« | Home | Recent Comments | Categories | »

Google Expected to Face Antitrust Charges in Europe

Posted on April 15th, 2015 at 9:12 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

The European Commission is said to be planning to charge Google with using its dominant position in online search to favor the company’s own services over others, in what would be one of the biggest antitrust cases here since regulators went after Microsoft.

Europe’s competition chief, Margrethe Vestager, is expected to make an announcement in Brussels on Wednesday that Google has abused its dominant position, according to two people who spoke Tuesday on the condition of anonymity.

[..]

It also expected the authorities to open an investigation into Android, the Google software that runs a majority of the world’s smartphones.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Android is Open Source right? So what’s there to investigate?

  2. Yes, any $HANDSET_MAKER can pick up the bare Android sources from the repository and create a phone.

    However, if $HANDSET_MAKER wants to have the Google Play app (pre-)installed, or many of the other Google apps, they have to follow certain rules.

    And mind you that matters – I had a good friend return a tablet to a store because Google Play could not be installed on it.

    Its those rules that are under investigation. Not the Android source code.

Youtube can’t even code a decent version check or feedback

Posted on April 6th, 2015 at 21:40 by John Sinteur in category: Google, Software

Screen Shot 2015-04-06 at 21.36.04

I don’t know how these morons are checking this, but when I try their feedback link at the bottom of the page to tell them I get into an endless loop: “please sign in, ok thanks verify that this information on you is still correct, oh you think it is correct, fine, now please sign in….”


Write a comment

Apple Car Seen as Serious Competitor by Auto Executives

Posted on March 3rd, 2015 at 19:53 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote]:

Automotive executives are taking seriously the prospect that Apple Inc. and Google Inc. will emerge as competitors even as they consider partnering with the two.

“If these two companies intend to solely produce electric vehicles, it could go fast,” Volkswagen AG Chief Executive Officer Martin Winterkorn said at the Geneva International Motor Show. “We are also very interested in the technologies of Google and Apple, and I think that we, as the Volkswagen company, can bring together the digital and mobile world.”

Apple has been working on an electric auto and is pushing to begin production as early as 2020, people with knowledge of the matter said last month. Google said in January it aims to have a self-driving car on the road within five years.

The timeframe — automakers typically need at least five years to develop a car — underscores the aggressive goals of the two technology companies and could set the stage for a battle for customers. The market for connected cars may surge to 170 billion euros ($190 billion) by 2020 from 30 billion euros now, according to a German government policy paper obtained by Bloomberg News.


Write a comment

Eric Schmidt on Google privacy: We’re ‘more secure’ than Apple

Posted on October 3rd, 2014 at 22:18 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote]:

The seemingly ongoing battle between Google and Apple has been well-documented, but it’s always at its best when the CEOs start trading blows. In an interview with Charlie Rose last month, Tim Cook took Google to task for its data collection practices. Unsurprisingly, Eric Schmidt wasn’t too pleased with Cook’s representative of his company, so he took the time to respond on a CNN Money segment this week.

[..]

“Someone didn’t brief him correctly on Google’s policies,” Schmidt quipped. “It’s unfortunate for him. In the first place, in Google’s case, we have always been the leader in security and encryption. Our systems are far more secure and encrypted than anyone else, including Apple. They’re catching up, which is great.”

First, Tim Cook wasn’t talking about how well they protect data from others – he was talking about how well they protect data from themselves… here’s what he said:

[Quote]:

Cook said Apple makes most of its profits by selling hardware, unlike many of its Silicon Valley neighbors that profit from advertising targeted at their users.

“Our business is not based on having information about you. You’re not our product,” Cook said. “I think everyone has to ask, how do companies make their money? Follow the money. And if they’re making money mainly by collecting gobs of personal data, I think you have a right to be worried.”

So, Let me summarize this back-and-forth:

“You’ve been spying on your users!”

“That’s not true! We protect our users from being spied on by other people all the time!”

So, Schmidt, you’re a deceptive little douche.


Write a comment

How do launch numbers for iPhones and Samsung Galaxy S phones compare?

Posted on September 16th, 2014 at 11:42 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote]:

Some rivalries will never die — chocolate vs peanut butter, Yankees vs Red Sox, and iPhone vs Android, just to name a few. With the announcement of the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus, many Android users took to the Internet to loudly exclaim how underwhelmed they were by the devices. Its new features were things they’d already had for years, except for all the ones that weren’t, of course. Rivalries are fun, but the musings of voices on the Internet aren’t nearly as important as the voices of the buying public. And when you compare the launch numbers of various Samsung Galaxy S phones to the iPhone 6 and earlier iPhones, there’s absolutely no competition.

BxlYi5LIUAEt6l5

And still the overall market share of Android is higher. I think it’s because people who get an iPhone make a conscious choice to do so, and (most) people who get an android do so because they walk into a store and tell the sales rep they want “a phone”. They will make calls, use facebook, make a selfie, and that’s it. They never download an app unless recommended by a friend (“get snapchat!”), and just use the phone as a phone and are very happy with it.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I don’t think that android users are attached to a brand. In my case, I have chosen between several brands before buying the phone, (Samsung, Sony, LG…). In addition, I’ve chosen and “old” model that runs smoothly the latest Android version, I’ve been waiting and studying several models. I would say that buying an iPhone the first day is not a conscious choice but an impulsive one. In addition, just released products have flaws, so buying it the first day is more like being a tester.

    I use several app, all free, among them you can find the “Rain Alert”, Maps (also offline), email, google drive (spreadsheets, documents), games…

    In Android, there are plenty of choices of high-end and other market segments phones. There are a lot app, but I think that Android users usually go for the free ones.

  2. Purchasing of iPhones may be social signalling of wealth and taste for some. Other people are excited by technology and like to try out new stuff. These are conditioned reactions to marketing not actually impulses. All these users are wealthy enough to make that choice and regularly buy new devices. These are nice products for nice people.

    What’s the marketing opposite of the “long tail”?

    Disclaimer: I bought my Android phone from a yard sale. I forgot the brand.

  3. One very simple factor: in the iOS ecosystem, there are 3 viable models right now. How many high-end-ish phones does Samsung have? S4 and S5 in several editions (regular, mini, active); Edge; Note; Duos… AT&T wireless has 10 listed as currently available. Sales in the Android domain are split over more models.

  4. There’s another gotcha in this graph: the Apple numbers are all for the first 1-3 days only, and the Samsung numbers are for 30-60 days. But the numbers are *per*day* sales. So Samsung had those lower numbers consistently over 30 days, and we don’t know what the drop-off was in Apple’s numbers. I don’t doubt that Apple’s numbers are higher, but this chart is deceptive.

  5. No, I don’t think that’s the gotcha. That’s the whole point of the graph. the iPad 3 had 1 mil of sales in 3 days, the S5, in 30 days, has yet to reach that number. Maybe it would have been clearer to have all bars at the same number of days, but then the samsung stuff would be 1 pixel on the left side of the graph..

  6. You are not comparing like with like. It’s a false comparison and the sort of sub high school use of stats that Apple cultists trot out to prove that their gang is the bestest ever, like deranged One Direction fans.

    When I upgraded from my Samsung S3 earlier this year I had a wealth of options to choose from (of which the Iphone was one) offering different combinations of features, allowing me to select the one that best suited me.

    With Apple, an upgrade means a choice of 1. New iphones are an event. So yes, if you are a devotee you are naturally going to want the latest iteration and you will want it as soon as it comes out. With Android there is no such pressure to upgrade to the latest model, as there are new and improved models coming out all the time. A new Samusung simply is not a big thing that will drive people to preorder.

    I can’t wait to find out what is wrong with the new iphone as 4 million people at once find out that holding it the wrong way cuts the signal, or syncing it with the cloud wipes everything or some such.

    For the record I switched to HTC.

  7. @John: The graph clearly says “units/day”. It’s meant to deceive.

  8. Or rather, it says “units/day” once you pay attention. It’s not actually *clear*, which is that makes it deceptive.

Boneh Publications: Gyrophone: Recognizing Speech From Gyroscope Signals

Posted on August 23rd, 2014 at 23:42 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote]:

We show that the MEMS gyroscopes found on modern smart phones are sufficiently sensitive to measure acoustic signals in the vicinity of the phone. The resulting signals contain only very low-frequency information (<200Hz). Nevertheless we show, using signal processing and machine learning, that this information is sufficient to identify speaker information and even parse speech. Since iOS and Android require no special permissions to access the gyro, our results show that apps and active web content that cannot access the microphone can nevertheless eavesdrop on speech in the vicinity of the phone.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Angela Merkel’s phone just got dropped down an elevator shaft, again.

  2. Bit iOS apps don’t get to do much in the background, so is this feasible on iOS?

  3. Correct. That’s why all those fitness apps use the gps+accelerometer instead.

X509

Posted on July 14th, 2014 at 13:37 by John Sinteur in category: Do you feel safer yet?, Google

[Quote]:

Shortly after the initial news came out that NSA fakes google and yahoo servers with stolen or faked certificates:

https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/09/new_nsa_leak_sh.html

the german computer magazine C’T issued a warning that it is a security risk, when microsoft automatically updates its list of certificates without any noticing of the users, so that dubious certificates could easily get into the windows certificate list, which is thrusted by webbrowsers like internet explorer or google chrome for windows:

http://www.heise.de/ct/artikel/Microsofts-Hintertuer-1921730.html

After reading this, I filed a bug in chromium, which then was dismissed as a “won’t fix”, with the chromium developers saying that the certificate list is “signed by Microsoft” and there would not be any break in the “chain of thrust”.

And now I see this message from google:

http://www.heise.de/security/meldung/Indien-stellte-falsche-Google-Zertifikate-aus-2252544.html

http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.de/2014/07/maintaining-digital-certificate-security.html

“On Wednesday, July 2, we became aware of unauthorized digital certificates for several Google domains. The certificates were issued by the National Informatics Centre (NIC) of India, which holds several intermediate CA certificates trusted by the Indian Controller of Certifying Authorities (India CCA).

The India CCA certificates are included in the Microsoft Root Store and thus are trusted by the vast majority of programs running on Windows, including Internet Explorer and Chrome. Firefox is not affected because it uses its own root store that doesn’t include these certificates.

We are not aware of any other root stores that include the India CCA certificates, thus Chrome on other operating systems, Chrome OS, Android, iOS and OS X are not affected. Additionally, Chrome on Windows would not have accepted the certificates for Google sites because of public-key pinning, although misissued certificates for other sites may exist.”

Update Jul 9: India CCA informed us of the results of their investigation on July 8. They reported that NIC’s issuance process was compromised and that only four certificates were misissued; the first on June 25. The four certificates provided included three for Google domains (one of which we were previously aware of) and one for Yahoo domains. However, we are also aware of misissued certificates not included in that set of four and can only conclude that the scope of the breach is unknown.”

Now microsoft has removed the certificates in question and it turnes out that the issue affected 45 domains:

http://www.heise.de/security/meldung/Microsoft-entzieht-Indischer-CA-das-Vertrauen-2255992.html

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/2982792

google.com
mail.google.com
gmail.com
www.gmail.com
m.gmail.com
smtp.gmail.com
pop.gmail.com
imap.gmail.com
googlemail.com
www.googlemail.com
smtp.googlemail.com
pop.googlemail.com
imap.googlemail.com
gstatic.com
ssl.gstatic.com
www.static.com
encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com
encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com
login.yahoo.com
mail.yahoo.com
mail.yahoo-inc.com
fb.member.yahoo.com
login.korea.yahoo.com
api.reg.yahoo.com
edit.yahoo.com
watchlist.yahoo.com
edit.india.yahoo.com
edit.korea.yahoo.com
edit.europe.yahoo.com
edit.singapore.yahoo.com
edit.tpe.yahoo.com
legalredirect.yahoo.com
me.yahoo.com
open.login.yahooapis.com
subscribe.yahoo.com
edit.secure.yahoo.com
edit.client.yahoo.com
bt.edit.client.yahoo.com
verizon.edit.client.yahoo.com
na.edit.client.yahoo.com
au.api.reg.yahoo.com
au.reg.yahoo.com
profile.yahoo.com
static.profile.yahoo.com
openid.yahoo.com

In view of this list, the advice from google looks especially funny:

“Chrome users do not need to take any action to be protected by the CRLSet updates. We have no indication of widespread abuse and we are not suggesting that people change passwords.”

The microsoft certificate list is used in the browser chrome. Faking of a google server is difficult, since chrome checks its certificate by different means and that was how the attack was revealed. But chrome does not have a similar check for yahoo. If that attack would not be working after all, the hackers would not have used it.

But still, google does explicitely not suggesting anyone that they should change passwords…


Write a comment

Skybox Can Predict iPhone Launch Using Satellite Imagery

Posted on June 17th, 2014 at 8:49 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote]:

By the time its entire fleet of 24 satellites has launched in 2018, Skybox will be imaging the entire Earth at a resolution sufficient to capture, for example, real-time video of cars driving down the highway. And it will be doing it three times a day.

The ability to take such frequent imaging will certainly aid Google’s Maps product, but it also opens up a market for competitive intelligence. Skybox says they are already looking at Foxconn every week and are able to pinpoint the next iPhone release based on the density of trucks outside their manufacturing facilities.


Write a comment

Google “apps”

Posted on June 12th, 2014 at 22:01 by John Sinteur in category: Google

94fc940681ee528e

[Quote]:

So you can run the Google Docs store app in Chrome as a Chrome App which runs as an App on my android device, or, alternatively, run the Google Docs store app in Firefox as a web app which runs as an app on Firefox OS?

What does the word “app” even mean?


Write a comment

Google Plans to Show Ads Through Your Thermostat and Car

Posted on May 21st, 2014 at 22:10 by Desiato in category: Google, News

[Quote]:

According to a December letter sent to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which became public on Tuesday, Google hopes to put ads “on refrigerators, car dashboards, thermostats, glasses, and watches, to name just a few possibilities.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Well, I guess I will have to do without refrigerators, car dashboards, thermostats, glasses, and watches, to name just a few devices.

  2. Are you opposed to Google or advertising?

  3. Weren’t we just talking about how hard it is to get staff who aren’t stoners?

  4. @rob: advertising.

  5. John, some strategically placed electrical tape will take care of those ads. :)

  6. How will I be able to read adds on the car’s dashboard when I’m on the phone all the time?

  7. @chas: Ah, good point! Clearly, this is a cunning plan to encourage acceptance of the self-driving car – provided by the Big G.

Bounden on Android delayed: we need your help

Posted on May 21st, 2014 at 11:14 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

In the Vine above are 7 devices all running the same compass app (ironically named Steady Compass) on Android. Yet, all compasses indicate that North is somewhere else. Unfortunately, this has nothing to do with electromagnetic fields confusing the compass; it has everything to do with the diversity of hardware inside these devices.

We have been developing Bounden for Android alongside its development on iOS, and have tested the game on a number of devices. It was only a week ago that we started expanding our list of test devices, after we quickly discovered that:

a) some devices had ‘broken’ gyroscopes that didn’t work on all axis,

b) that some devices were faking gyroscopes by mixing and matching the accelerometer data with compass data, or

c) that some devices did not have a gyroscope at all.


Write a comment

Google Knew About Heartbleed and Didn’t Tell the Government

Posted on April 15th, 2014 at 12:28 by John Sinteur in category: Google, Security

[Quote]:

“I suspect that over the past eight months, many companies have taken a real hard look at their existing policies about tipping off the U.S. government,” he said. “That’s the price you pay when you’re acting like an out-of-control offensive adversary.”


Write a comment

Yahoo, Google and Apple also claim right to read user emails

Posted on March 22nd, 2014 at 16:48 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google, Microsoft, Privacy, Security

[Quote]:

Microsoft is not unique in claiming the right to read users’ emails – Apple, Yahoo and Google all reserve that right as well, the Guardian has determined.

The broad rights email providers claim for themselves has come to light following Microsoft’s admission that it read a journalist’s Hotmail account in an attempt to track down the source of an internal leak. But most webmail services claim the right to read users’ email if they believe that such access is necessary to protect their property.


Write a comment

IT Threat Evolution: Q1 2013

Posted on February 27th, 2014 at 23:12 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

A total of 99.9% of new mobile threat detections target the Android platform.


Write a comment

Snowden document reveals key role of companies in NSA data collection

Posted on November 3rd, 2013 at 1:57 by John Sinteur in category: Google, Microsoft

[Quote]:

The key role private companies play in National Security Agency surveillance programs is detailed in a top-secret document provided to the Guardian by whistleblower Edward Snowden and published for the first time on Friday.

One slide in the undated PowerPoint presentation, published as part of the Guardian’s NSA Files: Decoded project, illustrates the number of intelligence reports being generated from data collected from the companies.

In the five weeks from June 5 2010, the period covered by the document, data from Yahoo generated by far the most reports, followed by Microsoft and then Google.

Between them, the three companies accounted for more than 2,000 reports in that period – all but a tiny fraction of the total produced under one of the NSA’s main foreign intelligence authorities, the Fisa Amendents Act (FAA).

It is unclear how the information in the NSA slide relates to the companies’ own transparency reports, which document the number of requests for information received from authorities around the world.

Yahoo, Microsoft and Google deny they co-operate voluntarily with the intelligence agencies, and say they hand over data only after being forced to do so when served with warrants. The NSA told the Guardian that the companies’ co-operation was “legally compelled”.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Heb jij laatst in mijn email ingebroken?

  2. If I was a conspiracy enthusiast, I might start thinking this whole dustup with the NSA is intentional theater.

Patent war goes nuclear: Microsoft, Apple-owned “Rockstar” sues Google

Posted on November 1st, 2013 at 16:01 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google, Intellectual Property, Microsoft

[Quote]:

Canada-based telecom Nortel went bankrupt in 2009 and sold its biggest asset—a portfolio of more than 6,000 patents covering 4G wireless innovations and a range of technologies—at an auction in 2011.

Google bid for the patents, but it didn’t get them. Instead, the patents went to a group of competitors—Microsoft, Apple, RIM, Ericsson, and Sony—operating under the name “Rockstar Bidco.” The companies together bid the shocking sum of $4.5 billion.

Patent insiders knew that the Nortel portfolio was the patent equivalent of a nuclear stockpile: dangerous in the wrong hands, and a bit scary even if held by a “responsible” party.

This afternoon, that stockpile was finally used for what pretty much everyone suspected it would be used for—launching an all-out patent attack on Google and Android. The smartphone patent wars have been underway for a few years now, and the eight lawsuits filed in federal court today by Rockstar Consortium mean that the conflict just hit DEFCON 1.

Google probably knew this was coming. When it lost out in the Nortel auction, the company’s top lawyer, David Drummond, complained that the Microsoft-Apple patent alliance was part of a “hostile, organized campaign against Android.” Google’s failure to get patents in the Nortel auction was seen as one of the driving factors in its $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola in 2011.

Rockstar, meanwhile, was pretty unapologetic about embracing the “patent troll” business model. Most trolls, of course, aren’t holding thousands of patents from a seminal technology company. When the company was profiled by Wired last year, about 25 of its 32 employees were former Nortel employees.

The suits filed today are against Google and seven companies that make Android smartphones: Asustek, HTC, Huawei, LG Electronics, Pantech, Samsung, and ZTE. The case was filed in the Eastern District of Texas, long considered a district friendly to patent plaintiffs.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I am still amazed that the *scoundrels* who ran Nortel into the ground managed to get away it.

Google: Our Robot Cars Are Better Drivers Than Puny Humans

Posted on October 27th, 2013 at 1:30 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

One of those analyses showed that when a human was behind the wheel, Google’s cars accelerated and braked significantly more sharply than they did when piloting themselves. Another showed that the cars’ software was much better at maintaining a safe distance from the vehicle ahead than the human drivers were.

“We’re spending less time in near-collision states,” said Urmson. “Our car is driving more smoothly and more safely than our trained professional drivers.”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. My 1998 car is smarter than I am. I’m surprised it lets me drive.

Google’s Datacenters on Punch Cards

Posted on October 1st, 2013 at 17:50 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

Who watches the watchers?

Apparently, Domino’s.


Write a comment

Browsers!

Posted on September 26th, 2013 at 17:31 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google, Microsoft

556585_10202021677089195_1131533175_n


Write a comment

What Google Glass aspires to be

Posted on September 2nd, 2013 at 20:31 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

Google has a plan. Eventually it wants to get into your brain. “When you think about something and don’t really know much about it, you will automatically get information,” Google CEO Larry Page said in Steven Levy’s book, “In the Plex: How Google Thinks, Works and Shapes Our Lives.” “Eventually you’ll have an implant, where if you think about a fact, it will just tell you the answer.”

Don’t worry, we’re only scanning your brains to check for pedophiles. Protect the children.


Write a comment

NSA paid millions to cover Prism compliance costs for tech companies

Posted on August 24th, 2013 at 15:08 by John Sinteur in category: Google, Microsoft, Privacy

[Quote]:

The National Security Agency paid millions of dollars to cover the costs of major internet companies involved in the Prism surveillance program after a court ruled that some of the agency’s activities were unconstitutional, according to top-secret material passed to the Guardian.

The technology companies, which the NSA says includes Google, Yahoo, Microsoft and Facebook, incurred the costs to meet new certification demands in the wake of the ruling from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (Fisa) court.

And in the article, you can find Google basically admitting as much:

Google did not answer any of the specific questions put to it, and provided only a general statement denying it had joined Prism or any other surveillance program. It added: “We await the US government’s response to our petition to publish more national security request data, which will show that our compliance with American national security laws falls far short of the wild claims still being made in the press today.”

Falling short of “wild claims” is very easy…


Write a comment

The Verge: Google patents ‘pay-per-gaze’ eye-tracking

Posted on August 19th, 2013 at 18:52 by John Sinteur in category: Google, If you're in marketing, kill yourself

[Quote]:

Google patents ‘pay-per-gaze’ eye-tracking that could measure emotional response to real-world ads

Advertisers spend heaps of cash on branding, bannering, and product-placing. But does anyone really look at those ads? Google could be betting that advertisers will pay to know whether consumers are actually looking at their billboards, magazine spreads, and online ads. The company was just granted a patent for “pay-per-gaze” advertising, which would employ a Google Glass-like eye sensor in order to identify when consumers are looking at advertisements in the real world and online. 


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I’ll let Google have a camera in my living room when water in hell transforms to its solid state.

Cross a border, lose your ebooks

Posted on August 18th, 2013 at 9:19 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

Jim O’Donnell was at a library conference in Singapore when his Ipad’s Google Play app asked him to update it. This was the app through which he had bought 30 to 40 ebooks, and after the app had updated, it started to re-download them. However, Singapore is not one of the countries where the Google Play bookstore is active, so it stopped downloading and told him he was no longer entitled to his books.

It’s an odd confluence of travel, updates, and location-checking, but it points out just how totally, irretrievably broken the idea of DRM and region-controls for ebooks is.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. I don’t purchase ANYTHING that is DRM-encumbered, other than DVD’s, which are trivial to circumvent…

Google goes dark for 2 minutes, kills 40% of world’s net traffic

Posted on August 17th, 2013 at 8:32 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

You can all relax now. The near-unprecedented outage that seemingly affected all of Google’s services for a brief time on Friday is over.

The event began at approximately 4:37pm Pacific Time and lasted between one and five minutes, according to the Google Apps Dashboard. All of the Google Apps services reported being back online by 4:48pm.

The incident apparently blacked out every service Mountain View has to offer simultaneously, from Google Search to Gmail, YouTube, Google Drive, and beyond.

Big deal, right? Everyone has technical difficulties every once in a while. It goes with the territory.

But then, not everyone is Google. According to web analytics firm GoSquared, worldwide internet traffic dipped by a stunning 40 per cent during the brief minutes that the Chocolate Factory’s services were offline.


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Seems to me that this indicates that the traffic that GoSquared tracks is likely not representative of traffic overall.

  2. That was how long it took the NSA to switch over all of Google’s fiber links to their data collectors…

  3. Careful. Do the words “too big to fail” mean anything? :)

  4. They found the cause:

Google is Reading Your Gmail

Posted on August 16th, 2013 at 20:12 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

When was the last time you emailed yourself something from work? Or had a private moment over chat, the kind you’d like to keep just to yourself? If you’re like most of us the answer is “relatively recently.” According to Google, however, that’s just too bad. All of that information, from your confidential memos to your love letters, is now fair game.

You see, in a recent filing in federal court, the Internet giant announced that no one should expect privacy when sending messages to or from a Gmail account.

“Just as a sender of a letter to a business colleague cannot be surprised that the recipient’s assistant opens the letter,” Google wrote in a brief to the court, “people who use web-based email today cannot be surprised if their communications are processed by the recipient’s ECS provider in the course of delivery. Indeed, ‘a person has no legitimate expectation of privacy in information he voluntarily turns over to third parties.'”


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. What a desperately poor analogy. Google is not the recipient’s assistant. Google is the postal service. OK they bring junk mail but that’s a price we accept. But if you found a postman had opened your mail and was reading it, you’d know what to do. For a start, have him arrested.

  2. I doubt the company actually approves of reading their clients’ email. I think they’re just protecting themselves in the event one of their employees does and makes it public.

    The only thing that continues to surprise me about Google’s revelation is that it surprises anyone. I had a BBS in the 90s. I didn’t read anything that passed through my system that wasn’t public or for me … but I could have.

  3. I guess we’ll all just have go back to using the old microdot-under-the-postage-stamp trick in future.

  4. @Rob – How on earth can you make the claim “I doubt the company actually approves of reading their clients’ email…” when that is the entire basis their revenue engine to deliver ads based on content? With all due respect sir, you need do some more research on this issue.

  5. Not true, Mykolas. They glean their information from their spiders and your cookies, your click-throughs, and your search history, not your email. You can test this, yourself, any time you want if you have a gmail account. Do a Google search on a cordless drill and click through any result that appears and you’ll start seeing lots of banner ads for cordless drills 5 minutes later … if that long. Send email to anyone saying you’re interested in purchasing a toaster and see if you start seeing any toaster ads.

  6. @Rob — Sorry I was not aware you worked for Google. Do they have in office in Bush?. Silly of me. Perhaps you and your “employer” should read http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-02-08/news/36993262_1_google-s-gmail-outlook-com-personal-email
    or the complaint available here http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/resources/gmailcomplaint051613.pdf
    Even your “employer” says they https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6603?hl=en .

  7. Your first link is suspect. It was commissioned by Google’s sworn enemy, Microsoft. Take it with a grain of salt … unless you believe everything else Microsoft claims. Any article that claims 90% of Americans agree is a load of cr@p. You can’t get 90% of Americans to agree the sky is blue.

    The second link is merely a complaint. Here nor there but I wonder

    The third link proves you technically correct but not really in the context of a “postman” opening your mail and reading it. That’s where I was. Sorry I didn’t make myself clearer.

    Nice snark BTW.

  8. Why was so much of that court document redacted? It’s here nor there as I was trying to say but I would think any good conspiracy enthusiast would jump at the chance to trash it rather than use it.

  9. I must agree with Mykolas on this. I sent an email to a friend describing the kinds of antics that boaters get up to when anchoring (hilarious, but off topic). I used the words “anchor windlass” a few times.

    Very shortly thereafter, ads appeared at the top of the mail viewer about anchor windlasses. Not my kind that are hand-operated for a small boat, but the frigging massive kind that are steam-driven for those Huge Ships (That One Must Avoid).

    OK, so perhaps that isn’t a person looking into each of my emails, but I see what they did there. Your email is just as much food for the mill as your searches, probably more.

  10. He is right. It’s automated.

    Was your email sent before or after Google’s revelation, Sue, and will you continue to use gmail or send to gmail addresses?

  11. Suggest no gmail and limit what is sent to gmail accounts “sorry, due to privacy concerns, I can no longer send info to gmail accounts”. Maybe this will start a trend.

  12. You can try that, I suppose, Mykolas, but a cursory glance at my contact list shows about a third of them using Gmail. You could also encrypt your email if you like but a substantial number of recipients will just trash it rather than read it because they don’t think it’s worth the trouble. Fast, easy, and cheap/free will trump any trend you suggest. There are a handful of people who CAN read your email if they’re so inclined. This doesn’t necessarily mean they ARE but they can. Proceed accordingly is the advice I’m giving but if you’d rather disconnect from a substantial portion of the world, have at it.

  13. Anything information you put online is available to some system administrator. About the only thing you can expect to have complete, paranoia-satisfying privacy over is your password, and only for reputable sites (the admins can see a salted, hashed version, but nothing more). Anything transmitted over the internet does not even have a reasonable expectation of privacy unless the transmission is encrypted. The problem here is that you can’t control over whose routers the connection will pass, so someone who is not contractually liable to you can intercept your email.

    Most mail administrators will get fired for reading your mail without a good reason, but if you suddenly start sending a higher volume of mail than usual, they’ll take a look to make sure a spammer hasn’t compromised your account. I know this because I’ve done it. It is considered a good reason. Almost all mail administrators scan your email coming and going to filter out spam messages.

    Frankly, Google is merely pointing out that what they are doing is not far outside of the normal boundaries. The ad scraping does not mean someone is reading your email, and the data is almost certainly as out of bounds to inspect as the contents of your messages. In other words, the admin doing it must be able to point to a good reason for their inspection.

    Also, if you think you can delete your email so the admin can’t see it, then you’ve obviously never heard of what’s known as “legal hold.” You won’t know when it gets turned on. It will look like the email went away. But in reality it just went to a folder you can’t access.

    The internet is a communication mechanism. It is not designed to keep your secrets. Keep them offline.

  14. @Rob –all that says is 33% of either ignorant of privacy issues, don’t care, or both.
    @Anon — Ah the world of absolutes – “The internet is a communication mechanism. It is not designed to keep your secrets.” — no argument on the communication system, but the applications are another thing. And email is an application that one should expect privacy. That said, anyone that uses google for anything at this juncture should not expect anything except that they are fodder for their ad business.

  15. @Rob; the email was sent several months ago. It’s pathetic that someone selling something so bloody huge was using these ads. As Google is my witness, I just don’t have that kind of money! (However, next time I buy a container ship I might consider whatever-their-name-was.)

    Private information held by governments will end up being misused, sold, or bought. Almost guaranteed. Just like information from tax departments or driver/vehicle registrations. Mistakes will be made, corrupt officials may seek bribes. Businesses probably have the most to lose; most individuals are less interesting sources of revenue (except perhaps for blackmail purposes).

  16. @Sue — Give up the main, genoa, and spinnaker. Stop fretting about chain-plate failure, sell your boatswain chair. Here is what you need http://www.ships-for-sale.com/container_ship_for_sale.htm . With this purchase, all your google ads will makes sense. :-)

  17. @Mykolas: lol…but what about my jib, not to mention my yankee? Arrr! Avast behind!

Samsung Electronics infringes Apple patents

Posted on August 10th, 2013 at 9:46 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google

[Quote]:

A U.S. trade panel on Friday ruled that South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co Ltd infringes on portions of two Apple Inc patents on digital mobile devices, a decision likely to inflame passions in the long-running dispute.

The U.S. International Trade Commission issued a limited exclusion order and a cease-and-desist order prohibiting Samsung from importing, selling and distributing devices in the United States that infringe certain claims on the patents.

And now we wait for Obama to veto this one as well…


Write a comment

Comments:

  1. Yeah (Obama veto) – when pigs can fly! Personally, I’d like to see Samsung refuse to sell anything more to Apple until this is resolved. The disruption to Apple’s production pipeline might make them think twice about their behavior.

    Disclaimer – I wrote a lot of the software that Samsung uses to run their semiconductor, display, and disc drive factories, and that gives them a serious competitive advantage over other manufacturers that don’t use that software – higher production, lower costs, less scrap, more profits. Most of Samsung’s competitors are using more recently issued software which doesn’t have the adaptive code that theirs does, which allows them to more quickly change their manufacturing processes without extensive engineering and programming…

Email service used by Snowden shuts itself down, warns against using US-based companies

Posted on August 9th, 2013 at 18:03 by John Sinteur in category: Apple, Google, Microsoft, News, Privacy

[Quote]:

Snowden, who told me today that he found Lavabit’s stand “inspiring”, added:

“Ladar Levison and his team suspended the operations of their 10 year old business rather than violate the Constitutional rights of their roughly 400,000 users. The President, Congress, and the Courts have forgotten that the costs of bad policy are always borne by ordinary citizens, and it is our job to remind them that there are limits to what we will pay.

“America cannot succeed as a country where individuals like Mr. Levison have to relocate their businesses abroad to be successful. Employees and leaders at Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Yahoo, Apple, and the rest of our internet titans must ask themselves why they aren’t fighting for our interests the same way small businesses are. The defense they have offered to this point is that they were compelled by laws they do not agree with, but one day of downtime for the coalition of their services could achieve what a hundred Lavabits could not.

“When Congress returns to session in September, let us take note of whether the internet industry’s statements and lobbyists – which were invisible in the lead-up to the Conyers-Amash vote – emerge on the side of the Free Internet or the NSA and its Intelligence Committees in Congress.”

[Quote]:

U.S. President Barack Obama met with the CEOs of Apple Inc, AT&T Inc as well as other technology and privacy representatives on Thursday to discuss government surveillance in the wake of revelations about the programs, the White House confirmed on Friday.

Google Inc computer scientist Vint Cerf and civil liberties leaders also participated in the meeting, along with Apple’s Tim Cook and AT&T’s Randall Stephenson, the White House said in confirming a report by Politico, which broke the news of the meeting.

“The meeting was part of the ongoing dialogue the president has called for on how to respect privacy while protecting national security in a digital era,” a White House official said.

The session was not included on Obama’s daily public schedule for Thursday.


Write a comment

FBI Taps Hacker Tactics to Spy on Suspects

Posted on August 3rd, 2013 at 13:15 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

The FBI develops some hacking tools internally and purchases others from the private sector. With such technology, the bureau can remotely activate the microphones in phones running Google Inc.’s Android software to record conversations, one former U.S. official said. It can do the same to microphones in laptops without the user knowing, the person said. Google declined to comment.


Write a comment

Now That It’s in the Broadband Game, Google Flip-Flops on Network Neutrality

Posted on July 31st, 2013 at 7:49 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

In a dramatic about-face on a key internet issue yesterday, Google told the FCC that the network neutrality rules Google once championed don’t give citizens the right to run servers on their home broadband connections, and that the Google Fiber network is perfectly within its rights to prohibit customers from attaching the legal devices of their choice to its network.

At issue is Google Fiber’s Terms of Service, which contains a broad prohibition against customers attaching “servers” to its ultrafast 1 Gbps network in Kansas City.

Google wants to ban the use of servers because it plans to offer a business class offering in the future. A potential customer, Douglas McClendon, filed a complaint against the policy in 2012 with the FCC, which eventually ordered Google to explain its reasoning by July 29.

In its response, Google defended its sweeping ban by citing the very ISPs it opposed through the years-long fight for rules that require broadband providers to treat all packets equally.

“Google Fiber’s server policy is consistent with policies of many major providers in the industry,” Google Fiber lawyer Darah Smith Franklin wrote, going on to quote AT&T, Comcast and Verizon’s anti-server policies.


Write a comment

Google hosts fundraiser for climate change denying US senator

Posted on July 24th, 2013 at 12:00 by John Sinteur in category: Google

[Quote]:

Google, which prides itself on building a “better web that is better for the environment”, is hosting a fundraiser for the most notorious climate change denier in Congress, it has emerged.

The lunch, at the company’s Washington office, will benefit the Oklahoma Republican Jim Inhofe, who has made a career of dismissing climate change as a “hoax” on the Senate floor.

Proceeds of the 11 July lunch, priced at $250 to $2,500, will also go to the national Republican Senatorial Committee.

It’s the second show of support from Google for the anti-climate cause in recent weeks.


Write a comment


« Older Entries