot corporations realize that the user experience matters far more than whichever marketing buzzwords they’ve been able to shoehorn into their clunky tat, they’re just going to keep on hearing a strange, almost continuous whooshing sound. It’s the sound of the fucking point whizzing right by them over and over again. If I were Steve Jobs, I’d want all my competitors to get involved in a project like this.

Leaving me with just a single platform to target. I understand the “complaints” about Apple, about locked devices, the app store process, multitasking, etc. Say about it what you want, but it did change the game. Understand that, and give me an alternative already!

Until then, I’m not going to port my stuff to your devices.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Amen to UX being key. I’m astounded that “innovation” in non-iPhone smart phones seems to mean yet another remix of Android with Facebook and Twitter widgets on the home page.

    Then there’s “Windows Phone” – renamed Windows Mobile with more bloody widgets on the home page, integrating with XBox Live and Zune.

    What’s the plan? Try to overwhelm customers and, in their confusion, pressure them to buy? There’s no real design here, just noise!

Microsoft’s Creative Destruction

Posted on February 5th, 2010 at 8:09 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Microsoft

[Quote:]

Another example: When we were building the tablet PC in 2001, the vice president in charge of Office at the time decided he didn’t like the concept. The tablet required a stylus, and he much preferred keyboards to pens and thought our efforts doomed. To guarantee they were, he refused to modify the popular Office applications to work properly with the tablet. So if you wanted to enter a number into a spreadsheet or correct a word in an e-mail message, you had to write it in a special pop-up box, which then transferred the information to Office. Annoying, clumsy and slow.

They could have had what Apple is going to deliver with iWorks for the iPad almost a decade ago, if it weren’t for the internal politics…


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I hate that. Another example of MS being on the wrong track. Full of creative, brilliant people, and a useless management.

  2. [Quote:]

    Think of Excel, a program that is now a tricked out spreadsheet application. Over the years users have been trying to push the limits of using Excel as a database. In a parallel universe you might think that a company would follow the lead of its users and extend or add the database capabilities and turn it into a true database management system.

    However this will never happen because of Microsoft Access which is their database management system. Between the Sales division, marketing, etc there is too much invested in keeping these silos. So what are the product managers and developers who work on the Excel team supposed to do when new versions are required? Rather than take the path of resistance they go into contortions coming up with “new features” that do not eat Access’ lunch.

    But then again, the Wall Street definition of “competent leadership” is “manages to get good quarterly results this quarter”, and Ballmer has been adequate for that.

  3. [Microsof responds:]

    We measure our work by its broad impact.

The iPad introduction, abridged edition

Posted on February 2nd, 2010 at 7:47 by John Sinteur in category: Apple


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Actually, this video just put me off the iPad.
    I think I better watch the original keynote, because this one just made me think: “wow, hot air, no content”.

the iPad

Posted on February 1st, 2010 at 20:18 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

The iPad – watch more funny videos

Write a comment

Cartoons

Posted on January 31st, 2010 at 11:33 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Cartoon


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. That guy in the top cartoon, is wearing the wrong T-shirt.

AppKit may be the next Carbon. UIKit is the frontier

Posted on January 30th, 2010 at 23:06 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote:]

Yes. Five. We want to bring all five of our productivity apps to iPad: OmniGraffle, OmniOutliner, OmniPlan, OmniFocus, and OmniGraphSketcher.


Write a comment

iPad keynote

Posted on January 29th, 2010 at 22:02 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

I finally had some time to watch the keynote.

Now all you folks saying that the iPad is just a bigger iPod Touch, go watch the iWorks demo in the keynote presentation.

Go ahead, I’ll wait….

Back again? Okay. Now ponder the following things:

- multi-touch (as in, three fingers or more)
- user interaction design

There’s some major progress being made here. Regardless of hype, the way Apple does introductions and all that. The real progress being made will not be by iPhone apps being scaled up. The real progress will be made with the mundane productivity apps.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. And because I am biased, Apple can do no wrong.

  2. Oh fuck off – am I going to get that every time I point out something nice by Apple without pointing out flaws as well?

  3. Oh, and go read this so you can whine some more.

  4. Well, to say something negative. I HATE the fact that it does not have several (ok, one) CF slots. Cheap 32GB to plug in. Why not? That would have been quite possible. The thing must be mostly empty so people will glue them in there. But why make us break it open? Man, I HATE that. I know there is, I even have, a Apple dongle thing that takes CF cards and plug into the bottom. But there it sticks out. There is no other reason I can think of but market domination. :-(

Microsoft: iPad’s Closed Platform is “Humorous”

Posted on January 29th, 2010 at 19:48 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Microsoft

[Quote:]

Watson claimed that many developers of applications for the iPhone OS–which the iPad uses–are not making money. Developing applications for the iPhone and iPad is expensive, he said, because iPhone OS uses the Objective C language rather than Microsoft’s more pervasive .NET platform. And Apple’s control over the platform has alienated some people that make software for its products, he said.

[Quote:]

Yes, there is much jealousy from iPhone developers at the sacks full of money being made by Zune and Windows Mobile app developers.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Honestly, I don’t understand why people bother reporting what Microsoft has to say about mobile devices.

  2. Well, you can run the .NET stack on an iPhone, as soon as you update the processor and the memory and attach an external disk. Easy peasy…

  3. I didn’t know Windows Mobile had developers. Oh, and what’s a Zune? I heard rumors about it but I have never seen one in the wild.

  4. Sack Ballmer, and the higher management, and set MS on a definite track. They are ruining the company.

Google responds to the iPad

Posted on January 29th, 2010 at 17:04 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google


Write a comment

Cruft: A message to the Internets regarding the iPad

Posted on January 29th, 2010 at 8:16 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote:]

Remember way back to January 2007, when the iPhone was announced? Oh Internets, you wailed and gnashed your teeth endlessly. No 3G network? No MMS? No apps on the iPhone? No replaceable battery? Oh, your complaints were endless. You were sure that the iPhone was doomed because it didn’t meet all your requirements.

And what happened? Well, Apple has sold 40 million iPhones. FORTY MILLION. They have become the largest mobile device company in the world.

So today, you moan on and on about all the features you expected and demand in the iPad. What no Verizon? No two-way camera? It’s not weightless? A full half inch thick? Only 10 hours of battery life? You make tons of predictions on the success and failure with scant details and without ever actually trying one.

[..]

“You can’t just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they’ll want something new.” – Steve Jobs


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Generally, I agree with you. However, I do hope that they open the iPad more than they have the iPhone, et al. A single source of software and add-ons for such a device is not accepatble, to me at least.

Apple Special Event January 2010

Posted on January 28th, 2010 at 8:11 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

The video is available here.

I can’t wait for the next generation – I expect Apple, just like with the iPod, to introduce an iPad Nano….


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Well, at least you skipped the joke that everyone else is making (maxipad).

    I was thinking.. Given that this is an iPod Touch on steroids, and therefore the logic board need not be much bigger, what’s in that thing? Is it otherwise all battery?

  2. well, 10 hours of video is pretty impressive battery-wise. I guess we’ll know when the first one ships, because within 24 hours some website will have done the usual apple-porn unpacking and opening up the device…

  3. I’ll believe the 10 hours when I see it–especially since the phrase I saw started with “up to”.

    I had really hoped for a camera, and was thinking 50-50 they might have multitasking, but alas.

    The most interestng question I saw is whether this will allow for user profiles, or if it’s essentially a personal gadget. If you leave this lying around the house, family members are going to want their own email, Facebook, and other accounts separated.

  4. Well, forgive me for not talking about the features in OS 3.2, and whether there’s something like that in there, or not at all. I’ve been playing around with it because all my apps will have to be reworked a bit to support the iPad, and I want to make sure I’m not breaking my agreement with Apple.

    But yes, I can see your point – and even if they have profiles now or later, I suspect Apple would really like you to buy one for each family member. It will be interesting to see future versions exploit that by doing a lot of sharing amongst devices, like you can do in iTunes and iPhoto on the mac.

  5. it would be really nice to see a next-gen version of the iPad that uses Qualcomm’s mirasol display tech. I’ve done enough reading of backlit text to know that a book reader with a backlit display is not something i’m willing to pay for. if then it’s just a mobile internet and media player, i might as well stick with my iphone.

  6. Well, I think flow has a point, it was one of the first things that I noticed about the pad: it uses a backlit display. Great for watching movies, nice for browsing, but everyone knows that it does not work well for reading.
    @Maarten: indeed an ‘iPod Touch on steroids’. It’s too big to fit in a pocket, so won’t replace the smartphone. Not easy to type on, so won’t replace the laptop (certainly not for working travellers that want to do some work in the train or on the couch like me). But it is the coolest clipboard I have seen yet. I never use a clipboard however, and have no intention to either.

    It would be a fun thingy to have lying about to surf the web on at home, but I don’t see much more use for it than that. I’d rather invest the $500+ in a good tablet – though I must admit I haven’t seen many of those yet. I’m sure we’ll see more of those emerge this year.

  7. Gotta say my reaction to the iPad is pretty much the same as the HP Slate: Meh!

  8. Well, my wife gets at least 8 hours on her Toshiba netbook (10″ screen, 250GB HDD), even with the WiFi running. So, I think it’s safe to assume Apple is getting 10 hours out of theirs, especially since I think they are using a lower-power display.

  9. It is very much an Itouch on steroids…but I would expect from that to support flash. That disappoints me very much. I think it’ll be great to watch a movie on, even read a book (as I find the back-lit screen not a problem as on the itouch you can set the luminosity). But that’s not enough to make me buy it. I’ll have to wait what apps are developed for it and see if any of them makes it worth my money.

  10. No flash – no cash

Frantic Steve Jobs Stays Up All Night Designing Apple Tablet | The Onion

Posted on January 27th, 2010 at 19:23 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

[Quote:]

Claiming that he completely forgot about the much-hyped electronic device until the last minute, a frantic Steve Jobs reportedly stayed up all night Tuesday in a desperate effort to design Apple’s new tablet computer. “Come on, Steve, just think—think, dammit—you’re running out of time,” the exhausted CEO said as he glued nine separate iPhones to the back of a plastic cafeteria tray. “Okay, yeah, this will work. This will definitely work. Just need to write ‘tablet’ on this little strip of masking tape here and I’m golden. Oh, come on, you piece of shit! Just stick already!” Middle-of-the-night sources reported that Jobs then began work on double-spacing his Keynote presentation and increasing the font size to make it appear longer.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. That must be why it is so full of DRM goodness… :-)

  2. The Onion also reported that Apple’s stock is down 3.60% with the following comments:

    Panicked investors dumped shares in this leading tech company on word that CEO Steve Jobs had delivered a trade-show speech in a heather-gray crewneck sweatshirt instead of his trademark black mock turtleneck.

    http://www.theonion.com/content/economy

iPad

Posted on January 27th, 2010 at 19:16 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

Remember, everything Steve does during a keynote is on purpose:


Write a comment

First picture of the Apple Tablet leaks!

Posted on January 27th, 2010 at 15:59 by John Sinteur in category: Apple


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. And here I thought it was the one you turned upside-down and shook to erase… Or did Microsoft patent that one?

Prediction Score Card

Posted on January 26th, 2010 at 6:35 by John Sinteur in category: Apple

Try it, I’m going for yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, no, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, no, yes, no, no, no, no, yes, yes, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, yes, no, no, yes, yes, yes, no, yes, yes.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. If Steve Jobs farted, you people would be appreciative of the finer aromas on display. The hint of garlic, that smidgen of penne all’arrabiata… It is almost religious fanaticism ;-)

  2. A paper-based poll. How quaint.

The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs : An anxious world awaits

Posted on January 25th, 2010 at 17:30 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Great Picture

[Quote:]

Check out the line that’s forming outside our store in San Francisco as of this morning.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Who or what do you think the original crowd in the picture was waiting for? I bet it wasn’t anything so trivial as a magic book.
    Thoughts?

  2. The news paper visible on the lower left says “Nazis give up”, which makes it a V.E. day celebration. From the looks of it I’d guess Times Square, and a quick google gives me reason to believe I’m right:

    http://www.skylighters.org/veday/index.html


« Older Entries